바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.31 No.3

Citation Share

Cultural disposition of individualism/collectivism and the perception of relevance between figures and grounds in natural scenes

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2012, v.31 no.3, pp.897-916




& (2012). Cultural disposition of individualism/collectivism and the perception of relevance between figures and grounds in natural scenes. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 31(3), 897-916.

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate whether people of individualistic disposition and those of collectivistic disposition perceive the natural scenes differently. It was hypothesized that the former pays more attention to the targets than the grounds, whereas the latter pays attention to the relation between the targets and the grounds as well as the targets themselves in the scene perception. In Experiment 1 where Korean individualists were contrasted with Korean collectivists, cultural disposition (individualism vs. collectivism), figure-ground relevance (naturalness vs. unnaturalness), and change of scene(no change vs. change of figures vs. change of grounds) were manipulated. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the correct recognition rates of the collectivists were better than those of the individualists only when the scenes were unnatural and the grounds were changed in the recognition phase. The similar patterns were observed in Experiment 2 in which Korean as collectivists and European American as individualists were contrasted with each other. In sum, these results suggest that the collectivists who tend to see the scenes holistically respond to the unnatural scenes more sensitively than the individualists. Implications and the limitations of this study and the future directions of related research were discussed in the final discussion section.

keywords
장면 지각, 개인주의, 집단주의, 비교문화, 전경-배경 관련성, scene perception, individualism, collectivism, relevance of foreground and background, cross-cultural study

Reference

1.

Chiu, L. -H. (1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 7, 235-242.

2.

Cha, J. H., & Nam, K. D. (1985). A test of Kelley's cube theory of attribution: A cross-cultural replication of McArthur's study. Korean Social Science Journal, 12, 151-180.

3.

Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and in the actor-observer bias. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 949-960.

4.

Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 12629-12633.

5.

Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 1211-1222.

6.

Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23.

7.

Jenkins, L. J., Yang, Y. J., Goh, J., Hong, Y. Y., & Park, D. C. (2010). Cultural differences in the lateral occipital complex while viewing incongruent scenes. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 5, 236-241.

8.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

9.

Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922-934.

10.

Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.

11.

Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought. New York: Free Press.

12.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.

13.

Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 11163-11170.

14.

Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653-684.

15.

Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2010). Priming “culture”: culture as situated cognition. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp.255-279). New York: Guilford Press.

16.

Shavitt, S., Torelli, C. J., & Riemer, H. (2011). Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism. In M. J. Gelfand, C-y. Chiu & Y-Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in Culture and Psychology(vol.1) (pp.309-350). Oxford University Press.

17.

Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy