바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

The Effects of Temporal Distance on Perceived Offense Severity and the Forgiveness Process

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2012, v.31 no.3, pp.961-974




  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the influences of objective and subjective temporal distance on perceived offense severity and the forgiveness process. Participants were university students, each of whom was given a packet that contained the transgression narratives. They were then asked to read the situation and imagine that the event had actually happened to them, after which they assessed the temporal distance, offense severity, and the forgiveness process. In the group of objective temporal distance, the sample of 135 university students (36 men and 99 women) determined the objective temporal distance based on perceived offense severity and the forgiveness process. However, objective temporal distance did not affect the perceived offense severity and made no difference in the phases of the forgiveness process. These results suggest that if simply time has passed, it is not enough to lower the perceived offense severity or to forgive with greater willingness. In the group of subjective temporal distance, the sample of 156 university students (55 men and 101 women) determined the influence of subjective temporal distance on offense severity and the forgiveness process. The results showed that subjective temporal distance affected the perceived offense severity and the forgiveness process. These findings suggest that it is more important to feel relatively distant from an event than the actual duration of time since the event, in terms of the effect on perceived offense severity and the forgiveness process. Implications and limitations of this study were discussed, along with suggestions for future research.

keywords
forgiveness process, temporal distance, objective temporal distance, subjective temporal distance, perceived offense severity, 용서 과정, 객관적인 시간적 거리, 주관적인 시간적 거리감, 심각성

Reference

1.

김광수 (1999). 용서교육 프로그램 개발. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문.

2.

김경욱 (2010). 특성불안과 시간거리 지각이 대안의 선호도에 미치는 영향: 해석수준이론에 근거하여. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29(4), 659-678.

3.

김기범, 임효진 (2005). 용서의 심리적 과정 분석: 관계, 이해, 사과와 인고가 용서의 마음에 미치는 영향 분석. 한국사회 및 성격심리학회 춘계 학술대회 자료집, 41-47.

4.

김상현, 금명자 (2011). 공감이 지각된 가해의도에 따라 용서동기에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(1), 325-339.

5.

김지영, 권석만 (2009). 용서특질척도의 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29(1), 239-261.

6.

라영선, 현명호, 차성이, 윤선영 (2010). 아동기 어머니의 정서적 학대와 복합 외상 후 스트레스 증상 및 용서의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상(29), 1, 21-34.

7.

박종효 (2003). 용서와 건강의 관련성 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 301-321.

8.

손운산 (2008). 용서와 치료. 서울: 이화여자대학교출판부.

9.

이경순 (2008). 용서 과정에 대한 질적 연구: 근거이론을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 13(1), 237-252.

10.

이지연 (2008). 용서받기와 용서하기가 심리적 안녕감과 대인신뢰감에 미치는 효과: 완벽주의와 문화성향을 조절변인으로. 한양대학교 석사학위 논문.

11.

정성진 (2011). 용서과정 척도 개발. 가톨릭대학교 박사학위 논문.

12.

Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289-303.

13.

Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp.680- 740). New York: McGraw-Hill.

14.

Block, R. A. (1989). Experiencing and remembering time: Affordances, context, and cognition. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective, 333-363. Oxford, UK: North-Holland.

15.

Boon, S. D., & Sulsky, L. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19-44.

16.

Brandsma, J M. (1982). Forgiveness: A dynamic, theological, and therapeutic analysis. Pastoral Psychology, 31, 41-50.

17.

Enright, R. D. (2004). 용서는 선택이다. (채규만 역). 서울: 학지사 (원전은 2001에 출판).

18.

Flanigan, B. J. (1994). Forgiving the unforgivable: Overcoming the bitter legacy of intimate wounds. Foster City, CA: IDG Books Worldwide.

19.

Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R., & Davila, J. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 72-81.

20.

Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention goal with incest survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64, 982-991.

21.

Girard, M., & Mullet, E. (1997). Forgiveness in adolescents, young, middle-aged, and older adults. Journal of Adult Development, 4, 209- 220.

22.

Lawler, K. A., Younger, J. W., Piferi, R. L., Billington, E., Jobe, R., Edmondson, K., & Jones, W. H. (2003). A change of heart: Cardiovascular correlates of forgiveness in response to interpersonal conflict. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 373-393.

23.

Mauger, P. A., Saxon, A., Hamill, C., & Pannell, M. (1996, March). The relationship of forgiveness to interpersonal behavior. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Southeastem Psychological Association, Norfolk, VA.

24.

McCullough, M. E., Bellah C. G., Kilpatrick S. D., & Johnson J. L. (2001). Vengefulness: Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-Being, and the big five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 601-610.

25.

McCullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 540-557.

26.

McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.

27.

McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L. (1995). Promoting forgiveness: A comparison of two brief psychoeducational group interventions with a waiting-list control. Counseling and Values, 40, 55-68.

28.

McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321-336.

29.

Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 368-378.

30.

Pruitt, L. D., & Zoellner, L. A. (2008). The impact of social support: An analogue investigation of the aftermath of trauma exposure. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 253- 262

31.

Ross, M., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). It feels like yesterday: Self-esteem, valence of personal past experiences, and judgments of subjective distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 792-803.

32.

Trope, Y & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal Construal. Psychological Review, 110((3), 403-21.

33.

Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95.

34.

Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O., & Zmuidinas, M. (1991). Public confiession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59, 281-312.

35.

Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2001). From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 572-584.

36.

Wohl, M. J. A., & McGrath, A. L. (2007). The perception of time heals all wounds: Temporal distance affects willingness to forgive following an interpersonal transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1023-1035.

37.

Wohl, M. J. A., & Reeder, G. D. (2004). When bad deeds are forgiven: Judgments of morality and forgiveness for intergroup aggression. In J. P. Morgan (Ed.), Focus on aggression research(pp.59-74). New York: Nova Science.

38.

Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2003). Hope-focused marriage. Recommendations for researchers and church workers. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 231-239.

39.

Worthington, E. L. Jr., Kurusu, T. A., Collins, W., Berry J. W., Ripley. J. S., & Baier, S. N. (2000). Forgiving usually takes time: A lesson learned by studying interventions to promote forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 28, 3-20.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General