바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

Development and Validation of Discrete Emotions Scale (DES)

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2013, v.32 no.1, pp.63-89



(University of Notre Dame)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The aims of the present investigation were to develop a self-report measure assessing discrete emotions based on Korean emotion words and to examine its reliability and validity. In a preliminary study, 153 undergraduate students evaluated 834 emotion terms collected by Han and Kang(2000) in order to determine the degree of appropriateness to be used as emotion terms. A final list of 146 emotion terms to be used in study 1 was selected based on the following two criteria: the appropriateness as emotion terms determined by the preliminary study and the frequency in which we experience these emotions in our daily lives as reported in Han and Kang(2000). In study 1, an emotion card sorting task was administered to 10 graduate students who were blind to the purpose of the study. Principle components analyses with varimax rotation yielded 11 factors, from which 3 factors (i.e., love, compassion, and interpersonal stability/intimacy) were eliminated. From the final 8 factors (i.e., enjoyment, contempt/disgust, sadness, guilt/hostility, fear, shame/shyness, feeling of achievement, anger), 35 representative emotion terms were selected to form our Discrete Emotions Scale(DES). In study 2, 345 undergraduate students and community adults completed the Discrete Emotions Scale(DES), Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS), Differential Emotions Scale-Ⅳ(DES-Ⅳ), Symptom Checklist-90(SCL-90), and Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being Scale(COMOSWB). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the 7 factor structure of guilt/hostility, enjoyment, anger/contempt/disgust, fear, feeling of achievement, shame/shyness, and sadness. Our Discrete Emotions Scale(DES) showed adequate reliability and validity. In conclusion, the Discrete Emotions Scale(DES) has a potential to be used as a valid measure of seven discrete emotion factors in Korea.

keywords
Discrete Emotions Scale(DES), reliability, validity, emotion structure, 개별정서척도, 신뢰도, 타당도, 정서구조

Reference

1.

강혜자, 한덕웅 (1994). 정서의 공발생 경험 구조. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 13(1), 207-218.

2.

구재선, 김의철 (2005). 한국인의 행복한 생활경험과 정서경험: 토착심리학적 접근. 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표 논문집, 168-169.

3.

김광일, 김재환, 원호택 (1984). 간이정신진단검사 실시요강. 중앙적성출판부.

4.

남기숙, 조선미, 이훈진 (2006). 한국어 단어를 기초로 한 수치심 척도의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 25(4), 1063 -1085.

5.

박인조, 민경환 (2005). 한국어 감정단어의 목록 작성과 차원 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19(1), 109-129.

6.

서상규 (1998). 현대 한국어의 어휘 빈도. 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원.

7.

서은국, 구재선 (2011). 단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(1), 95-113.

8.

안신호, 이승혜, 권오식 (1993). 정서의 구조: 한국어 정서단어 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 7(1), 107-123.

9.

이만영, 이흥철 (1990). 형용사 서술 의미의 구조에 관한 연구: 정서관련어휘를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 2, 118 -138.

10.

이선화, 김보미, 유성은 (2012). 차별적 정서척도(DES-Ⅳ)의 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(1), 147-167.

11.

이준웅, 송현주, 나은경, 김현석 (2008). 정서 단어 분류를 통한 정서의 구성 차원 및 위계적 범주에 관한 연구. 한국언론학보, 52(1), 85-116.

12.

이현희, 김은정, 이민규 (2003). 한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도(Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(4), 935 -946.

13.

한덕웅, 강혜자 (2000). 한국어 정서 용어들의 적절성과 경험 빈도. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 19(2), 63-99.

14.

홍창희 (2004). 한국 정서경험척도의 개발과 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 23(3), 771-787.

15.

Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., & Yi, Y. (1999). The role of culture and gender in the relationship between positive and negative affect. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 641-672.

16.

Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., Li, B-S., & Li, D. (1999). Adolescent outcomes of socail functioning in Chinese children. International Journal of Bahavioral Development, 23, 199-223.

17.

Derogatis, L. R. (1977). Scl-90(Revised) ManualⅠ. Clinical Psychometrics Research Unit, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

18.

Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130-141.

19.

Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter- and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869-885.

20.

Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3, 364-370.

21.

Ekman, P., Sorenson, E. R., & Friesen W. V. (1969). Pan-Cultural Elements in Facial Displays of Emotion. Science, 164(3875), 86 -88.

22.

Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 719-737.

23.

Izard, C. E. (1977). Human Emotions. New York: Plenum Press.

24.

Izard, C. E., Libero, D. Z., Putnam, R., & Haynes, O. M. (1993). Stability of emotion experiences and their relations to traits of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 847-860.

25.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

26.

Rapee, R. M., Kim, J., Wang, J., Liu, X., Hofmann, S. G., Chen, J., Oh, K. Y., Bogels, S. M., Arman, S., Heinrichs, N., & Alden, L. E. (2011). Perceived impact of socially anxious behaviors on individuals' lives in Western and East Asian Countries. Behavior Therapy, 42, 485-492.

27.

Scherer, K. R., & Wallbott, J. G. (1994). Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 310-328.

28.

Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2004). Emotions across cultures and methods. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 35, 304-326.

29.

Scollon, C. N., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2005). An experience sampling and cross-cultural investigation of the relation between pleasant and unpleasant affect. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 27-52.

30.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1984). Cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood: A Japanese replication and a comparison with U.S. findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 127-144.

31.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General