Mediating effect of forgiveness in the relationship between non-adoptive cognitive emotion regulation and physical symptom

이아름; 이민규

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

KOREAN
P-ISSN1229-067X
E-ISSN2734-1127
KCI

Home

OA Policy

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.32 No.1

Citation Share

Mediating effect of forgiveness in the relationship between non-adoptive cognitive emotion regulation and physical symptom

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127

2013, v.32 no.1, pp.45-61

& (2013). Mediating effect of forgiveness in the relationship between non-adoptive cognitive emotion regulation and physical symptom. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 32(1), 45-61.

copy

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the role of forgiveness in the relationship between non-adoptive cognitive emotion regulation and physical symptom. The participants of this study are university students and common people in Gyeongnam and Busan (average age 22.38, males 249, females 191). Regarding the method of research, this study used the questionnaire for measurement of those facts, other forgiveness, cognitive emotion regulation, and physical symptom. The study analyzed whether forgiveness have mediation effect or not when four non-adoptive cognitive regulation strategies that consist of ‘self blame’, ‘other blame’, ‘rumination’ and ‘catastrophizing’ affect the physical symptom through SEM (Structural Equation Modeling). The result of research has shown that ‘other blame’ and ‘catastrophizing’ affect significantly on physical symptom and rest strategies, and that forgiveness also has effect on physical symptom. Moreover, other blame and catastrophizing have indirect effect on the process with forgiveness, so the study proves that there is mediation effect related with 2 variations. With this, it is proved that partial mediation model is more proper thing from the result of comparison between partial mediation model and full mediation model. This result indicates that there is direct effect to increase physical symptoms when 2 non-adoptive emotion regulation strategies, other blame and catastrophizing, use the case but those 2 rest other strategies, forgiveness affect indirectly in physical symptom. Lastly, it also discusses about the limitation of this study and the future work.

keywords: 용서, 부정적 인지적 정서조절전략, 신체증상, 매개효과, forgiveness, non-adoptive cognitive emotion regulation, physical symptom, mediating effect

Reference

구세준, 배성만, 현명호 (2011). 스트레스, 대처 전략 및 용서가 화병 증상에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 16(4), 691-707.

권희영, 홍혜영 (2010). 중학생의 내현적 자기애와 우울과의 관계: 자기비난과 수치심의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 22(4), 1023-1048.

김광수 (2008). 용서상담 프로그램: 아동 및 청소년의 또래 대인관계 문제 개선과 정서능력 개발을 중심으로. 학지사.

김상현, 금명자 (2011). 공감이 지각된 가해의도에 따라 용서동기에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(1), 325-339.

김소정, 김지혜, 윤세창 (2010). 한국판 반추적 반응 척도(K-RRS)의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29(1), 1-19.

김소희 (2004). 스트레스 사건, 인지적 정서조절전략과 심리적 안녕감 간의 관계. 가톨릭대학교 석사학위 청구논문.

김정미 (2009). 대학생의 부적응적 완벽주의와 부적응적 정서의 관계: 자기비난과 수치심의 매개효과. 청소년학연구, 16(10), 205- 225

김철환 (2008). 용서훈련이 집단따돌림 피해아동의 용서와 피해의식 및 보복심리에 미치는 영향. 진주교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

김희영, 김정희, 이연숙 (2004). 용서 프로그램이 대학생의 용서 정도와 분노, 불안 및 우울에 미치는 영향: 분산형 집단상담과 집중형 집단상담의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 16(3), 347-366.

10.

박종효 (2003). 용서와 건강의 관련성 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 301-321.

11.

오영희 (2008). 한국인 용서 척도 개발을 위한 예비연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 13(4), 1045-1063.

12.

이경순 (2008). 용서과정에 대한 질적 연구: 근거이론을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강. 13(1). 237-252.

13.

이서정, 현명호 (2008). 정서인식의 명확성과 인지적 정서조절이 정신건강에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 13(4), 887-905.

14.

이선복 (2008). 용서 심리치료 프로그램이 청소년의 용서수준과 대인관계 스트레스에 미치는 영향. 서울여자대학교대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

15.

이지영 (2009). 정서강도와 정서조절방략의 관계. 한국임상심리학회지: 임상, 28(4), 1217 -1226

16.

이지영, 권석만 (2006). 정서조절과 정신병리의 관계: 연구 현황과 과제. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 18(3), 461-493.

17.

장선숙, 김향숙, 홍상황 (2005). 초등학생용 교우관계 용서프로그램의 효과검증. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 2(2), 199-220.

18.

전은숙, 홍혜영 (2012). 성인애착과 용서의 관계에서 인지적 정서조절전략의 조절효과. 상담학연구, 13(3), 1159-1179.

19.

정성진, 장성숙, 서경현 (2012). 용서과정 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 17(1), 123-142.

20.

조성은, 오경자 (2007). 정서인식의 명확성, 정서강도, 정서주의력과 스트레스 대처 및 우울과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(4), 797-812.

21.

조현주, 전태연, 채정호, 우영섭, 최정은, 기백석, 임현우 (2007). 우울장애의 불안, 신체화, 분노 증상과 정서조절방략과의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 26(3), 663-679.

22.

하늘, 배성만, 현명호 (2011). 성피해자의 수치심과 우울의 관계에서 용서의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 16(4), 725-737..

23.

한덕웅, 전겸구, 탁진국, 이창호, 이건효 (1993). 대학생 생활 부적응의 영향 요인과 영향 과정: 생활 부적응에 영향을 미치는 생활 사건과 개인차 변인. 학생지도연구, 10(1), 1-35. 성균관대학교학생생활연구소.

24.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정 기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

25.

Allemand, M. (2008). Age differences in forgivingness: The role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1137-1147.

26.

Barber, L., Maltby, J., & Macaskill, A. (2005) Angry memories and thoughts of revenge: The relationship between forgiveness and anger rumination. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 253-262.

27.

Baron, R. M., & D. A. Kenny. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distrnction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

28.

Bono, G., McCullough, M. E., & Root, L. M. (2008) Forgiceness, feeling connected to others, and well-bing: Two longitudinal studies. Personality and Sosial Psychology Bulletin, 34, 182-195.

29.

Briana, L. R., & Julie, J. E. (2011). Gender Differences in Response to Experimental Forgiveness Prompts: Do Men Show Stronger Responses Than Women?. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 182-193.

30.

Brown, R. F., & Schutte, N. S. (2006) Direct and indirect relationships between emotional intelligence and subjective fatigue in university students. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(6), 585-593.

31.

Crossley, C. D. (2009). Emotional and behavioral reactions to social undermining: A closer look at perceived offender motives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 14-24.

32.

Enright, R. D. (2004). 용서는 선택이다 [Forgiveness is a choise]. (채규만 역). 서울: 학지사.

33.

Finkel, E. J., Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., & Hannon, P. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: does commitment promote forgiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956-974.

34.

Gassin, E. A. (1995). Social cognition and forgiveness in adolescents romance: An intervention study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

35.

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative Life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1311-1327.

36.

Garnefski, N., Teerds, J., Kraaij, V., Legerstee, J., & Van den Kommer, T. (2004). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: Differences between males and females. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 267-276.

37.

Ghaemmaghami, P., Allemand, M., & Martin, M. (2011). Forgiveness in younger, middle-aged and older adults: Age and gender matters. Journal of Adult Development, 18(4), 192-203.

38.

Lawler-Row, K. A., Karremans, J. C., Scott, C., Edlis-Matityahou, M., & Edwards, L. (2008). Forgiveness, physiological reactivity and health: The role of anger. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 68, 51-58.

39.

MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.

40.

McCullough, M. E., (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and lings to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43-55.

41.

McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade-Brown, S., & Hight, T. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships II: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.

42.

McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., Tabak, B., & Witvliet, C. v. O. (2009). Forgiveness. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed.). (pp.427-435). New York: Oxford.

43.

Miller, A. J., Worthington, E. L., & Mcdaniel, M. A. (2008). Gender and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(8), 843-876.

44.

DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Jr., & Bushman, B. J. (2010). Sweet revenge: Diabetic symptoms predict less forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 823-826.

45.

Rizkalla, L., Wertheim, E. H., & Hodgson, L. K. (2008). The roles of emotion management and perspective taking in individuals' conflict management styles and disposition to forgive. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1594 -1601.

46.

Ohtsubo, Y. & Watanabe, E. (2009). Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of a costly signaling model of apology. Evolution and Human Begavior, 30, 114-123.

47.

Thompson, L. Y., Snyder C. R., Hoffman, L., Michael, S. T., Rasmussen, H., Billings, L. S., Heinze, L., Neufeld, J. E., Shorey, H. S., Roberts, J. C., & Roberts, D. E. (2005). Dispositional Forgiveness of Self, Others, and Situations. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 313 -360.

48.

Tse, W. S. & Yip, T. H. J. (2009). Relationship among dispositional forgiveness of other, interpersonal adjustment and psychological well-being: Implication for interpersonal theory of depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 513-523.

49.

Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Theoretical and empirical connections between forgiveness, mental health, and well-being. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp.349-362). New York: Routledge.

50.

Worthington, E. L., & Wade, N. G. (1999). The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 385-418.

51.

Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2007). Rumination: Bridging a gap between forgivingness, vengefulness, and psychological health. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1573-1584.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.32 No.1

Mediating effect of forgiveness in the relationship between non-adoptive cognitive emotion regulation and physical symptom

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Psychology: General