The Social Attribution Test-Multiple Choice(SAT-MC): Feasibility and Preliminary Validation Study

송명주; 최기홍

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

KOREAN
P-ISSN1229-067X
E-ISSN2734-1127
KCI

Home

OA Policy

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.32 No.4

Citation Share

The Social Attribution Test-Multiple Choice(SAT-MC): Feasibility and Preliminary Validation Study

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127

2013, v.32 no.4, pp.867-882

& (2013). The Social Attribution Test-Multiple Choice(SAT-MC): Feasibility and Preliminary Validation Study. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 32(4), 867-882.

copy

Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to predict and explain others’ behavior based on the mental representations of their intentions, desire and knowledge. ToM measures have been introduced, however, some concerns such as high dependence on verbal memory or external cues have been raised. Social Attribution Test-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC, Bell et al., 2010) is known to be less reliant on verbal ability or external cues as the SAT-MC assesses participants’ ability to detect and understand the intent of the movement. In the current study, we aimed to translate the SAT-MC into Korean and to evaluate its feasibility and preliminary validity in a Korean sample of college students. The results showed that 98% of participants made immediate social attributions to the animations of two triangles and a circle, even without external cues. The SAT-MC appeared to have a singe factor structure and acceptable internal consistency, as reported in Western samples. The SAT-MC scores had significant positive correlations with those on other ToM measures but non-significant correlations with those on facial affect perception tasks. It is concluded that the SAT-MC would be feasibly applicable to measure ToM of Korean samples. Thus, in future studies, it should be examined whether the SAT-MC measures ToM with good reliability and validity in specific samples with various clinical conditions such as autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia.

keywords: 마음이론, 사회 인지, 사회 귀인, 사회적 귀인 검사, Theory of Mind, ToM, Socail cognition, Social attribution, Social attribution test

Reference

김민우, 최준식, 조양석. (2011). 고려대학교얼굴표정모음집(KUFEC)과 의미미분법을 통한 정서차원평정, 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(4), 933-955.

김신향. (2011). 정신분열병 환자를 위한 마음이론 향상 사회인지 재활프로그램의 효과. 고려대학교 심리학과 일반대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

허두호, 박재홍, 유병국. (2006). 정신분열병 환자에서 힌트과제와 눈빛과제를 이용한 마음이론의 연구. 생물치료정신의학, 12(2), 215-223.

Abell, F., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2000). Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development, 15(1), 1-16.

Baron‐Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30(2), 285-297.

Bell, M., Joanna, F., Tamasine, G., & Bruce, W. (2010). Social attribution test-multiple choice (SAT-MC) in schizophrenia: Comparison with community sample and relationship to neurocognitive, social cognitive and symptom measures. Schizophrenia Research, 122(1), 164- 171.

Bell, M., Corbera, S., Johannesen, J., Joanna, F., & Bruce, W. (2013). Social Cognitive Impairments and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Are There Subtypes With Distinct Functional Correlates? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(1), 186-196.

Berry, D., Misovich, S., Kean, K., & Baron, R. (1992). Effects of disruption of structure and motion on perceptions of social causality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 237-244.

Blakemore, S-J., Boyer, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Meltzoff, A., Segebarth, C., & Decety, J. (2003). The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 13(8), 837-844.

10.

Blakemore, S-J., & Decety., J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(8), 561-567.

11.

Bora, E., Eryavuz, A., Kayahan, B., Sungu, G., & Veznedaroglu, B. (2006). Social functioning, theory of mind and neurocognition in outpatients with schizophrenia; mental state decoding may be a better predictor of social functioning than mental state reasoning. Psychiatry Research, 145(2-3), 95-103.

12.

Brüne, M. (2005). Emotion recognition, 'theory of mind, 'and social behavior in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research. 133(2-3), 135-147.

13.

Carlson, S., Moses, L., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11(2), 73-92.

14.

Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage, 12(3), 314-325.

15.

Corcoran, R., Mercer, G., & Frith, C. (1995). Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: investigating “theory of mind” in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 17(1), 5-13.

16.

Corcoran, R., Cahill, C., & Frith, C. (1997). The appreciation of visual jokes in people with schizophrenia: a study of ‘mentalizing’ ability. Schizophrenia Research, 24(3), 319-327.

17.

Corcoran, R. (2003). Inductive reasoning and the understanding of intention in schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 8(3), 223-235.

18.

Corcoran, R, & Frith, C. (2003). Autobiographical memory and theory of mind: evidence of a relationship in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 33(5), 897-905.

19.

Craig, J., Hatton, C., Craig, F., & Bentall, R. (2004). Persecutory beliefs, attributions and theory of mind: comparison of patients with paranoid delusions, Asperger's syndrome and healthy controls. Schizophrenia Research, 69(1), 29-33.

20.

Doody, G., Götz, M., Johnstone, E., Frith, C., & Cunningham Owens, D. (1998). Theory of mind and psychoses. Psychological Medicine, 28(2), 397-405.

21.

Frith, C., & Corcoran, R. (1996). Exploring theory of mind in people with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 26(3), 521-530.

22.

Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. SeriesB: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 459-473.

23.

Froese, T., Stanghellini, G., & Bertelli, M. (2013). Is it normal to be a principal mindreader? Revising theories of social cognition on the basis of schizophrenia and high functioning autism-spectrum disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(5), 1376-1387.

24.

Gallagher, H., & Frith, C.. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 77-83.

25.

Gobbini, M., Koralek, A., Bryan, R., Montgomery, K., & Haxby, J. (2007). Two takes on the social brain: A comparison of theory of mind tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1803-1814.

26.

Green, M., Olivier, B., Crawley, J., Penn, D., & Silverstein, S. (2005). Social cognition in schizophrenia: recommendations from the measurement and treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia new approaches conference. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31(4), 882-887.

27.

Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. (1988). Relation to sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265-275.

28.

Hashimoto, H. (1966). A phenomenal analysis of social perception. Journal of Child Development, 2, 1-26

29.

Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243-259.

30.

Horan, W., Nuechterlein, K., Wynn, J., Lee, J., Castelli, F., & Green, M. (2009). Disturbances in the spontaneous attribution of social meaning in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 39(4), 635-643.

31.

Johannesen, J., Lurie, J., Fiszdon, J., & Bell, M. (2013). The Social Attribution Task-Multiple Choice (SAT-MC): A Psychometric and Equivalence Study of an Alternate Form. ISRN Psychiatry, 2013, Article ID 830825, 9 pages. doi:10.1155/2013/830825.

32.

Kelemen, O., Erdélyi, R., Pataki, I., Benedek, G., Janka, Z., & Kéri, S. (2005). Theory of mind and motion perception in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 19(4), 494-500.

33.

Kington, J., Jones, L., Watt, A., Hopkin, E., & Williams, J. (2000). Impaired eye expression recognition in schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 34(4), 341-347.

34.

Klin, A. (2000). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: the social attribution task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(7), 831-846.

35.

Klin, A. (2003). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: the social attribution task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(7), 831-846.

36.

Langdon, R., Davies, M., & Coltheart, M. (2002). Understanding minds and understanding communicated meanings in schizophrenia. Mind & Language, 17(1-2), 68-104.

37.

Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., & Ward, P. (2006). Empathetic perspective-taking is impaired in schizophrenia: Evidence from a study of emotion attribution and theory of mind. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 11(2), 133-155.

38.

Lysaker, P., Buck, K., Dimaggio, G., & Brune, M. (2013). Association of metacognition and social cognition with neurocognition, negative symptoms and function in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39 (Suppl1): S21-S22.

39.

Marek, J. (1966). Information perception and social context: II. The Balance and relevance of complex perceptual responses. Human Relations, 19(4), 353-380.

40.

Mazza, M, De Risio, A, Surian, L, Roncone, R, & Casacchia, M. (2001). Selective impairments of theory of mind in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 47(2), 299-308.

41.

Roberts, D., & Penn, D. (2009). Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT) for outpatients with schizophrenia: a preliminary study. Psychiatry Research, 166(2-3), 141-147.

42.

Roncone, R., Falloon, I., Mazza, M., De Risio, A., Pollice, R., Necozione, S., & Casacchia, M. (2002). Is theory of mind in schizophrenia more strongly associated with clinical and social functioning than with neurocognitive deficits?. Psychopathology, 35(5), 280-288.

43.

Russell, T., Rubia, K., Bullmore, E., Soni, W., Suckling, J., Brammer, M., & Sharma, T. (2000). Exploring the social brain in schizophrenia: left prefrontal underactivation during mental state attribution. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(12), 2040-2042.

44.

Russell, T., Reynaud, E., Herba, C., Morris, R., & Corcoran, R. (2006). Do you see what I see? Interpretations of intentional movement in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 81(1), 101-111.

45.

Sarfati, Y, Hardy-Bayle, M., Nadel, J., Chevalier, J., & Widlocher, D. (1997). Attribution of mental states to others by schizophrenic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 2(1), 1-18.

46.

Sarfati, Y., Passerieux, C., & Hardy-Bayle, M. (2000). Can verbalization remedy the theory of mind deficit in schizophrenia?. Psychopathology, 33(5), 246-251.

47.

Sprong, M., Schothorst, P., Vos, E., Hox, J., & Van Engeland, H. (2007). Theory of mind in schizophrenia Meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(1), 5-13.

48.

Streit, M., Wölwer, W., & Gaebel, W. (1997). Facial-affect recognition and visual scanning behaviour in the course of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 24(3), 311-317.

49.

Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). Exploring the relationship between theory of mind and social-communicative functioning in children with autism. In Repacholi, B., Slaughter, V (Ed..), Macquarie Monographs In Cognitive Science (pp.197-212). New York: Psychology Press.

50.

Turetsky, B., Kohler, C., Indersmitten, T., Bhati, M., Charbonnier, D., & Gur, R. (2007). Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: when and why does it go awry? Schizophrenia Research, 94(1), 253-263.

51.

Walther, S., Federspiel, A., Horn, H., Bianchi, P., Wiest, R., Wirth, M., & Müller, T. (2009). Encoding deficit during face processing within the right fusiform face area in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 172(3), 184- 191.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.32 No.4

The Social Attribution Test-Multiple Choice(SAT-MC): Feasibility and Preliminary Validation Study

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Psychology: General