바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.33 No.2
Citation Share

성취목표지향성의 종단적 변화와 안정성

Longitudinal Change and Stability of Achievement Goal Orientation

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2014, v.33 no.2, pp.353-373
이은주 (경북대학교)
이은주. (2014). 성취목표지향성의 종단적 변화와 안정성. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 33(2), 353-373.
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구의 목적은 상태-특성이론을 바탕으로 성취목표지향성의 변화에 작용하는 상태와 특성의 문제를 규명하는데 있었다. 이를 위해 개인의 성취목표지향성이 내포하고 있는 특성적 요인과 상태적 요인을 구분하고, 성취목표의 유형 중 어느 목표가 종단적으로 보다 안정적이고, 또 어느 목표가 상대적으로 변화가능한지 알아보았다. 한국교육개발원의 한국교육종단조사 2~4차년도 데이터를 사용하여 잠재 특성-상태-상황(TSO)모델을 적용하여 분석한 결과, 성취목표지향성은 특성적 요인과 상황적 요인을 모두 포함하는 개념으로 이해하는 것이 타당한 것으로 나타났다. 잠재상태 성취목표지향성의 변량 중 특성적 요인과 상황적 요인을 구분한 결과, 모든 성취목표 유형에 걸쳐 상황적 요인이 차지하는 변량(60~70%)이 특성적 요인(30~40%)보다 컸다. 특히 특성적 요인이 차지하는 비중은 숙달접근 목표에서 가장 높았으며, 상황적 요인이 차지하는 비중은 숙달목표나 수행목표에 상관없이 회피목표에서 가장 높았다. 즉, 숙달접근목표가 상대적으로 가장 안정적인 목표이며 회피목표가 시간의 흐름에 따라 변화가능성이 가장 높음을 의미한다. 본 연구의 의의 및 후속연구에 대한 제언이 논의되었다.

keywords
성취목표지향성, 잠재 특성-상태-상황모델, 안정성, 종단적 변화, achievement goal orientation, latent trait-state-occasion model, stability, longitudinal change

Abstract

This study posits that achievement goal endorsement is likely to be stable to some degree, but it is also likely to exhibit change across time. A longitudinal state-trait approach was utilized in the present study to examine the stability of achievement goal orientation. With a sample of 5,847 eighth graders followed over 3 years, the present study used a latent trait-state-occasion(TSO) model(Cole, Martin, & Steiger, 2005) to isolate the trait and state components. Results showed that TSO model was the best representation for achievement goals, validating that the achievement goal measures included both state and trait components. Over three years, the percentages of variance explained by the state component (60~70%) were greater than that explained by the trait component(30~40%) across four goals; State components were higher than trait components across all types of achievement goals. The portion of the variance attributed to the occasion-specific variable was higher in both mastery-avoidance and performance- voidance goals than mastery-approach goals. Regardless of mastery or performance goal, avoidance goals are more reactive to the situation, whereas mastery-approach goals are more similar to enduring disposition in their expression of stability. The implications of the present findings are discussed.

keywords
성취목표지향성, 잠재 특성-상태-상황모델, 안정성, 종단적 변화, achievement goal orientation, latent trait-state-occasion model, stability, longitudinal change

참고문헌

1.

김주환, 김은주, 홍세희 (2006). 한국 남녀 중학생 집단에서 자기결정성이 학업성취도에 주는 영향. 교육심리연구, 20(1), 243-264.

2.

양명희, 정윤선 (2012). 성취목표지향성의 안정성 검토. 교육심리연구, 26(1), 251-270.

3.

이은주, 정익중 (2010). 청소년비행과 일탈적자아개념의 상호적 인과관계: 잠재 상태-특성 자기회귀 모델을 통한 재검증. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 16(4), 447-468.

4.

소연희 (2010). 성취목표지향성, 지각된 학급목표구조, 목표몰입의지, 자기조절학습 및수학학업성취의 구조적 분석. 아동교육, 19(3), 41-56.

5.

Albin, M. L., Benton, S. L., & Khramtsova, I. (1996). Individual differences in interest and narrative writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 305-324.

6.

Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.

7.

Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students’achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 21-37.

8.

Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131-147.

9.

Anderman, E. M. & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269-298.

10.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS 7.0 User's Guide. Chicago, SPSS.

11.

Bong, M. (2005). Within-grade changes in Korean girls’ motivation and perceptions of the learning environment across domains and achievement level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 656-672.

12.

Braten, I., & Olaussen, B. S. (2005). Profiling individual differences in student motivation: A longitudinal cluster-analytic study in different academic contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 359-396.

13.

Church, M. A., Elliiot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43-54.

14.

Cole, D. A., Martin, N. C., Steiger, J. H. (2005). Empirical and conceptual problems with longitudinal trait-state models: Introducing a trait-state-occasion model. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 3-20.

15.

Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Arvey, R., & Salas, E. (1993). Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 174-184.

16.

Conroy, D. E., Elliot, A. J., & Hofer, S. M (2003). A 2×2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: Evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25, 456-476.

17.

Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.

18.

Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model to approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.

19.

Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.

20.

Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.

21.

Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613-628.

22.

Eysenck, H. J. (1983). Personality, conditioning, and antisocial behavior. In W. S. Lauffer & J. M. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development, and criminal behavior (pp.51-81). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

23.

Fryer, J. W., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). Stability and change in achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 700-714.

24.

Hertzog, C., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1987). Beyond autoregressive models: Some implications of the trait-state distinction for the structural modeling of developmental change. Child Development, 58, 93-109.

25.

Hertzog, C., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Assessing psychological change in adulthood: An overview of methodological issues. Psychology and Aging, 18(4), 639-657.

26.

Kaplan, A., Green, M. & Midgley, C. (2002), Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 191-211.

27.

Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (2001). The trait-state models for longitudinal data. In L. M.Collins & A. G.Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 243-263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

28.

Kumar, S. & Jagacinski, C. M. (2011). Confronting task difficulty in ego involvement:Change in performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 664-682.

29.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd. ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

30.

Lee, E. J. (in press). The relationship between unstable self-esteem and aggression: Differences in reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Early Adolescence. DOI: 10.1177/ 0272431613518973.

31.

Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197-213.

32.

Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 292-326.

33.

Matthews, G., & Deary, I. J. (1998). Personality traits. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (1999). Changes in elementary school children’s achievement goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 207-229.

35.

Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 454-480.

36.

Muis, K. R., & Edwards, O. (2009). Examining the stability of achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 265-277.

37.

Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievementrelevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 432-447.

38.

Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3-53.

39.

Olatunji, B. O., & Cole, D. A. (2009). The longitudinal structure of general and specific anxiety dimensions in children: Testing a latent trait-state-occasion model. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 412-424.

40.

Pajares, F. & Y. F. Cheong. (2003). Achievement goal orientations in writing: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 437-455.

41.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.

42.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.

43.

Prenoveau, J. M., Craske, M. G., Zinbarg, R. E., Mineka, S., Rose, R. D., & Griffith, J. W. (2011). Are anxiety and depression just as stable as personality during late adolescence? Results from a three-year longitudinal latent variable study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(4), 832-843.

44.

Putwain, D. W., Larkin, D., & Sander, P. (2013). A reciprocal model of achievement goals and learning related emotions in the first year of undergraduate study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 361-374.

45.

Rosenberg, M (1986). Self-concept and psychological well-being in adolescence. In R. L. Leahy (Ed.), The Development of the Self (pp. 205-246). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

46.

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

47.

Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 320-336.

48.

Shim, S. S., Ryan, A. M., & Anderson, C. J. (2008). Achievement goals and achievement during early adolescence: Examining timevarying predictor and outcome variables in growth-curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 655-671.

49.

Silva, T., & Nicholls, J. G. (1993). College students as writing theorists: Goals and beliefs about the causes of success. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 281-293.

50.

Smith, L., Sinclair, K. E., & Chapman, E. S. (2002). Students’ goals, self-efficacy, selfhandicapping, and negative affective responses:An Australian senior school student study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 471-485.

51.

Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

52.

Taris, T. (2002). A primer in longitudinal data analysis. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

53.

Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2011). Stability and change in achievement goal orientations: A personoriented approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 82-100.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책