바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.35 No.4

Citation Share

A Validation Study of Korean Version of PANAS-Revised

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2016, v.35 no.4, pp.617-641
https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2016.12.35.4.617


& (2016). A Validation Study of Korean Version of PANAS-Revised. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 35(4), 617-641, https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2016.12.35.4.617

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to revalidate the Korean version of Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS). Twenty items originally developed by Watson, Clark, & Tellegen(1988) went through a translation and back-translation procedure to be adapted prior to data collection and were supported the scales’ validity by study 2. In study 1, Existed K-PANAS were evaluated by exploratory factor analysis. and It revealed that Existed K-PANAS have several of critical fault. On the basis of result of study 1, In study 2, psychometric analyses revealed that the Revised K-PANAS has 2 correlated factors and same questions as like the original PANAS with 2 times of exploratory factor analysis. Statistical analysis revealed that the Revised K-PANAS is a reliable and valid measurement for Korean. In confirmatory factor analysis, The model fits of the 2 factor model of structure were not good. but Depending of the opnion which is affect cannot be independent with other affect, The model fits of the 2 factor permitting correlated error were moderately good. These results suggest that Revised K-PANAS can be used for measuring affect in cross-national or cross-cultural study.

keywords
정서척도, 정적정서 부적정서 척도(PANAS), 한국판 정적정서 부적정서척도(K-PANAS), 척도 타당화, Affect Scale, Korean version of PANAS-Revised, K-PANAS-R, Validation

Reference

1.

강혜자, 한덕웅, 전겸구 (2000). 정서측정을 위한 도구 개발: 자기 차이 이론을 중심으로. 예술치료학회, 7(1), 51-67.

2.

권기남, 성미영 (2010). 유아의 행복감이 행동문제 및 대인간 문제해결 전략에 미치는영향. 한국생활과학회지, 19(2), 257-270.

3.

김송이, 엄진섭, 노은여, 유성은 (2013). 개별정서척도의 개발과 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(1), 63-89.

4.

배병렬 (2005). Lisrel 구조방정식모델: 이해와활용. 서울: 도서출판 청람.

5.

손원숙 (2003). 심리검사 번안에 대한 통합적접근. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 22(2), 57-80.

6.

이노미 (2005). 인문과학 제36집, 성균관대학교인문과학연구소.

7.

이현희, 김은정, 이민규 (2003). 한국판 정적정서 및 부적정서 척도(Positive Affect andNegative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(4), 935-946.

8.

임영진, 고영건, 신희천, 조용래 (2012). 정신적웰빙척도(MHC-SF)의 한국어판 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지, 31(2), 369-386.

9.

정현숙 (2002). 한국인과 미국인의 언어 사용차이: 다문화 조직의 커뮤니케이션 사례연구에 나타난 문제점을 중심으로. 사회언어학, 10(1), 275-293.

10.

한덕웅, 강혜자 (2000). 한국어 정서 용어들의적절성과 경험빈도. 한국심리학회지: 일반,19(2), 63-99.

11.

홍세희 (2000). 특별기고. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

12.

홍창희 (2004). 한국 정서경험 척도의 개발과타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 23(3),771-787.

13.

Bentler, P. M. & Yuan, K. H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(2), 181-197.

14.

Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large nonclinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 245-265.

15.

Crocker, P. R. (1997). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Positive Affect Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS) with a youth sport sample. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology.

16.

Diener, E.(1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

17.

Fredrickson, B. L.(2002). Positive emotions. Handbook of positive psychology, 120-134.

18.

Gaudreau, P., Sanchez, X., & Blondin, J. P. (2006). Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting: Testing the factorial structure of the PANAS across two samples of French-Canadian participants. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(4), 240-249.

19.

Green, D. P., Goldman, S. L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Perso0nality and Social Psychology, 64(6), 1029.

20.

Joiner Jr, T. E., Sandin, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., & Marquina, G. (1997). Development and factor analytic validation of the SPANAS among women in Spain: (More) cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 600-615.

21.

Keyes, C. L. M.(2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207-222.

22.

Kline, R. B. (2010). 구조방정식모형: 원리와 적용. (이현숙, 김수진, 전수현 역). 서울: 학지사.

23.

Lonigan, C. J., Hooe, E. S., David, C. F., & Kistner, J. A. (1999). Positive and negative affectivity in children: Confirmatory factor analysis of a two-factor model and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 374.

24.

Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (2003). Measuring positive emotions.

25.

Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E.(2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success?. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803.

26.

Matthews, G., Jones, D. M., & Chamberlain, A. G. (1990). Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST mood adjective checklist. British Journal of Psychology, 81(1), 17-42.

27.

Melvin, G., & Molloy, G. N. (2000). Some psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule among Australian youth. Psychological Reports, 86(3 Pt 2), 1209-1212.

28.

Molloy, G. N., Pallant, J. F., & Kantas, A. (2001). A psychometric comparison of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule across age and sex. Psychological Reports, 88(3 Pt 1), 861.

29.

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.

30.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: Are view of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166.

31.

Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2001). Development of the Japanes eversion of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS) scales. Japanese Journal of Personality, 9(2), 138-139.

32.

Schimmack, U., Bȍckenholt, U., & Reisenzein, R. (2002). Response styles in affect ratings: Making a mountain out of a molehill. Journal of personality assessment, 78(3), 461-483.

33.

Vande Vijver, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests. European psychologist, 1(2), 89-99.

34.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A.(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy