바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.39 No.1

Citation Share

Exploring the possible direction of interpreting inconsistent mediational effect

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2020, v.39 no.1, pp.91-115
https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2020.3.39.1.91


& (2020). Exploring the possible direction of interpreting inconsistent mediational effect. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 39(1), 91-115, https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2020.3.39.1.91

Abstract

The mediational model is one of the most commonly used statistical methods in the social sciences as well as in psychology. However, there are some instances where the results are hard to interpret, one of which is inconsistent mediation. The inconsistent mediation refers to the case that the direct and indirect effects have differing signs or that the magnitude of the direct effect exceeds that of the total effect, which is a suppression effect. Despite the models with the inconsistent mediation is getting more popular and important, there is a lack of research providing guidance on plausible interpretation of the results. This study aims to integrate and classify diverse types of the inconsistent mediation and to propose a typology that one can refer to for proper interpretation of the results. We first review the traditional mediation analysis and its criticism in terms of the inconsistent mediational effect. We then explain the theoretical and methodological concepts of the inconsistent mediation and try to structuralize the patterns of interpretation by exploring empirical studies. Finally, we discuss the implications as well as the limitations of the present study.

keywords
매개모형, 비일관적 매개, 억제효과, mediation analysis, inconsistent mediation, suppression effect

Reference

1.

김수영 (2016). 구조방정식 모형의 기본과 확장:Mplus 예제와 함께. 서울: 학지사.

2.

김영혜, 안현의 (2014). 대학생의 부모-자녀 유대, 부모의 사회경제적 지위와 진로결정관계에서 성취압력 및 진로결정자기효능감의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및심리치료, 26(3), 657-684.

3.

문광수, 조항수, 이계훈, 오세진 (2014). 임금만족이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 27(3), 585-615.

4.

박영례, 조성호 (2018). 고통 감내력이 주관적안녕감에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지:문화 및 사회문제, 24(1), 49-62.

5.

박중길 (2010). 체육수업에서 과제가치, 성취목표, 정서 및 과제지속성과의 인과적 관계:다중매개모형 검증. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 21(4), 71-90.

6.

서경현, 이상숙, 정구철, 김신섭 (2011). 노년기스트레스와 웰빙에 대한 사회비교 및 사회비교 대처의 매개효과 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 16(1), 117-134.

7.

성정아, 홍혜영 (2014). 대학생의 이성관계에서불안정 성인애착이 친밀감 두려움에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 26(2), 387-414.

8.

송보라, 이기학 (2009). 자기개념 복잡성과 심리적 적응 관계에서의 인지적 유연성 및 자기개념 명확성의 매개효과 모형 검증. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(3), 73-88.

9.

안수정, 서영석 (2017). 중년 남성의 전문적 도움추구에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 29(3), 629-657.

10.

이나빈, 심기선, 안현의 (2017). 세월호 참사에대한 일반인들의 침습기억과 사건중심성간 관계에서 사회적 공유의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 31(4), 27-50.

11.

이소진, 김은석, 유성경 (2017). 워킹맘의 일-가정 갈등과 우울의 관계에서 마음챙김의매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 22(4), 767-782.

12.

이시은, 이재창 (2008). 부모유대와 대인애착간의 관계에 대한 지각된 사회적 지지의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 20(1), 83-101.

13.

이지원, 이기학 (2014). 대학생의 성인애착과진로의사결정문제와의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 11(1), 55-87.

14.

정선호, 서동기 (2016). 회귀분석을 이용한 매개된 조절효과와 조절된 매개효과 검증 방법. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 35(1), 257-282.

15.

정선호, 양태석, 박중규 (2019). 조절회귀분석을 이용한 매개된 조절효과 검정에 관한종합적 고찰. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 38(3), 323-346.

16.

조윤진, 유성경 (2012). 기혼 취업 여성의 사회적 지지와 일-가족 갈등 및 향상의 관계에서 문제-중심 대처와 우울정서의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 24(2), 441-463.

17.

조화진, 서영석 (2010). 부모애착, 분리-개별화, 성인애착, 대학생활적응, 심리적 디스트레스의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 22(2), 385-411.

18.

지성호, 강영순 (2014). 사회과학분야의 구조방정식모형에서 매개효과 검정 방법에 대한논의. Journal of Korean Data Analysis Society, 16(6), 3121-3131.

19.

차지연, 김정규 (2018). 불안정 성인애착과 사회불안의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상심리연구와 실제, 4(3), 377-394.

20.

최영주, 탁진국 (2017). 진정성 리더십이 직무열의에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 30(1), 25-47.

21.

하은혜, 곽진영 (2010). 청소년의 자기애와 우울증상의 관계에서 수치심의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 7(3), 315-331.

22.

하 정, 안현의 (2013). 지각된 스트레스, 불안, 문제성 인터넷 사용과의 관계에서 걱정에대한 상위인지의 다중매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 25(2), 251-273.

23.

Ang, S., & Malhotra, R. (2016). Association of received social support with depressive symptoms among older males and females in Singapore: Is personal mastery an inconsistent mediator?. Social Science & Medicine, 153, 165-173.

24.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

25.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

26.

Cerin, E., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). Acommentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity. Public Health Nutrition, 12(8), 1182-1188.

27.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S.(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences(3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 35-46.

29.

Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69(3), 161-182.

30.

Dillon, K. H., Cunningham, K. C., Neal, J. M., Wilson, S. M., Dedert, E. A., Elbogen, E. B., Calhoun, P. S., Beckham, J. C., VA Mid-Atlantic MIRECC Workgroup., & Kimbrel, N. A. (2018). Examination of the indirect effects of combat exposure on suicidal behavior in veterans. Journal of Affective Disorders, 235, 407-413.

31.

Donovan, R. A., Huynh, Q. L., Park, I. J., Kim,S. Y., Lee, R. M., & Robertson, E. (2013). Relationships among identity, perceived discrimination, and depressive symptoms in eight ethnic‐generational groups. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(4), 397-414.

32.

Fairchild, A. J., & McDaniel, H. L. (2017). Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: mediation analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 105(6), 1259-1271.

33.

Friedman, L., & Wall, M. (2005). Graphical views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. The American Statistician, 59(2), 127-136.

34.

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny:Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.

35.

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

36.

Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5(5), 602-619.

37.

Kato, T. (2014). Insomnia symptoms, depressive symptoms, and suicide ideation in Japanese white-collar employees. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(3), 506-510.

38.

Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25(2), 334-339.

39.

Kline, R. B. (2015). The mediation myth. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(4), 202-213.

40.

Kühnel, J., Sonnentag, S., & Westman, M. (2009). Does work engagement increase after a short respite? The role of job involvement as a double‐edged sword. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3), 575-594.

41.

Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A.(2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 595-612.

42.

MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S.(2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.

43.

MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C.M. (2000). Mediation, confounding and suppression. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173-181.

44.

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104.

45.

Mehio-Sibai, A., Feinleib, M., Sibai, T. A., & Armenian, H. K. (2005). A positive or a negative confounding variable? A simple teaching aid for clinicians and students. Annals of Epidemiology, 15(6), 421-423.

46.

Merrill, J. E., & Read, J. P. (2010). Motivational pathways to unique types of alcohol consequences. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(4), 705-711.

47.

Mohanty, J. (2013). Ethnic and racial socialization and self-esteem of Asian adoptees: The mediating role of multiple identities. Journal of Adolescence, 36(1), 161-170.

48.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.

49.

Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359-371.

50.

Shieh, G. (2006). Suppression situations in multiple linear regression. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 435-447.

51.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies:New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445.

52.

Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Martinez, A. G.(2014). Two faces of shame: The roles of shame and guilt in predicting recidivism. Psychological Science, 25(3), 799-805.

53.

Tzelgov, J., & Stern, I. (1978). Relationships between variables in three variable linear regression and the concept of suppressor. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(2), 325-335.

54.

Widmer, P. S., Semmer, N. K., Kälin, W., Jacobshagen, N., & Meier, L. L. (2012). The ambivalence of challenge stressors: Time pressure associated with both negative and positive well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 422-433.

55.

Wood, R. E., Goodman, J. S., Beckmann, N., & Cook, A. (2008). Mediation testing in management research: A review and proposals. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 270-295.

56.

Yoon, W., Ro, Y. S., & Cho, S. I. (2019). A mediation analysis of the effect of practical training on the relationship between demographic factors, and bystanders’ selfefficacy in CPR performance. PloS one, 14(4), e0215432.

57.

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy