Abstract

Delivering high-quality psychological services requires the cultivation of competent professionals. Legislation concerning psychological services outlines criteria for service providers' qualifications, encompassing educational background, degrees, and training. This paper compares the education and training requirements specified in five proposed bills related to psychological services and suggests qualification standards for professionals in line with the domestic context. Insights are drawn from effective psychological service practices in Europe and the United States. The comparative analysis reveals significant variations in three main aspects: the provider's major, degree requirements, and training. Only one bill explicitly specifies a major in psychology and a postgraduate degree as prerequisites for educational qualifications, while others include counseling or recognize undergraduate degrees. Some bills mandate only practical experience without supervised training, raising concerns about potential compromises in service quality. To address these issues, the paper suggests adapting a modified version of the Europe system, based on psychological education with bachelor's and master's degrees, a minimum of three years of supervised training, and a certification system with a overseeing committee. The proposed system emphasizes mandatory training areas rather than specific subjects. The establishment of legislation and systems related to psychological services should prioritize the public interest, addressing the essential process of reconciling conflicts among stakeholders. This paper proposes a fundamental philosophy prioritizing evidence-based scientific services, serving as a core criterion for negotiation and compromise among stakeholders.