open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0696
This research extended the findings on the effect of merge and acquisition by applying social identity theory. Various (correlates) of merge and acquisition were investigated using 818 South Korean employees. This investigation had purposes. it is identified that effect of status perception and the permeability of status difference between employees from merging and merged organization on pre-merger organizational identity and pre-merger organizational identity management strategy. The main results were as followed. the more they were likely to have a high pre-merger organization identity, they more use collective behavior strategy and less use individual behavior strategy. And when people who are relatively low status perceived, the more they were likely to have a high pre-merger organization identity, they more use collective cognition strategy. And People who had merged relative to people who had been merged think of their status high. At the same time, the more permeable people who think of their status high perceived, the more they were likely to have a high pre-merger organization identity. In contrast, when people who are relatively low status perceived their current status permeable, they felt low pre-merger identity and likely to use individual behavior strategy and more use collective cognition strategy.
김금미 (2001). 집단의 사회정체성과 지위에 따른 내집단 편애: 성별집단과 최소집단에서. 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.
김원형 (1994). 조직동일화 모형: 선행변인, 조직몰입, 조직내재화, 이직의도의 관계. 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.
박군석 (2002). 사회구조 요인과 사회정체성에 따른 상대박탈 경험 및 집합행동: 영호남인의 지역간 갈등을 중심으로. 성균관대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.
한덕웅 (2002). 집단행동이론. 서울: 시그마프레스.
Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 697-729.
Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1996). Intergroup Relations. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brown R. J., & Ross, G. F. (1982). They battle for acceptance: An exploration into the dynamics of intergorop behavior. In H. Tajfel(Ed.) Social identity and intergroup relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buono, A. F., & Bowditch, J. L. & Lewis, J. W (1985). When cultures collide: The anatomy of a merger. Human Relations, 38, 477-500.
Cartwright, S., & Cooper, L. C. (1993). Managing mergers, acquisitions and startegic alliance: Integrating people and culture. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Ellemer, N., Wilke H., & van Knippenberg A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 766-778.
Ellemers, N., van Knippenverg A., & Wilke H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
Ellemers, N., van Knippenverg A., de Vries, N. K., & Wilke H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. European review of social psychology, 18, 497-513.
Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 123-140.
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organization. London: Sage.
Hinkle S., & Brown R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunac. In D. Abrams, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances, 48-70. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams D. (1988). Social identification: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group process. London: Routledge.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams D. (1990). Social motivation, self esteem and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances, 28-47. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L. A., Harnish, R., & Hodge, C. N. (1996). Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 241-254.
Jost, J. T., & Elsbach, K. D. (2001). How status and power differences erode personal and social identities at work: A system justification critique of organizational applications of social identity theory. In Hogg, M. A. & Terry, D.(Eds.). Social identity processes in organizational contexts, New York. Psychology press.
Karasawa, M. (1991). Toward and assessment of social identity: The structure of group identification and its effects on ingroup evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 293-307.
Kessler T., & Munnendey A. M. (2002). Sequential or Parallen Processes? A longitudinal field study concerning determinants of identity-management strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 75-88.
Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: A integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-123.
Panchal, S., & Cartwright, S. (2001). Group difference in post-merger stress. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 16(6), 424-433.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
Schmitt, M. T., Ellemers, N., & Bachmann, S. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination in organizations. In Haslam, S. A., Knippenberg, D. V., Platow, M. J., & Ellemers, N. (Eds.). Social identity at work, New York. Psychology press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp.33-47). Monterey, C. A.; Brooks-cole.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worche, l & W. G. Austin, (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp.7-24). Chicago; Nelson-Hall.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 14, 101-118.
Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change. Social Change Information, 14, 101-118.
Tajfel, H. (1978a). Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In H. Tajfel(Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. (pp. 27-66). London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1978b). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel(Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
Terry, D. J. (2003). A social identity perspective on organizational mergers: The role of group status, permeability, and similarity. In Haslam, S. A., Knippenberg, D. V., Platow, M. J., & Ellemers, N.(Eds.). Social identity at work, New York. Psychology press.
Terry, D. J., & O'Brien, A. T. (2001). Status, legitimacy, and ingroup bias in the context of an organizational merger. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 271-289.
Terry, D. J., Callan, V. J. (1998). In-group bias in response to and organizational merger. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 67-81.
Terry, D. J., Callan, V. J., & Callan, V. J. (2001). Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 267-290.
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or the motivational bias is alive and well in attributional theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245-287.