바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.28 No.2

Citation Share

M-FAST(Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test)의 타당화 연구

A Validation Study of M-FAST (Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test)

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2009, v.28 no.2, pp.427-447
김재옥 (경기대학교)
조성희 (백석대학교)
이수정 (경기대학교)
김재옥, 조성희, & 이수정. (2009). M-FAST(Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test)의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(2), 427-447.

초록

본 연구의 목적은 형사사법 현장에서 정신병리의 가장을 탐지하기 위해 고안된 M-FAST(Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test)를 국내에 소개하고, M-FAST의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증을 통해 본 검사도구가 국내 표본을 대상으로 꾀병 탐지에 있어 적합한 지를 알아보는데 있다. 이를 위하여 K대학교에서 교양강좌를 수강하는 대학생(n=92), 그리고 국립 법무병원에서 정신감정으로 인해 입원해 있는 범죄자 집단(n=66)의 M-FAST 실시 자료가 분석에 사용되었다. M-FAST 전체 25문항의 내적 일치도는 신뢰도 계수 .90으로 매우 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 M-FAST의 7요인 구조에 대한 확인적 요인 분석이 실시되었다. 한편, MMPI-2 타당도 척도와의 상관관계 분석을 통하여 준거관련 타당도의 증거 또한 확인하였다. 전체 실험 참자가를 꾀병 집단과 솔직 응답 집단으로 재분류하여 M-FAST의 변별력을 살펴본 결과, M-FAST 총점과 모든 하위 척도에서 꾀병 집단이 솔직 응답 집단보다 유의하게 더 높은 점수를 보인 것으로 나타났다. 한편, ROC 분석 결과 M-FAST의 AUC는 .949로, 표준오차는 .017, p<.001, 95% 신뢰구간은 .9151에서 .982의 범위로 나타나 솔직 응답 집단과 꾀병 집단을 M-FAST가 효과적으로 구분하고 있는 것으로 나타났으며, M-FAST 총점의 변별 기준점이 6점이었을 때 예측 정확률은 최대가 되는 것으로 확인되었다.

keywords
M-FAST, 꾀병, 범죄자, 정신병리, MMPI-2, M-FAST, malingering, feigning, mental illness, validity, M-FAST, malingering, feigning, mental illness, validity

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to introduce the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test(M-FAST) which was developed for detecting malingered mental illness and to test the reliability and validity of M-FAST using Korean population. For this purpose, undergraduate students(n=92) and criminal defendants who were referred to forensic examination(n=66) were included in the study. Reliability analysis of 25 M-FAST items produced an alpha coefficient of .90. Confirmatory factor analysis for testing 7 factor model of M-FAST was also examined. Correlation analysis between M-FAST total score, scale scales and validity scales of MMPI-2 found evidence of construct validity. Total data were reclassified into two sub-groups(honest respondents group and malingered group), and the independent sample t-test was conducted to determine the difference in the M-FAST total score and 7 scale scores between two groups. The results revealed that the honest respondents group showed higher M-FAST total score and scale scores than malingered group. ROC analysis yielded an AUC of .949(SE=.017, p<.001). Finally, the optimum M-FAST total cut-off score was revealed as 6 points(sensitivity=.895, specificity=.915). These results indicates that M-FAST has high reliability and validity in this study using Korean population.

keywords
M-FAST, 꾀병, 범죄자, 정신병리, MMPI-2, M-FAST, malingering, feigning, mental illness, validity, M-FAST, malingering, feigning, mental illness, validity

참고문헌

1.

김중술, 한경희, 임지영, 이정흠, 민병배, 문경주 (2005). 다면적 인성검사 Ⅱ 매뉴얼. 서울: 마음사랑.

2.

문화일보 (2004년 7월 20일). <엽기 연쇄살인마> 병원 정신감정 때 ‘유씨 정상’. <http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=021&aid=0000076152>

3.

조성희, 이수정, 김재옥 (2008). 정신감정 결과 정상으로 판단된 범죄자들과 장애 진단 집단 간의 꾀병관련 특성 비교 연구: MMPI-2 프로파일을 중심으로. 한국 심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(2), 45-58.

4.

최윤정, 조지희, 권정화 (1998). 형사적 정신감정결과와 법원 판결에 관한 고찰. 신경정신의학, 37(5), 903-912.

5.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4rd ed. text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

6.

Archer, R. P., Handel, R. W., Greene, R. L., Baer, R. A., & Elkins, D. E. (2001). An evaluation of the usefulness of the MMPI-2 F(p) scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 282-295.

7.

Bagby, R. M., Rogers, R., Buis, T., Nicholson, R. A., Cameron, S. L., Rector, N. A., Shuller, D. R., & Seeman, M. V. (1997). Detecting feigned depression and schizophrenia on the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 650-664.

8.

Bagby, R. M., Rogers, R., Nicholson, R., Buis, T., Seeman, M. V., & Rector, N. (1997). Does clinical training facilitate feigning schizophrenia on the MMPI-2? Psychological Assessment, 9, 106-112.

9.

Bourg, S., Connor, E., & Landis, E. (1995). The impact of expertise and sufficient information on psychologists' ability to detect malingering. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, pp.505-515

10.

Bury, A. S., & Bagby, R. (2002). The detection of feigned uncoached and coached posttraumatic stress disorder with the MMPI-2 in a sample of workplace accident victims. Psychological Assessment, 14, 472-484.

11.

Butcher, J. N., Arbisi, P. A., Atlis, M. M., & McNulty, J. L. (2003). The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale: Does this measure somatic malingering and feigned emotional distress? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 473-485.

12.

Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory MMPI-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Medical Decision Making, 11, 102-106.

13.

Centor, R. M. (1991). Signal detectability: The use of ROC curves and their analyses. Medical Decision Making, 11, 102-106.

14.

Crawford, E., Greene, R., Dupart, T., Bongar, B., & Childs, H. (2006). MMPI-2 assessment of malingered emotional distress related to a workplace injury: A mixed group validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 217-221.

15.

Guy, L. S., Kwartner, P. P., & Miller, H. (2006). Investing the M-FAST: Psychometric properties and utility to detect diagnostic specific malingering. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24, 687-702.

16.

Guy, L. S., & Miller, H. A. (2004). Screening for Malingered Psychopathology in a Correctional Setting: Utility of the Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test(M-FAST). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 695-716.

17.

Heinze, M. C., & Purisch, A. D. (2001). Beneath the mask: Use of psychological tests to detect and subtype malingering of criminal defendants. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1, 23-52.

18.

Hsiao, J. K., Bartko, J. J., & Potter, W. A. (1989). Diagnosing diagnoses: Receiver operator characteristic methods in psychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 664-667.

19.

Jackson, R. L., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (2005). Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST): Screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 199-210.

20.

Lewis, J. L., Simcox, A. M., & Berry, D. T. R. (2002). Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Psychological Assessment, 14, 170-176.

21.

Melton, G., Petrila, J., Poythress, N., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

22.

Miller, H. A. (2001). M-FAST: Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

23.

Miller, H. A. (2004). Examining the use of the M-FAST with criminal defendants incompetent to stand trial. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(3), 268-280.

24.

Resnick, P. J. (1984). The detection of malingered mental illness. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 21-38.

25.

Rosenfeld, B., Sands, S. A., & Van-Gorp, W. G. (2000). Have we forgotten the base rate problem? Methodological issues in the detection of distortion. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(4), 349-359.

26.

Rogers, R. (1984). Towards an empirical model of malingering and deception. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 93-112.

27.

Rogers, R. (1997). Current status of clinical methods. In Richard Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed. pp.301-327). New York: Guilford.

28.

Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

29.

Rogers, R. & Cavanaugh, J. (1983). “Nothing but the truth”... A reexamination of malingering. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 11(4), 443-459.

30.

Rogers, R., & Cruise, K. R. (1998). Assessment of Malingering with Simulation Designs: Threats to external validity. Law and Human Behavior, 22(3), 273-285.

31.

Rogers, R., Jackson, R. L., Sewell, K. W., & Harrison, K. S. (2004). An examination of the ECST-R as a screen for feigned incompetency to stand trial. Psychological Assessment, 16, 139-145.

32.

Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., Martin, M. A., & Vitacco, M. J. (2003). Detection of feigned mental disorders: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 and malingering. Assessment, 10(2), 160-177.

33.

Smith, G. P. (1997). Assessment of malingering with self-report instruments. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.) (pp. 351-372). New York: Guilford.

34.

Streiner, D. L., & Cairney, J. (2007). What's Under the ROC? An Introduction to Reciever Operating Characteristics Curves. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(2), 121-128.

35.

Veazey, C. H., Wagner, A. L., Hays, J. R., & Miller, H. A. (2005). Validity of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test in psychiatric inpatients. Psychological Reports, 96, 771-774.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책