Meaningful change in memory scores in repeated administration of the Elderly Memory disorder Scale

김호영; 최진영

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

KOREAN
P-ISSN1229-067X
E-ISSN2734-1127
KCI

Home

OA Policy

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.29 No.3

Citation Share

Meaningful change in memory scores in repeated administration of the Elderly Memory disorder Scale

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127

2010, v.29 no.3, pp.441-460

& (2010). Meaningful change in memory scores in repeated administration of the Elderly Memory disorder Scale. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 29(3), 441-460.

copy

Abstract

Memory is a very important cognitive domain in neuropsychological evaluation of aged adults, and longitudinal assessments are often recommended for objective evidence of memory decline. Since memory decline and practice effects are both often observed in test-retest memory evaluation, normative standards to determine meaningful or reliable changes in memory performance are necessary in elderly adults. We explored the factors affecting the test-retest performance of memory tests and established normative rates of change on the Elderly Memory-disorder Scale from baseline to follow-up testing among 111 neurologically normal adults aged 60 and older. The results of stepwise multiple regression analyses revealed that the most powerful predictor of performance change was the initial performance level. Education, age and general intellectual functioning were also significant predictors for some test scores. Generally, a person whose baseline performance was lower improved more on the retest. After controlling for one's initial performance, a person who was better-educated, younger, or more intelligent demonstrated greater improvement in one's performance. Normative retest data are presented for two analytic techniques: the Reliable Change Index adjusted for practice (RCIp) and the Standardized Regression-Based technique (SRB). For long-term memory indices of EMS, we classified improver and decliner by using the 90% prediction intervals of RCIp and SRB. We compared the two techniques in the improved group, the declined group, and the unchanged group, and found that RCIp tended to classify low performers as improvers. These results suggest that the SRB, which factors in performance differences at baseline and demographic variables, is a more useful and unbiased method for detecting changes compared to the RCIp.

keywords: 기억 평가, 연습효과, RCIp, SRB, 예측구간, memory tests, practice effect, SRB, RCIp, prediction interval

Reference

김호영, 석정서, 최진영 (2010). 한국판 치매 평가 검사(K-DRS)를 이용한 노인인지기능 평가에서 변화유의성 탐지: 50세 이상 장노년 검사-재검사 규준 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29권, 495-513

최진영 (1998). 한국판 치매 평가 검사: Korean- Dementia Rating Scale. 서울: 학지사.

최진영 (2007). 노인 기억장애 검사. 서울: 학지사.

통계청 (2007). 2005 인구주택총조사보고서: 표본조사결과, 제10권. 고령자. 대전: 통계청.

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Basso, M. R., Carona, F. D., Lowery, N., & Axelrod, B. N. (2002). Practice effects on the WAIS-III across 3- and 6-month intervals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 57-63.

Beglinger, L. J., Gaydos, B., Tangphao-Daniels, O., Duff, K., Kareken, D. A., Crawford, J., Fastenau, P. S., & Siemers, E. R. (2005). Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 517-529.

Benedict, R. H. B., & Zgaljardic, D. J. (1998). Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternative forms. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 339-352.

10.

Bush, R. M., Chelune, G. J., & Suchy, Y. (2006). Using norms in neuropsychological assessment of the elderly. In D. K. Attix & K. A. Welsh-Bohmer (Eds.), Geriatric neuropsychology: Assessment and intervention pp. 133-157. New York: Guilford Press

11.

Chelune, G. J. (2002). Assessing reliable neuropsychological change. In R. Franklin (Ed.), Prediction in forensic and Neuropsychology: New approaches to psychometrically sound statistical practices, pp. 115-138. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

12.

Chelune, G. J., Naugle, R. I., Luders, H., Sedlak, J., & Awad, I. A. (1993). Individual change after epilepsy surgery: Practice effects and base-rate information. Neuropsychology, 7, 41-52.

13.

Chey, J., Na, D. R., Park, S., Park, E., & Lee, S. (1999). Effects of education in dementia assessment: Evidence from standardizing the Korean-Dementia Rating Scale. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 3, 293-302.

14.

Frerichs, R. J., Tuokko, H. A. (2005). A comparison of methods for measuring cognitive change in older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 321-333.

15.

Lineweaver, T. T. & Chelune, G. J. (2003). Use of the WAIS-III and WMS-III in the context of serial assessments: Interpreting reliable and meaningful change. In D. S. Tulsky, D. H. Saklofske, G. J. Chelune, R. K. Heaton, R. J. Ivnik, R. A. Bornstein, A. Prifitera, & M. F. Ledbetter. (Eds.), Clinical Interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III, pp. 301-335. New York: Academic Press.

16.

Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia Rating Scale (DRS): Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assemssment Resources.

17.

McSweeny, A. J., Naugle, R. I., Chelune, G. J., & Luders, H. (1993). ‘‘T scores for change’’:An illustration of a regression approach to depicting change in clinical neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 7, 300-312.

18.

Ratcliff, G., Dodge, H., Birzescu, M., & Ganguli, M. (2003). Tracking cognitive functioning over ten years of followup of a rural elderly community population. Applied Neuropsychology, 10, 76-88

19.

Temkin, N. R., Heaton, R. K., Grant, I., & Dikmen, S. S. (1999). Detecting significant change in neuropscyhological test performance: A comparison of four models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 357-369.

20.

Winblad, B., Palmer, K., Kivipelto, M., Jelic, V., Fratiglioni, L., Wahlund, L.-O., Nordberg, A., Bäckman, L., Albert, M., Almkvist, O., Arai, H., Basun, H., Blennow, K., de Leon, M., DeCarli, C., Erkinjuntti, T., Giacobini, E., Graff, C., Hardy, J., Jack, C., Jorm, A., Ritchie, K., van Duijn, C., Visser, P., & Petersen, R. C.(2004). Mild cognitive Impairment: beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240-246.

21.

Zehnder, A. E., Bläsi, S., Berres, M., Spiegel, R. & Monsch, A. U.(2007). Lack of Practice Effects on Neuropsychological Tests as Early Cognitive Markers of Alzheimer Disease? American Joural of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementia, 22, 416-426.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.29 No.3

Meaningful change in memory scores in repeated administration of the Elderly Memory disorder Scale

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Psychology: General