바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

ISSN : 1229-067X

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.3

Citation Share

The Effect of the type of median strip on Drivers' subjective sense of speed

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2010, v.29 no.3, pp.489-505



& (2010). The Effect of the type of median strip on Drivers' subjective sense of speed. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 29(3), 489-505.

Abstract

The type of median strip have an influence on drivers' subjective sense of speed. We have tried to figure out whether there is a difference depending on the type of median strip. And There is to have relation between human factors and a difference depending on the type of median strip. The 100 participants who had a driver license attended this study. The test conditions are forms of the concrete and guardrail and pavement markings. We used a simulation program which was developed to describe a real traffic situation. and It had three types of median strip. The participants were asked to push the button when they sense each 60km/h, 80km/h, 100km/h. And lastly, we have conducted a survey about human factors. The condition of physical facilities are faster sense of speed than pavement markings. And then the condition of guardrail are faster sense of speed than a form of concrete. The condition of guardrail had the fastest sense of speed among all condition. And There were significant differences to relation between level of human factors(lack of risk sensitivity, lack of law-abidance) and a difference depending on the type of median strip. We found out that the types of median strip have an influence on drivers' subjective sense of speed by conducting this experiment. Therefore, we conclude that designer should develop the median strip regarding to drivers' subjective sense of speed and the effect of median strip. They could make more effective safety-facilities on the road. We need to consider other factors which affect drivers` subjective sense of speed such as road environment.

keywords
중앙분리대, 주관적 속도감, 지각, 인적특성, 과속, median strip, subjective sense of speed, perception, human factors, speeding

Reference

1.

강재수 (2000). 고속도로 중앙분리대 개선방안 연구. 공학계열 논총, 3, 71-85.

2.

건설교통부 (1998). 도로안전시설 설치 및 관리 지침: 중앙분리대 편.

3.

김종회, 오주석, 이순철 (2006). 운전행동결정요인이 위반행동 및 사고에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19(3), 349- 369.

4.

경찰청 (2005). 교통노면표시 설치·관리 매뉴얼.

5.

공대호, 이준범, 이재식 (2005). 운전중 실내 소음의 유형 및 강도에 따른 주관적 속도감에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 11(2), 31-46.

6.

김현정 (2006). 움직이는 시각대상의 형태적 특징이 속도지각에 미치는 영향. Digital Interaction Design, 5, 115-120.

7.

법제처 (개정 2008. 2. 29). 도로교통법 제1장 제2조(정의).

8.

연합뉴스 (2007). 기능성 중앙분리대, 사고방지 효과 커. 2007, 8, 1에서 인출.

9.

오주석, 신용균, 이순철 (2006). 청소년 운전자의 운전중 음악청취가 운전속도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 12(1), 35- 54.

10.

오주석, 이순철 (2007). 사고 및 음주운전자들의 운전행동결정요인 특성이 위험행동 및 교통사고에 미치는 영향: 경로분석 연구. 대한교통학회지, 25(2), 71-86.

11.

오주석, 박선진, 이순철 (2009). 운전행동결정요인과 직무만족이 택시운전자의 위험운전행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 22(1), 71-86.

12.

이순열, 이순철, 김인석 (2006). 고령운전자 차량 좌회전 상황에서의 위험요인 분석. Journal of the korean data analysis society, 8(1), 375-390.

13.

이순철 (2000). 교통심리학. 서울: 학지사.

14.

이순철, 오주석 (2007). 운전행동결정요인이 위험운전, 주의행동 및 피로대처에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 20(4), 395-414.

15.

이 양 (1986). Muller-Lyer 착시에 있어서 거리-크기수정 모형과 자극관계분석모형. 경상대논문집, 25(2), 97-104.

16.

이재식 (1996). 운전자의 속도통제와 정보처리에서의 인간요인: 운전자의 눈높이와 인지부하의 효과. 한국심리학회지: 실험 및 인지, 8(2), 345-366.

17.

정찬섭, 유명현 (1989). 착시효과를 통해서 본 심상의 표상특성. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 8 (1), 34-43.

18.

한국건설기술연구원 (2001). 개선된 콘크리트 중앙분리대의 시공결과 추적조사 및 최적화 연구(Ⅱ).

19.

Denton, G. G. (1980). The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed. perception, 9(4), 393-402.

20.

Drakopoulos, A., & Vergou, G. (2003). Evaluation of the converging chevron pavement marking pattern at one Wisconsin location. Washington DC: American Automobile Association Foundation for Traffic Safety.

21.

Griffin, L. I., & Reinhardt, R. N. (1995). A Review of Two Innovative Pavement Marking Patterns that have been Developed to Reduce Traffic Speeds and Crashes. Washington DC: American Automobile Association Foundation for Traffic Safety.

22.

Larish, J. F., & Flach, J. M. (1990). Sources of Optical Information Useful for Perception of Speed of Rectilinear Self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 295-302.

23.

Manser, M. P., & Hancock, P. A. (2008). The influence of perceptual speed regulation on speed perception, choice and control: Tunnel wall characteristics and influences. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 69-78.

24.

Nilsson. G. (2004). Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Modal to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety. Lund Institute of Technology and Society, Traffic Engineering.

25.

Pretto, P., & Chatziastros, A. (2006). Changes in optic flow and scene contrast affect the during speed. Driving Simulation Conference 2006, Europe, 1.

26.

Warren, R. (1982). Optical transformations during movement: Review of the optical concomitants of egospeed. (Final technical report for Grant No. AFOSR-81-0108). Colombus: Ohio State University.

27.

Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2003). 공학심리학 [Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 3rd ed.].(곽호완, 김영진, 박창호, 남종호, 이재식 역). 서울: 시그마프레스.(원전은 2000년에 출판)

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

e-Submission OA Policy