바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

Theoretical Basis and Controversial Issues in Evolutionary Psychology

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2010, v.29 no.4, pp.747-766

Abstract

For the past two decades, evolutionary psychology has rapidly developed as a novel theoretical perspective that studies the human mind and behavior, thus gaining much attention from psychologists working worldwide. Unfortunately, Korea has few psychologists specialized in evolutionary psychology, which often results in a number of misunderstandings or prejudices of evolutionary psychology among mainstream psychologists. To overcome this difficulty, I hereby attempt to clarify the theoretical foundations of evolutionary psychology and to redress the common misunderstandings about it. Evolutionary psychology aims to elucidate the adaptive design of the human mind and hence provides the organizing theoretical framework that can be utilized to study any psychological phenomena. I then discuss four common misunderstandings of evolutionary psychology: 1) evolutionary psychology is empirically unfalsifiable, 2) evolutionary psychology is a form of genetic determinism, 3) human behavior stems from learning, rather than from biological evolution, and 4) between-group differences are best explained by culture, rather than biological evolution. I conclude that the evolutionary perspective not only unify scattered findings within a coherent explanation, but also provides a heuristic guide to unknown facts.

keywords
evolutionary psychology, psychological mechanism, natural selection, adaptation, human mind, 진화심리학, 심리 기제, 자연선택, 적응, 마음

Reference

1.

최재천 외 18인 (2009). 21세기 다윈 혁명. 서울: 사이언스북스.

2.

Alcock, J., & Sherman, P. W. (1994). The utility of the proximate-ultimate dichotomy in ethology. Ethology, 96(1), 58-62.

3.

Barrett, H. C. (2008). Evolved cognitive mechanisms and human behavior. In C. Crawford & D. Krebs (Eds.), Foundations of evolutionary psychology (pp.173-189). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

4.

Bobrow, D., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Is male homosexuality maintained via kin selection? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 361-368.

5.

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

6.

Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.

7.

Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological inquiry, 6, 1-30.

8.

Buss, D. M. (2005). The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

9.

Buss, D. M. (2007). Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind (3rd.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

10.

Buss, D. M., & Haselton, M. (2005). The evolution of jealousy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 506-507.

11.

Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary Psychology: Controversies, Questions, Prospects, and Limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110-126.

12.

Cornwell, R. E., Palmer, C., Guinther, P. M., & Davis, H. P. (2005). Introductory psychology texts as a view of sociobiology/evolutionary psychology's role in psychology. Evolutionary psychology, 3, 355-374.

13.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994b). Origins of domain-specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In L. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain-specificity in cognition and culture (pp.85-116). New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2005). Neurocognitive adaptations designed for social exchange. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp.584-627). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

15.

Crawford, C. B., & Anderson, J. L. (1989). Sociobiology: An environmentalist discipline? American Psychologist, 44, 1449-1459.

16.

Crawford, C. B., & Krebs, D. (2008). Foundations of evolutionary psychology. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

17.

Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide, Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

18.

Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species. New York: Literary Classics.

19.

Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.

Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

21.

Domjan, M. (2004). The essentials of learning and conditioning. New York, NY: Wadsworth.

22.

Dunbar, R. I. M. D., & Barrett, L. (2007). Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Ermer, E., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2007) Functional specialization and the adaptationist program. In S. Gangstead & J. Simpson (Eds.), The evolution of mind: Fundamental questions and controversies (pp.153-160). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

24.

Gallistel, C. R. (1995). The replacement of general-purpose learning models with adaptively specialized learning modules. In M. Gazzania (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (pp. 1255-1267). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

25.

Gangestad, S. W. & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89-96.

26.

Gangestad, S. G., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17(2), 75-95.

27.

Gaulin, S. J. C., & McBurney, D. H. (2004). Evolutionary psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

28.

Goodwin, K. M., Jackson, R. E., & Cormack, L. K. (2007). No Lifeguard on Duty: Do Humans Exhibit Aquatic Distance Estimation Adaptations? Paper presented at the 19th Annumal Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, College of William and Mary, Virginia.

29.

Hagen, E. H. (1999). The functions of postpartum depression. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 325-359.

30.

Hagen, E. H. (2005). Controversial issues in evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 145-173). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

31.

Henrich, J., & McElreath, R. (2007). Dual- inheritance theory: the evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), The oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp.555-570). Oxford: Oxford University PRess.

32.

Jackson, R. E., & Cormack, L. K. (2007). Evolved navigation theory and the descent illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 353-362.

33.

Kenrick, D. T., Gutierres, S. E., & Goldberg, L. L. (1989). Influence of popular erotica on judgments of strangers and mates. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 159-167.

34.

Ketelaar, T., & Ellis, B. J. (2000). Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 1-21.

35.

Kurzban, R. (2002). Alas poor evolutionary psychology: Unfairly accused, unjustly condemned. Human Nature Review, 2, 99.109.

36.

Lalumière, M. L.. Chalmers, L., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (1996). A test of the mate deprivation hypothesis of sexual coercion. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 299-318.

37.

Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 445, 727-731.

38.

Mayr, E. (1993). Proximate and ultimate causations. Biology and Philosophy, 8, 93-94.

39.

Mayr, E. (1983). How to carry out the adaptationist program? American Naturalist, 121, 324-334.

40.

Pérusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267-322.

41.

Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton [마음은 어떻게 작동하는가, 2009, 김한영 역, 서울, 소소].

42.

Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.[빈 서판, 2004, 김한영 역, 서울, 사이언스북스].

43.

Profet, M. (1992). Pregnancy sickness as adaptation: a deterrent to maternal ingestion of teratogens. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 327-365). New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

44.

Ridley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue: Human instincts and the evolution of cooperation New York: Penguin.

45.

Ronay, R., & von Hippel, W. (2010). The presence of an attractive woman elevates testosterone and physical risk taking in young men. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 57-64.

46.

Rose, H., & Rose, S. (Eds). (2001). Alas, poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. New York: Harmony books.

47.

Salmon, C., & Shackelford, T. K. (2007). Family relationships: an evolutionary perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

48.

Segerstråle, U. C. O. (2000). Defenders of the truth: The battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond. Oxford: Oxford Universit Press.

49.

Silverman, L., & Choi, J. (2005). Locating places. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp.177-199). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

50.

Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

51.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp.19-136). New York: SUNY press.

52.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp.5-67). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

53.

Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior: Primate models (pp.183-237). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

54.

Vining, D. R., Jr. (1986). Social versus reproductive success: the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 167-216.

55.

Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

56.

Williams, G. C. (1998). The pony fish's glow: And other clues to plan and purpose in nature. New York: Basic books [진화의 미스터리, 2009, 이명희 역, 서울, 사이언스북스].

57.

Wilson, E. 0. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

58.

Wright, R. (1995). The moral animal: Why we are the way we are: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Vintage [도덕적 동물, 2003, 박영준 역, 서울, 사이언스북스].

Korean Journal of Psychology: General