바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

Understanding and Utilizing a Consultation Model for Home-School Collaboration

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2011, v.30 no.2, pp.419-442

Abstract

Consultation is an indirect service delivery model in psychology, education and other mental health fields. While there is a growing interest in consultation and its importance has increasingly been recognized, especially in school psychology, specific consultation models that could potentially be useful for psychologists and related specialists in Korean schools and their applicability have rarely been examined. This article reviews an emerging and promising school-based consultation model, Conjoint Behavioral Consultation (CBC; Sheridan et al., 2008) in which the parent and the teacher (consultees) collaboratively work together as partners with the psychologist (consultant) in order to address the student's needs. Theoretical foundations and recent development of CBC and consultation processes are examined. A schematic conceptual and process model of CBC is presented and major empirical studies on the efficacy of CBC are also reviewed. Finally, major rationales to utilize CBC are presented and practical challenges for its application within school systems in Korea are discussed.

keywords
연합행동자문, 학교자문, 가족-학교 협력, 자문모델, conjoint behavioral consultation, school consultation, home-school collaboration, consultation model

Reference

1.

강진령, 강복란 (2005). 초등학교 상담교사의 교사자문 모형 구안. 상담학 연구, 6, 973-988.

2.

김동일, 이명경 (2008). 학교상담 컨설테이션. 서울: 학지사.

3.

동아일보 (2009, 10, 19). 초중고생 17% 정신건강 정밀검진 필요. http://news.donga.com에서 2011, 2, 1 인출.

4.

신현숙 (2004). 학교장면에서 자문의 모형과 실제. 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 논문집, 391-392.

5.

신현숙, 김인아, 류정희 (2004). 중․고등학교 교사가 지각한 학교상담 실태와 학교심리학 서비스의 필요성. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 1, 53-77.

6.

윤초희 (2009). 학습컨설팅의 모형과 현장 적용 가능성 고찰. 학교심리와 학습컨설팅, 1, 1-18.

7.

이동형 (2009). 학교장면에서 성공적인 개입을 위한 열쇠: 자문을 통한 협력. 학교심리학회 추계 세미나 자료집, 11월 28일. 서울: 이화여대.

8.

진동섭, 김정현, 신철균, 이혜나, 이주희, 민윤경 (2009). 학교컨설팅에 대한 초등 예비교사의 인식 연구. 초등교육연구, 22, 245-269.

9.

Bergan, J. R. (1977). Behavioral consultation. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

10.

Bergan, J. R., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York: Plenum.

11.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp.187-249). London: Jessica Kingsley.

12.

Busse, R. T., Kratochwill, T. R., & Elliott, S. N. (1995). Meta-analysis for single-case outcomes: Applications to research and practice, Journal of School Psychology, 33, 269-285.

13.

Center for Mental Health in School at UCLA. (2008). Youngsters' mental health and psychosocial problems: What are the data? Los Angeles, CA: Author. http://smhp.psych.ucla.edu에서 2011, 2, 2 인출

14.

Christensen, S. L. (1995). Best practices in supporting home-school collaboration. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology III (pp.253-267). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.

15.

Christensen, S. L., & Sheridan, S. M. (2001). School and families: Creating essential connections for learning. New York: Guilford Press.

16.

Clark, D., & Fiedler, C. R. (2003). Building family-school relationships during the assessment and intervention process. In M. J. Breen & C. R. Fiedler (Eds.), Behavioral approach to assessment of youth with emotional/behavioral disorders (pp.561-585). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

17.

Conoley, J. C., & Conoley, C. W. (1992). School consultation: Practice and training (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

18.

Cowen, E., Trost, M. A., Lorion, R. P., Dorr, D., Izzo, L. D., & Isaacson, R. V. (1975). New ways in school mental health: Early detection and prevention of school maladaptation. New York: Human Sciences Press.

19.

D'Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78, 107-126.

20.

Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (1987). Enabling and empowering families: Conceptual and intervention issues. School Psychology Review, 16, 443-456.

21.

Erchul, W. P., & Chewning, T. G. (1990). Behavioral consultation from a request-centered relational communication perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 204-211.

22.

Erchul, W. P., & Martens, B. K. (2010). School consultation: Conceptual and empirical bases of practice (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.

23.

Erchul, W. P., & Sheridan, S. M. (2008). Overview: the state of scientific research in school consultation. In W. P. Erhcul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation (pp.3-12). New York: Taylor & Francis Group/Routledge.

24.

Erchul, W. P., DuPaul, G. J., Bennett, M. S., Grissome, P. F., Jitendra, A. K., Tresco, K. E., et al. (2009). A follow-up study of relational processes and consultation outcomes for students with ADHD. School Psychology Review, 38, 28-37.

25.

Erchul, W. P., Sheridan, S. M., Ryan, D. A., Grissom, P. F., Killough, C. E., & Mettler, D. W. (1999). Patterns of relational communication in conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 121-147.

26.

Fagan, T. K., & Wise, P. S. (2007). School psychology: Past, present, and future (3rd ed.). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

27.

Farrell, P., Jimerson, S., Kalambouka, A., & Benoit, J. (2005). Teachers' perceptions of school psychologists in different countries. School Psychology International, 26, 525-544.

28.

Freer, P., & Watson, T. S. (1999). A comparison of parent and teacher acceptability ratings of behavioral and conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Review, 28, 672-684.

29.

Garbacz, S. A., Woods, K. E., Wanger-Gagne, M. S., Taylor, A. M., Black, K. A., & Sheridan, S. M. (2008). The effectiveness of a partnership-centered approach in conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 312-326.

30.

Grissom, P. F., Erchul, W. P., & Sheridan, S. M. (2003). Relationships among relational communication processes and perceptions of outcomes in conjoint behavioral consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 157-180.

31.

Guli, L. A. (2005). Evidence-based parent consultation with school-related outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 20, 455-472.

32.

Gutkin, T. B., & Conoley, J. C. (1990). Reconceptualizing school psychology from a service delivery perspective: Implications for practice, training, and research. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 203-223.

33.

Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (2009). School-based consultation: The science and practice of indirect service delivery. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp.591-635). New York: Wiley.

34.

Gutkin, T. B., Clark, J. H., & Ajchenbaum, M. (1985). Impact of organizational variables on the delivery of school-based consultation services. School Psychology Review, 14, 230-235.

35.

Hersch, C. (1968). The discontent explosion in mental health. American Psychologist, 23, 497-506.

36.

Hobbs, N. (1963). Strategies for the development of clinical psychology. American Psychological Association Division of Clinical Psychology Newsletter, 16, 3-5.

37.

Hobbs, N. (1966). Helping disturbed children: Psychological and ecological strategies. American Psychologist, 21, 1105-1115.

38.

Jacob-Timm, S., & Hartshorne, T. S. (1998). Ethics and law for school psychologists (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

39.

Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2000). Uncovering critical research agenda for school psychology: Conceptual dimensions and future directions. School Psychology Review, 29, 591-603.

40.

Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 341-389.

41.

Kratochwill, T. R., Elliott, S. N., & Soiber, K. C. (2002). Best practices in school-based problem-solving consultation. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-IV (pp.583-608). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

42.

McWilliam, R. A., Snyder, P., Harbin, G. L., Porter, P., & Munn, D. (2000). Professionals' and families' perceptions of family-centered practices in infant-toddler services. Early Education and Development, 11, 519-538.

43.

Medway, F. J. (1979). How effective is school consultation? A review of recent research. Journal of School Psychology, 17, 275-281.

44.

Medway, F. J., & Updike, J. F. (1985). Mata-analysis of consultation outcome studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 489-504.

45.

Merrell, K. W., Ervin, R. A., & Gimpel, G. A. (2006). School psychology for the 21st century: Foundations and practices. New York: Guilford Press.

46.

Miller, G. A. (1969). Psychology as a means of promoting human welfare. American Psychologist, 24, 1063-1075.

47.

Reinking, R. J., Livesay, G., & Kohl, M. (1978). The effects of consultation style on consultee productivity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 6, 283-290.

48.

Sheridan, S, M., Eagle, J. W., & Doll, B. (2006). An examination of the efficacy of conjoint behavioral consultation with diverse clients. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 396-417.

49.

Sheridan, S. M. (1997). Conceptual and empirical bases of conjoint behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 119-133.

50.

Sheridan, S. M., & Cowan, R. J. (2004). Consultations with school personnel. In R. T. Brown (Ed.), Handbook of pediatric psychology in school settings (pp.599-616). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

51.

Sheridan, S. M., & Steck, M. C. (1995). Acceptability of conjoint behavioral consultations: A national survey of school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 24, 633-647.

52.

Sheridan, S. M., Clarke, B. L., & Burt, J. D. (2008). Conjoint behavioral consultation: What do we know and what do we need to know? In W. P. Erhcul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation (pp. 171-202). New York: Taylor & Francis Group/Routledge.

53.

Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., Cowan, R. J., & Mickelson, W. (2001). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation: Results of a 4-year investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 361-385.

54.

Sheridan, S. M., Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan, J. R. (1996). Conjoint behavioral consultation: A procedural manual. New York: Plenum.

55.

Sheridan, S. M., Warnes, E. D., Cowan, R. J., Schemme, A. V., & Clarke, B. L. (2004). Family-centered positive psychology: Focusing on strengths to build student success. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 7-17.

56.

Sugai, G., Horner, R., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., et al. (2000). Applying positive behavior supports and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 2, 131-143.

57.

Tharp, R. G., & Wetzel, R. J. (1969). Behavior modification in the natural environment. New York: Academic Press.

58.

Wilkinson, L. A. (2006). Conjoint behavioral consultation: An emerging and effective model for developing home-school partnerships. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 2, 224-238.

59.

Witt, J. C. (1990). Collaboration in school-based consultation: Myth in need of data. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1, 367-370.

60.

Zins, J. E., & Erchul, W. P. (2002). Best practices in school consultation. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-IV (pp.625-643). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists

Korean Journal of Psychology: General