바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.31 No.2

Citation Share

정신적 웰빙 척도(MHC-SF)의 한국어판 타당화 연구

Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in South Koreans

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2012, v.31 no.2, pp.369-386
임영진 (대구대학교)
고영건 (고려대학교)
신희천 (아주대학교)
조용래 (한림대학교)
임영진, 고영건, 신희천, & 조용래. (2012). 정신적 웰빙 척도(MHC-SF)의 한국어판 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(2), 369-386.

초록

본 연구에서는 서구에서 개발된 정신적 웰빙 척도(Mental Health Continuum Short Form: MHC-SF; Keyes et al., 2008) 14문항을 번역ㆍ역번역 절차를 통해 한국판을 구성하고, 일반인 1000명(남 495, 여 505)에게 실시하여 한국판 정신적 웰빙 척도(K-MHC-SF)의 요인구조, 신뢰도와 수렴 및 변별타당도를 경험적으로 검증하고자 하였다. K-MHC-SF의 요인구조를 알아보기 위하여, 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 선행 연구와 일치되게, 정서적 웰빙, 사회적 웰빙, 그리고 심리적 웰빙으로 구성된 상관 3요인 모형이 지지되었다. K-MHC-SF의 내적 합치도는 .93으로 양호하였고, 검사ㆍ재검사 신뢰도는 .72로서 기준에 부합하였다. K-MHC-SF 척도와 여러 타당도 지표간의 상관분석을 실시한 결과, 척도의 수렴ㆍ변별 타당도가 확립되었다. 정신적 웰빙의 진단 기준을 적용하여 참가자들을 분류한 결과, 8.1%가 번영 단계, 19.1%가 쇠약 단계, 그리고 나머지 대다수의 참여자들은 양호 단계에 해당하였다. 이에 더해, 정신적 웰빙과 정신장애의 관계를 규명하기 위하여 확인적 요인분석을 수행한 결과, 상관 2요인 모형이 가장 적합한 것으로 밝혀졌다. 결론적으로, 이 결과들은 K-MHC-SF가 정신적 웰빙의 세 차원들을 매우 신뢰롭고 타당하게 측정하는 도구임을 시사한다. 끝으로, 연구의 의의와 제한점 및 추후 연구 과제에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
정신적 웰빙, 정신건강, 정신장애, K-MHC-SF, Mental well-being, mental health, mental illness, K-MHC-SF

Abstract

A continuous assessment and a categorical diagnosis of the presence of mental well-being, characterized as flourishing, and the absence of mental well-being, described as languishing, are applied to a random sample of 1,000 South Korean adults. The aim here is to examine the factorial structure, reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity of a Korean version of the Mental Health Continuum short form (K-MHC-SF). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the 3-factor structure in emotional, social, and psychological well-being. The internal consistency of the overall K-MHC-SF was .93 and its test-retest reliability was .72. The total score on the K-MHC-SF correlated .54 with a measure of psychosocial functioning, showing convergent validity. In addition, criteria for the categorical diagnosis were applied, and findings revealed that 8.1% were flourishing, 72.8% were moderately mentally healthy, and 19.1% were languishing. Another CFA supported the hypothesized two-continua model of mental health and mental illness, showing discriminant validity. The results of the present study suggest that the K-MHC-SF is a psychometrically sound instrument for measuring the three dimensions of mental well-being.

keywords
정신적 웰빙, 정신건강, 정신장애, K-MHC-SF, Mental well-being, mental health, mental illness, K-MHC-SF

참고문헌

1.

임낭연, 이화령, 서은국 (2010). 한국에서의 Diener의 삶의 만족 척도 사용 연구 개관. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29(1), 21-47.

2.

임영진, 고영건, 신희천, 조용래 (2010). 한국인의 정신건강. 2010 한국심리학회 연차학술대회 논문집, 233-257.

3.

신선인 (2001). 한국판 일반정신건강척도(KGHQ)의 개발에 관한 연구Ⅰ: KGHQ-20과 KGHQ-30을 중심으로. 한국사회복지학, 9, 210-235.

4.

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

5.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

6.

Cho, M., Chang, S., Lee, Y., Bae, A., Ahn, J., Son, J., Hong, J., Bae, J., Lee, D., Cho, S., Park, J., Lee, J., Kim, J., Jeon, H., Sohn, J., & Kim, B. (2010). Prevalence of DSM-IV major mental disorders among Korean adults: A 2006 National Epidemiologic Survey (KECA-R). Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 3, 26-30.

7.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

8.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

9.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

10.

Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9(1), 139-145.

11.

Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 617–627.

12.

Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.

13.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207-222.

14.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2003). Complete mental health: An agenda for the 21st century. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived (pp. 293-312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

15.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental health and/or mental illness? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 539-548.

16.

Keyes, C. L. M., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 197-201.

17.

Keyes, C. L. M., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Toward a science of mental health: Positive directions in diagnosis and interventions. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 45-59). New York: Oxford University Press.

18.

Keyes, C. L. M., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum—Short Form (MHC-SF) in Swetsana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15(3), 181–192.

19.

Lamers, S. M. A., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E. T., ten Klooster, P. M., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2010). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum—Short Form (MHC-SF). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 99-110.

20.

Lim, Y-J., Go, Y-G., Shin, H-C., & Cho, Y-R. (in press). Prevalence and correlates of complete mental health in the South Korean adult population. In C. Keyes (Eds.), Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health. New York: Springer.

21.

Meng, X. L., Rosenthal, R, Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 172-175.

22.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). Mplus 2.02 [Computer software]. Los Angeles: Author.

23.

Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

24.

Robitschek, C., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2009). The structure of Keyes' model of mental health and the role of personal growth initiative as a parsimonious predictor. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 321-329.

25.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.

26.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727.

27.

Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180.

28.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.

29.

Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책