바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

한국판 상태자존감척도(K-SSES)의 타당화 연구

A Validation study of the Korean Version of State Self-Esteem Scale

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2015, v.34 no.1, pp.133-158
박홍석 (성신여자대학교 교양학부)
이정미 (용문상담심리대학원대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 한국 성인의 상태자존감 측정을 위한 신뢰롭고 타당한 다차원적인 척도의 제안을 목적으로 세 개의 연구로 진행되었다. 연구 1에서는, Heatherton과 Polivy(1991)의 State self-esteem scale(SSES)을 번안⋅수정한 한국판 상태자존감척도(K-SSES)의 요인구조를 탐색하고 신뢰도 및 타당도를 검증하였으며, 측정모형의 적합도 검증을 통해 요인구조를 확인하였다. 이를 위해 성인 239명(표본 1)을 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하여 3요인을 추출하였으며, 이에 대해 각각 수행자존감, 일반자존감, 사회자존감이라 명명하였다. 또한, 공인타당도 검증결과, Rosenberg 자존감척도(RSES), 자기효능감척도, 심리적 안녕감척도, 신체존중감척도와 같은 자기개념 관련 준거척도들과 모두 양호한 수준의 정적 상관을 나타냈으며, BAI 및 CES-D의 준거척도들과는 양호한 수준의 부적 상관을 나타내었다. 이어, 적합도 검증을 위해 성인 236명(표본 2)을 대상으로 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였으며, 적정수준의 적합도를 나타내어 K-SSES의 3요인 측정모형이 지지되었다. 다음으로, K-SSES가 시간과 상황에 따른 자존감 변화추이를 민감하게 측정하는 상태척도임을 검증하기 위해 연구 2와 연구 3을 통해 각각 두 차례의 준실험연구를 실시하였다. 자존감향상프로그램 실시결과, K-SSES의 총점 및 하위요인점수에서 유의한 자존감 변화가 나타났으므로, K-SSES가 자존감의 상태적 변화에 민감하게 반응하는 척도임이 지지되었다.

keywords
K-SSES, State Self-Esteem Scale, State Self-Esteem, Self-Esteem, Validation, K-SSES, 자존감, 상태자존감, 특질자존감, 타당화 연구

Abstract

The present study proceeded with 3 experiments in order to propose a trustworthy, valid and multi-dimensional criterion for measuring self-esteem. To accomplish such goal, validation of the Korean version of State Self-Esteem Scale (K-SSES), which examines the measurement of short-lived changes in self-esteem was conducted. In study 1, Twenty items originally developed by Heatherton and Polivy (1991) went through a translation and reverse-translation procedure to be adapted prior to data collection and three consecutive studies that support the scales’ validity were presented. Psychometric analyses revealed that the K-SSES has 3 correlated factors: performance, general, and social self-esteem. Statistical analysis revealed that the K-SSES is a reliable and valid measurement for Korean. In study 2 and 3, effects of self-esteem enhancement intervention on K-SSES scores were examined. And it was concluded that the K-SSES is sensitive to these state-like change of self-esteem. Therefore, it was supported that the K-SSES was sensitive enough to measure the change of state self-esteem for Koreans and to distinguish the differences among sub-scales. These results suggest that K-SSES can be used for measuring clinical change in self-esteem and untangling the confounded relation between mood and self-esteem, and so on.

keywords
K-SSES, State Self-Esteem Scale, State Self-Esteem, Self-Esteem, Validation, K-SSES, 자존감, 상태자존감, 특질자존감, 타당화 연구

참고문헌

1.

김명소, 김혜원, 차경호 (2001). 심리적 안녕감의 구성개념 분석: 한국 성인 남녀를 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), 19-39.

2.

김아영 (1997). 학구적 실패에 대한 내성의 관련 변인 연구. 교육심리연구, 11(2), 1-19.

3.

김아영, 차정은 (1996) 자기효능감과 측정. 산업 및 조직심리학회 동계학술발표대회 논문집, 51 -64.

4.

김완석 (2007). 전반적신체존중감척도(KOBES): 개발 및 성차 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 12(2), 231-253.

5.

김정진, 김미옥 (2002). 장애아동 어머니의 정신건강 증진을 위한 집단프로그램의 효과 연구: 자존감의 향상과 우울감의 감소를 중심으로. 한국아동복지학, 14, 7-36.

6.

배병렬 (2005). Lisrel 구조방정식모델: 이해와 활용. 서울: 도서출판 청람.

7.

서수균, 권석만 (2002). 자존감 및 자기애 성향과 공격성의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21(4), 809-827.

8.

이동귀, 양난미, 박현주 (2013). 한국형 자존감 평가영역 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(1), 271-298.

9.

이순묵 (1995). 요인분석: Exploratory factor analysis를 중심으로. 서울: 학지사.

10.

이훈진, 원호택 (1995). 편집증 척도의 신뢰도, 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 14(1), 83-94.

11.

전겸구, 이민규 (1992). 한국판 CES-D 개발 연구Ⅰ. 한국심리학회: 임상, 11(1), 65-76.

12.

전병재 (1974). Self-esteem: A test of its measurability. 연세논총, 11, 109-129.

13.

조맹제, 김계희 (1993). 우울증 장애환자 예비평가에서 CES-D의 진단적 타당성 연구. 신경정신의학, 32(3), 381-399.

14.

차경호, 홍기원, 김명소, 한영석 (2006). 한국 성인의 자존감 구성요인 탐색 및 척도개발. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 25(1), 105-139.

15.

홍기원, 한영석 (2005). 인구학적 변인에 따른 한국 성인들의 자존감 차이. 한국심리학회지 여성, 10(2), 135-156.

16.

홍세희 (2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

17.

홍세희, 노언경, 정 송 (2011). 부정문항이 포함된 검사의 요인구조: 자아존중감 검사의 예. 교육평가연구, 24(3), 713-732.

18.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

19.

Antonucci, T. C., & Jackson, J. S. (1983). Physical health and self-esteem. Family and Community Health, 6, 1-9.

20.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self‐.esteem, Structural Equation Modeling. A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 35-67

21.

Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.

22.

Block, J. H., Gjerde, P. F., & Block, J. H. (1991). Personality antecedents of depressive tendencies in 18-year- olds: A prospective study, Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60, 726-738

23.

Branden, N. (1992). The power of self- esteem, FL: Health Communications.

24.

Branden, N. (1994). The six pillars of self-esteem. NY: Bantam Books.

25.

Brown, J. D., & Marshall, M. A. (2006). The three faces of self-esteem. In M. Kernis(Ed.), Self-esteem: Issues & answers (pp.4-9). NY: Psychology Press.

26.

Chang, A. M., & Mackenzi, A. E. (1998). State self-esteem following stroke, Stroke, 29, 2325- 2328.

27.

Conley, J. J. (1984). The hierarchy of consistency: Are view and model of longitudinal findings on adult individual differences in intelligence, personality, and self opinion. Personality & Individual Differences, 5, 11-26.

28.

Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and social order. NY: Charles Scribner & Sons.

29.

Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. IL: Freeman.

30.

Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of Self-Worth. Psychological Review, 108(3), 593-623.

31.

Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross -cultural correlations of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 653-663

32.

Fleming, J. S., & Courtney, B. E. (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem: II. Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 46, 404-421.

33.

Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., McNamara, C. W., Waschull, S. B., Berry, A. J., Herlocker, C. E., & Abend, T. A. (1999). Individual differences in reactivity to daily events: Examining the roles of stability and level of self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 67, 185-208.

34.

Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/ performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52, 123-142.

35.

Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. NY: Guilford Press.

36.

Heatherton, T. F., & Wyland, C. L. (2003). Assessing self-esteem. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp.219-235). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

37.

Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.

38.

Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 980–988.

39.

Hobza, C. L., Walker, K. E., Yakushko, O., & Peugh, J. L. (2007). What about men? Social comparison and the effects of media images on body and self-esteem. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8(3), 161-172.

40.

Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Komocar, J. (1982). Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 818-825.

41.

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). NY: Holt.

42.

James, W. (1892). Psychology: The briefer course. NY: Henry Holt.

43.

Janis, I. L., & Field, P. B. (1959). Sex differences and factors related to persuasibility. In C. I. Hovland, & I. L. Janis, Personality & Persuasibility (pp.55-68). CT: Yale University Press.

44.

Jordan, C. H., Whitefield, M., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2007). In tuition and the Correspondence between implicit and explicit Self-esteem, Journal of Personality & Social psychology, 93(6), 1067-1079.

45.

Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., & Harlow, T. (1993). There’s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204.

46.

Kwon, S. M., & Oei, T. P. (1992). Differential causal roles of dysfunctional attitudes and automatic thoughts in depression. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 16(3), 309-328.

47.

Neiss, M. B., Sedikides, C., & Stevenson, J. (2002). Self-esteem: A behavioral genetics perspective. European Journal of Personality, 16, 1-17.

48.

Pliner, P., Chaiken, S., & Flett, G. L. (1990). Gender differences in concern with body weight and physical appearance over the life span. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 263-273.

49.

Pyszczynski, T., & Cox, C. (2004). Can we really do without self-esteem: Comment on Crocker and Park (2004). Psychological Bulletin, 130, 425-429.

50.

Radloff, L. S. (1997). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement I, 385-401.

51.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. NJ: Princeton University Press.

52.

Rosenberg, M., Schoenbach, C., Schooler, C., & Rosenberg, F.(1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem; Different concepts, different outcomes, American Socialogical Review, 60(1), 141-156.

53.

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081.

54.

Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102- 111.

55.

Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (1993). The puzzles of self-esteem: A clinical perspective. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Plenum series in social/clinical psychology (pp.241-262). NY: Plenum Press.

56.

Werner, O., & Campbell, D. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters and the problem of decentering. In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of method in cultural anthropology, NY: Columbia University Press.

57.

Wiesenfeld, B. M., Swann Jr, W. B., Brockner, J., & Bartel, C. A. (2007). Is more fairness always preferred? Self-Esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1235-1253.

58.

Wojciszke, B., & Kujalowicz, A. S. (2007). Power influences Self-esteem, Social Cognition, 25(4). 472-494.

한국심리학회지: 일반