ERP correlates of eyewitness memory recognition: Effects of time delay and misinformation

& (2019). ERP correlates of eyewitness memory recognition: Effects of time delay and misinformation. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 38(1), 53-74, https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2019.3.38.1.53

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

Recent event-related potentials (ERP) studies for eyewitness memory recognition have been reported the frontal N400 (FN400), and late positive complex (LPC) old/new differences. This study investigated the effect of time delay and misinformation on FN400 and LPC old/new differences. Especially, we investigated whether the old/new effects were remained after time delay even when similar lure stimuli was presented. Thirty-one participants watched staged-crime video and performed recognition task across two session (1-hour delay, 2-weeks delay). Correct or false information about the video was presented just before the 1st recognition task session. The attenuation of the FN400 occurred in time delay, but the FN400 old/new difference was remained. The LPC old/new difference was not affected by time delay. Although the group with misinformation showed decreased accuracy for witnessed cue, there were no differences in FN400 and LPC. These results indicate that there is a difference of the familiarity and the amount of information retrieved from memory between observed stimuli and unobserved stimuli even with a certain time delay. This results suggest some ERP component (especially, LPC) could be useful for eyewitness memory identification.

keywords: event-related potentials, eyewitness memory, FN400, LPC, time delay, misinformation, 사건관련전위, 목격자 기억, FN400, LPC, 시간 지연, 오정보

Reference

강기영, 김영윤 (2010). 문장을 이용한 P300-기반 유죄지식검사. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(4), 19-41.

김기평, 정호진, 함근수 (2019). 딥러닝 알고리즘을 이용한 뇌파-기반 목격 여부 분류 시스템의 성능 비교. 과학수사학회지, 13(1), 인쇄중.

김미영, 김시업 (2016). SAI(Self-Administered Interview)가 사건회상 정확성에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 30(3), 63-75.

엄진섭, 전하정, 손진훈 (2018). P300 숨긴 정보검사의 오류 긍정률. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 30(3), 241-259.

엄진섭, 한유화, 박광배, 손진훈 (2008). P300숨긴정보검사의 민감도: 목표자극을 이용하는 측정 패러다임과 두 자극에 대한 범주판단 및 재인검사를 이용하는 측정패러다임의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 27(3), 653-673.

유상우, 김영신, 노주선, 오강섭, 김찬형, 남궁기, ...., 김세주 (2006). 한국판 Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 타당도 연구. 대한불안의학회지, 2(1), 50-55.

이민희, 전하정, 손진훈, 엄진섭 (2018). 뇌 파동과 사건관련전위를 이용한 허위기억손상의 탐지. 대한인간공학회지, 37(2), 205-217.

함근수, 김기평, 정호진 (2018) 유형이 다른기억 단서에 대한 사건관련전위의 차이:FN400과 LPC. 한국수사심리학회지, 4(1), 1-12.

함근수, 김기평, 정호진, 유성호 (2018). 뇌파를이용한 목격자 기억의 평가: 기계학습의 적용. 대한법의학회지, 42(2), 62-70.

10.

홍현기, 김희송, 지형기, 김기평 (2015). 사건관련전위(ERP)를 이용한 CIT 검사 시 관련자극과 무관련 자극 간의 P3 진폭의 차이연구. 스트레스硏究, 23(2), 101-107.

11.

Addante, R. J., Ranganath, C., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2012). Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection. Neuroimage, 62, 439-450.

12.

Allan, K., & Rugg, M. D. (1997). An eventrelated potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition. Neuropsychologia, 35(4), 387-397.

13.

Anderson, M. C., & Hanslmayr, S. (2014). Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(6), 279-292.

14.

Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. WH Freeman.

15.

Boldini, A., Beato, M. S., & Cadavid, S. (2013). Modality-match effect in false recognition: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 24, 108-113.

16.

Curran, T., & Cleary, A. M. (2003). Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(2), 191-205.

17.

Curran, T., & Friedman, W. J. (2004). ERP old/new effects at different retention intervals in recency discrimination tasks. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(2), 107-120.

18.

Curran, T., & Hancock, J. (2007). The FN400indexes familiarity-based recognition of faces. Neuroimage, 36(2), 464-471.

19.

Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Swire, B., & Chang, D. (2011). Correcting false information in memory: Manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 18(3), 570-578.

20.

Finnigan, S., Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., & Geffen, G. (2002). ERP ‘old/new’ effects:Memory strength and decisional factor (s). Neuropsychologia, 40(13), 2288-2304.

21.

Forgas, J. P., & Koch, A. S. (2013). Mood effects on cognition. In Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 231-251).

22.

Friedman, D., 2004. ERP studies of recognition memory: differential effects of familiarity, recollection and episodicpriming. Cognitive. Sciences, 1(1), 81-121.

23.

Friedman, D., de Chastelaine, M., Nessler, D., & Malcolm, B. (2010). Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: An ERP perspective. Brain Research, 1310, 124-141.

24.

Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1991). Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 19(6), 617-623.

25.

Griffin, M., DeWolf, M., Keinath, A., Liu, X., & Reder, L. (2013). Identical versus conceptual repetition FN400 and parietal old/new ERP components occur during encoding and predict subsequent memory. Brain research, 1512, 68-77.

26.

Hallett, M. (1994). Movement-related cortical potentials. Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, 34(1), 5-13.

27.

Herzmann, G., Jin, M., Cordes, D., & Curran, T. (2012). A within-subject ERP and fMRI investigation of orientation-specific recognition memory for pictures. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(3-4), 174-192.

28.

Hoppstädter, M., Baeuchl, C., Diener, C., Flor, H., & Meyer, P. (2015). Simultaneous EEG-fMRI reveals brain networks underlying recognition memory ERP old/new effects. Neuroimage, 116, 112-122.

29.

Kiat, J. E., & Belli, R. F. (2017). An exploratory high-density EEG investigation of the misinformation effect: Attentional and recollective differences between true and false perceptual memories. Neurobiology of learning and memory, 141, 199-208.

30.

Lefebvre, C. D., Marchand, Y., Smith, S. M., & Connolly, J. F. (2007). Determining eyewitness identification accuracy using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Psychophysiology, 44(6), 894-904.

31.

Meek, S. W., Phillips, M. C., Boswell, C. P., & Vendemia, J. M. (2013). Deception and the misinformation effect: An event-related potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(1), 81-87.

32.

Meng, X., Zhang, L., Liu, W., Ding, X., Li, H., Yang, J., & Yuan, J. (2017). The impact of emotion intensity on recognition memory:valence polarity matters. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 116, 16-25.

33.

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113.

34.

Olichney, J. M., Van Petten, C., Paller, K. A., Salmon, D. P., Iragui, V. J., & Kutas, M. (2000). Word repetition in amnesia:Electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory. Brain, 123(9), 1948-1963.

35.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Hu, X., Labkovsky, E., Meixner, J., & Winograd, M. R. (2013). Review of recent studies and issues regarding the P300-based complex trial protocol for detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 90(2), 118-134.

36.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., & Ryan, A. (2004). Simple, effective countermeasures to P300‐based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41(2), 205-219.

37.

Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11(6), 251-257.

38.

Schacter, D. L., & Loftus, E. F. (2013). Memory and law: What can cognitive neuroscience contribute? Nature Neuroscience, 16(2), 119-123.

39.

Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23(6), 695-703.

40.

Strozak, P., Bird, C. W., Corby, K., Frishkoff, G., & Curran, T. (2016). FN400 and LPC memory effects for concrete and abstract words. Psychophysiology, 53(11), 1669-1678.

41.

Tanner, D., Morgan-Short, K., & Luck, S. J. (2015). How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. Psychophysiology, 52(8), 997-1009.

42.

Trott, C. T., Friedman, D., Ritter, W., Fabiani, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1999). Episodic priming and memory for temporal source:Event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. Psychology and Aging, 14(3), 390.

43.

Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(2), 45-75.

44.

Wolk, D. A., Schacter, D. L., Lygizos, M., Sen, N. M., Holcomb, P. J., Daffner, K. R., & Budson, A. E. (2006). ERP correlates of recognition memory: Effects of retention interval and false alarms. Brain Research, 1096(1), 148-162.

45.

Wolk, D. A., Sen, N. M., Chong, H., Riis, J. L., McGinnis, S. M., Holcomb, P. J., & Daffner, K. R. (2009). ERP correlates of item recognition memory: Effects of age and performance. Brain Research, 1250, 218-231.

46.

Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory:Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.38 No.1

ERP correlates of eyewitness memory recognition: Effects of time delay and misinformation

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Psychology: General