바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.38 No.4

Citation Share

대한민국 행복 지도: 소셜미디어를 활용한 대한민국 지역별 행복 비교

Happiness Map of Korea: Regional Difference in Happiness in Korea Using Social Media

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2019, v.38 no.4, pp.647-667
https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2019.12.38.4.647
최은수 (고려대학교)
최인철 (서울대학교)
최종안 (강원대학교)
최은수, 최인철, & 최종안. (2019). 대한민국 행복 지도: 소셜미디어를 활용한 대한민국 지역별 행복 비교. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 38(4), 647-667, https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2019.12.38.4.647

초록

최근 행복에 대한 관심이 증가하는 가운데 개인의 행복을 예측하는 다양한 심리적인 변인들에 대한연구가 많이 이루어졌다. 그러나 아직까지 국내에서는 거시적 수준에서의 환경적인 요인들을 고려한 행복 연구가 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는 개인의 행복 수준을 예측하는 거시적인 요인으로 지역을 살펴보았고, 대한민국에 거주하고 있는 사람들의 주관적 안녕감이 17개 권역에 따라 어떻게 다른 지를 조사하였다. 이를 위해 소셜미디어에서 수집한 데이터를 활용하여 총 1,039,426명의 2,261,667건수의 응답을 분석하였다. 본 연구는 대규모 데이터를 활용함으로써 제한된 표본을 가진 기존 연구의 한계를 극복하였으며 기존 연구에서 사용한 측정치를 보완한 종합적인 행복 측정치인 안녕지수를 활용하였다. 다층적인 구조를 가지고 있는 자료의 특성을 고려하여 저자들은 위계적 선형 모형(hierarchical linear modeling)을 이용하였으며, 분석 결과 응답자들의 행복은 17개 권역에 따라 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
대한민국, 지역, 행복, 소셜미디어

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increase in happiness research, many of which focused on the psychological variables that are associated with happiness. However, there is a dearth of research conducted in Korea that focused on ecological factors to explain happiness. In light of this background, the present study considered region as an important factor that predicts individual differences in happiness and investigated the level of happiness in 17 regions in Korea. We used the data collected by social media from 1,039,426 respondents, which amounted to 2,261,667 responses in total. The large size of the present data allowed us to overcome the limitation of previous studies. Moreover, the "Annyeong Index" used in the current data encompassed multiple aspects of happiness that complement the happiness measure used in previous studies. Considering the multi-level structure of the data, we used hierarchical linear modeling and found that the level of happiness differed by 17 regions in Korea.

keywords
Korea, region, happiness, social media
투고일Submission Date
2019-07-15
수정일Revised Date
2019-10-07
게재확정일Accepted Date
2019-11-19

참고문헌

1.

한민, 최인철, 김범준, 이훈진, 김진형 (2012). 한국인의 마음지도 Ⅰ: 한국 대학생의 정서, 사고방식, 가치관. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(2), 435-464.

2.

허청라, 구재선, 서은국 (2014). 기본적 욕구충족 이후의 행복: 사회적 욕구의 중요성. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 28(2), 59-78.

3.

Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. D. (2006). The subjective well-being of the homeless, and lessons for happiness. Social Indicators Research, 76(2), 185-205.

4.

Choi, E., Kim, Y. Y., & Uchida, Y. (2016). The folk psychology of happiness in Korea. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 22(2), 165-182.

5.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P.,West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

6.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1-11.

7.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.

8.

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43.

9.

Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Subjective emotional well-being. Handbook of Emotions, 2, 325-337.

10.

Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 434-450). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

11.

Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener, C. (2009). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. In Culture and well-being (pp. 43-70). Springer, Dordrecht.

12.

Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne, 58(2), 87-104.

13.

Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., & Arora, R. (2009). Income’s association with judgments of life versus feelings. In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, & J. F. Helliwell (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 3-15). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

14.

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being:Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403-425.

15.

Diener, E., Seligman, M. E., Choi, H., & Oishi, S. (2018). Happiest people revisited. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 176-184.

16.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.

17.

Harrington, J. R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2014). Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(22), 7990-7995.

18.

Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2014). Social capital and well-being in times of crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(1), 145-162.

19.

Helliwell, J., Huang, H., Wang, S., & Shiplett, H. (2018). International migration and world happiness. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2018(p33-44). New York: United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

20.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

21.

Jokela, M., Bleidorn, W., Lamb, M. E., Gosling, S. D., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2015). Geographically varying associations between personality and life satisfaction in the London metropolitan area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(3), 725-730.

22.

Lawless, N. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2011). Predictors of regional well-being: A county level analysis. Social Indicators Research, 101(3), 341-357.

23.

MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992-1000.

24.

Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. C. (2013). Concepts of happiness across time and cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(5), 559-577.

25.

Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095-1100.

26.

Ostroot, N. M., & Snyder, W. W. (1985). Measuring cultural bias in a cross-national study. Social Indicators Research, 17(3), 243-251.

27.

Ouweneel, P., & Veenhoven, R. (1991). Cross national differences in happiness: Cultural bias or societal quality? In N. Bleichrodt & P. J. Drenth (Eds.), Contemporary issues in crosscultural psychology(pp 168-184). Amsterdam:Swets & Zeitlinger.

28.

Plaut, V. C., Markus, H. R., & Lachman, M. E. (2002). Place matters: Consensual features and regional variation in American well-being and self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 160-184.

29.

Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W. J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2009). MLwiN Version 2.1. Bristol, England: Centre for multilevel modelling, University of Bristol.

30.

Rentfrow, P. J. (2019). Geographical psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.09.009

31.

Rentfrow, P. J., & Jokela, M. (2016). Geographical psychology: The spatial organization of psychological phenomena. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 393-398.

32.

Rentfrow, P. J., Mellander, C., & Florida, R. (2009). Happy states of America: A state-level analysis of psychological, economic, and social well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1073-1082.

33.

Seresinhe, C. I., Preis, T., MacKerron, G., & Moat, H. S. (2019). Happiness is greater in more scenic locations. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 4498.

34.

Stanca, L. (2010). The geography of economics and happiness: Spatial patterns in the effects of economic conditions on well-being. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 115-133.

35.

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox (No. w14282). National Bureau of Economic Research.

36.

Tay, L., Herian, M. N., & Diener, E. (2014). Detrimental effects of corruption and subjective well-being: Whether, how, and when. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 751-759.

37.

Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(2), 279-292.

38.

Veenhoven, R. (2012). Cross-national differences in happiness: Cultural measurement bias or effect of culture?. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(4), 333-353.

39.

Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

40.

Wierzbicka, A. (2004). ‘Happiness’ in cross-linguistic & cross-cultural perspective. Daedalus, 133(2), 34-43.

41.

Yamawaki, N. (2012). Within-culture variations of collectivism in Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(8), 1191-1204.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책