바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Managerial explanation and fairness in organizational change implementation: Investigating moderators of the explanation effect

Abstract

The present research aimed to investigate the effect of managerial explanation on fairness perception and its boundary conditions. The author defined the explanation effect as the influences of managerial explanations (reframe, mitigation, and inspiration) on fairness and examined both the direct effect and the moderating variables such as subjective uncertainty, social inclusion, and sensitivity to fairness. A survey of employees was conducted (N=483) to test those effects in organizational change implementation. The results of hierarchical regression analysis are summarized as follows. First, providing reframe and inspiration explanation significantly increased change fairness perception, but mitigation decreased. Second, the effect of explanation significantly differed across some conditions, such that (a) providing reframe was more influential to fairness perceptions of those who felt more uncertain, (b) providing mitigation was more influential to fairness perceptions of those who were less sensitive to fairness, and (c) providing inspiration was more influential to fairness perceptions of those who perceived more included. Further, the authors integrated the present findings, discussed the theoretical implications and limitations, and suggested for future research.

keywords
organizational fairness, explanation, uncertainty, social inclusion, sensitivity to fairness, 조직 공정성, 설명, 사회적 소속감, 불확실성, 공정 민감성

Reference

1.

Adams,J.S., (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic

2.

Aiken, L. S., (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Sage

3.

Bell, B. S., (2004) Justice expectations and applicant perceptions, International Journal of Selection and Assessment

4.

Bell, B. S., (2006) Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system, Journal of Applied Psychology

5.

Bies, R. J, (1986) Identifying principles of interactional justice: The case of corporate recruiting, In R. J. Bies (Chair), Moving beyond equity theory: New directions in research on justice in organizations, Symposium conducted at the meeting of Academy of Management, Chicago.

6.

Bies,R.J, (1987) The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press.

7.

Bies, R. J., (1987) Interactional fairness judgments:The influence of causal accounts.Social Justice, Social Justice Research

8.

Bies, R. J., (1988) Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgment, Academy of Management Journal

9.

Bobocel, D. R., (2005) How can be explanations be used to foster organizational justice? In Handbook of organizational justice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

10.

Brockner, J., (2005) The influence of interdependent self-construal on procedural fairness effects, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

11.

Brockner, J., (1990) When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanations of a layoff and survivors' reactions to the layoff, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

12.

Brockner, J., (1994) The interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on the victims and survivors of job loss, Academy of Management Journal

13.

최대정 ; 박동건, (2006) The dimensionality and consequences of organizational Justice: A Meta-analytic review of Korean studies, Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology

14.

Cobb, A. T., (1998) The role social accounts can play in a “justice intervention, Research in organizational change and development

15.

Cohen-Charash, Y., (2001) The role of justice in organizations: A meta- analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

16.

Collie, T., (2002) Fair process revisited: Differential effects of interactional and procedural justice in the presence of social information, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

17.

Colquitt, J. A, (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure, Journal of Applied Psychology

18.

Colquitt, J. A., (2002) Explaining injustice: The interactive effect of explanation and outcome on fairness perceptions and task motivation, Journal of Management

19.

Colquitt, J, (2003) Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science (2nd ed.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

20.

Colquitt, J. A., (2005) How should organizational justice be measured? In Handbook of Organizational Justice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

21.

Colquitt, J. A., (2001) Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research, Journal of Applied Psychology

22.

Colquitt, J. A., (2005) Organizational justice: Where do we stand? In Handbook of Organizational Justice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

23.

Colquitt, J. A., (2005) What is organizational justice? A historical review. In Handbook of Organizational Justice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

24.

Colquitt, J. A., (2006) Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to drive moderators of justice effects, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

25.

Cropanzano, R., (2001) Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice, Journal of Vocational Behavior

26.

Cropanzano, R., (2003) Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness, Journal of Organizational Behavior

27.

Cropanzano, R., (2000) Doing justice to workplace emotions. In Emotions at workplace, Westport, CT: Quorum Books

28.

Daly, J. P, (1995) Explaining changes to employees: The influence of justifications and change outcomes on employees' fairness judgment, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

29.

Daly, J. P., (1994) The role of fairness in implementing large-scale change: Employee evaluations of process and outcome in seven facility relocations, Journal of Organizational Behavior

30.

Davidson, M., (1998) When excuses don's work: The persistent effect among Black managers, Administrative Science Quarterly

31.

De Cremer, D., (2005) Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

32.

Festinger, L, (1954) A theory of social comparison processes, Human Relations

33.

Folger, R., (2001) Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In Advances in Organizational Justice, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Press

34.

Folger, R., (2001) Fairness as a dependent variable: Why though times can lead to bad management. In Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

35.

Furst, S. A, (2004) An expectancy-based model of managerial influence tactics and employee commitment to organizational change.Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,

36.

George, J. M., (2001) When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach, Journal of Applied Psychology

37.

Gibbons, F. X., (1999) Individual differences in social comparison: Development. of a scale of social comparison orientation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

38.

Gillespie, J. Z., (2005) Are the goals of organizational justice self- interested? In Handbook of Organizational Justice (, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

39.

Gilliland, S. W, (1994) Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reaction to a selection system, Journal of Applied Psychology

40.

Gilliland, S. W., (1996) Procedural and distributive justice in the editorial review process, Personnel Psychology

41.

Gilliland, S.W., (2001) Improving applicants' reactions to rejection letters: An application of fairness theory, Personnel Psychology

42.

Goldman, B. M., (2002) A social information processing view of organizational justice. In Emerging Perspectives on Managing Organizational Justice, Greenwich: Information-Age.

43.

Greenberg, J, (1990) Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, Journal of Management

44.

Greenberg, J, (1993) The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

45.

Greenberg, J, (1994) Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban, Journal of Applied Psychology

46.

Hagedoorn, M., (1998) Opening the black box between justice and reactions to unfavorable outcomes in workplace, Social Justice Research

47.

Hogg, M. A, (2000) Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes, European Review of Social Psychology

48.

Hogg,M.A., (2005) Uncertainty, social identity and ideology, Advances in group processes

49.

Hogg, M. A., (1993) Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. In Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf

50.

Hogg,M.A.,& Mullin,B.A, (1999) Joining groups to reduce uncertainty:Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification.In D.Abrams & M.A.Hogg(Eds),Social Identity and Social Cognition(pp.249-279), Blackwell.

51.

Huseman, R. C., (1987) A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct, Academy of Management Review

52.

Joy, V. L., (1992) Delay of gratification as a moderator of the procedural justice-distributive justice relationship, Group and Organization Management

53.

Kernan, M.C., (2002) Survivor reactions to reorganization: Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal and informational justice, Journal of Applied Psychology

54.

King, W. C., Jr, (1994) The measurement of equity sensitivity, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

55.

Kirkman, B. L., (1996) Employee concerns regarding self-managing work teams: a multidimensional perspective, Social Justice Research

56.

Kramer, R. M, (1996) Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: Trust and the intuitive auditor at work. In Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, Sage

57.

Larsen,R.J., (2000) Toward a science of mood regulation, Psychological Inquiry

58.

Lazarus, R. S, (1991) Emotion and Adaptation, Oxford University Press

59.

Leventhal, G. S, (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, Plenum.

60.

Lewicki, R.J., (2005) What is the role of trust in organizational justice? In Handbook of Organizational Justice, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

61.

Liao, H., (2005) The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level framework, Journal of Applied Psychology

62.

Lind, E. A, (2001) Thinking critically about justice judgments, Journal of Vocational Behavior

63.

Lind,E.A., (2001) Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgment as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In Advances in Organizational Justice, Stanford University Press.

64.

Lind, E. A., (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice, Plenum.

65.

Lind, E. A., (2002) When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press

66.

Mayer, R. C., (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review

67.

Novelli, L., (1995) Effective implementation of organizational change: An organizational justice perspective, Trends in Organizational Behavior

68.

O'Neil, B. S., (1998) Investigating equity sensitivity as a moderator of relations between self-efficacy and workplace attitudes, Journal of Applied Psychology

69.

Reid, S. A., (2005) Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and social identification, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

70.

Rousseau D, (1999) What’s a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in organizational change, Journal of Applied Psychology

71.

Rupp, D. E., (2003) Justice orientation and its measurement: Extending the deontological model, Paper presented at the 18th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

72.

Salancik, G. R., (1978) A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design, Administrative Science Quarterly

73.

Schlenker, B. R, (1980) mpression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations, Brooks/Cole

74.

Schmitt, M, (1996) Individual difference in sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI), Personality and Individual Differences

75.

Schmitt,M.,& D?fel,M, (1999) Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic wellbeing, European Journal of Social Psychology

76.

Schmitt, M., (2005) Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space, European Journal of Psychological Assessment

77.

Shapiro, D. L., (1999) Employees’ reaction to the change to work teams: The influence of ‘anticipatory’ injustice, Journal of Organizational Change Management

78.

Shapiro, D. L., (2001) Anticipatory injustice: The consequences of expecting injustice in the workplace. In Advances in organizational justice, Stanford University Press

79.

Shaw, J. C., (2003) To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic re-view of the effects of explanations, Journal of Applied Psychology

80.

Sitkin, S. B., (1993) Social accounts in conflict situations: Using explanations to manage conflict, Human Relations

81.

Skarlicki, D. P., (1999) Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation, Academy of Management Journal

82.

Tajfel,H., (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks Cole

83.

Taylor, S. E., (1995) Social comparison and self-regulation. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.) Handbook of motivation and cognition, Guilford Press.

84.

Thibaut. J., (1975) Procedural justice: A psychological analysis, Erlbaum.

85.

Turner,J.C, (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, Basil Blackwell

86.

Tyler, T. R., (2002) The influence of status judgments in hierarchical groups: Comparing autonomous and comparative judgments about status, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

87.

Tyler,T.R.,& Lind,E.A, (1992) A relational model of authority in groups.In M.P.Zanna(Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol.25,pp.115-191), San Diego

88.

Tyler, T. R., (1996) Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychology dynamics of the group-value model, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

89.

Van den Bos, K, (2001) Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

90.

Van den Bos, K, (2002) ssimilation and contrast in organizational justice: The role of primed mindsets in the psychology of the fair process effect, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

91.

Van den Bos,K.,& Lind,E.A, (2002) Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

92.

Van den Bos, K., (2005) Prior experiences as temporal frames of reference: The influence of previous fairness experiences on reactions to new and old supervisors, Research

93.

Van den Bos, K., (2003) Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity, Social Justice Research

94.

Van den Bos, K, (2000) Toward understanding of why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

95.

Van den Bos, K., (1998) Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect:Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments.Journal of Personality and Social, Psychology

96.

an Prooijen, J.-W., (2002) Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

97.

Van Prooijen, J.-W., (2004) The role of standing in the psychology of procedural justice: Towards theoretical integration, European Review of Social Psychology

98.

Van Prooijen, J.-W., (2004) Group belongingness and procedural justice: Social inclusion and exclusion by peers affects the psychology of voice, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

99.

Van Prooijen, J.-W., (2005) Procedural justice and intragroup status: Knowing where we stand in a group enhances reactions to procedural justice, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

100.

Weick, K. E, (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, Sage Publications

101.

Weiss, H. M, (1996) Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experience at work, Research in organizational behavior

102.

Weiss, H. M., (1999) Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions, Journal of Applied Psychology

103.

Whetten, D. A, (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution, Academy of Management Review

104.

Witt, L. A., (2001) The interactive effects of procedural justice and exchange ideology on supervisor-rated commitment, Journal of Organizational Behavior

105.

Yukl, G., (2002) Preliminary validation research on the extended version of the Influence Behavior Questionnaire, Presented at annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

logo