바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

지구적 금융위기 일상화에 대응하는 토지주택은행 : 미국 사례를 중심으로

Land and Housing Bank to Cope with New Normal of Global Financial Crisis: Focusing on US Cases

공간과 사회 / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2017, v.27 no.2, pp.12-52
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2017.27.2.12
김용창 (서울대학교)

초록

현대자본주의의 성격에 대해 마르크스주의 연구자들 사이에 많은 논쟁이 있지만 경제의 금융화가 심화되고 있다는 데 많은 연구자들이 주목하고 있다. 경제의금융화와 더불어 금융의 증권화 및 세계화는 금융위기를 지구적 현상으로 만들고 있다. 경제쇠퇴와 금융위기에 따른 주거위기는 개별가구의 생활기반을 파괴할 뿐만 아니라 지역사회의 황폐화를 가속화시킨다. 이러한 위기에 능동적으로 대응하고, 주거자원을 비롯한 도시 기초생활자원의 공유화와 공공적 통제를 높이기 위한 수단이 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 서브프라임 주택금융 위기를 극복하는 데 기여한 미국의 토지은행이 이러한 발전 방향에서 중요한 수단이 될 수 있음을 보여준다. 이론적 검토에서는 현대 자본주의 성격 변화를 금융화의 관점에서 고찰하고, 주거공간의 위기에 미치는 영향을 살펴본다. 그리고 미국 토지은행의 기능적특성, 법제적 진화 과정을 검토한 다음, 취득부동산 특징과 취득 방법, 조세압류채권의 처리 절차, 신속 소유권 확인 소송, 주요 재원조달 수단으로서 조세환수협약 등 미국 토지은행제도의 운영과정상의 특성을 분석한다. 마지막으로 위기관리형 토지주택은행이 공유경제로의 발전에 기여할 수 있음을 제시한다.

keywords
부채자본주의, 부실채권, 금융화, 금융자본주의, 토지은행, 공유경제, debt capitalism, non performing loan, financialization, financial capitalism, land bank, sharing economy

Abstract

There is a lot of controversy among Marxist researchers about the nature of modern capitalism, but many researchers note that financialization of economy is deepening. Along with the financialization of economy, securitization of financing and globalization are making the financial crisis a global phenomenon. The housing crisis not only destroys the base of living of individual households but also accelerates the deterioration of the communities. It is necessary to actively respond to these crises and to increase public control and sharing of urban basic resources of living including housing. This paper shows that the U.S. land bank, which contribute to overcoming of the subprime mortgage crisis, can be an important tool toward sharing economy. Theoretical review consider the changing nature of contemporary capitalism and examine the impact on the housing crisis. And this paper analyzes the characteristics and functions of the U.S. land bank system such as the acquisition of property, tax foreclosure proceedings, expedited quiet title action, tax recapture agreement as a key financial instrument, evolution of legal institutions. Finally, it suggests that the land bank to cope with the financial crisis can contribute to the development of a sharing economy model.

keywords
부채자본주의, 부실채권, 금융화, 금융자본주의, 토지은행, 공유경제, debt capitalism, non performing loan, financialization, financial capitalism, land bank, sharing economy

참고문헌

1.

김영민. 2010. 「주택압류를 줄이기 위한 미국의 주택비용부담 완화 대책」. ≪국제노동브리프≫, 8(10), 59∼64쪽.

2.

김용창. 2017. 「신자유주의 도시 인클로저와 실존의 위기, 거주자원의 공유화」. 「희망의 도시」. 서울연구원 엮음. 한울, 176∼215쪽.

3.

김용창 외. 2014. 「토지은행의 역할 재조명과 기능개선방안 연구용역」. 한국토지주택공사.

4.

김창현. 2014. 「공간생산의 금융화: 금융지리학의 관점에서」. ≪공간과 사회≫, 24(3), 110∼143쪽.

5.

박원석. 2013. 「주거복지 확충을 위한 리츠의 활용 방안」. ≪한국경제지리학회지≫, 16(2), 275∼292쪽.

6.

서순탁 외. 2010. 「토지은행제도 발전방안 연구」. 한국토지주택공사.

7.

이재민·유경원. 2014. 「가계부채가 내수에 미치는 영향」. 국회예산정책처.

8.

이정구. 2007. 「금융 주도의 축적체제론 비판」. ≪진보평론≫, 33, 214∼238쪽.

9.

지주형. 2011. 「신자유주의의 복합질서: 금융화. 계급권력. 사사화」. ≪사회과학연구≫, 19(1), 194∼246쪽.

10.

최승재. 2009. 「미국 서브프라임 모기지 관련 소송의 현황과 전망」. ≪증권법연구≫, 10(2), 403∼443쪽.

11.

伊藤誠. 2009. 「サブプライム金融恐慌の構造と意義」. ≪現代思想≫(다중네트워크 역. 써브프라임 금융공황의 구조와 의의. http://blog.daum.net/chobits1985/40).

12.

Aalbers, M. B. 2008. “The Financialization of Home and the Mortgage Market Crisis.”Competition & Change, 12(2), pp. 148∼162.

13.

Alexander, F. S. and Toering, S. J. 2013. Georgia Land Bank Resource Manual. Center for Community Progress.

14.

Alexander, F. S. 2011. Land Banks and Land Banking. Center for Community Progress.

15.

Alexander, F. S. 2015. Land Banks and Land Banking. 2nd. Center for Community Progress.

16.

Anacker, K. B. 2015. “Analyzing census tract foreclosure risk rates in mature and developing suburbs in the United States.” Urban Geography, 36(8), pp. 1221∼1240.

17.

Ashton, P. 2011. “The financial exception and the reconfiguration of credit risk in US mortgage markets.” Environment and Planning A., 43(8), pp. 1796∼1812.

18.

Brown, E. 2012. “Occupy the Neighborhood: How Counties Can Use Land Banks and Eminent Domain.” http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/occupy.php

19.

Center for Community Progress. 2017. “Frequently Asked Questions on Land Banking. ”http://www.communityprogress.net/land-banking-faq-pages-449.php.

20.

Center for Community Progress. 2017. “National Map of Land Banks & Land Banking Programs.”http://www.communityprogress.net/land-bank-map-pages-447.php

21.

Deutschmann, C. 2011. “Limits to Financialization: Sociological Analyses of the Financial Crisis.” European Journal of Sociology, 52(3), pp. 347∼389.

22.

Dong, H. and Hansz, J. 2016. “The Geography of the Recent Housing Crisis: The Role of Urban Form.” Housing Policy Debate, 26(1), pp. 151∼171.

23.

Dymski, G. 2009. “Racial exclusion and the political economy of the sub-prime crisis.”Historical Materialism, 17(2), pp. 149∼179.

24.

Evans, A. W. 2004. “Land Availability and Land Banking.” in Evans. Alan W. 2004. Economics, Real Estate and the Supply of Land, Chapter 13, Wiley-Blackwell.

25.

Federal Reserve Board. 2012. “The U.S. Housing Market: Current Conditions and Policy Considerations.” http://federalreserve.gov/publications/other-reports/files/housingwhite-paper-20120104.pdf

26.

Feldman, D. W. and Agness, B. 2013. Land Banks in Pennsylvania: A Handbook for Counties and Municipalities. Right-Sized Homes. LLC.

27.

Fields, D. 2014. The Rise of The Corporate Landlord: The Institutionalization of the Single-family Rental Market and Potential Impacts on Renters. Right To The City Alliance.

28.

Fishman, R. P. and Gross, R. D. 1972. “Public Land Banking: a New Praxis for Urban Growth.” Case Western Reserve Law Review, 23, pp. 897∼975.

29.

GAO(Government Accountability Office). 2010. Mortgage Foreclosures: Additional Mortgage Servicer Actions Could Help Reduce the Frequency and Impact of Abandoned Foreclosures. GAO-11-93. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1193.pdf

30.

GAO(Government Accountability Office). 2011. Vacant Properties: Growing Number Increases Communities’ Costs and Challenges. GAO-12-34. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1234.pdf

31.

GCLBA(Genesee County Land Bank Authority). 2010. “NSP Land Banking Toolkit:Overview of Land Bank Decisions and Tools.” U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Neighborhood Stabilization Program, pp. 1∼17.

32.

GCLBA(Genesee County Land Bank Authority). 2014. Celebrating the First Ten Years 2004-2014 Genesee County Land Bank Authority.

33.

Goldstein, J., Jensen, M. and Reiskin, E. 2001. “Urban Vacant Land Redevelopment:Challenges and Progress.” Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper, pp. 1∼32.

34.

Goodman, L. S. 2015. The Rebirth of Securitization: Where is the Private Label Mortgage Market?. Urban Institute.

35.

Gotham, K. F. 2009. “Creating Liquidity out of Spatial Fixity: The Secondary Circuit of Capital and the Subprime Mortgage Crisis.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), pp. 355∼371.

36.

Hockett, R. 2012. “It takes a village: Municipal condemnation proceedings and public/private partnerships for mortgage loan modification. value preservation. and local economic recovery.” Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance, 18, pp. 121∼176.

37.

Hockett, R. 2013. “Paying Paul and Robbing No One: An Eminent Domain Solution for Underwater Mortgage Debt.” Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 19(5), pp. 1∼9.

38.

Houston, C. C. 2013. “Overview of Act 153 of 2012. Land Bank Legislation.” University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics. http://www.iop.pitt.edu/

39.

HUD(Department of Housing and Urban Development). 2008. “Notice of Allocations. Application Procedures. Regulatory Waivers Granted to and Alternative Requirements for Emergency Assistance for Redevelopment of Abandoned and Foreclosed Homes Grantees Under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act. 2008.” Federal Register, 73(194), pp. 58329∼58349.

40.

HUD(Department of Housing and Urban Development). 2010. “HUD Secretary Announces National First Look Program To Help Communities Stabilize Neighborhoods Hard-Hit By Foreclosure.”https://portal.hud.gov/

41.

Jones, M. 2015. “Hedge funds buy swathes of foreclosed subprimes. force up rents. float rent-bonds.” http://boingboing.net/2015/05/23/

42.

Kaplan, D. H. 2008. “Foreclosures. Predatory Lending. and Reverse Redlining.” Urban Geography, 29(8), pp. 762∼766.

43.

Klein, A. 2017. “Understanding the True Costs of Abandoned Properties: How Maintenance Can Make a Difference.” Community Blight Solutions.

44.

Krippner, G. 2005. “The financialization of the American economy.” Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), pp. 173∼208.

45.

Lapavitsas, C. and Powell, J. 2013. “Financialisation varied: a comparative analysis of advanced economies.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(3), pp. 359∼379.

46.

Lapavitsas, C. 2011. “Theorizing financialization.” Work. Employment and Society, 25(4), pp. 611∼626.

47.

Li, Yanmei. 2011. “Geography of Opportunity and Residential Mortgage Foreclosure: A Spatial Analysis of a U.S. Housing Market.” Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 3(2), pp. 195∼214.

48.

Mian, A. and Sufi, A. 2014. House of Debt. University of Chicago Press(박기영 옮김. 2014. 「빚으로 지은 집」. 열린책들).

49.

MLBFTA(Michigan Land Bank Fast Track Authority). 2004. “Frequently Asked Questions for Taxes Collected on Property Owned or Sold by a Land Bank Fast Track Authority.” http://www.michigan.gov/landbank/

50.

MLBFTA(Michigan Land Bank Fast Track Authority). 2009. “Biennial Report: Fiscal Years 2009 and 2010.”http://www.michigan.gov/documents/treasury/

51.

NCST(National Community Stabilization Trust). 2017. “First Look Program.” http://www.stabilizationtrust.org/programs-services/property-acquisition/

52.

NVPC(National Vacant Properties Campaign). 2005. Vacant Properties: The True Costs to Communities. http://www.vacantproperties.org.

53.

Pais, R. 2010. “Addressing Foreclosed and Abandoned Properties.” Bureau of Justice Assistance. https://www.bja.gov/publications/

54.

Paull, E. and Otto, S. 2013. “Investing in the Brownfields Land Bank.” Brownfield Renewal, 17(2), pp. 8∼13.

55.

Pfeiffer, D. and Lucio, J. 2015. “An unexpected geography of opportunity in the wake of the foreclosure crisis: low-income renters in investor-purchased foreclosures in Phoenix. Arizona.” Urban Geography, 36(8), pp. 1197∼1220.

56.

Poupore, J. B. 2013. “Mortgage Takings and Municipal Finance: Solution for Preserving Home Ownership.” Brooklyn Journal of Corporate. Financial & Commercial Law, 8(1), pp. 187∼221.

57.

Razza, C. M. 2014. “Vulture Capital Hits Home: How HUD is Helping Wall Street and Hurting Our Communities.” The Right To The City Alliance & The Center for Popular Democracy, 1∼11.

58.

Sage Computing. Inc. 2009. Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with Land Banks. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Office of Policy Development and Research.

59.

Samsa, M. J. 2008. “Reclaiming Abandoned Properties: Using Public Nuisance Suits and Land Banks to Pursue Economic Redevelopment.” Cleveland State Law Review, 56(1), pp. 189∼232.

60.

Savini, F. and Aalbers, M. B. 2016. “The de-contextualisation of land use planning through financialisation: Urban redevelopment in Milan.” European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4), pp. 878∼894.

61.

Schwarz, L. 2009. “The Neighborhood Stabilization Program: Land Banking and Rental Housing as Opportunities for Innovation.” Journal of Affordable Housing & Community Development Law, 19(1), pp. 51∼79.

62.

Shelton, J. R. 2015. “Constitutional Constraints on Using Eminent Domain to Write-Down Underwater Mortgages.” Cornell Real Estate Review, 13(1), pp. 46∼60.

63.

Silva, D. A. 2011. “Land banking as a Tool for the Economic Redevelopment of Older Industrial Cities.” Drexel Law Review, 3(2), pp. 607∼641.

64.

Smith, M. L. 2014. No Property Left Behind: An Exploration of Abandoned Property Policies. University of Pennsylvania. Masters Thesis.

65.

Teather, D. 2008. “The woman who built financial weapon of mass destruction.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/sep/20/wallstreet.banking

66.

Thompson, S. 2013. “Comment: Eminent Domain for the Seizure of Underwater Mortgages.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat, 47(1), pp. 22∼33.

67.

Thorne, B. 2014. “Ten years of fighting blight: Genesee County Land Bank was the model for the nation.” http://www.mlive.com/news/

68.

Urban Institute. 2017. Housing Finance at a Glance: A Monthly Chartbook.

69.

van der Zwan, N. 2014. “Making sense of financialization.” Socio-Economic Review, 12(1), pp. 99∼129.

70.

Vey, J. S. 2011. Restoring Prosperity: The State Role in Revitalizing America’s Older Industrial Cities. Brookings Institution.

71.

Wade, J. and Rees, A. 2012. “Converting Vacant Lots into Assets: Comparing National Community Garden Programs to Community Garden Projects in Columbus GA.”Community Geography Center.

72.

Wilkinson, L. 2011. Vacant Property: Strategies for Redevelopment in the Contemporary City. Georgia Institute of Technology.

73.

Wyly, E. et al. 2009. “Cartographies of race and class: Mapping the class monopoly rents of American subprime mortgage capital.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), pp. 332∼354.

74.

≪프레시안≫. 2014.12.26. “대침체 무덤 판 미국… 박근혜호 한국도?: [프레시안books] 아티프 미안·아미르 수피 <빚으로 지은 집>.”

공간과 사회