바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

ISSN : 1225-6706

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.29 No.2

Citation Share

Feminist Insurgent City Planning: The Anti-Gentrification Movement Story of Okbaraji Alley

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2019, v.29 no.2, pp.14-62
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2019.29.2.14

(2019). Feminist Insurgent City Planning: The Anti-Gentrification Movement Story of Okbaraji Alley. Space and Environment, 29(2), 14-62, https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2019.29.2.14

Abstract

This ethnographic research paper examines the history of anti-gentrification efforts connected to Okbaraji Alley, an area in front of the Seo-Daemun Prison. Built in the Japanese colonial era, the area evidences a Feminist Insurgent Planning framework. This framework was based on feminist epistemology and it criticized other anti-gentrification movements as male-centric. The author analyzes the following aspects of the Okbaraji anti-gentrification movement: 1) From the speaker to the listener: therapeutic urban planning, 2) Reflection on instrumental rationalism, 3) The demand of the “right to the city”, 4) Reflection on governance and participation, 5) Feministic activism tactics, 6) Making a space of hospitality against cultural imperialism, 7) The revival of urban history. In scholarship on urban resistance movements in South Korea there is a lack of attention to female activism and research. This essay thus reminds of the importance of considering feminist perspectives in this area.

keywords
페미니스트 저항 도시 계획, 페미니스트 도시 계획, 옥바라지 골목, 서대문형무소, 안티 젠트리피케이션 운동, Feminist insurgent planning, Feminist planning, Okbaraji Alley, Seodaemun prison, anti gentrification movement

Reference

1.

강현수. 2010. 『도시에 대한 권리』(책세상문고 우리시대 125). 책세상.

2.

강현수. 2011. ｢‘도시에 대한 권리’ 개념 및 관련 실천 운동의 흐름｣. ≪공간과 사회≫32, 42∼90쪽.

3.

경향신문. 2016. ｢역사단체들, 서울시에 옥바라지 골목 보존 요구｣.

4.

국가지표체계. 2019. 국가지표체계 [WWW Document]. URL http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1239｣(accessed 1.28.19).

5.

김갑성. 2016. 『지자체의 젠트리피케이션 정책 대응』. 도시문제.

6.

김미덕. 2013. ｢인류학 연구 과정에서 발생하는 권력 메커니즘에 대한 논의; 성찰적연구에 대한 검토를 중심으로｣. ≪한국문화인류학≫ 46, 3∼41쪽.

7.

김진아. 2016. ｢정의론의 관점에서 바라본 도시정비사업, 그리고 젠트리피케이션｣. ≪도시문제≫ 51권, 26∼29쪽.

8.

동아일보. 1930. ｢忠南警察部(충남경찰부) 兩人(양인)을 檢擧(검거)｣.

9.

동아일보. 1931. ｢左翼新劇團(좌익신극단) 『靑服劇塲(청복극장)』 五月中公演(오월중공연)｣.

10.

동아일보. 1932. ｢共產靑年會(공산청년회) 四部(사부)를 設定(설정)｣.

11.

동아일보. 1936. ｢間共事件(간공사건)의 李(이), 金兩名出獄(금양명출옥)｣.

12.

瀧口實二. 1930. 최복순 심문 [WWW Document]. URL ht t p: / / d b . h i s t o r y . go . k r / i t e m/ l eve l . do ? s et I d =1 3 5 &i t e mI d=h d&s y nonym=off&chinessChar=on&page=1&pre_page=1&brokerPagingInfo=&position=58&levelId=hd_052r_0020_0010_0100 (accessed 4.30.19).

13.

리슨투더시티 외. 2016. 『아시아로컬리티, 도시재생과 예술』. 리슨투더시티.

14.

매일경제. 2013. ｢서울시 100년 내다보는 도시계획 밑그림 그린다｣.

15.

박완서. 1993. 『그 많던 싱아는 누가 다 먹었을까』. 웅진닷컴.

16.

변창흠. 2011. ｢정비사업에서 세입자 주거권의 성격과 침해 구조에 대한 비판적 고찰｣. ≪공간과 사회≫ 36, 103∼142쪽.

17.

샌드라 하딩. 2009. 『누구의 과학이며 누구의 지식인가?』. 나남.

18.

서순탁. 2016. 『도시재생과 젠트리피케이션』. 한울.

19.

손정목. 2003. 『서울도시계획이야기』. 한울.

20.

연합뉴스. 2013. ｢강제철거 막자’…보상 확정 전 사전협의체 운영해야｣.

21.

永沼直方, 1920. 유명원 심문 [WWW Document]. URL h t t p : / / d b . h i s t o r y . g o . k r / i t e m/ l e v e l . d o ? s e t I d = 1 3 & i t e mI d =h d & s y n onym=off&chinessChar=on&page=1&pre_page=1&brokerPagingInfo=&position=12&levelId=hd_008r_0020_0060 (accessed 4.30.19).

22.

유채림. 2011. ｢두리반을 잊으셨나요?｣. ≪인물과사상≫ 6-10.

23.

유채림. 2012. 『매력만점 철거농성장-유채림 펑크록: 실천과 사람들 1』. 실천문학사.

24.

이계수. 2011. ｢강제퇴거와 재개발; 주거권의 재산권적 재구성: 강제퇴거금지법 제정운동에 붙여｣. ≪민주법학≫ 46, 13∼55쪽.

25.

이나영. 2017. ｢페미니스트 질적 연구의 원리: 입장 인식론과 페미니스트 정치학을중심으로｣. ≪미디어, 젠더 & 문화≫ 32, 71∼99쪽.

26.

이재경·윤택림. 2012. 『여성주의 역사 쓰기: 구술사 연구 방법』. 아르케.

27.

이태우. 2011. ｢하버마스, 이데올로기, 의사소통 [WWW Document]｣. ≪인문과학연구≫. URL http://www.dbpia.co.kr (accessed 4.7.18).

28.

장미경. 1999. [기획시리즈:현대 비판사회이론의 흐름⑥] ｢페미니스트 근대론자들-낸시 프레이저, 아이리스 영, 앤 필립스를 중심으로[WWW Document]｣. ≪경제와사회≫. URL http://www.dbpia.co.kr (accessed 5.28.18).

29.

전상인. 2007. ｢계획이론의 탈근대적 전환에 대한 비판적 성찰｣. ≪국토계획≫ 42, 7∼24쪽.

30.

조명래. 2011. ｢8‧10 성남 대단지 사건의 재해석과 성남 도시정체성의 모색: 도시권리의 관점에서｣. ≪공간과 사회≫ 38, 34∼66쪽.

31.

최병두. 2011. ｢신자유주의의 불균등발전과 국토 및 도시 공간 정책의 변화｣. ≪국토지리학회지≫ 45, 455∼472쪽.

32.

최인기. 2012. 『가난의 시대: 대한민국 도시빈민은 어떻게 살았는가』. 동녘출판사.

33.

최인기. 2013. ｢도시빈민운동의 조직화와 연대｣. ≪역사비평≫ 102호, 91∼106쪽.

34.

최인기. 2014. 『떠나지 못하는 사람들: 무엇이 그들을 도시의 유령으로 만드는가?』. 동녘출판사.

35.

프레이저낸시. 2017. 『전진하는 페미니즘』. 돌베개.

36.

Allmendinger, P. 2017. Planning theory. Palgrave.

37.

Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.

38.

De Souza, M. L. 2006. “Social movements as ‘critical urban planning’agents.” City 10, pp. 327∼342.

39.

Fainstein, S. S. 2010. The just city. Cornell University Press.

40.

Ferguson, K. E. 1984. The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Temple University Press.

41.

Friedmann, J. 1986. “The world city hypothesis.” Development and change 17, pp. 69∼83.

42.

Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton University Press.

43.

Friedmann, J. 1992. Empowerment: the politics of alternative development. Blackwell.

44.

Friedmann, J. 2000. “The good city: In defense of utopian thinking.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24, pp. 460∼472.

45.

Friedmann, J. 2002. The prospect of cities. U of Minnesota Press.

46.

Hackworth, J. 2002. “Postrecession Gentrification in New York City.” Urban Affairs Review 37, 815∼843. https://doi.org/10.1177/107874037006003.

47.

Hackworth, J. & Smith, N. 2001. “The changing state of gentrification.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 92, pp. 464∼477.

48.

Hall, P. 1988. Cities of tomorrow. Blackwell Publishers Oxford.

49.

Hamnett, C. & Williams, P. 1980. “Social change in London: a study of gentrification.”The London Journal 6, pp. 51∼66.

50.

Harding, S. 1992. “After the Neutrality Ideal: Science, Politics, and ‘Strong Objectivity’.”Social Research 59, pp. 567∼587.

51.

Harding, S. 1995. “‘Strong objectivity’: A response to the new objectivity question.” Synthese 104, 331∼349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064504.

52.

Harding, S. 2009. Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.

53.

Harvey, D. 1992. “Social Justice, Postmodernism and the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16, pp. 588∼601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00198.x.

54.

Harvey, D. 2012. Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso Books.

55.

Holston, J. 1998. “Spaces of insurgent citizenship.” Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history 2, pp. 37∼56.

56.

Holston, J. 2008. Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press.

57.

Holston, J. 2009. “Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries.” City & Society 21, pp. 245∼267.

58.

Huxley, M. 2000. “The Limits to Communicative Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19, 369∼377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900406.

59.

Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York.

60.

Jeon. 2016. “Okbaraji Around Seodaemun Prison During the Japanese Colonial Period:About the Historicity of the So-called ‘Okbaraji Alley.’” Korean Journal of Urban History, vol.16, pp. 105∼134.

61.

Kim, S.-J. 2015. ｢옥바라지 아낙들의 기거…’100년 여관 골목’을 보다｣. Ohmynews.

62.

Lefebvre, H. 1974. The Production of Space. Blackwell Publishing.

63.

Lefebvre, H., Kofman, E. & Lebas, E. 1996. Writings on cities. Blackwell Oxford.

64.

McCann, E. J. 1999. “Race, protest, and public space: Contextualizing Lefebvre in the US city.” Antipode 31, pp. 163∼184.

65.

Miraftab, F. 2009. “Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South.” Planning Theory 8, pp. 32∼50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099297.

66.

Miraftab, F. & Wills, S. 2005. “Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 25, pp. 200∼217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05282182.

67.

Roy, A. 2005. “Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning.” Journal of the american planning association 71, pp. 147∼158.

68.

Sager, T. 2017. Communicative Planning, in: The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. Routledge, pp. 105∼116.

69.

Sandercock, L. & Lyssiotis, P. 2003. Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the 21st century. A&C Black.

70.

Sandercock, L. 2000a. Negotiating fear and desire. Presented at the Urban Forum. Springer, p. 201.

71.

Sandercock, L. 2000b. “When Strangers Become Neighbours: Managing Cities of Difference.”Planning Theory & Practice 1, pp. 13∼30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350050135176.

72.

Sandercock, L. 2003. “Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice.” Planning Theory & Practice 4, pp. 11∼28.

73.

Sandercock, L. 2004. “Towards a Planning Imagination for the 21st Century.” Journal of the American Planning Association 70, pp. 133∼141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976368.

74.

Sandercock, L. 1998. Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history. Univ of California Press.

75.

Sandercock, L. & Bridgman, R. 1999. “Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 8, p. 108.

76.

Sandercock, L. & Dovey, K. 2002. “Pleasure, politics, and the public interest: Melbourne’s riverscape revitalization. American Planning Association.” Journal of the American Planning Association 68, p. 151.

77.

Sassen, S. 2016. Global networks, linked cities. Routledge.

78.

Shin, H.-J. & Lee, K.-W. 2016. 『서울, 젠트리피케이션을 말하다』.

79.

Smith, N. 1996. THE NEW URBAN FRONTIER Gentrification and the revanchist city. Routledge.

80.

Speak, S. 2012. “Planning for the needs of urban poor in the Global South: The value of a feminist approach.” Planning Theory 11, pp. 343∼360. https://doi. org/10.1177/1473095212440424.

81.

Takeshi, F. 2016. [세상 읽기] ｢옥바라지 기억하기｣.

82.

Yang, S.-S. 2005. “Opeing Seodaemun prison and the actual conditions of the imprisonment of the anti-Japanese army in the cause of justice.” JOURNAL OF KOREAN INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT STUDIES 25, pp. 109∼139.

83.

Young, I. M. 1986. “The ideal of community and the politics of difference.” Social theory and practice 12, pp. 1∼26.

84.

Young, I. M. 1988. “Five faces of oppression.” Geographic thought: A praxis perspective, pp. 55∼71.

85.

Young, I. M. 2002. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press on Demand.

86.

Young, I. M. 2011. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.

87.

Zukin, S. 1987. “Gentrification: Culture and Capital in the Urban Core.” Annual Review of Sociology 13, pp. 129∼147.

Space and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy