바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

The precarity of female marital migrants beyond their home: The production of precarity of (potential) Multicultural Instructors beyond female marital migrants’ home

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2019, v.29 no.2, pp.63-95
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2019.29.2.63

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to extend the space of social reproduction of female marital migrants who are Multicultural Instructors or students of the Multicultural Instructors Vocational Programs by using the concept of precarity. The women’s experiences are predicated on crafting a felicitous but fictitious work-family balance based on a cost-benefit calculus, but differences between expectations and actual practices produce their precarity. I analyze the ways in which the governance of the women that asks them to be social reproductive labor workers at their homes is slipped over, so the women decide to be income earners beyond their homes. First, despite female marital migrants’ desire to be engaged in professional and high-wage work, they voluntarily choose insecure, low-paid, and temporary work positions due to social reproductive work at their homes. Second, their labor beyond their homes enables these women to exercise their abilities and avoid others’ disrespect, but also gives them a more vulnerable status; the women’s reproduction activities at their homes cannot help but force them to choose flexible occupations, which in turn entrenches them on the margins of Korean society. Based on these results, I argue that social reproduction of female marital migrants is situated in the continuum from wife to worker experiencing various precarities, and that the women are situated in a marginalized social position in Korean society.

keywords
결혼이주여성, 다문화강사, 신자유주의 주체, 불안정성, 가정, 사회재생산, female marital migrants, Multicultural Instructors, neoliberal subject, precarity, home, social reproduction

Reference

1.

Anderson, B. 2007. “A very private business: exploring the demand for migrant domestic workers.” European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(3), pp. 247∼264.

2.

Anderson, B. 2010. “Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers.” Work, Employment and Society, 24(2), pp. 300~317.

3.

Banki, S. 2013. “Precarity of place: a complement to the growing precariat literature.”Global Discourse, 3(3~4), pp. 450~463.

4.

Becker, G. S. 2009. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

5.

Bélanger, D. 2010. “Marriages with foreign women in East Asia: bride trafficking or voluntary migration?” Population & Societies, 469, p. 1~4.

6.

Constable, N. (ed.). 2005. Cross Border Marriages: Gender and Mobility in Transnational Asia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

7.

Dyer, S., L. McDowell., and A. Batnitzky. 2011. “Migrant work, precarious work-life balance: what the experiences of migrant workers in the service sector in Greater London tell us about the adult worker model.” Gender, Place &Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 18(5), pp. 685~700.

8.

Elwood, S., V. Lawson., and E. Sheppard. 2017. “Geographical relational poverty studies.” Progress in Human Geography, 41(6), pp. 745~765.

9.

Ettlinger, N. 2007. “Precarity unbound.” Alternatives, 32(3), pp. 319~340.

10.

Fantone, L. 2007. “Precarious changes: gender and generational politics in contemporary Italy.” Feminist Review, 87(1), pp. 5~20.

11.

Farris, S. R. 2015. “Migrants’ regular army of labour: gender dimensions of the impact of the global economic crisis on migrant labor in Western Europe.” The Sociological Review, 63(1), pp. 121~143.

12.

Ferguson, S., and D. McNally. 2015. “Precarious migrants: gender, race and the social reproduction of a global working class.” Socialist Register, 51, pp. 1~23.

13.

Foster, K. R. 2013. “Disaffection rising? Generations and the personal consequences of paid work in contemporary Canada.” Current Sociology, 61(7), pp. 931~948.

14.

Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Translated by Burchell, G., edited by Davidson A. I. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.

15.

Friedman, S. L. 2016. “Revaluing marital migrants: educated professionalism and precariousness among Chinese spouses in Taiwan.” Critical Asian Studies, 48(4), pp. 511~527.

16.

Hsia, H. C. 2007. “Imaged and imagined threat to the nation: the media construction of the ‘foreign brides’ phenomenon’ as social problems in Taiwan.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 8(1), pp. 55~85.

17.

Jongwilaiwan, R., and E. C. Thompson. 2013. “Thai wives in Singapore and transnational patriarchy.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 20(3), pp. 363~381.

18.

Katz, C., S. A. Marston., and K. Mitchell. 2015. “Demanding life’s work,” in Meehan, K., Strauss, K. (eds.). Precarious Worlds: Contested Geographies of Social Reproduction, Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, pp. 174~188.

19.

Kern, L. 2010. “Selling the ‘scary city’: gendering freedom, fear and condominium development in the neoliberal city.” Social & Cultural Geography, 11(3), pp. 209~230.

20.

Kim, D. Y. 2017. “Resisting migrant precarity: a critique of human rights advocacy for marriage migrants in South Korea.” Critical Asian Studies, 49(1), pp. 1~17.

21.

Kim, J. 2010. “Trafficked: domestic violence, exploitation in marriage, and the foreign-bride industry.” Virginia Journal of International Law, 51(2), pp. 443~506.

22.

Kim, J. W. 2014. “The problems and improvement plan of multicultural family policies after the establishment of new ‘immigration control law’ in 2014.” Annual Research Report of Multicultural Family in Korea, Korea Institute of Multiculture, Daejeon(in Korean).

23.

Kim, Y. 2016. “Scalar politics of welfare for marriage migrants between NGO and government in South Korea.” Journal of Geography, 62, pp. 61~80.

24.

Ko, H., and S. Kim. 2010. “Employment assistance measures for female marriage immigrants: focused on language and cultural resources.” Korean Women’s Development Institute Report 10-27-05(in Korean).

25.

Lan, P. C. 2003. “Maid or madam? Filipina migrant workers and the continuity of domestic labor.” Gender & Society, 17(2), pp. 187~208.

26.

Lan, P. C. 2008. “New global politics of reproductive labor: gendered labor and marriage migration.” Sociology Compass, 2(6), pp. 1801~1815.

27.

Larner, W. 2000.” Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality.” Studies in Political Economy, 63(1), pp. 5~25.

28.

Laurie, N., D. Richardson., M. Poudel., and J. Townsend. 2015. “Post-trafficking bordering practices: perverse co-production, marking and stretching borders.”Political Geography, 48, pp. 83~92.

29.

Le, D. B., T. D. Truong., and T. H. Khuat. 2014. “Transnational marriage migration and the East Asian family-based welfare model: social reproduction in Vietnam, Taiwan, and South Korea,” in Truong TD., Gasper D., Handmaker J., and Bergh S(eds.). Migration, Gender and Social Justice. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, 9, Berli, Heidelberg:Springer, pp. 87~103.

30.

Lee, E., S. K. Kim., and J. K. Lee. 2015. “Precarious motherhood: lives of Southeast Asian marriage migrant women in Korea.” Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4), pp. 409~430.

31.

Lee, H. 2012. “Political economy of cross-border marriage: economic development and social reproduction in Korea.” Feminist Economics, 18(2), pp. 177~200.

32.

Lee, H. 2014. “Trafficking in women? Or multicultural family? The contextual difference of commodification of intimacy.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 21(10), pp. 1249~1266.

33.

Lee, K. 2012. “Policy direction for supporting foreign brides’ employment.” Monthly Review of Labor, 2012(8), pp. 74~90(in Korean).

34.

Lee, S., and N. Piper. 2013. Understanding Multiple Discrimination against Labor Migrants in Asia: An Intersectional Analysis. Berlin: International Policy Analysis, Friedrich Elbert Stiftung.

35.

Lewis, H., P. Dwyer., S. Hodkinson., and L. Waite. 2015. “Hyper-precarious lives:migrants, work and forced labour in the Global North.” Progress in Human Geography, 39(5), pp. 580~600.

36.

McDowell, L. 2014. “Border crossings: reflections on women’s lives in twentieth-century Britain.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 21(2), pp. 152~173.

37.

McDowell, L., A. Batnitzky., and S. Dyer. 2009. “Precarious work and economic migration:emerging migrant divisions of labour in Greater London’s service sector.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), pp. 3~25.

38.

Meehan, K., and K. Stauss. (eds.). 2015. Precarious Worlds: Contested Geographies of Social Reproduction. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

39.

Mountz, A. 2010. Seeking Asylum: Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

40.

Mountz, A., and N. Hiemstra. 2014. “Chaos and crisis: dissecting the spatiotemporal logics of contemporary migrations and state practices.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(2), pp. 382~390.

41.

Munt, S. R. 2016. “Sensory geographies and defamiliarisation: migrant women encounter Brighton Beach.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 23(8), pp. 1093~1106.

42.

Neilson, B., and N. Rossiter. 2006. “From precarity to precariousness and back again:labour, life and unstable networks.” Variant, 25, pp. 10~13.

43.

Noxolo, P. 2014. “Towards an embodied securityscape: Brian Chikwava’s Harare North and the asylum seeking body as site of articulation.” Social & Cultural Geography, 15(3), pp. 291~312.

44.

Parreñas, R. 2013. “Transnational mothering: a source of gender conflict in the family,”in Geisen T., Studer T., and Yildiz E. (eds.) Migration, Familie und soziale Lage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 169~194.

45.

Philo, C. 2014. “Insecure bodies/selves: introduction to theme section.” Social &Cultural Geography, 15(3), pp. 284~290.

46.

Piper, N. 2003. “Wife or worker? Worker or wife? Marriage and cross~border migration in contemporary Japan.” Population, Space and Place, 9(6), pp. 457~469.

47.

Piper, N., and S. Lee. 2016. “Marriage migration, migrant precarity, and social reproduction in Asia: an overview.” Critical Asian Studies, 48(4), pp. 473~493.

48.

Read, J. 2009. “A genealogy of homo-economicus: neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity.” Foucault Studies, 6, pp.25~36.

49.

Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. New York:Cambridge University Press.

50.

Rottenberg, C. 2014. “The rise of neoliberal feminism.” Cultural Studies, 28(3), pp. 418~437.

51.

Silva, J. M. 2013. Coming up Short: Working-Class Adulthood in an Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

52.

Stewart, K. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

53.

Strauss, K. 2012. “Coerced, forced and unfree labour: geographies of exploitation in contemporary labour markets.” Geography Compass, 6(3), pp. 137~148.

54.

UN-INSTRAW, 2007. Feminization of Migration. Gender, Remittances and Development Working Paper 1, pp. 1~7.

55.

Vosko, L. F., M. MacDonald., and I Campbell. (eds.). 2009. Gender and the Contours of Precarious Employment. London: Routledge.

56.

Waite, L. 2009. “A place and space for a critical geography of precarity?” Geography Compass, 3(1), pp. 412~433.

57.

Waite, L., G. Craig., H. Lewis., and K. Skrivankova. (eds.). 2015. Vulnerability, Exploitation and Migrants: Insecure Work in a Globalised Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

58.

Waite, L., G. Valentine, G., and H. Lewis. 2014. “Multiply vulnerable populations:mobilising a politics of compassion from the ‘capacity to hurt’.” Social &Cultural Geography, 15(3), pp. 313~331.

59.

Wang, H. Z. 2007. “Hidden spaces of resistance of the subordinated: case studies from Vietnamese female migrant partners in Taiwan.” International Migration Review, 41(3), pp. 706~727.

60.

Wang, H. Z., and Bélanger, D. 2008. “Taiwanizing female migrant spouses and materializing differential citizenship.” Citizenship Studies, 12(1), pp. 91~106.

61.

Williams, L. 2010. Global Marriage: Cross-Border Marriage Migration in Global Context. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

62.

Wilson, J. A., and E. C. Yochim. 2015. “Mothering through precarity: becoming mamapreneurial.” Cultural Studies, 29(5-6), pp. 669~686.

63.

Worth, N. 2016. “Feeling precarious: millennial women and work. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(4), pp. 601~616.

64.

Yeoh, B. S. A., H. L. Chee., and G. H. Baey. 2013. “The place of Vietnamese marriage migrants in Singapore: social reproduction, social ‘problems’ and social protection.” Third World Quarterly, 34(10), pp. 1927~1941.

Space and Environment