Understanding the Space Multiple Using the Actor-Network Theory COVID-19 and Its Multiple Spatiality

이준석

doi:10.19097/kaser.2020.30.3.278

Space and Environment

P-ISSN1225-6706
E-ISSN2733-4295
KCI

Home

ISSN : 1225-6706

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.30 No.3

Citation Share

Understanding the Space Multiple Using the Actor-Network Theory COVID-19 and Its Multiple Spatiality

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295

2020, v.30 no.3, pp.278-318

https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2020.30.3.278

(2020). Understanding the Space Multiple Using the Actor-Network Theory COVID-19 and Its Multiple Spatiality. Space and Environment, 30(3), 278-318, https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2020.30.3.278

copy

Abstract

In this article, I will describe the main concepts of the actor-network theory regarding the spatiality. After analyzing the spatial implications of the key concepts of ANT such as actors/actants, network, and the concept of theories, I will analyze how they can be applied to the understanding of technoscience and spatiality. Lastly, I will describe how ANT can be used to analyze the space laden with COVID-19 pandemic. By doing it, the concept of the space multiple which is a concept borrowed from Mol and Law’s concepts of the body multiple and the world multiple, will be used. Also four modes of spatialities that ANT argues network spatiality, Euclidean spatiality, fluid spatiality and fire spatiality will be discussed to analyze how we can use ANT to prevent the epidemic.

keywords: Actor-Network Theory (ANT), body multiple, space multiple, multiple spatiality, COVID-19, 행위자-네트워크 이론, 다중체(body multiple), 다중공간(space multiple), 다중공간성(multiple spatiality), 코로나19

Reference

김숙진. 2006. ｢생태 환경 공간의 생산과 그 혼종성(hybridity)에 대한 분석: 청계천 복원을사례로｣. ≪한국도시지리학회지≫ 제9권 2호, 113-124.

김숙진. 2010. ｢행위자-연결망 이론을 통한 과학과 자연의 재해석｣. ≪대한지리학회지≫ 제45권 4호, 461-477.

김숙진. 2016. ｢아상블라주의 개념과 지리학적 함의｣. ≪대한지리학회지≫ 제51권 3호, 311-326.

김지현. 2019. ｢행위자-네트워크 이론을 통한 공간의 다중성 연구: 런던 포춘스트리트 공원과 킹스턴 마켓 광장 사례를 중심으로｣. ≪공간과사회≫ 제29권 4호, 157-194.

김진택. 2012. ｢행위자 네트워크 이론(ANT)을 통한 문화콘텐츠의 이해와 적용: 공간의 복원과 재생에 대한 ANT의 해석｣. ≪인문콘텐츠≫ 제24권, 9～37.

김환석. 2006. 『과학사회학의 쟁점들』. 문학과지성사.

박경환. 2013. ｢글로벌 시대 창조담론의 제도화 과정: 행위자-네트워크 이론을 중심으로｣. ≪한국도시지리학회지≫ 제16권 2호, 31-48.

박경환. 2014. ｢글로벌 시대 인문지리학에 있어서 행위자-네트워크 이론(ANT)의 적용 가능성｣. ≪한국도시지리학회지≫ 제17권 1호, 57-78.

아베 긴야. 2007[1978]. 『중세를 여행하는 사람들』. 한길사.

10.

이근용. 2014. ｢행위자 네트워크 이론으로 본 지역성과 지역방송의 역할｣. ≪언론학연구≫제18권 1호. 135-164.

11.

이준석. 2010. 「공간화된 기술과학적 실천과 실험실의 물질문화: 민속방법론적 참여관찰을통해 분석한 뇌과학 첨단연구 공간의 이해」. 《공간과사회》 제34호, 185-223.

12.

이준석. 2013. ｢과학적 실행의 회색상자(grey box): 비/가시적 협력의 헤테로토피아(heterotopia)로서의 실험실 공간｣. ≪과학기술학연구≫ 제13권 1호, 1-39.

13.

이현재. 2012. ｢다양한 공간 개념과 공간 읽기의 가능성｣. ≪시대와 철학≫ 제23권 4호, 221-248.

14.

장세용. 2012. ｢공간과 이동성, 이동성의 연결망: 행위자-연결망 이론과 연관시켜｣. ≪역사와 경계≫ 제84권, 271-303.

15.

최병두. 2015. ｢행위자-네트워크 이론과 위상학적 공간 개념｣. ≪공간과사회≫ 제25권 3호, 125-172.

16.

최병두. 2017. ｢관계이론에서 행위자-네트워크 이론으로: 초국적 이주 분석을 위한 대안적연구방법론｣. ≪현대사회와 다문화≫ 제7권 1호, 1-47.

17.

홍성욱. 2010. 『인간·사물·동맹: 행위자-네트워크 이론과 테크노사이언스』. 이음.

18.

홍성욱. 2016. 『홍성욱의 STS, 과학을 경청하다』. 동아시아.

19.

Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke Univ. Press.

20.

Beckett, S. 2011[1953]. Waiting for Godot. Grove Press.

21.

Bingham, N. 2006. “Bees, Butterflies, and Bacteria: Biotechnology and the Politics of Nonhuman Friendship,” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 38(3): 483-498.

22.

Blok, A., and T. Jensen. 2011. Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World. Routledge; 황장진 역. 2017. 『처음 읽는 브뤼노 라투르: 하이브리드 세계의 하이브리드 사상』. 사월의책.

23.

Blok, A., I. Farias and C. Roberts (eds.). 2020. The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory. Routledge.

24.

Callon, M. 1984. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay,” The Sociological Review, 32.1_suppl: 196-233.

25.

Collins, H. 1974. “The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks,” Science Studies, 4(2): 165-185.

26.

Collins, H. 2001. “Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire,” Social Studies of Science, 31(1): 71-85.

27.

Collins, H. 2010. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.

28.

De la Cadena, M., and M. Blaser. (eds.). 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Duke Univ. Press.

29.

De Laet, M., and A. Mol. 2000. “The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology.” Social Studies of Science, 30(2): 225-263.

30.

Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari, 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Bloomsbury Publishing.

31.

Fuentes, A. 2010. “Naturalcultural Encounters in Bali: Monkeys, Temples, Tourists, and Ethnoprimatology,” Cultural Anthropology, 25: 600–624.

32.

Hall, E. 1990[1969]. The Hidden Dimension. New York & London: Anchor Books.

33.

Haraway, D. 1985. “Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Social-Feminist in the Late 20th Century,” Social Review, 80: 65-108.

34.

Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™:Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge.

35.

Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

36.

Jones, O. 2003. “The Restraint of Beasts: Rurality, Animality, Actor-Network Theory and Dwelling,” in P. Cloke (ed.) Country Visions. Harlow, UK: Pearson.

37.

Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

38.

Lambert, G. 2006. Who’s Afraid of Deleuze and Guattari? Continuum; 최진석 역. 2013. 『누가 들뢰즈와 가타리를 두려워하는가?』. 자음과모음.

39.

Latour, B. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World”, in K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (eds.) Science Observed. Sage.

40.

Latour, B. 1986[1979]. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton Univ. Press; 이상원 역. 『실험실 생활: 과학적 사실의 구성』. 한울. 2019.

41.

Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard Univ. Press; 황희숙 역. 2016. 『젊은 과학의 전선: 테크노사이언스와 행위자-연결망의 구축』. 아카넷.

42.

Latour, B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Harvard Univ. Press.

43.

Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard Univ. Press; 홍철기 역. 2009. 『우리는 결코 근대인이었던 적이 없다』. 갈무리.

44.

Latour, B. 1996. Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Harvard Univ. Press.

45.

Latour, B. 1999a. “On Recalling ANT” in J. Law and J. Hassard (eds.) Actor-Network Theory and After. Blackwell Publishing.

46.

Latour, B. 1999b. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard Univ. Press; 홍성욱·장하원 역. 2018. 『판도라의 희망: 과학기술학의 참모습에 관한 에세이』. 휴머니스트.

47.

Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring Sciences into Democracy. Harvard Univ. Press

48.

Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: an Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford Univ. Press.

49.

Latour, B. 2009. “A Collective of Humans and Nonhumans: Following Daedalus’s Labyrinth”, Readings in the Philosophy of Technology, 11.

50.

Latour, B. 2010. Cogitamus. LA DECOUVERTE; 이세진 역. 2012. 『브뤼노 라투르의 과학인문학 편지: 인간과 자연, 과학과 정치에 관한 가장 도발적인 생각』. 사월의책.

51.

Latour, B. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: an Anthropology of the Moderns. Harvard Univ. Press.

52.

Latour, B. ed. 2016. reset MODERNITY! ZKM.

53.

Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climate Regime. polity.

54.

Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986[1979]. Laboratory Life: the [Social] Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton Univ. Press.

55.

Latour, B., and P. Weibel. 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. MIT Press.

56.

Law, J. 1994. Organizing Modernity, Blackwell Publishing.

57.

Law, J. 2002a. Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Duke Univ. Press.

58.

Law, J, 2002b, “Objects and Spaces,” Theory, Culture & Society 19(5/6): 91-105.

59.

Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge.

60.

Law, J. 2011. “What’s Wrong with a One-World World”, conference paper presented at Wesleyan University [Downloadable at http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2011WhatsWrongWithAOneWorldWorld.pdf ] (2020.4.1. 방문).

61.

Law, J., and J. Hassard. 1999. Actor-Network Theory and After. Blackwell Publishing.

62.

Law, J., and A. Mol. 2001. “Situating Technoscience: an Inquiry into Spatialities,”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 19(5): 609-621.

63.

Law, J. 2002. Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Duke Univ. Press.

64.

Law, J. 2008. “The Actor-Enacted: Cumbrian Sheep in 2001,” in C. Knappett and L. Malafouris (eds.). Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer.

65.

Law, J., and M. Lien. 2018. “Denaturalizing Nature,” in M. de la Cadena et al. (eds.) A World of Many Worlds. Duke Univ. Press.

66.

Lenton T., and B. Latour. “Gaia 2.0,” Science 361(6407): 1066-1068.

67.

Michael, M. 2004. “Roadkill: Between Humans, Nonhuman Animals, and Technologies,”Society and Animals: J. of Human-Animal Studies, 12(4): 277-298.

68.

Michael, M. 2017. Actor-Network Theory: Trials, Trails, and Translations. London: Sage Publications.

69.

Mol. A. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke Univ. Press.

70.

Mol. A., and J. Law. 2005. “Boundary Variations: an Introduction,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 23(5): 637-642.

71.

Nimmo, R. 2011. “Bovine Mobilities and Vital Movements: Flow of Milk, Mediation and Animal Agency,” in J. Bull (ed.). 2011. Animal Movements, Moving Animals:Essays on Direction, Velocity and Agency in Humanimal Encounters. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala Univ. Press.

72.

Nimmo, R. (ed.). 2016. Actor-Network Theory Research. Vol. I-IV. Los Angeles: Sage.

73.

Nonaka, I., and G. von Krogh. 2009. “Perspective: Tacit Lnowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory”. Organization Science, 20(3): 635-652.

74.

Omura, K. et al. (eds.). 2019. The World Multiple: The Quotidian Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangles Worlds. Routledge.

75.

Polanyi, M. 2009[1966]. The Tacit Dimension. University of Chicago press.

76.

Polanyi, M. 2015[1958]. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.

77.

Salt, D., G. Polhill and Y. Wang. 2017. “Normalizing Callon’s Theory of Translation”, conference paper presented at Social Simulation Conference [downloadable at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324106844 ] (2020.4.20. 방문).

78.

Stengers, I. 2018. “The Challenge of Ontological Politics,” in M. de la Cadena et al. (eds.). A Worlds of Many Worlds. Duke Univ. Press.

79.

Toffler, A., and H. Toffler. 1995. War and Anti-War: Making Sense of Today’s Global Chaos. Grand Central Publishing.

80.

Whatmore, S., and L. Thorne. 2000. “Elephants on the Move: Spatial Formations of Wildlife Exchange,” Environmental and Planning D: Society and Space. 18(2):185-203.

81.

유현준, 『공간의 역사』 제14강. ｢코로나19시대의 공간｣. (2020.7.2. EBS 방영)

82.

｢美연구진 “코로나19 수십년간 박쥐 사이에 유행했었다”｣ (『동아일보』, 2020.7.29. 기사. https://www.donga.com/news/Inter/article/all/20200729/102203218/1, 2020.7.15. 접속),

83.

｢송호근의 제언 “1일 접촉 3명 제한…열흘간 사회관계망 끊자”｣ (『중앙일보』, 2020.2.17. 기사. https://news.joins.com/article/23716518, 2020.9.21. 접속).

84.

｢코로나 덕보는 닌텐도: ‘모동숲(모여봐요 동물의 숲)’ 돌풍 - 닌텐도 스위치 값 두배 껑충｣ (『매일경제』, 2020.4.27. 기사. https://www.mk.co.kr/news/business/view/2020/04/433929/, 2020.7.15. 접속).

85.

｢‘코로나 특수’ 닌텐도, ‘동물의 숲’으로 실적 급증 - “칩거 중 해방감 폭발”｣ (『조선일보』, 2020.5.8. 기사. https://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/05/08/2020050802856.html, 2020.7.15. 접속).

86.

｢“코로나 70년 넘게 박쥐 안에 잠복했다”｣ (『조선일보, 2020.7.29. 기사. https://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/07/29/2020072900605.html, 2020.7.15. 접속).

87.

“Disease X: The Next Pandemic”(https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/2018/03/disease-x, 2020.7.20. 접속).

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.30 No.3

Understanding the Space Multiple Using the Actor-Network Theory COVID-19 and Its Multiple Spatiality

Abstract

Reference

Space and Environment