바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

Social Capital and Cross-border Small-Scale Trade Networks on the “Central Asia Street” in Seoul

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2021, v.31 no.3, pp.338-370
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2021.31.3.338

Abstract

This paper explores the case study of the “Central Asian Street” in Seoul to investigate how cross-border small-scale trade still operates in the district. This paper evolved from two primary questions: ①Why do traders prefer cross-border small-scale trading over the distribution services available to them, including wholesale and transportation companies, which are ubiquitous; and ②What are the economic benefits that traders receive through cross-border small-scale trading? Through the conduct of fieldwork and in-depth interviews, I focused on two main activities that traders engaged in: face-to-face contact with wholesalers and retailers and the personal transit of goods by hand. This research reveals that cross-border small-scale traders from Central Asia are flying back and forth between Korea and their home countries with luggage to overcome high tariffs and long-distance transit via trains or trucks. However, traders can still profit from the use of rail and truck transportation via cargo companies, depending on the situation and items they are handling. Additionally, the unique social relationships that are fostered through face-to-face interactions, enable traders to stabilize transactions, effectively obtain business information, negotiate prices, and reduce the risks associated with inventory by making small purchases. This paper uses the concept of social capital to demonstrate the trading mechanisms and factors that facilitate the continued success of cross-border small-scale trade networks. It offers evidence that the importance of in-person interactions in trade cannot be overlooked.

keywords
Central Asia Street, Cross-border Small-Scale Trade, Social Capital, Garment Trade Network. Social Network, 중앙아시아 거리, 소무역, 대면 거래, 사회적 관계, 사회자본, 의류 소무역 네트워크

Reference

1.

국세청. 2018. 해외세정연구 경진대회 연구보고서(우즈베키스탄).

2.

김수진·양승우. 2017. 「서울시 중구 중앙아시아거리 형성 과정 연구」. 《서울학연구》, (68), 35~70쪽.

3.

김용창·백일순·이성호. 2011. 「3장 동대문 시장의 사회경제지리」. 서울역사박물관 엮음. 『동대문시장: 불이 꺼지지 않는 패션 아이콘』. 서울역사박물관.

4.

김우승. 2000. 「사회현상으로서의 국경무역상(보따리장수)의 현황과 전망: 시베리아·극동지역을 중심으로」. 《한국시베리아학보》, 2호, 53~71쪽.

5.

남기범. 2003. 「서울 신신업집적지 발전의 두 유형: 동대문시장과서울벤처벨리의 산업집적, 사회적 자본의 형성과 제도화 특성에 대한 비교」. 《한국경제지리학회지》, 6호(1), 45~60쪽.

6.

박세훈·이영아·김은란·정소양. 2009. 다문화사회에대응하는 도시정책 연구 (I): 외국인 밀집지역의 현황과 정책과제, 국토연구원.

7.

배명숙. 2017. 「동대문 고려인 커뮤니티의 현황과 변화」. 《단군학연구》, (36), 127~161쪽.

8.

심의섭. 2018. 「광희동 중앙아시아거리의 현황과 특징」. 동중아시아경상학회 학술대회 자료집. 187-202쪽.

9.

안현효. 2010. 「사회자본과 화교경제: 캘리포니아주 한인 및 중국계은행의 비교를 중심으로」. 《한국경제지리학회지》, 13호(4), 641~662쪽.

10.

이영민·이종희. 2013. 「이주자의 민족경제 실천과 로컬리티의 재구성: 서울 동대문 몽골타운을사례로」. 《한국도시지리학회지》, 16호(1), 19~36쪽.

11.

이종희. 2012. 「재한 몽골인의 트랜스이주와 몽골타운의 로컬리티에 관한 연구」. 이화여자대학교 일반대학원 석사학위논문.

12.

장영진. 2010. 「한· 중 소무역의 변화 과정과 공간적 특성」. 《대한지리학회지》, 45호(5), 628~646쪽.

13.

장영진. 2011. 「한· 중 소무역의 성격과 운영 메커니즘」. 《한국경제지리학회지》, 14호(4), 568-582쪽.

14.

주수인. 2015. 「우즈베키스탄 이주노동자들의 초국적 경제활동 –사회적 네트워크와 신뢰관계를 중심으로-」. 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

15.

한구영. 2017. 「클러스터의 진화: 동대문시장 패션클러스터를 중심으로」. 서울대학교 환경대학원 박사학위논문.

16.

한국농수산식품유통공사, 2020. 농식품 신북방시장 진출가이드: 우즈베키스탄.

17.

서울연구데이터서비스, https://data.si.re.kr/node/73 (검색일: 2021.09.07.)

18.

스마트서울맵, https://map.seoul.go.kr/smgis2/seoulMap?searchWord=%25EB%25AA%25BD%25EA%25B3%25A8%25ED%2583%2580%25EC%259A%25B4 (검색일: 2021.09.07.)

19.

판토스, http://www.lxpantos.com/kr/business/railroad.do (검색일: 2021.08.10.)

20.

통합무역정보서비스, http://www.tradenavi.or.kr/CmsWeb/viewPage.req?idx=PG0000002176#nohref (검색일: 2021.09.07.)

21.

Altinay, L. 2008, "The relationship between an entrepreneur's culture and the entrepreneurial behaviour of the firm." Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 111~129.

22.

Amankwah, B. 2004. Small businesses of immigrants: The Ghanaian experience in Columbus. Ohio. Miami University.

23.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986, “The Forms of Capital”, in J. G. Richardson (ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Westport, CT:Greenwood Press.

24.

Coleman, J. S. 1988. “Social capital in the creation of human capital.” American journal of sociology, Vol. 94, pp. S95~S120.

25.

Egbert, H. 2006. “Cross-border small‐scale trading in south-eastern Europe: Do embeddedness and social capital explain enough?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 346~361.

26.

Elo, M. and Ivanova-Gongne, M. 2020. “Language Resources and Multiethnic Central Asian Economies.” Eurasian Journal of Economic & Business Studies, Vol. 3, No. 57.

27.

Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.

28.

Huber, F. 2009. “Social capital of economic clusters: Towards a network-based conception of social resources.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 160~170.

29.

Koh, M. and Malecki, E. J. 2016. “The emergence of ethnic entrepreneurs in Seoul, South Korea: globalisation from below.” The Geographical Journal, Vol. 182, No. 1, pp.59~69.

30.

Light, I., Sabagh, G., Bozorgmehr, M. and Der-Martirosian, C. 1994. “Beyond the Ethnic Enclave Economy.” Social Problems, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp.65~80.

31.

Lin, N. 2002, Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

32.

McGlinn, L. 1995. “Power networks and early Chinese immigrants in Pennsylvania.”Journal of Historical Geography, Vol. 21, No. 4, 430.

33.

Mukhina, I. 2009. “New losses, new opportunities: (Soviet) women in the shuttle trade, 1987-1998.” Journal of Social History, pp.341~359.

34.

Mukhina, I. 2014. Women and the Birth of Russian Capitalism: A History of the Shuttle Trade. Northern Illinois University Press.

35.

Ndofor, H. A. and Priem, R. L. 2011. “Immigrant entrepreneurs, the ethnic enclave strategy, and venture performance.” Journal of Management, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.790~818.

36.

Özcan, G. B. 2006. “Djamila’s journey from kolkhoz to bazaar: Female entrepreneurs in Kyrgyzstan.” Enterprising women in transition economies, pp. 93~118.

37.

Polanyi. M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge.

38.

Portes, A. 2000. “The Two Meanings of Social Capital.” Sociological Forum, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp.1~12.

39.

Rippa, A. 2019. “Cross-Border Trade and “the Market” between Xinjiang (China)and Pakistan.“ Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 254~271.

40.

Storper, M. and Venables, A. J. 2004. “Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy.” Journal of economic geography, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 351~370.

41.

Taraban, S. 2002. “Women and economic restructuring in post-socialist Ukraine:The paradoxes of constructing a businesswoman.” Canadian Woman Studies, Vol. 21, No. 4.

42.

Thompson, D. K. and Grant, R. 2015. “Enclaves on edge: Strategy and tactics in immigrant business spaces of Johannesburg.” Urban Forum, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 243~262.

43.

Wallace, C., Shmulyar, O. and Bedsir, V. 1999. “The significance of borders in the East European transition.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp.738~750.

44.

Williams, A. M. and Baláž, V. 2002. “International petty trading: Changing practices in trans–Carpathian Ukraine.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.323~342.

45.

Williams, A. M. and Baláž, V. 2005. “Winning, then losing, the battle with globalization: Vietnamese petty traders in Slovakia.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp.533~549.

46.

Yang, X., Ho, E. Y. H., and Chang, A. 2012. “Integrating the resource-based view and transaction cost economics in immigrant business performance.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp.753~772.

47.

Yükseker, D. 2004. “Trust and gender in a transnational market: the public culture of Laleli, Istanbul.” Public Culture, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.47~65.

48.

Yükseker, D. 2007. “Shuttling goods, weaving consumer tastes: Informal trade between Turkey and Russia.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 60~72.

49.

Zhou, Y. 1998. “How do places matter? A comparative study of Chinese ethnic economies in Los Angeles and New York City.” Urban Geography, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp.531~553.

50.

Zolin, R., Chang, A., Yang, X. and Ho, E. Y. H. 2016. “Social capital or ethnic enclave location? A multilevel explanation of immigrant business growth.”Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 58, No, 5, pp.453~463.

Space and Environment