바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

수퍼비전 작업 동맹, 역할 어려움, 수퍼비전 만족도 간의 관계: 비교문화 연구

The relations among supervisory working alliance, role difficulties, and supervision satisfaction: A cross-cultural comparison

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2007, v.26 no.2, pp.161-182
손은정 (계명대학교)
M. V. Ellis (SUNY at Albany)
유성경 (이화여자대학교)

Abstract

This study compared 149 US and 168 South Korea supervisees’ perceptions of the clinical supervision relationship to find out the cultural differences between two countries. Specifically, the relations among the three elements of the supervisory working alliance (emotional bond, agreement on goals, and agreement on tasks) with role difficulties and supervision satisfaction were examined. A few differences in clinical supervision were observed between the two countries. The correlations between the three supervisory working alliance elements and satisfaction with supervision were stronger for US than South Korea supervisees. The supervisory working alliance was significantly related to role difficulties and supervision satisfaction in both countries. Implications for theory, research, and practice were discussed.

keywords
supervisory working alliance, role difficulties, role conflict, satisfaction with supervision, cross-cultural supervision, 수퍼비전 작업동맹, 역할 모호함, 역할 갈등, 수퍼비전 만족도, 비교문화 수퍼비전

참고문헌

1.

Bahrick, A. S. (1990). Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the supervisory working alliance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 1484B. (University Microfilms No. 90-14, 392).

2.

Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

3.

Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252-260.

4.

Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervisor. The Counseling Psychologist, 11,35-42.

5.

Carter, J. W., Pak, J. H., & Goodyear, R. K. (2000). Cultural differences in alliance formation during group supervision. Paper presented at the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington DC.

6.

Chen, E. C., & Bernstein, B. L. (2000). Relations of complementarity and supervisory issues to supervisory working alliance: A comparative analysis of two cases. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 485-497.

7.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

8.

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

9.

Cook, D. A., & Helms, J. E. (1988). Visible racial/ethnic group supervisees’ satisfaction with cross-cultural supervision as predicted by relationship characteristics. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 268-274.

10.

Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counseling supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 322-329.

11.

Ellis, M. V., & Blustein, D. L. (1991a). Developing and using educational and psychological tests and measures: The unificationist perspective. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 550-555.

12.

Ellis, M. V., & Blustein, D. L. (1991b). The unificationist perspective: A context for validity. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 561-563.

13.

Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: A integrative review. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.) Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision (pp. 447-507). New York: John Willey & Sons.

14.

Fagley, N. S. (1985). Applied statistical power analysis and the interpretation of nonsignificant results by research consumers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 391-396.

15.

Gatmon, D., Jackson, D., Koshkarian, L., Koshkarian, L. Martos-Perry, N., Molina, A., Patel, N., & Rodolfa, E. (2001). Exploring ethnic, gender, and sexual orientation variables in supervision: Do they really matter? Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 29, 102-113.

16.

Glass, G. V., & Stanley, J. C. (1970). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

17.

Haase, R. F., Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1989). Multiple criteria for evaluating the magnitude of experimental effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 511-516.

18.

Haj-Yahia, M. M, & Roer-Strier, D. (1999). On the encounter between Jewish supervisors and Arab supervisees in Israel. The Clinical Supervisor, 18, 17-37.

19.

Heppner, P. P., & Handley, P. G. (1981). A study of the interpersonal influence process in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 437-444.

20.

Hilton, D. B., Russell, R. K., & Salmi, S. W. (1995). The effects of supervisor’s race and level of support on perceptions of supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 559-563.

21.

Holland, B. S., & Copenhaver, M. D. (1988). Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 145-149.

22.

Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. London: Sage.

23.

Holloway, E. L., & Wampold, B. E. (1983). Patterns of verbal behavior and judgments of satisfaction in the supervision interview. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 227-234.

24.

Holloway, E. L., & Wampold, B. E. (1984). Dimensions of satisfaction in the supervision interview. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, Canada.

25.

Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Development and validation of thealliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223-233.

26.

Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139-149.

27.

Huberty, C. J., & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302-308.

28.

Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Komocar, J. (1982). Applications of item response theory to analysis of scale translation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 818-825.

29.

Joo, E., & Orlinsky, D. E. (1994). Psychotherapeutic relationship in different cultures. Proceedings of 16th International Congress of Psychotherapy, Korea.

30.

Killian, K. D. (2001). Differences making a difference: Cross-cultural interactions in supervisory relationships. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 12, 61-103.

31.

Kim, S., Cho, K., & Lee, S. (1994). The analyses method of Likert scale data including response bias. Journal of Statistical Theory and Methods, 5, 107-116.

32.

Krause, A. A., & Allen, G. J. (1988). Perceptions of counselor supervision: An examination of Stoltenberg’s model from the perspectives of supervisor and supervisee. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 77-80.

33.

Ladany, N., Brittan-Powell, C. S., & Pannu, R. K. (1997). The influence of supervisory racial identity interaction and racial matching on the supervisory working alliance and supervisee multicultural competence. Counselor Education and Supervision, 36, 284-304.

34.

Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and77, 447-455.

35.

Ladany, N., & Friedlander, M. L. (1995). The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees’ experience of role conflict and role ambiguity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 220-231.

36.

Ladany, N., & Lehrman-Waterman, D. (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 161-176.

37.

Ladany, N., Lehrman-Waterman, D., Molinaro, M., & Wolgast, B. (1999). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 443-475.

38.

Luborsky, L., Crits-Cristoph, P., Alexander, L., Margolis, M., & Cohen, M. (1983). Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcomes of psychotherapy: A counting signs vs. a global rating method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 171, 480-491.

39.

Magnuson, S., Wilcoxon, S. A., & Norem, K. (2000). Clinical supervision of prelicensed counselors: Recommendation for consideration and practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 22, 176-188.

40.

McRoy, R. G., Freeman, E. M., Logan, S. L., & Blackmon, B. (1986). Cross cultural field supervision: Implications for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 22, 50-56.

41.

Meier, S. T., & Davis, S. R. (1990). Trends in reporting psychometric properties of scales used in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 113-115.

42.

Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.

43.

Morgan, R., Luborsky, L., Crits-Cristoph, P., Curtis, H., & Solomon, J. (1982). Predicting the outcomes of psychotherapy by the Penn Helping Alliance Rating Method. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 397-402.

44.

Moskowitz, S. A., & Rupert, P. A. (1983). Conflict resolution within therelationship. Professional Psychology, 14, 632-641.

45.

Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee’s perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 384-395.

46.

Olk, M. E, & Friedlander, M. L. (1992). Trainees’ experience of role conflictrole ambiguity in supervisory relationship. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 389-397.

47.

Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.

48.

Patton, M. J.,& Kivlighan, D. M., Jr. (1997). Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 108-115.

49.

Puri, M. L., & Sen, P. K. (1971). Nonparametric methods in multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley.

50.

Ramos-Sάnchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L. O., Wright, L. K., Ratanasiripong, P., & Rodolfa, E. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 197-202.

51.

Sue, D. W. (1991). A modal for cultural diversity training. Journal of Counseling Development, 70, 99-105.

52.

Tan, S., & Dong, N.J. (2000). Psychotherapy with members of Asian American churches and spiritual traditions. In P.S. Richards & A. E. Bergin (Eds.) Handbook of psychotherapy and religious diversity (pp. 421-444). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

53.

Tracey, T. J. G., & Glidden-Tracey, C. E. (1999). Integration of theory, research design, measurement, and statistics: Toward a reasoned argument. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 299-324.

54.

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 3, 506-520.

55.

Vander Kolk, C. J. (1974). The relationship of personality, values, and race to anticipation of the supervisory relationship. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 18, 41-46.

56.

Wampold, B. E., Davis, B., & Good, R. H., III (1990). Hypothesis validity of clinical research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 360-367.

57.

Werner, O., & Campbell, D. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering. In R. Naroll and R. Cohen (Eds.), A handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. New York: American Museum of Natural History.

58.

Wilkinson, L., & APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.

59.

Worthen, V. E., & Isakson, R. L. (2003). Enhancing supervision relationship. Paper presented at the 111th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Toronto, Canada.

60.

Yoo, S., & Yoo, J. (2000). Individualism-collectivism and tolerance of stigma associated with help seeking. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 12, 19-32.

61.

Yuen, K. W., & Tinsley, H. (1981). International and American student’s expectations about counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28,66-69.

한국심리학회지: 일반