바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

A qualitative study of conceptualizing "Shinmyeong"

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2007, v.26 no.2, pp.279-306


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to generate a substantial theory about Shinmyeong experience. This study was executed by applying the grounded theory based on Strauss and Corbin(1998). Open-ended questionnaire survey was conducted to 220 participants and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants. The qualitative data were analyzed with the open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. Three types of Shinmyeong experiences assumed by theoretical study were demonstrated and their categories were extracted by open coding. The structures of their categories were concretized by axial coding and selective coding. The causal condition was 'Recognition of self(or group) worth', the contextual condition was 'Negative perception of past self(or group)', the phenomena were 'Primary pleasure' and ’secondary pleasure', the intervening condition was ’sharing pleasure(co-experience)', the action/interaction was 'Radiating the self(or gourp) worth', and the consequence was ’sense of freedom', 'Acquirement of positive feelings' and so on. According to the results, Shinmyeong experience consists of three phases; pleasure from recognition(or expression) of one’s self-worth, sharing the feeling with other people, and radiating negative feeling through expressive behaviors.

keywords
Cultural Psychology, Shinmyeong, Grounded theory, Qualitative, 신명, 구조, 근거이론, 신명경험의 구조

Reference

1.

김열규 (1982). 한국인의 신명. 서울: 주류.

2.

김준희 (2005). 댄스스포츠 경력에 따른 신명감과 자아정체감에 관한 연구. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 28, 49-55.

3.

마광수 (1984). 음양사상과 카타르시스. 인문과학 52, 1-15.

4.

마광수 (1988). 카타르시스의 실제적 효용에 관한 연구. 延世論叢 24, 1-27.

5.

오율자 (1995). 춤에서의 신명체험에 관한 연구. 무용학회논문집, 18. 161-172.

6.

유진, 김장우 (2004). 프로 한국무용수의 신명경험. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 15(1), 97-112.

7.

이규태 (1991). 한국인의 의식구조. 서울: 신원문화사.

8.

이상일 (1981). 굿과 놀이. 서울: 문음사.

9.

이어령 (1982, 9, 23). 푸는 문화, 신바람의 문화, 중앙일보.

10.

조동일 (1997). 카타르시스, 라사, 신명풀이-연극․영화미학의 기본원리에 대한 생극론의 해명. 서울: 지식산업사.

11.

채희완 (1983). 집단연희에 있어서 예술체험으로서의 신명. 호서문화논집, 2, 107-121.

12.

최상진 (2000). 한국인 심리학. 서울: 중앙대학교 출판부.

13.

최상진, 김기범 (1999). 한국인의 심정심리: 심정의 성격, 발생과정, 교류양식 및 형태. 한국심리학회지 일반, 18(1), 1-16.

14.

한민, 한성열 (2007). 신명에 대한 문화심리학적 고찰. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 26(1), 83-103.

15.

한민, 한성열 (2007). 신명에 대한 사회적 표상 분석. 미간행.

16.

Bowers, B. (1990). Grounded theory, In B, Sarter (Ed.), Paths to knowledge (pp. 29-33). New York: National League for Nursing Press.

17.

Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-534). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

18.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 42.

19.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Introduction in Optimal Experience Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. UK, Cambridge: Cambridge University.

20.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). 몰입의 즐거움 [Finding flow]. (이희재 역). 서울: 해냄. (원전은 1997년에 출판)

21.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). 몰입의 기술 [Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and play]. (이삼출 역). 서울: 더불어책. (원전은 2000년에 출판)

22.

Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. NY: Plenum Press, 23.

23.

Eisner, E. (1991). The Enlightened eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. NY: Macmillan.

24.

Fouts, G. (1994). Moments of “connection” on television and in the movies. Paper presented to the Canadian Communications Association, Calgary, Alberta.

25.

Fouts, G., & Schwartz, K. (1996). Music and affective attunement by adolescents. Paper presented to th Canadian Communications Association, St. Catherines, Ontario.

26.

Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1966). The Purpose and Credibility of Qualitative Research. Nursing Research, 15, 56-61.

27.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.

28.

Goetz, J. & Lecompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. NY: Academic press.

29.

Hones, D. F. (1998). Known in part: The transformational power of narrative inquiry. Qualitative inquiry, 4(2), 225-248.

30.

Hrynchak, D & Fouts, G. (1992). Affective attunement profiles of university students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Quebec City, Quebec.

31.

Hrynchak, D & Fouts, G. (1998). Perception of affect attunement by adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 43-48.

32.

Mason, J. (1999). 질적연구방법론 [Qualitative Researching]. 김두섭 역. 서울: 나남출판. (원전은 1996년에 출판)

33.

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 281.

34.

Smith, B. (1999). The abyss: Exploring depression through narrative of the self. Qualitative inquiry, 5(2), 264-279.

35.

Spradley, J. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

36.

Stainback, S., & Stainback, W.(1992). 질적연구의 이해와 실천 [Understanding & Conducting Qualitative Research]. (김병하 역). 서울: 도서출판 특수교육. (원전은 1988년에 출판)

37.

Stern, D. N. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: a view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books inc.

38.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of Qualitative Research. New Deli: Sage publications.

39.

Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.

40.

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

41.

Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General