바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.27 No.2

Citation Share

혈연과 비혈연을 향한 이타주의의 발달: 진화적 관점

Development of Altruism toward kin vs. non-kin: Evolutionary perspective

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2008, v.27 no.2, pp.351-371
차재연 (충북대학교 심리학과)
김혜리 (충북대학교)
차재연, & 김혜리. (2008). 혈연과 비혈연을 향한 이타주의의 발달: 진화적 관점. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 27(2), 351-371.

초록

진화적 원리는 혈연과 비혈연을 향한 이타주의의 본질에 차이가 있을 것임을 시사한다. 즉 비용이 많이 드는 도움행동은 혈연에게 하나(혈연선택 이론), 비용이 적게 드는 행동은 호혜성에 따라 비혈연에게도 한다(호혜적 이타주의 이론)는 것이다. 본 연구는 5세, 11세 및 대학생을 대상으로 도움행동에 대한 진화적 원리를 검증하였다. 178명의 참가자에게 주인공이 형제자매, 사촌, 친구 중 누구에게 도움을 받았는지에 따라 이 후 그 세 명이 도움을 필요로 하는 상황에서 누구를 도울지를 질문하였다. 5세 아동은 도움행동에 드는 비용에 관계없이 주인공이 도움을 받았던 대상을 도울 것이라고 판단하였다. 일상적인 도움이 필요한 상황에서는, 11세 아동과 대학생도 5세 아동과 유사하게, 주인공이 도움을 받았던 대상을 도울 것이라고 판단하였으나, 형제자매를 도울 것이라고 판단한 비율이 5세보다는 높았다. 비용이 많이 드는 생사 도움이 필요한 상황에서는 11세 아동과 대학생은 누구에게서 도움을 받았었는지에 관계없이 형제자매를 도울 것이라고 판단하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 이타행동의 본질이 발달시점에 따라 다르다는 것을 보여주었다. 즉, 5세 아동의 이타행동은 호혜적 이타주의 이론으로, 11세 아동과 대학생의 이타행동은 혈연선택 이론으로 보다 잘 설명되었다.

keywords
altruism, evolutionary principle, kin selection theory, reciprocity, kin, 이타주의, 진화적 원리, 혈연선택 이론, 호혜성, 혈연

Abstract

Evolutionary principles suggest that there will be differences in the nature of altruism directed toward kin vs. non-kin; humans preferentially provide the low-cost help to non-kin who had helped them, but the high-cost help to close relations. The present study sought to explore these differences. Participants were 178 5-year-olds, 11-year-olds and adults. Participants were asked to whom they would provide the high-cost help and low-cost help. Five-year-olds preferentially provided both the low- and high-cost helps to the helper who had helped them in the past, demonstrating the importance of reciprocity for helping behavior. Eleven-year-olds and adults preferentially provided the low-cost helps to the past helper just like 5-year-olds. However, they provided the high-cost help to siblings even though they had not helped them, suggesting the impotance of close relation for the high-cost helping behavior. The present results suggest that the nature of altruism changes during developmental course.

keywords
altruism, evolutionary principle, kin selection theory, reciprocity, kin, 이타주의, 진화적 원리, 혈연선택 이론, 호혜성, 혈연

참고문헌

1.

Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773-789.

2.

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual Changes in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.

3.

Cialdini R. B., Brown S. L., Mewis B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 481-494.

4.

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L Cosmides, & Tooby, J. (Ed.), The Adapted Mind (pp. 163-228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5.

Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & J. Barkow (1992). Evolutionary Psychology and Conceptual Integration. In J. H. Barkow, L Cosmides, & Tooby, J. (Ed.), The Adapted Mind (pp. 3-15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

6.

Dawkins, R. (2002). 이기적 유전자[The selfish gene]. (홍영남 역). 서울: 을유문화사. 원전은 1976년에 출판.

7.

Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1991). Prosocial behavior and empathy: A multimethod developmental perspective. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 34-61). Newbury Park. CA: Sage.

8.

Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1-15.

9.

Hamilton, W. D. & Axelrod, R., (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390-1396.

10.

Hauser, M. D., Chen, M. K., Chen, F., & Chuang, E. (2003). Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B, 270, 2362-2370.

11.

Haviland, S., & Clark, E. (1974). This man's father is my father's son: A study of acquisition of kin terms. Journal of Child Language, 1, 23-47.

12.

Jankowiak, W., & Diderich, M. (2000). Sibling solidarity in a polygamous community in the USA: Unpacking inclusive fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 125-139.

13.

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of independence. New York: Interscience.

14.

Korchmaros, J. D., & Kenny, D. A. (2001). Emotional closeness as a mediator of the effect of genetic relatedness on altruism. Psychological Science, 12, 262-265.

15.

Korchmaros, J. D., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). An evolutionary and close relationship model of helping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 21-43.

16.

Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection: Siblings, altruism and incest. Nature, 445, 727-731.

17.

Marler, P. R. (1959). Developments in the study of animal communication. In P. R. Bell (ed.), Darwin's Biological Work (pp. 150-206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311, 1297-1300.

19.

Moore, J. (1984). The evolution of reciprocal sharing. Ethological Sociobiology, 5, 5-14.

20.

Neyer, F. J. (2002). Twin relationships in old age: A developmental perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 155-178.

21.

Neyer, F. J., & Lang, F. R. (2003). Blood is thicker than water: Kinship orientation across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 310-321.

22.

Olson, K. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108, 222-231.

23.

Romer, D., Gruder, C. L., & Lizzadro, T. (1986). A person-situation approach to altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1001-1012.

24.

Rosenberg, A. (1985). The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

25.

Rushton, J. P. (1989). Genetic similarity, human altruism, and group selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 503-559.

26.

Rushton, J. P. (1991). Is altruism innate? Psychological Inquiry, 2, 141-143.

27.

Shavit, Y., Fischer, C. S., & Koresh, Y. (1994). Kin and nonkin under collective threat: Israeli networks during the gulf war. Social Forces, 72, 1197-1215.

28.

Singer, P. (1980). Marx. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29.

Smith, M. S., Kish, B. J., & Crawford, C. B. (1987). Inheritance of wealth as human kin investment. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 171-182.

30.

Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto Others. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

31.

Springer, K. (1992). Children's awareness of the biological implications of kinship. Child Development, 63, 950-959.

32.

Springer, K. (1995). Acquiring a naive theory of kinship through inference. Child Development, 66, 547-558.

33.

Stevens, J. R., & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 60-65.

34.

Stone, V., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Kroll, N., Knight, R. T. (2002). Selective impairment of reasoning about social exchange in a patient with bilateral limbic system damage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencies of the United States of Ameriaca, 99(17), 11537-11542.

35.

Sugiyama, L. S., Tooby, J., & cosmides, L. (2002). Cross-cultural evidence of cognitive adaptations for social exchange among the Shiwiar of Ecuadorian Amazonia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencies of the United States of Ameriaca, 99(17), 11531- 11536.

36.

Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P.J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ; lawrence Ealbaum Asspcoates.

37.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In W. G. Runciman & J. M. Smith (Ed.), Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man (pp. 119-143). London: Oxford University Press.

38.

Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior (pp. 183-237). New York: State University of New York Press.

39.

Trevarthen, C. (1979). Instincts for human understanding and for cultural cooperation: Their development in infancy. In M. von Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, & D. Ploog (Eds.), Human ethology: Claims and limits of a new disciplines. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

40.

Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46, 35-57.

41.

Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311, 1301-1302.

42.

White, L. K., & Riedmann, A. (1992). When the Brady Bunch grows up: Step/half and full sibling relationships in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 197-208.

43.

Wilson, E. O. (1978). On Human Nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책