바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

The Influence of Meaningfulness on the Judgment of the Beauty of Hangul Characters

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2008, v.27 no.3, pp.621-633

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

To investigate which factor had an effect on the judgment of Hangul character's beauty, 84 Hangul characters were selected according to their usage frequencies, and its visual simplicity, ease of pronunciation, and meaningfulness were surveyed of each 100 college students, respectively, in the survey 1. Multiple regression analysis revealed that meaningfulness was the most important factor. Even though each other factor had its own contribution, its effect size was very small when compared simultaneously with the meaningfulness factor. In the survey 2, students were induced to give more attention to visual aspects of Hangul characters. Some rated visual dynamics of Hangul characters, and others had to choose between two kinds of Hangul fonts before they rated Hangul's visual beauty. The analysis, however, found that meaningfulness was still the most important. This result indicates that Koreans do not give much attention to the visual aspects of Hangul and they are apt to be greatly influenced by semantic factors on Hangul-related judgments.

keywords
멋, 한글, 의미충만성, 시각적 단순성, 시각 역동성, beauty, Hangul, meaningfulness, visual simplicity, visual dynamics, beauty, Hangul, meaningfulness, visual simplicity, visual dynamics

Reference

1.

김흥규, 강범모 (1997). 한글 사용빈도의 분석. 서울: 고려대학교 민족문화연구소.

2.

남영신 (2003). 국어대사전(개정 2판). 서울: 성안당.

3.

박창호 (2008). 색채 감성의 위계 구조에 대한 탐구. 인지과학, 19(1), 41-56.

4.

이모영 (1997). 지각역동성과 표현지각. 1997년 실험 및 인지심리학회 겨울학술발표논문집, 105-115.

5.

이의철, 조명한 (1968). 한 단어의 시각적 체제화에 작용하는 요인에 대한 분석. 한국심리학회지, 1, 5-13.

6.

장현정, 윤형건 (2003). 디자인 요소로서 한글 글꼴의 감성적 평가와 선호에 대한 연구. 한국감성과학회지, 6(2), 49-58.

7.

최동찬, 박영택 (2000). 한글의 감성공학 분석에 관한 연구. 한국감성과학회 2000년 추계학술대회 논문집, 13-19.

8.

한국일보 (2008. 10. 6.) 한글, 디자인 예술로 화려한 변신. 주간한국 Magazine. 2242호http://weekly.hankooki.com/lpage/08_coverstory/200810/wk20081008125602100810.htm에서 인출.

9.

Arnheim, R. (1984). 예술심리학. (김재은 역)[원제는 Toward a Psychology of Art(1966)] 서울: 이화여대 출판부.

10.

Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

11.

Bornstein, M. H. (1984). Psychology and art. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Psychology and Its Allied Disciplines (Vol. 1) (Pp.1-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Garner, W. R. (1974). The Processing of Information and Structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

13.

Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1971). A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 307-349.

14.

Martindale, C., Moore, K., & Borkum, J. (1990). Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 53-80.

15.

Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General