바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.29 No.3

Citation Share

Torrance의 창의적 사고 검사에 대한 구성개념 타당도 분석

Construct validation of Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2010, v.29 no.3, pp.461-488
강윤정 (성균관대학교)
이순묵 (성균관대학교)
강윤정, & 이순묵. (2010). Torrance의 창의적 사고 검사에 대한 구성개념 타당도 분석. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29(3), 461-488.

초록

본 연구는 전 세계적으로 가장 널리 사용되고 있지만, 지속적으로 논란이 되어오고 있는 ‘Torrance의 창의적 사고 검사(TTCT)’의 구성개념타당도에 관련하여 요인타당도를 분석하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같이 요약될 수 있다. 첫째, Torrance의 창의적 사고검사 평가 요인들의 과제별 세부측정치들을 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였고, 다음으로 탐색적 요인분석으로 얻은 결과가 안정적으로 나타나고 요인의 분산이 유의미한지를 확인하기 위하여 확대된 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, TTCT에서 산출된 11개의 과제별 세부측정치들은 TTCT의 과제효과를 나타내는 2개 요인과 인지적 개념을 나타내는 1개 요인으로 나타났다. 둘째, Torrance의 창의적 사고검사 차원성에 대한 선행연구에서는 TTCT가 단일차원성을 가지는지, 다차원성을 가지는지에 대한 논쟁이 끊임없이 제기되었다. 선행연구에서 언급된 1요인모형과 2요인모형은 분석 수준이 문항수준이 아닌 소척도(subscale)이므로 내용요인과 과제요인이 분리되지 않는 모형이었다. 그에 반해, 본 연구에서는 내용요인으로서 ‘확산적 사고’요인, 과제요인으로서 ‘그림완성과제’요인 및 ‘선 더하기과제’요인이 추출되었다. 이것은 TTCT에서 측정되는 구성개념이 현재의 자료에서는, Torrance의 주장과 달리 1차원이며 아울러 측정치는 확산적 사고라는 인지(cognition)만 측정하지 않고 과제요인까지 측정하는 상황인지적 도구라고 할 수 있다.

keywords
Creativity Assessment, Divergent Thinking Test, Structure of TTCT, Task effect, Creativity Assessment, Divergent Thinking Test, Structure of TTCT, Task effect, 창의성 측정, 확산적 사고 검사, TTCT 구조 모형, 과제효과

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the construct validity of the TTCT, which showed ongoing conflict regarding its dimensionality. The results can be summarized as follows. First of all, exploratory factor analysis was administered to at the level of task activities measuring creativity factors of divergent thinking. Next, a confirmatory rotation was performed to confirm whether the results obtained by exploratory factor analysis were generalizable. Therefore, total of three factor was derived; two factors representing task effect(i.e. Task 2 and Task 3), and one factor representing creativity measured by TTCT. Second, we tried to answer the long controversies have been raised continually whether TTCT is a single dimensional or multidimensional. To examine the dimensionality of TTCT, confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to test the fit of one factor model, and two factor model mentioned in the extent literature, and three factor model of this study. The result shows that the construct measured by TTCT is dimensional, which is not in accord with Torrance's view. It also demonstrated that task activities in TTCT measure both cognition factor and task factor, suggesting that TTCT is a tool of measuring situated cognition.

keywords
Creativity Assessment, Divergent Thinking Test, Structure of TTCT, Task effect, Creativity Assessment, Divergent Thinking Test, Structure of TTCT, Task effect, 창의성 측정, 확산적 사고 검사, TTCT 구조 모형, 과제효과

참고문헌

1.

교육인적자원부 (1998). 제7차 교육과정.

2.

김명숙 (1998). 창의성 교육프로그램의 유형 및 관련 변인이 창의성 향상에 미치는 효과. 성균관대학교 일반대학원 박사학위 청구논문.

3.

김영채 (2002). 검사요강: Torrance TTC(도형) A형. 대구: 창의력 한국 FPSP/현곡 R & D.

4.

김준엽 (2006, 11, 6). 대기업이 꼽는 인재의 조건 1순위는 ‘창의성’. 국민일보. http:// ranking.empas.com/survey/survey_view_result.html?artsn=236615에서 2008. 11, 19 인출.

5.

김현철 (2000). 표본의 추출과 분석. 서울: 교육과학사.

6.

김혜숙 (1999). 창의성 진단 측정도구의 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 13(4). 269-303.

7.

이영덕, 정원식. (1971). 표준화 간편 창의성 검사 실시 요강 및 규준(초등학교용). 서울: 코리안테스킹센터.

8.

이순묵 (1990). 공변량구조분석. 서울: 성원사.

9.

이순묵 (1994). 요인분석의 관행과 문제점, 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 7(1), 1-27.

10.

이순묵 (1995). 요인분석 Ⅰ, 서울: 학지사.

11.

이순묵, 한기순 (2004). 창의성의 영역일반성과 영역특수성 연구에서의 문제 및 대안으로서의 잠재변수모형, 교육심리연구, 18(4), 155-176.

12.

이순묵, 김영록, 최인수 (2007). 산물창의성 검사에서의 창의성 요인과 영역효과: 다특질다방법 접근, 교육심리연구, 21(4), 827- 846.

13.

전경원 (2000). 동․서양의 하모니를 위한 창의학. 서울: 학문사.

14.

조성연 (1985). 창의성 검사의 타당화를 위한 일 연구, 연세대학교 일반대학교 석사학위 청구논문.

15.

최인수 (1998). 창의성을 이해하기 위한 여섯 가지 질문. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 17(1), 25-47.

16.

Alliotti, N. C., Britt, M. F., & Haskins, G. P. (1975). Relationships among creativity, intelligence, and achievement measures in upward bound students. Psychology in the Schools, 12, 423-427.

17.

Almeida, L., Pritto, L., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 53-58.

18.

Alston, D. J. (1971). A comparison of motor creativity with verbal creativity of black cultural deprived children. Dissertation abstract international, 32, 2458.

19.

Aslan, A. E., & Puccio, G. J. (2006). Developing and testing a Turkish version of Torrance's Tests of Creative Thinking: A study of adults. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 163-178

20.

Ball, O. E., & Torrance, E. P. (1984). Streamlines scoring workbook: Figural A. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.

21.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

22.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.

23.

Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp.136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage..

24.

Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Tateneni, K., & Mels, G. (1999). CEFA: Comprehensive exploratory factor analysis, WWW document and computer program. URL http:// quantrm2. psy. ohio-state. edu/browne/.

25.

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D, W. (1959). Convergent and Discriminant Validation by The Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.

26.

Chase, C. I. (1985). Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. In J. V. Mitchell, Jr.(Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbooks(pp.1631-1632). Lincoln: University of nebraska, Buros Institute of Mental measurements.

27.

Child, D. The essentials of factor analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.

28.

Clapham, M. M. (1998). Structure of figural Forms A and B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 275-283.

29.

Clapham, M. M. (2004). The convergent validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and Creativity Interest Inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 828-841.

30.

Cohen, S., & Oden, S. An examination of creativity and locus of control in children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1974, 124, 179- 185.

31.

Cooper, E. (1991). A critique of six measures for assessing creativity. Journal of creative Behavior, 25(3), 194-204.

32.

Cramond, B., Morgan, J. M., & Bandalos. (2005). A Report on the 40-Year Follow-Up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and Well in the New Millennium, Gifted child quarterly, 49(4), 283~291.

33.

Cropley, A. J. (1972). A five-Year longitudinal study of the validity of creativity tests. Developmental Journal of Psychology, 24, 31-36.

34.

Cropley. A. J. (2007). 창의성과 학교교육[Fostering Creativity: More Ways Than One]. (이재신, 박기현, 황계자, 이지혜). 서울: 원미사.(원전은 1992에 출판)

35.

Davis, G. A. (1989). Testing for creative potential. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 257- 274.

36.

Fishkin, A. S., & Johnson, A. S. (1998). Who is creative? Identifying children's creative ability. Roeper Review, 21(1), 40-46.

37.

Fitzgerald, D., & Hattie, J. A. (1983) An evaluation of the ‘Your Style of Learning and Thinking Inventory’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 336-346.

38.

Gonzales, M. A., & Campos, A. (1997). Mental imagery and creative thinking. Journal of Psychology, 131, 357–364.

39.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis, 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

40.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Address of the president of the American Psychological. Association at Pennsylvania State College.

41.

Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of the intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.

42.

Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

43.

Guilford, J. P. (1962). Factors that aid and hinder creativity. Teachers College Record, 63, 380–392.

44.

Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego: Robert R. Knapp.

45.

Harvey, O. J., Hoffmeister, J. K., Coates, C., & White, B. J. (1970) A partial evaluation of Torrance's tests of creativity. American Educational Research Journal, 7, 359-372.

46.

Hassan, M. A. (1986). Construct validity of Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: A confirmatory factor-analytic study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(8-A), 2233. (UMI No. 8523000).

47.

Heausler, N. L., & Thompson, B. (1988). Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 463-468.

48.

Helson, R. (1999). A longitudinal study of creative personality in women. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 89-102.

49.

Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.

50.

Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurement used in the study of creativity. In, A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds(Ed). Handbook of creativity(pp.53-76). New York: Plenum.

51.

Hocevar, D., & Michael, W. (1979). The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 39, 917-921.

52.

Isaksen, S. G., & Puccio, G. J. (1988). Adaptation-Innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The level style-issue revisited. Psychological Reports, 63, 659-670.

53.

Jórekog, K. G. (1974). Analysing Psychological Data by Structural Analysis of Covariance Matrics. In R. C. Atkinson, D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce & P. Suppes(Ed.), Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, 12, 1- 56.

54.

Kaltsoonnis, B. (1972). Additional instruments useful in studying creative behavior and creative talents: Part Ⅲ. Noncommercially available instruments. Journal of creative behavior, 6(4), 268-274.

55.

Kaufman, J. C., Plucker. J. A., & Baer. J. (2008). Essentials of Creativity Assessment. New York: Wiley.

56.

Kaiser, H. F. & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111-117.

57.

Kazelskis, R. (1972). The convergent, divergent, and factorial validity of the Torrance Figural Test of Creativity. Southern Journal of Educational Research, 6, 123-129.

58.

Kim. H. K. (2006). Is creativity Unidimensional or Multidimensional? Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251-259.

59.

Kim, H. K., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L. (2006). The latent structure and measurement invariance of scores on the Torrance Tests of creative thinking-figural. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(3), 459-477.

60.

Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629.

61.

Kogan, N., & Pankove, E. (1972). Creative ability over a fiveyear span. Child Development, 43, 427-442.

62.

Lee, S-M. (2010). A review of CEFA software: comprehensive exploratory factor analysis program. International Journal of Testing, 10, 95-103.

63.

Lissitz, R. W. & Willhoft, J. L. (1985). A Methodological study of the Torrance Tests of Creativity. Journal of educational measurement, 22(1), 1-11.

64.

Mackler, B., & Shontz, F. C. (1967). Characteristics of responses to tests of creativity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 73- 80.

65.

Mednick, S. A. (1968). The Remote Associates Test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213-214.

66.

Parkhurst, Shawn. (1999). In the middle of the myth: The problem of power in gender relations and the Alto Douro region of northern Portugal. Anthropologica XLI: 103-115.

67.

Parnes, S. J., Noller, R. B., & Biondi, A. M. (1977). Guide to Creative Action. NYC: Scribners.

68.

Plass, H., Michael, J. J., & Michael, W. B. (1974). The factorial validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking for a sample of 111 sixth-grade children. Educational and Psychological measurement, 34, 413-414.

69.

Pelz, D. C. (1963). Relationships between measures of scientific performance and other variables. in C. W. Taylor & F. Barron(Ed.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: Wiley.

70.

Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalysis of Torrance's(1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.

71.

Puccio, G. J., Treffinger, D. J., & Talbot, R. J. (1995). Exploratory examination of relationships between creativity styles and creative products, Creativity Research Journal, 8, 157-172.

72.

Runco, M. A. (1999). Divergent thinking, creativity, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 16-22.

73.

Runco, M. A. (2004). Everyone has creative Potential. In R. J. Stenrnberg, E. L. Grigenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From Potential to realization(pp.21-30). Washington: DC.: American Psychological Association.

74.

Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. New York: Academic Press.

75.

Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.

76.

Runco, M. A., & Marz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 213-221.

77.

Thorndike, R. L. (1972). Review of Torrance Tests of Creativity thinking. In O. K. Buros (Ed), The seventh mental measurements yearbook(pp. 838-839). Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon Press.

78.

Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

79.

Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.

80.

Torrance, E. P. (1970). Encouraging creativity in the classroom. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Company Publishers.

81.

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

82.

Torracne, E. P. (1976). Creativity testing in education. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 1, 136-148.

83.

Torrance, E. P. (1979). Unique needs of the creative child and adult. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development. 78th NSSE Yearbook(pp. 352-371). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.

84.

Torrance, E. P. (1990). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Norms-Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.

85.

Torrance, E. P. (1998). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Norms-Technical Manual Figural(Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.

86.

Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrnace Tests of Creative Thinking Norms-Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

87.

Torrance, E. P., & Horng, R. Y. (1980). Creativity and style of learning and thinking characteristics of adaptors and innovators. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 5, 80-85.

88.

Torrance, E. P., & Wu, T. (1981). A comparative longitudinal study of the adult creative achievements of elementary school children identified as highly intelligent and as highly creative. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 6, 71-76.

89.

Treffinger, D, J., & Poggio, J. P. (1972). Needed research on the measurement of creativity. Journal of creative Behavior, 5(2), 253-257.

90.

Wallach, M. A. (1976). Test tell us little about talent. American Scientist, January-February, 57- 63.

91.

Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Models of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

92.

Ward. W. C. (1968). Creativity in young children. Child Development. 39, 737-754.

93.

Wechsler, S. (2006). Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking to the Brazilian culture. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 15-25.

94.

Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait- multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1-26.

95.

Yamada, H., & Tam, A. Y. (1996). Prediction study of adult creative achievement: Torrance's longitudinal study creativity revisited. Journal of Creative Behavior. 30, 144-149.

96.

Yamamoto, K. (1964). Evaluation of some creativity measures in a high school with peer nominations as criteria. The Journal of Psychology, 58, 285-293.

97.

Yamamoto, K., & Frengel, B. (1966). An exploratory component analysis of the Minnesota Tests of Creative Thinking. California Journal of Educational Research, 77, 220-229.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책