바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

한국심리학회지: 일반

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

Vol.30 No.1
Citation Share

한국판 인지실패 질문지의 타당화: 대학생을 대상으로

A Study on the Validation of Cognitive Failures Questionnaire: Case of Korean College Students

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2011, v.30 no.1, pp.341-355
박창호 (전북대학교)
강희양 (학교법인 을지대학병원)
박창호, & 강희양. (2011). 한국판 인지실패 질문지의 타당화: 대학생을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(1), 341-355.
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

일상적으로 경험하는 인지 오류를 포괄적으로 측정하는 도구로서, Broadbent, Cooper, Fitzgerald와 Parkes(1982)는 인지실패 질문지를 개발하였다. 이 질문지의 요인구조들이 여러 가지로 제안되어 왔는데, Wallace(2004)는 자신과 동료들(Wallace, Kass, & Stanny, 2002)이 제안한 4 요인 모형의 타당성을 주장하였다. 본 연구는 번안된 인지실패질문지의 요인구조와 타당성을 검토하고자 수행되었다. 293 명의 대학생을 대상으로 인지실패, 일상주의, 일상기억, 성격의 5 요인 척도 및 학업성취 수준을 조사하였다. 인지실패 질문지를 요인분석하여 추출한 5개 요인으로 구성된 모형의 적합도를 확인적 요인분석으로 평가하였을 때, 이 모형이 수용할 만한 것으로 보였다. 척도들 간의 상관관계를 분석하였을 때, 인지실패는 주의 및 기억과 높은 상관을 보이나 학업성취 수준과는 상관을 보이지 않았다. 그리고 성격의 5 요인 중, 신경증과는 정적 상관을, 성실성과는 부적 상관을 보이는, 예상되는 결과가 얻어졌다. 번안한 인지실패 질문지는 타당한 것으로 보이지만, 그 요인구조는 Wallace(2004)의 제안과 차이가 있었다. 이는 인지실패 질문지에 대한 한국판의 고려가 필요함을 시사한다. 인지실패질문지의 한계점과 개선 방향에 대한 논의를 하였다.

keywords
인지실패질문지, 인지오류, 일상주의, 일상기억, 성격의 5요인, cognitive failures questionnaire, cognitive error, everyday attention, everyday memory, five factor model of personality

Abstract

Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) was developed as a measure of everyday cognitive errors by Broadbent, Cooper, Fitzgerald, and Parkes (1982). Concerning the factor structure of this questionnaire, there have been various models suggested, including a 4-factor model which was suggested by Wallace, Kass, and Stanny (2002) and was validated by Wallace (2004). This study was performed to make Korean version of CFQ and to evaluate its factor structure and validity. With 293 college students, scores of cognitive failures, everyday attention, everyday memory, and five factor scales of personality, and their levels of academic achievement were surveyed. Factor analysis of CFQ suggested 5 factors, whose fit indices were assessed positively by confirmatory factor analysis. Correlation analysis showed that cognitive failures correlated highly with everyday attention and memory, but not with academic achievement level. As expected, cognitive failures had positive correlation with neuroticism and negative correlation with conscientiousness. In conclusion, Korean version of CFQ was judged to have a lot of validity, but it revealed somewhat different factor structure from the English one suggested by Wallace. Limitations of CFQ and directions of future studies were discussed.

keywords
인지실패질문지, 인지오류, 일상주의, 일상기억, 성격의 5요인, cognitive failures questionnaire, cognitive error, everyday attention, everyday memory, five factor model of personality

참고문헌

1.

유태용, 이기범, Ashton, M.C. (2004). 한국판 HEXACO 성격검사의 구성 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18, 61-75.

2.

윤선아, 김현택, 최준식 (2007). 주의력 조절 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상. 26, 185-199.

3.

이순묵 (1995). 요인분석 1. 서울: 학지사.

4.

이원영 (2006). 안전행동 및 사고에 대한 성실성, 인지실패 및 직무스트레스의 상호작용. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19, 475-497.

5.

Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., Fitzgerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1-16.

6.

Esgate, A., & Groome, A. (2008). 응용인지심리학. (이영애, 이나경 역) 서울: 시그마프레스. [원저: An Introduction to Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2005]

7.

Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologists, 48, 26-43.

8.

Groome, D., & Grant, N. (2005). Retrival-induced forgetting is inversely related to everyday cognitive failures. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 313-319.

9.

Hough, L. M., & Schneider, R. J. (1996). Personality traits, taxonomies, and applications in organizations. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual Differences and Behavior in Organizations (pp.31-88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

10.

Larson, G. E., Alderton, D. L., Neideffer, M., & Underhill, E. (1997). Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the cognitive failures questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 29-38.

11.

Martin, M. (1986). Ageing and patterns of change in everyday memory and cognition. Human Learning, 5, 63-74.

12.

Matthews, G., Coyle, K., & Craig, A. (1990). Multiple factors of cognitive failure and their relationships with stress vulnerability. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 12, 49-65.

13.

Matthews, G., & Wells, A. (1988). Relationships between anxiety, self-consciousness, and cognitive failure. Cognition and Emotion, 2, 123-132.

14.

Mecacci, L., & Righi, S. (2006). Cognitive failures, metacognitive beliefs and aging. Preview. Personality & Individual Differences, 40, 1453-1459.

15.

Meiran, N., Israeli, A., Levi, H., & Grafi, R. (1994). Individual differences in self reported cognitive failures: The attention hypothesis revisted. Personality & Individual Differences, 17, 727-739.

16.

Merckelbach, H., Muris, P., & Rassin, E. (1999). Fantasy proneness and cognitive failures as correlates of dissociative experiences. Personality & Individual Differences, 26, 961-967.

17.

Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1-15.

18.

Pollina, L. K., Greene, A. L., Tunick, R. H., & Puckett, J. M. (1992). Dimensions of everyday memory in young adulthood. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 305-321.

19.

Reason, J., & Lucas, D. (1984). Absent-mindedness in shops: Its incidence, correlates, and consequences. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 121-131.

20.

Royle, J., & Lincoln, N. B. (2008). The everyday memory questionnaire-revised: Development of a 13-item scale. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 114-121.

21.

Schneider, R. J., & Hough, L. M. (1995). Personality and industrial/organizatinal psychology. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson(Eds), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.75-129). Chichester, England: Wiley.

22.

Tipper, S. T., & Baylis, G. C. (1987). Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure. Personality & Individual Differences, 8, 667-675.

23.

van der Linden, D., Keijsers, G. P. J., Eling, P., & van Schaijk, R. (2005). Work stress and attentional difficulties: An initial study on burnout and cognitive failures. Work & Stress, 19(1), 23-36.

24.

Wallace, J. C. (2003). Workplace Safety Performance: Conscientiousness, Cognitive Failure, and Their interaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 316-327.

25.

Wallace, J. C. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the cognitive failures questionnaire: Evidence for dimensionality and construct validity. Personality & Individual Differences, 37, 307-324.

26.

Wallace, J. C., Kass, S. J., & Stanny, C. J. (2002). The cognitive failures questionnaire revisited: Dimensions and Correlates. The Journal of General Psychology, 129, 238-256.

27.

Wallace, J. C., & Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Can accidents and industrial mishaps be predicted? Further investigation into the relationship between cognitve fialure and reports of accidents. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 503-514.

28.

Wallace, J. C., Vodanovich, S. J., & Restino, B. M. (2003). Predicting cognitive failures from boredom proneness and daytime sleepiness scores: an investigation within military and undergraduate samples. Personality & Individual Differences, 34, 635-644.

29.

Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2003). 공학심리학(3판). (곽호완, 김영진, 박창호, 남종호, 이재식 역). 서울: 시그마프레스.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책