ISSN : 1229-067X
본 연구는 한국 대학생의 음주 예방행동전략 척도를 타당화하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 예비문항 개발을 위해 번역, 역번역의 번안과정을 거친 예방행동전략(protective behavioral strategies scale: PBSS) 문항과 국내 4년제 대학 재학생 117명을 대상으로 실시한 개방형 설문조사 응답을 통합하여 음주 예방행동전략 예비척도 50문항을 제작하였다. 개발된 예비척도에 대해 국내 4년제 대학 재학생 66명에게 이해도와 음주 예방 효과성을 평정하도록 하였고 최종 문항을 확정하기 위해 국내 4년제 대학 재학생 246명을 대상으로 예비척도에 대한 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 탐색적 요인분석 결과, 총 13개 문항으로 이루어진 2개 요인이 확인되었다. 1요인은 활동 전략에 대한 문항으로 대인관계 및 개인의 사고와 행동으로, 2요인은 음주 방법에 대한 문항으로 알콜섭취 및 비알콜섭취와 관련된 행동으로 구성되었다. 마지막으로 국내 4년제 대학 재학생 257명을 대상으로 확인적 요인분석과 타당도 분석을 실시했다. 확인적 요인분석 결과 모형이 적합함을 확인할 수 있었고 음주동기, 음주정도, 대학생 음주문제 척도들과의 상관분석을 통해서 수렴, 공존 타당도를 확인하였으며, 위계적 중다회귀분석을 통해 변별유용성을 확인하였다. 또한 3주 후 실시한 재검사를 통해서 안정적인 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 확인하였다. 마지막으로, 본 연구의 학문적 의의 및 시사점, 그리고 제한점에 대해 논의하였다.
The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of protective behavioral strategies scale. In order to develop preliminary items, the items of a protective behavioral strategies scale (PBSS) were adapted through translation and back-translation, and an open-ended survey was conducted on 117 students at a domestic four-year university. Then a preliminary alcohol-related protective strategies scale of 50 items was produced based on the adapted items of the protective behavioral strategies scale and the results of the survey. 66 students from another domestic four-year university were asked to rate their own understanding and effectiveness of the scale on drinking prevention, and an exploratory factor analysis was made after selecting 246 students from a third domestic four-year university to finalize the items. As a result of making an exploratory factor analysis, two factors that consisted of 13 items were selected. Factor 1 was composed of items about activity strategies, which covered interpersonal relationship, personal thinking and behavior. Factor 2 was constituted by items about manner of drinking, which covered behaviors related to alcohol drink and alcohol non-drink. Finally, a confirmatory factor analysis and a validity analysis were carried out after 257 students from a fourth four-year university were selected. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the goodness-of-fit of the model, and the convergent, concurrent and discriminant validity of it was all confirmed by making a correlation and hierarchical multiple regression with scales of drinking motivation, alcohol use and drinking problems of college students. When a retest was conducted three weeks later, the test-retest reliability of the model was confirmed as well. Finally, the academic significance, suggestions and limitations of the study were discussed.
노컷뉴스 (2011. 2. 16.). 대학생 10명 중 7명이 폭음. http://www.nocutnews.co.kr/show.asp? idx=1719923.
동아일보 (2011. 2. 16). 대학생 10명 중 7명은 폭음자... 수시폭음자는 여자가 더 많아. http://news.donga.com/3/all/20110216/34880737/1.
류 미, 이민규, 신희천 (2010). 대학생의 폭음관련 사회인지적 요인과 음주정도의 관계-지각된 음주규준의 역할을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 16(1), 63-79.
박경민 (2005). 음주행동과 음주동기, 음주욕구를 설명하는 심리적 요인의 탐색: 스트레스대처방식, 사회적지지, 알코올 결과기대를 중심으로. 경상대학교 석사학위논문.
박부금, 이희경 (2012), 강점 활용 척도의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(3), 599- 616.
배병렬 (2011). 구조방정식 모델링: 원리와 실제. 서울: 청람.
서경현 (2003). 음주동기, 문제음주 및 음주 가족력과 대학생의 데이트 폭력. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 9(2), 61-78.
신행우 (2004). 남자대학생의 자아정체성 발달과 음주문제의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 17(2), 141-156.
양난미 (2010). 성, 음주정도에 따른 대학생의 음주문제 이해. 상담학연구, 11(4), 1707- 1727.
오혜숙 (2011). 원주지역 대학생들의 음주실태 및 음주문화에 대한 인식. 한국식생활문화학회지, 26(2), 101-112.
정원철 (2006). 대학생의 문제성음주의 실태와 관련 심리사회적 요인. 한국사회복지학, 58(1), 347-372.
탁진국 (2007). 심리검사 개발과 평가방법의 이해. 서울: 학지사.
한소영, 이민규, 신희천 (2005). 남녀 대학생의 음주문제 위험요인: 사회인지적 요인과 정서적 요인의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 17(4), 1003-1019.
Archie, S., Zangeneh Kazemi, A., Akhtar-Danesh, N. (2012). Concurrent binge drinking and depression among Canadian youth: Prevalence, patterns, and suicidality. Alcohol, 46(2), 165- 172.
Babor, T. F., De la Fuente, J. R., Saunders, J., & Grant, M. (1989). AUDIT-Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Health Care. World Health Organization, Division of Mental Health, Geneva.
Barnett, N. P., Murphy, J. G., Colby, S. M., & Monti, P. M. (2007). Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. Addictive Behaviors, 32(11), 2529-2548.
Cooper, M. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological assessment, 6(2), 117-128.
Ham, L. S., & Hope, D. A. (2003). College students and problematic drinking: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(5), 719-759.
Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus alternatives. Structural equation modeling, 6, 1-55.
Larimer, M. E., Lee, C. M., Kilmer, J. R., Fabiano, P. M., Stark, C. B., Geisner, I. M., Mallett, K. A., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., Feeney, M., & Neighbors, C. (2007). Personalized Mailed Feedback for College Drinking Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(2), 285-293.
Marlatt, G. A., Baer, J. S., Larimer, M. E. (1995) Preventing alcohol abuse in college students: A harm-reduction approach. Alcohol problems among adolescents: Current directions in prevention research, 147-172. Boyd G. M., Howard J., & Zucker R. A. (Eds), NJ: Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
Martens, M. P., Ferrier, A. G., & Cimini, M. D. (2007). Do protective behavioral strategies mediate the relationship between drinking motives and alcohol use in college students? Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68(1), 106-114.
Martens, M. P., Ferrier, A. G., Sheehy, M. J., Corbett, K., Anderson, D. A., & Simmons, A. (2005). Development of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66(5), 698-705.
Martens, M. P., Karakashian, M. A., Fleming, K. M., Fowler, R. M., Hatchett, E. S., Cimini, M. D. (2009). Conscientiousness, protective behavioral strategies, and alcohol use: Testing for mediated effects. Journal of Drug Education, 39(3), 273-287.
Martens, M. P., Martin, J. L., Hatchett, E. S., Fowler, R. M., Fleming, K. M., Karakashian, M. A., Cimini, M. D. (2008). Protective Behavioral Strategies and the Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms and Alcohol- Related Negative Consequences Among College Students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(4), 535-541.
Martens, M. P., Pedersen, E. R., LaBrie, J. W., Ferrier, A. G., Cimini, M. D. (2007). Measuring Alcohol-Related Protective Behavioral Strategies Among College Students: Further Examination of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(3), 307-315.
Martens, M, P., Taylor, K. K., Damann K. M., Page, J. C., Mowry, E. S., Cimini M. D. (2004). Protective behavioral strategies when drinking alcohol and their relationship to negative-alcohol related consequences in college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(4), 390-393.
Palmer, R. S., Corbin, W. R., & Cronce, J. M. (2010). Protective strategies: A mediator of risk associated with age of drinking onset. Addictive Behaviors, 35(5) 486-491.
Sugarman, D. E., & Carey, K. B. (2009). Drink Less or Drink Slower: The Effects of Instruction on Alcohol Consumption and Drinking Control Strategy Use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 577-585.
Wechsler, H., & Nelson, T. F. (2001). Binge drinking and the American College student: What's five drinking?. Journal of Addictive Behaviors, 15(4), 287-291.
White, H. R., Labouvie, E. W. (1989). Toward the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 30-37.