바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

학교 괴롭힘의 개념화와 자기보고식 평가: 현 쟁점 및 개선방안 고찰을 중심으로

Conceptualization and Self-Report Assessment of School Bullying: Current Issues and Future Directions

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2014, v.33 no.4, pp.759-785
이동형 (부산대학교)

초록

본 연구는 학교에서의 괴롭힘에 대한 연구물이 국내외적으로 급증하고 있는 상황에서 괴롭힘의 개념화 및 평가 관련 주요 쟁점들을 정리하고 개선방안을 고찰하였다. 이를 위해 괴롭힘에 대한 국내외 최근 연구문헌들을 검토하여 괴롭힘의 개념화에 대한 현 쟁점을 핵심 요소, 하위 유형 및 용어 선택의 문제로 나누어 자세히 분석하고, 괴롭힘 연구에서 현재 널리 사용되고 있는 자기보고식 평가방법을 중심으로 괴롭힘의 조작화 및 측정 방법론적 쟁점들을 핵심 요소 및 하위 유형의 조작화, 단일문항 대 다문항 접근, 실시 맥락과 절차, 응답자의 반응 특성, 공유방법분산의 문제로 범주화하여 차례로 고찰하였다. 또한 이러한 고찰을 바탕으로 국내의 괴롭힘 연구자들이 유념해야 할 시사점을 도출하고 괴롭힘 평가의 향후 개선방안을 제언하고 논의하였다.

keywords
괴롭힘, 학교폭력, 개념화, 조작화, 자기보고식 평가, bullying, school violence, conceptualization, operationalization, self-report assessment

Abstract

While the amount of research on bullying in schools has markedly increased in Korea and internationally, relatively little attention has been paid to its conceptualization and assessment practice. This study was to provide a systematic review on current issues in the conceptualization and self-report assessment of bullying with implications and future directions for research and practice. Recent domestic and international research publications were critically reviewed and three major issues (i.e., core components, subtypes and terminology) in the current conceptualization of bullying were identified and discussed, followed by self-report measurement/assessment issues in terms of the operationalization of core components and subtypes, single- vs. multiple-item approaches, contextual and procedural factors, response characteristics, and shared method variance. Implications and future directions for self-report assessment practice of bullying were derived and fully discussed especially for researchers and practitioners in Korea.

keywords
괴롭힘, 학교폭력, 개념화, 조작화, 자기보고식 평가, bullying, school violence, conceptualization, operationalization, self-report assessment

참고문헌

1.

강진령, 유형근 (2000). 집단괴롭힘. 서울: 학지사.

2.

교육부 (2014). 2014년 1차 학교폭력 실태조사분석결과 발표 - 보도자료. http://moe.go.kr 에서 2014년 8월 20일 자료 얻음.

3.

권준모 (1999). 한국의 왕따 현상의 개념화와왕따 연구의 방법론적 고찰. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 5(2), 59-72.

4.

김종구, 박지현 (2014). 또래괴롭힘의 개념과법적규율: 학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한법률과 관련하여. 일감법학, 27, 307-338.

5.

김현주 (2003). 집단 따돌림에서의 동조집단 유형화 연구. 청소년복지연구, 5(2), 103-118.

6.

김혜원 (2013). 청소년 학교폭력: 이해, 예방, 개입을 위한 지침서. 서울: 학지사.

7.

네이버국어사전 (2014). http://krdc.naver.com에서2014년 8월 20일 자료 얻음.

8.

서미정 (2008). 방관자의 집단 특성에 따른또래괴롭힘 참여 역할행동. 아동학회지, 29(5), 79-96.

9.

송지윤 (2010). 중학생의 또래괴롭힘, 정서표현성, 사회적지지 및 신체증상경험의 관계. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위청구논문.

10.

신유림 (2006). 학령기 아동의 또래괴롭힘에서측정방법에 따른 심리사회적 부적응 차이: 자기보고법과 또래 지명법의 비교. 한국가정관리학회지, 24(4), 141-149.

11.

이규미, 지승희, 오인수, 송미경, 장재홍, 정제영, 조용선, 이정윤, 유형근, 이은경, 고경희, 오혜영, 이유미, 김승혜, 최희영 (2014). 학교폭력 예방의 이론과 실제. 서울:학지사.

12.

이승연 (2013). 또래괴롭힘: 주변인 개입과 사회적 맥락 변화의 필요성. 한국심리학회지:학교, 10(1). 59-81.

13.

이춘재, 곽금주 (1999). 학교에서의 집단 따돌림:실태, 특성 및 대책. 서울: 집문당

14.

이해경, 김혜원 (2001). 초등학생들의 집단괴롭힘 개해행동과 피해행동에 대한 사회적, 심리적 예측변인들: 학년과 성별을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(1), 117-138.

15.

정옥분, 정순화, 김경은, 박연정 (2008). 국내집단따돌림 관련 연구의 경향분석. 인간발달연구, 15(1), 115-137.

16.

정종진 (2013). 학교폭력의 개념. 송재홍, 김광수, 박성희, 안이환, 오익수, 은혁기, 정종진, 조붕환, 홍종관, 황매향 (공저), 학교폭력의 예방 및 대책(pp. 51-86). 서울: 학지사.

17.

정태연, 김인경, 김은정 (2001). 집단 따돌림의측정방법에 따른 행동평가의 차이: 자기평가와 동료평가의 비교. 한국심리학회지:발달, 14(1), 145-149.

18.

정한중 (2009). 학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 문제점과 개선방안. 경희법학, 44(1), 73-99.

19.

조대훈, 김승혜, 강민수, 전연진, 이유미, 최희영 (2013). 학교 폭력 예방 및 대책. 서울:박영사.

20.

청소년폭력예방재단 (2014). 전국 학교폭력 실태조사 연구. (재)푸른나무 청예단.

21.

최보가, 임지영 (1999). 또래괴롭힘이 아동의외로움과 불안에 미치는 영향. 대한가정학회지, 37(5), 111-121.

22.

최은숙 (1999). 집단따돌림 가해, 피해 경향과 관련된 심리적 요인에 관한 일 연구. 서강대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

23.

최지영 (2008). 괴롭힘 상황에서의 아동의 가해 및 피해경험 측정방법 비교를 통한심리적 특성 연구. 초등교육연구, 21(3), 339-358.

24.

Ahmad, Y., & Smith, P. K. (1990). Behavioral measures: Bullying in schools. Newsletter of Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 26-27.

25.

Arora, C. M. J. (1996). Defining bullying:Towards a clearer general understanding and more effective intervention strategies. School Psychology International, 17, 317-329.

26.

Baly, M. W., & Cornell, D. G. (2011). Effects of an educational video on the measurement of bullying by self-report. Journal of School Violence, 10, 221-238.

27.

Batsche, G. M. (1997). Bullying. In G. G. Bear, K. M. Minke, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Children's needs, Part II: Development, problems, and alternatives (pp. 171-179). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

28.

Bovaird, J. A. (2010). Scales and surveys: some problems with measuring bullying behavior. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools:An international perspective (pp. 277-292). New York, NY: Routledge.

29.

Camodeca, M., Gossens, F. A., Schuengel, C., & Meerum, T. M. (2003). Links between social information processing in middle childhood and involvement in bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 116-127.

30.

Chan, H. F. J., Myron, R., & Crawshaw, M. (2005). The efficacy of non-anonymous measures of bullying. School Psychology International, 26, 443-458.

31.

Cook. C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., & Kim. T. E. (2010). Variability in the prevalence of bullying and victimization: A cross-national and methodological analysis. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools:An international perspective (pp. 347-362). New York, NY: Routledge.

32.

Cornell, D. G. & Cole, J. C. M. (2012). Assessment of bullying. In S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice (pp. 289-303). New York, NY: Routledge.

33.

Cornell, D. G., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2010). The assesment of bullying. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 265-276). New York, NY:Routledge.

34.

Cornell, D. G., & Loper, A. B. (1998). Assessment of violence and other high-risk behaviors with a school survey. School Psychology Review, 27, 317-330.

35.

Cornell, D. G., Sheras, P. L. & Cole, J. C. (2006). Assessment of bullying. In S. R. Jimerson &M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety (pp. 587-602). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.

36.

Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1987). Estimating trait, method, and error variance: Generalizing across seventy construct validation studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 315-319.

37.

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1999). “Superiority” is in the eye of the beholder: A comment on Sutton, Smith, and Swettenham. Social Development, 8, 128-131.

38.

Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1996). Children's treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 367-380.

39.

Cross, J., & Newman-Gonchar, R. (2004). Data quality in student risk behavior surveys and administrator training. Journal of School Violence, 3, 89-108.

40.

Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan., X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 533-553.

41.

Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32, 365-383.

42.

Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J., Edstrom, L. V., Mackenzie, E., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: An experimental trial of steps to Step to Respect program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479-491.

43.

Furlong, M. J., Sharkey, J. D., Felix, E. D., Tanigawa, D., & Green, J. G. (2010). Bullying assessment: A call for increased precision of self-reporting procedures. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 329-345). New York, NY: Routledge.

44.

Greif, J. L. & Furlong, M. J. (2006). The assessment of school bullying: Using theory to inform practice. Journal of School Violence, 5, 33-50.

45.

Griffin, R. S., & Gross, A. M. (2004). Childhood bullying: Current empirical findings and future directions for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 379-400.

46.

Hamby, S. L., & Finkelhor, D. (2000). The victimization of children: Recommendations for assessment and instruction development. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 829-840.

47.

Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2003). Correspondence between self-reports of interpersonal violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 223-239.

48.

Jimerson, S. R., Nickerson, A. B., Mayer, M. J., & Furlong, M. J. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice. New York, NY:Routledge.

49.

Jimerson, S. R., Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of bullying in schools:An international perspective. New York, NY:Routledge.

50.

Kert, A. S., Codding, R. S., Tyron, G. S., & Shiyko, M. (2009). Impact of the word “Bully” on the reported rate of bullying behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 193-204.

51.

Land, D. (2003). Teasing apart secondary students'conceptualizations of peer teasing, bullying, and sexual harassment. School Psychology International, 24, 147-165.

52.

Morrison, G., & Furlong, M. J. (2002, June). Understanding the turing points in students' school discipline histories. Paper presented at Safe Schools for the 21st Century, National Conference of the Hamilton Fish Institute, Monterey, California.

53.

O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2000). A comparison of confidential versus anonymous survey procedures: Effects on reporting of drug use and related attitudes and beliefs in a national study of students. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 35-54.

54.

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK:Blackwell Publishers.

55.

Olweus, D. (2007). The Olweus Bullying Questionnaire. Center City, MN: Hazelden.

56.

Olweus, D. (2010). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 9-33). New York, NY: Routledge.

57.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.

58.

Reynolds, W. (2003). Reynolds Bully Victimization Scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

59.

Rigby, K. (2004). What it takes to stop bullying in schools: An examination of the rationale and effectiveness of school-based interventions. In M. J. Furlong, M. P. Bates, D. C. Smith, & P. Kingery (Eds.), Appraisal and prediction of school violence (pp. 165-191). Hauppauge, NY:Nova Science.

60.

Ross, D. M. (2003). Childhood bullying, teasing, and violence: What school personnel, other professionals, and parents can do (2nd ed.). Alexandra, VA:American Counseling Association.

61.

Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 410-415.

62.

Sharkey, J. D., Dowdy, E., Twyford, J. Twyford, J., & Furlong, M. J. (2012). An overview of measurement issues in school violence and school safety research. In S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice (pp. 259-272). New York, NY: Routledge.

63.

Smith, D., & Ananiadou, K. (2003). The nature of school bullying and the effectiveness of school-based interventions. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 5, 189-209.

64.

Smith, P. K. (2012). Cyberbullying and cyber aggression. In S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: International research and practice (pp. 93-103). New York, NY: Routledge.

65.

Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. F., & Liefooghe, A. P. D. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in fourteen-country international comparison. Child Development, 73, 1119-1133.

66.

Solberg, M., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239-268.

67.

Sveinsson, A. V., & Morris, R. J. (2007). Conceptual and methodological issues in assessment and intervention with school bullies. In J. E. Zins, M. J. Elias, & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 9-26). New York, NY:Routledge.

68.

Swearer, S. M., Siebecker, A. B., Johnsen-Frerichs, L. A., & Wang, C. (2010). Assessment of bullying/victimization: The problem of comparability across studies and across methodologies. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 305-327). New York, NY: Routledge.

69.

Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use. and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867-873.

70.

Vaillancourt, T., Trinh, V., McDougall, P., Duku, E., Cunningham, L., Cunningham, C., Hymel, S., & Short, K. (2010). Optimizing population screening of bullying in school-aged children. Journal of School Violence, 9, 233-250.

71.

You, S., Furlong, M. J., Felix, E. D., Sharkey, J. D., Tanigawa, D., & Grief, J. (2008). Relations among school connectedness, hope, life satisfaction, and bullying victimization. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 446-460.

72.

Zins, J. E., Elias, M. J., & Mahler, C. A. (Eds.). (2007). Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention. New York, NY: Routledge.

한국심리학회지: 일반