바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.36 No.1

Citation Share

베일리영유아발달검사 제3판(Bayley-Ⅲ)의 미국 규준 적용의 문제: 미숙아 집단을 대상으로

The Clinical Utility of Korean Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Ⅲ -Focusing on using of the US norm-

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2017, v.36 no.1, pp.81-107
https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2017.03.36.1.081
임유진 (고려대학교 안암병원)
이순행 (가천대학교 세살마을연구원)
방희정 (이화여자대학교)
임유진, 이순행, & 방희정. (2017). 베일리영유아발달검사 제3판(Bayley-Ⅲ)의 미국 규준 적용의 문제: 미숙아 집단을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 36(1), 81-107, https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2017.03.36.1.081

초록

베일리영유아발달검사 제3판(Bayley-Ⅲ)의 미국 규준이 영유아의 발달수행을 과대추정하고 발달지연율을 과소추정 한다는 논란이 있어서, 본 연구는 발달지연의 고위험군인 미숙아를 대상으로 미국 규준 적용시 Bayley-Ⅲ의 임상적 유용성을 살펴보고자 하였다. 본 연구는 생후 1개월부터 24개월(교정원령)의 미숙아(재태기간 37주 미만)와 만삭아 93명을 대상으로 Bayley-Ⅲ와 한국형베일리영유아발달검사 2판(K-BSID-Ⅱ)을 실시하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 미숙아/만삭아 각 93명을 대상으로 혼합설계 분산분석을 실시한 결과 재태기간(경증미숙아, 중증미숙아, 극중증미숙아, 만삭아)에 따른 Bayley-Ⅲ의 발달지수 및 척도점수 간에 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 특히 경증미숙아 집단 내에서는 발달영역(인지, 언어, 운동)에 따라 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타냈다. 둘째, Bayley-Ⅲ와 K-BSID-Ⅱ을 모두 실시한 미숙아(n=79)를 대상으로 환산점수 평균 간의 차이를 살펴본 결과, Bayley-Ⅲ의 발달지수는 K-BSID-Ⅱ의 발달지수에 비해 유의미하게 높은 것으로 나타났으며 발달지연률은 크게 감소하는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 ROC 분석을 통해 발달지연 변별에 대한 Bayley-Ⅲ의 민감도와 특이도를 분석하고 Bayley-Ⅲ의 임상적 절단점을 탐색한 결과, Bayley-Ⅲ의 하위 척도 모두 우수한 수준의 변별정확도를 나타냈으나, 미국 규준 적용시 절단점은 더 높게 나타났다. 본 연구는 미국 규준을 사용하여 Bayley-Ⅲ를 임상 현장에 적용할 때 점수 해석의 주의를 알리는 실증적인 자료로서, 한국 규준 마련시 표집 문제와 관련된 논의를 제공하였다.

keywords
Bayley scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition, clinical utility, preterm infants, 베일리 영유아 발달검사 3판(Bayley-Ⅲ), 미숙아, 규준, 임상적 유용성

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the clinical utility of Bayley-Ⅲ using US norm in Korea. A total of 98 preterm infants and 93 term infants were assessed with the K-Bayley-Ⅲ. The performance pattern of preterm infants was analyzed with mixed design ANOVA which examined the differences of scaled scores and composite scores of Bayley-Ⅲ between full term- and preterm- infant group and within preterm infants group. Then, We have investigated agreement between classifications of delay made using the BSID-II and Bayley-III. In addition, ROC plots were constructed to identify a Bayley-Ⅲ cut-off score with optimum diagnostic utility in this sample. The results were as follows. (1) Preterm infants have significantly lower function levels in areas of 5 scaled scores and 3 developmental indexes compared with infants born at term. Significant differences among scores within preterm infant group were also found. (2) Bayley-Ⅲ had the higher scores of the Mental Development Index and Psychomotor Developmental Index comparing to the scores of K-BSID-Ⅱ, and had the lower rates of developmental delay. (3) All scales of Bayley-Ⅲ, Cognitive, Language and Motor scale had the appropriate level of discrimination, but the cut-off composite scores of Bayley-Ⅲ were adjusted 13~28 points higher than 69 for prediction of delay, as defined by the K-BSID-Ⅱ. It explains the lower rates of developmental delay using the standard of two standard deviation. This study has provided empirical data to inform that we must careful when interpreting the score for clinical applications, identified the discriminating power, and proposed more appropriate cut-off scores. In addition, discussion about the sampling for making the Korean norm of Bayley-Ⅲ was provided. It is preferable that infants in Korea should use our own validated norms. The standardization process to get Korean normative data must be performed carefully.

keywords
Bayley scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition, clinical utility, preterm infants, 베일리 영유아 발달검사 3판(Bayley-Ⅲ), 미숙아, 규준, 임상적 유용성

참고문헌

1.

김문선, 김진경 (2010). 발달지연아에서 K-ASQ (Korean-Ages & Stages Questionnaires) 발달선별 검사와 베일리 영유아 발달 검사의비교. 대한소아신경학회지, 18(1), 49-57.

2.

김지혜, 방희정, 이순행, 김현미, 남민 (2014). 한국형 베일리 영유아 발달검사 3판 사회-정서척도의 표준화 예비 연구. 한국인간발달학회, 21(2), 201-225.

3.

신희선, 권범선, 임성오 (2005). 발달문제 위험아동 선별을 위한 한국형 Denver Ⅱ 검사의 타당성에 관한 연구. 아동간호학회지, 11(3), 316-321.

4.

신희선, 김정미, 임성오 (2007). 0-5세를 위한한국형 영ㆍ유아 발달 선별검사(K-CDR)의타당성에 대한 연구. 아동간호학회지, 13(2), 222-229.

5.

박인환, 석혜은, 김아영, 신석호, 방희정 (2015). 한국형 베일리 영유아 발달검사 제 3판사회-정서 척도의 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 28(3), 29-50.

6.

박주영 (2010). Bayley 영유아 발달검사(Ⅲ)를이용한 고위험군 영아의 발달검사. 인제대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

7.

오수경, 방희정, 이순행 (2014). 한국형 베일리 영유아 발달검사 3판 인지척도 예비 연구. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 27(1), 117-140.

8.

이순행, 안소현, 이은지, 방희정 (2014). 한국형베일리 영유아 발달검사 3판 소근육 운동척도 예비 연구. 한국아동학회, 35(5), 37-61.

9.

이종승 (2005). 표준화 심리검사. 서울: 교육과학사.

10.

이지연, 김영태, 방희정, 이순행 (2014). 한국형베일리 영유아 발달검사 제3판 표현언어척도 예비연구. 한국언어청각임상학회, 19(3), 320-330.

11.

이진, 김영아, 오경자 (2009). 한국판 CBCL 1.5-5의 변별타당도 및 임상적 유용성. 한국임상심리학회지: 임상, 28(1), 171-186.

12.

조복희, 박혜원 (2004). 한국 Bayley 영유아 발달검사(K-BSID-2) 표준화 연구(1). 한국심리학회지: 발달, 17(1), 191-206.

13.

Acton, B. V., Biggs, W. S. G., Creighton, D. E., Penner, K. A. H., Switzer, H. N., Thomas, J. H. P., Joffe, A. R., & Robertson, C. M. T. (2011). Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-Ⅲ after early complex cardiac surgery. Pediatrics, 128(4), 794-800.

14.

Anderson, P. J., Doyle, L. W., De Luca, C. R., Hutchinson, E., Roberts, G., Callanan, C., Davis, N., Duff, J., Kelly, E., McDonald, M., Stewart, M., Ung, L., Hunt, R., Opie, G., Watkins, A., Williamson, A., Woods, H., Carse, E., Charlton, M. P., & Hayes, M. (2010). Underestimation of developmental delay by the new bayley-III scale. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 164(4), 352-356.

15.

Aylward, G. P. (2009). Developmental screening and assessment: What are we thinking? Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 30(2), 169-173.

16.

Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley scales of infant development:manual. Psychological Corporation.

17.

Bayley, N. (2006b). Bayley Scales of Infant Development and Toddler development: Technical manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

18.

Dezoete, J. A., MacArthur, B. A., & Tuck, B. (2003). Prediction of Bayley and Stanford-Binet scores with a group of very low birthweight children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 29(5), 367-372.

19.

Duncan, A. F., Watterberg, K. L., Nolen, T. L., Vohr, B. R., Adams-Chapman, I., Das, A., & Lowe, J. (2012). Effect of ethnicity and race on cognitive and language testing at age 18-22 months in extremely preterm infants. The Journal of Pediatrics, 160(6), 966-971.

20.

Gagnon, S. G., & Nagle, R. J. (2000). Comparison of the revised and original versions of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. School Psychology International, 21(3), 293-305.

21.

Gesell, A., Halverson, H. M., Thomson, H., Ilg, F. L., Castner, B. M., Ames, L. B., & Amatruda, C. S. (1940). The first five years of life, the preschool years. Oxford, England.

22.

Glenn, S. M., Cunningham, C. C., & Dayus, B. (2001). Comparison of the 1969 and 1993standardizations of the Bayley Mental Scales of Infant Development for infants with down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45(1), 56-62.

23.

Greene, M. M., Patra, K., Nelson, M. N., & Silvestri, J. M. (2012). Evaluating preterm infants with the Bayley-III: patterns and correlates of development. Research in Developmental Disability, 33(6), 1948-1956.

24.

Hack, M., Friedman, H., & Fanaroff, A. A. (1996). Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics, 98(5), 931-937.

25.

Hack, M., Taylor, H. G., Drotar, D., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Wilson-Costello, D., Klein, N., Friedman, H., Mercuri-Minich, N., & Morrow, M. (2005). Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age. Pediatrics, 116(2), 333-341.

26.

Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: The reshaping of American life by differences in intelligence. New York: Free.

27.

Johnson, S., & Marlow, N. (2006). Developmental screen or developmental testing?. Early Human Development, 82(3), 173-183.

28.

Johnson, S., Moore, T., & Marlow, N. (2014). Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: which cut-off should be used? Pediatric Research, 75(5), 670-674.

29.

Kelly, Y., Sacker, A., Schoon, I., & Nazroo, J. (2006). Ethnic differences in achievement of developmental milestones by 9 months of age:the Millennium Cohort Study. Developmental Medicine & child Neurology, 48(10), 825-830.

30.

Lowe, J. R., Erickson, S. J., Schrader, R., Duncan, A. F. (2011). Comparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III Cognitive Scale: are we measuring the same thing? Acta Paediatrica, 101(2), e55-e58.

31.

Luttikhuizen dos Santos, E. S. L., de Kieviet, J. F., Königs, M., van Elburg, R. M., & Oosterlaan, J. (2013). Predictive value of the Bayley scales of infant development on development of very preterm/very low birth weight children: a meta-analysis. Early human development, 89(7), 487-496.

32.

McFadden, T. U. (1996). Creating language impairments in typically achieving children:the pitfalls of “normal” normative sampling. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 3-9.

33.

Månsson, J., & Stjernqvist, K. (2014). Children born extremely preterm show significant lower cognitive, language and motor function levels compared with children born at term, as measured by the Bayley‐III at 2.5 years. Acta Paediatrica, 103(5), 504-511.

34.

Miska, L., Jan, H. (2005). Evaluation of current statistical approaches for predictive geomorphological mapping. Geomorphology, 67(3-4), 299-315.

35.

Moore, T., Johnson, S., Marlow, N., Haider, S., & Hennessy, E. (2012). Relationship between test scores using the second and third editions of the bayley scales in extremely preterm children. Journal of Pediatrics, 160(4), 553-558.

36.

Msall, M. E. (2009). Optimizing neuromotor outcomes among very preterm, very low-birth-weight infants. JAMA, 302(20), 2257-2258.

37.

Reuner, G., Fields, A. C., Wittke, A., Pietz, J., & Lὅpprich, M. (2013). Comparison of the developmental tests Bayley-III and Bayley-II in 7-month-old infants born preterm. European Jounal of Pediatrics, 172(3), 393-400.

38.

Ross, G., & Lawson, K. (1997). Using the Bayley-ll: Unresolved Issues in Assessing the Development of Prematurely Born Children. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 18(2), 109-111.

39.

Ross, G., Lipper, E. G., & Auld, P. A. (1985). Consistency and change in the development of premature infants weighing less than 1,501grams at birth. Pediatrics, 76(6), 885-891.

40.

Sansavini, A., Guarini, A., Justice, L. M., Savini, S., Broccoli, S., Alessandroni, R., & Faldella, G. (2010). Does preterm birth increase a child's risk for language impairment?. Early human development, 86(12), 765-772.

41.

Siegel, L. S. (1983). Correction for Prematurity and Its Consequences for the Assessment of the Very Low Birth Weight Infant. Child Development, 54(5), 1176-1188.

42.

Siegel, L. S., Cooper, D. C., Fitzhardinge, P. M., & Ash, A. J. (1995). The use of the mental development index of the Bayley Scale to diagnose language delay in 2-year-old high-risk infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 18(4), 483-486.

43.

Silveira, R. C., Filipouski, G. R., Goldstein, D. J., O’Shea, T. M., & Procianoy, R. S. (2012). Agreement between Bayley scales second and third edition assessments of very low-birth-weight infants. Archives of Pediatrics &Adolescent Medicine, 166(11), 1075-1076.

44.

Skranes, J., Vik, T., Nilsen, G., Smevik, O., Andersson, H. W., & Brubakk, A. M. (1998). Can cerebral MRI at age 1 year predict motor and intellectual outcomes in very‐low‐birth weight children?. Developmental Medicine &Child Neurology, 40(4), 256-262.

45.

Spencer-Smith, M. M., Spittle, A. J., Lee, K. J., Doyle, L. W., & Anderson, P. J. (2015). Bayley-III cognitive and language scales in preterm children. Pediatrics, 135(5), e1258-e1265.

46.

Steenis, L. J., Verhoeven, M., Hessen, D. J., & van Baar, A. L. (2014). First steps in developing the Dutch version of the Bayley III: Is the original Bayley III and its item sequence also adequate for Dutch children?. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(4), 494-511.

47.

Synnes, A. R., Rogers, M., Petrie Thomas, J., Wright, S., & Butt, A. (2010). The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development in extremely low birth weight survivors at 18months corrected age. Pediatr Child Health, 15(suppl A), 41A.

48.

Tallandini, M. A., Franco, A., & Morsan, V. (2013). Bayley scales of infant and toddler development (bsitd-iii): un contributo alla taratura italiana su un campione di bambini prematuri. Ricerche di Psicologia.

49.

Vohr, B. R., Stephens, B. E., Higgins, R. D., Bann, C. M., Newman, J. E., Hintz, S. R., Das, A., Peralta-Carcelen, M., Yolton, K., Dusick, A. M., Evans, P. W., Goldstein, R. F., Ehrenkranz, R. A., Pappas, A., Adams-Chapman, I., Wilson-Costello, D. E., Bauer, C. R., Bodnar, A., Heyne, R. J., Vaucher, Y. E., Dillard, R. G., Acarregui, M. J., McGowan, E. C., Myers, G. J., & Fuller, J. (2012). Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes. Journal of Pediatrics, 161(2), 222-228.

50.

Washington, K., Scott, D. T., Johnson, K. A., Wendel, S., & Hay, A. E. (1998). The B6ayley Scales of Infant Development-II and children with developmental delays: a clinical perspective. Journal of Developmental &Behavioral Pediatrics, 19(5), 346-349.

51.

Williams, M. L., Lewandowski, L. J., Coplan, J., & D'Eugenio, D. B. (1987). Neurodevelopmental outcome of preschool children born preterm with and without intracranial hemorrhage. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 29(2), 243-249.

52.

Xu, Y., & Filler, J. W. (2005). Linking assessment and intervention for developmental/functional outcomes of premature, low-birth-weight children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(6), 383-389.

53.

Yu, Y. T., Chen, L. C., Wu, Y. C., Jeng, S. F., Hsieh, W. S., Lee, W. T., Hsu, C. H., & Chiu, N. C. (2013). A psychometric study of the Bayley scales of infant and toddler development - 3rd edition for term and preterm Taiwanese infants. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(11), 3875-3883.

54.

Wang, S. T., Wang, C. J. Huang, C. C., & Lin, C. H. (1998). Neurodevelopment of surviving infants at age two years, with a birthweight less than 2000g and cared for in neonatal intensive care units(NICU)-results from a population based longitudinal study in Taiwan. Public Health, 112, 331-336.

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책