바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Psychology: General

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

Does make-up make men's faces appear more attractive?

Korean Journal of Psychology: General / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2019, v.38 no.4, pp.625-646
https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2019.12.38.4.625


Abstract

Today, the idea that only women can wear makeup is no longer accepted. Although many men do wear makeup, the social responses to those men are not always positive. Does makeup actually make men’s faces appear more attractive? The current study finds the answer for this question through psychological experiments. As stimuli for these experiments, male faces that were made up in five steps (1: no makeup, 2: skin makeup, 3: eyebrow makeup, 4: eyeliner makeup, 5: eyeshadow makeup) were employed. In the experiments, after presenting male faces with makeup, participants were asked to rate how attractive those faces looked (experiment 1) and how heavily made up those faces appeared (experiment 2). A 7-point likert scale was used in both experiments: a higher point means more attractive and heavier, respectively. In experiment 1, the results showed the inverted U curve. There was an increase in attractiveness from step 1 (no makeup) to step 3 (eyebrow makeup), and after that there was a decrease. The results of experiment 2 showed that the more make-up applied, the easier participants can detect the degree of make-up. In particular, until step 3 (eyebrow makeup), faces were perceived as having light makeup; in steps 4 and 5, the faces were perceived as having (relatively) heavy makeup. Collectively, as the level of make-up increases, the perceived attractiveness increases to a certain point, but after that, it decreases, which seems to be related to the detection of make-up. This study was the first in Korea to explore male makeup with an experimental paradigm, which directly confirmed whether the male face can be perceived as more attractive with makeup or not. The relationship between makeup and the attractiveness of the male face is different from that of the female, suggesting that systematic follow-up studies are required to identify the effect of various bottom-up and top-down factors.

keywords
남성 화장, 그루밍족, 얼굴 매력, 화장 탐지, male makeup, the grooming tribe, facial attractiveness, makeup detection

Reference

1.

김민경 (2014). 다양한 아이라이너의 형태의 일러스트레이션이 얼굴 이미지에 미치는 감성 반응 효과. 대한피부미용학회지, 12(2), 217-223.

2.

김별이 (2010). 한국 남성의 화장품에 대한 사용실태와 요구도에 관한 연구. 건국대학교 석사학위논문.

3.

김일란, 김주덕 (2013). 남성화장에 대한 여대생들의 인식 및 태도에 관한 연구. 한국화장품미용학회지, 3(2), 169-187.

4.

김한아 (2010). 남성의 화장품 사용실태와 구매행동에 관한 연구. 숙명여자대학교 석사학위논문.

5.

박장순, 이재숙 (2013). 인구통계학적 요인에 따른 남성색조화장의 이용실태에 대한 연구. 한국인체미용예술학회지, 14(4), 77-93.

6.

박정신 (2012). 눈썹메이크업 디자인의 수리적분석 연구. 대한피부미용학회지, 10(3), 463-468.

7.

양윤미 (2010). 현대 메이크업에 나타난 스모키 메이크업에 관한 연구-로맨틱 감성과 매니쉬 감성을 중심으로. 코리아뷰티디자인학회지, 6(3), 293-304.

8.

유승희, 김주덕 (2009). 연구논문: 남성들의 생활 습관 및 화장품 구매행태에 관한 연구. 한국미용학회지, 15(3), 1019-1032.

9.

이금희 (2006). 일부지역 대학생들의 남성화장에 대한 인식도. 원광대학교 보건환경대학원 석사학위논문.

10.

이서현 (2012). 남성들의 외모관리 의식과 행동에 따른 남성 메이크업 인식 연구. 동덕여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

11.

이윤정 (2002). 입술 화장의 형태에 관한 연구. 한국인체미용예술학회지, 3(2), 175-184.

12.

정나래, 송연숙, 이근광 (2013). 남자 대학생들의 피부인식과 화장품 사용 및 구매행태에 관한 연구. 대한미용문화예술학회지, 2(1), 68-81.

13.

정의정 (2011). 성인 남성의 외모관리행동과 특성에 관한 연구. 한국인체미용예술학회지, 12(2), 27-45.

14.

한가영, 김주덕 (2012). 남성화장에 대한 여성들의 인식 및 태도에 관한 연구. 한국화장품미용학회지, 2(1), 61-77.

15.

홍재기, 김주덕 (2008). 연구논문: 연령별 남성들의 화장품에 대한 사용실태 및 요구도에 관한 연구. 한국미용학회지, 14(2), 481-494.

16.

황수연 (2014). 남성 색조 화장품의 제품별 사용실태 및 인식도. 건양대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

17.

Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(2), 173-189.

18.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433-436.

19.

Cash, T. F., & Cash, D. W. (1982). Women's use of cosmetics: psychosocial correlates and consequences. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 4(1), 1-14.

20.

Cash, T. F., Dawson, K., Davis, P., Bowen, M., & Galumbeck, C. (1989). Effects of cosmetics use on the physical attractiveness and body image of American college women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(3), 349-355.

21.

Cash, T. F., Rissi, J., & Chapman, R. (1985). Not Just Another Pretty Face Sex Roles, Locus of Control and Cosmetics Use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(3), 246-257.

22.

Chandra, M. (1973). Costumes, Textiles, Cosmetics &Coiffure in Ancient and Mediaeval India. S. P. Gupta, K. N. Dikshit, V. P. Dwivedi, & S. Asthana (Eds.). Delhi: Oriental Publishers.

23.

Cox, C. L., & Glick, W. H. (1986). Resume evaluations and cosmetics use: When more is not better. Sex Roles, 14(1-2), 51-58.

24.

Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B., & Wu, C. H. (1995). “Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours”: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 261-279.

25.

Dayagi-Mendeles, M. (Ed.). (1989). Perfumes and cosmetics in the ancient world (Vol. 305). Israel Museum. (p. 202)

26.

Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. A., & House, D. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype:Modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PloS one, 6(10), e25656.

27.

Graham, J. A., & Jouhar, A. J. (1981). The effects of cosmetics on person perception. International journal of cosmetic science, 3(5), 199-210.

28.

Huguet, P., Croizet, J. C., & Richetin, J. (2004). Is “What Has Been Cared For” Necessarily Good? Further Evidence for the Negative Impact of Cosmetics Use on Impression Formation1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(8), 1752-1771.

29.

Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4(3), 271-296.

30.

Jones, A. L., & Kramer, R. S. (2015). Facial cosmetics have little effect on attractiveness judgments compared with identity. Perception, 44(1), 79-86.

31.

Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception, 33(5), 569-576.

32.

Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological bulletin, 126(3), 390-423.

33.

Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., Casey, R. J., Ritter, J. M., Rieser-Danner, L. A., & Jenkins, V. Y. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype?. Developmental psychology, 23(3), 363-369.

34.

Levy, B., Ariely, D., Mazar, N., Chi, W., Lukas, S., & Elman, I. (2008). Gender differences in the motivational processing of facial beauty. Learning and Motivation, 39(2), 136-145.

35.

Mahmud, Y., & Swami, V. (2010). The influence of the hijab (Islamic head-cover) on perceptions of women's attractiveness and intelligence. Body Image, 7(1), 90-93.

36.

Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?. Journal of applied psychology, 81(1), 11-21.

37.

Mulhern, R., Fieldman, G., Hussey, T., Lévêque, J. L., & Pineau, P. (2003). Do cosmetics enhance female Caucasian facial attractiveness?. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 25(4), 199-205.

38.

Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophyscs: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 437-442.

39.

Porcheron, A., Mauger, E., & Russell, R. (2013). Aspects of facial contrast decrease with age and are cues for age perception. PloS one, 8(3), e57985.

40.

Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 199-226.

41.

Russell, R. (2003). Sex, beauty, and the relative luminance of facial features. Perception, 32(9), 1093-1107.

42.

Russell, R. (2009). A sex difference in facial contrast and its exaggeration by cosmetics. Perception, 38(8), 1211-1219.

43.

Samuels, C. A., & Ewy, R. (1985). Aesthetic perception of faces during infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(3), 221-228.

44.

Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 410-414.

45.

Slater, A., Von der Schulenburg, C., Brown, E., Badenoch, M., Butterworth, G., Parsons, S., & Samuels, C. (1998). Newborn infants prefer attractive faces. Infant Behavior and Development, 21(2), 345-354.

46.

Subbarayappa, B. V. (Ed.). (1999). Chemistry and chemical techniques in India. Centre for Studies in Civilizations.

47.

Teuscher, U., & Teuscher, C. (2007). Reconsidering the double standard of aging:Effects of gender and sexual orientation on facial attractiveness ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(4), 631-639.

48.

Tsushima, Y., Sasaki, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2006). Greater disruption due to failure of inhibitory control on an ambiguous distractor. Science, 314(5806), 1786-1788.

49.

Ueno, A., Ito, A., Kawasaki, I., Kawachi, Y., Yoshida, K., Murakami, Y.,..., & Fujii, T. (2014). Neural activity associated with enhanced facial attractiveness by cosmetics use. Neuroscience letters, 566, 142-146.

50.

Willadsen-Jensen, E., & Ito, T. A. (2014). The effect of context on responses to racially ambiguous faces: changes in perception and evaluation. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 10(7), 885-892.

51.

Zhang, Y., Kong, F., Zhong, Y., & Kou, H. (2014). Personality manipulations: Do they modulate facial attractiveness ratings?. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 80-84.

Korean Journal of Psychology: General