바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The cross-validation and multi-sample analysisof internal/external career movement model

Abstract

This study was intended to cross-validate and generalize the ‘internal/external career movement model’ proposed by Oh, Suh, and Shin (2004). To achieve these purposes, the study was conducted by taking the following steps. After cross-validation with an independent sample was carried out, the model was tested using multi-sample analysis to examine if the cross-validated model generalizes across two demographic variables such as job levels/positions (manager-level vs. non-managerial level) and job types (sales vs. non-sales). First, the ‘internal/external career movement model’ was cross-validated using 585 clerical employees working for a large Korean company. The result revealed that the model showed satisfactory fit indices, and thus it was successfully cross-validated. In addition, the alternative model inputing ‘turnover intention’ instead of ‘external career movement intention’ also indicated satisfactory fit indices. Moreover, the zero-order correlation between two variables was very high (r=.86), which suggested that employees could not distinguish those two measures empirically. Next, multi-sample analysis was conducted and it showed that a non-managerial (low job-level) sub-sample showed higher negative path coefficient than a managerial (high job-level) sub-sample in terms of the relationship between ‘job satisfaction’ and ‘internal career movement intention’ and that between ‘career satisfaction’ and ‘external career movement intention.’ However, there was no difference between sales and non-sales sub-samples in terms of the ‘internal/external career movement model’, so the model perfectly generalized. This suggested that the direction of career development and management practices should be based upon job levels rather than job types in Korea. In addition, research limitations, future research directions, and implications for human resource management were discussed.

keywords
Career, career movement, internal career movement, external career movement, 경력, 경력이동, 조직내 경력이동, 조직외 경력이동, Career, career movement, internal career movement, external career movement

Reference

1.

김기령, (2001) 다시 부각되는 경력개발제도,

2.

김명언, (2000) 기업 조직에서의 세대격차 산업 및 조직,

3.

김명언, (1997) 조직문화의 자리매김 한국 기업문화의 이해, 오롬출판사

4.

오인수, (2004) 조직내/외 경력이동에 영향을 미치는 선행변인에 관한 탐색적 연구 정성적 연구와 정량적 연구의 통합과 모형화 ,

5.

오인수, (2004) 조직내/외 경력이동의 개념화와 그 선행변인의 규명 및 측정 산업 및 조직,

6.

유태용, (2001) 다양한 장면에서 수행을 예측하기 위한 5요인 성격모델의 사용가능성과 한계 성격요인과 수행간의 관계에 대한 통합분석 산업 및 조직,

7.

이순묵, (1993) 중급 LISREL, 한국심리학회 동계연수회

8.

이순묵, (1990) 공변량구조분석, 성원사

9.

조현철, (2003) 구조방정식모델, 석정

10.

홍세희 ; 유숙경, (2004) Autoregressive Crosslagged Model을 적용한 내외통제성과 학업성취의 종단관계 연구,

11.

Barrick,M.R.,, (1991) The big five personality dimensions and job performance:A meta-analysis,

12.

Bernardin, H. J. , (2003) Human resource management: An experiential approach., McGraw- Hill/Irwin

13.

Byrne, B. M. , (1998) Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.,

14.

Hall,D.T, (1996) Protean careers of the 21st century,

15.

Hunter, (1997) Eight common but false objections to the discontinuation of significance testing in the analysis of research data,

16.

Hurtz,G.M.,, (2000) Personality and job performance:The Big Five revisited,

17.

Ivancevich,J.M, (1998) Human resource management, McGraw-Hill/Irwin

18.

London, (1988) The Job analysis handbook for business,

19.

MacCallum, (1992) Model modifications in covariance structure analysis The problem of capitalization on chance,

20.

Montgomery,C.E, (1996) Organizational fit is key to job success,

21.

Robbins, (2003) 성공하는 사람관리의 63가지 진실 [The truth about managing people Nothing but the truth 원전은 2002년 출판, 시그마프레스

22.

Tannenbaum, (1997) Diagnostic findings from multiple companies,

logo