바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effects of status, pre-merger organizational identity and organizational culture similarity on the post-merger organizational identity in Merger Enterprise

Abstract

This research extended the findings on the effect of merge and acquisition by applying social identity theory. Various (correlates) of merge and acquisition were investigated using 818 South Korean employees. Employees who perceive their current status to “high status” after merge and acquisition, the higher the pre-merger organizational identity and the similarity of organizational culture, the higher the post-merger organizational identity which leads to high organizational effectiveness. On the other hand, employees who perceive their current status to “low status” after merge and acquisition, the higher the pre-merger organizational identity and the similarity of organizational culture, the lower the post-merger organizational identity which leads to low organizational effectiveness.

keywords
status, pre-merger organizational identity, organizational culture similarity, post-merger organizational identity, organizational effectiveness., 지위, 출신조직정체성, 조직문화유사성, 합병조직정체성, 조직효과성

Reference

1.

김금미, (2001) 집단의 사회정체성과 지위에 따른 내집단 편애:성별집단과 최소집단에서,

2.

박군석, (2002) 사회구조 요인과 사회정체성에 따른 상대박탈 경험 및 집합행동:영호남인의 지역간 갈등을 중심으로,

3.

김원형, (1993) 조직동일화 모형:선행변인,조직몰입,조직내재화,이직의도의 관계,

4.

신창근, (2002) 효율적 인적자원관리의 통합이 성공적인 인수합병에 미치는 영향 - 국내 H 자동차社의 기업합병 사례 중심으로 -, 산업관계연구

5.

이영석, (2003) 조직신뢰와 조직효과성에 관한 이론모형에 관한 연구-회사신뢰와 상사신뢰를 중심으로-,

6.

한영석 ; 서용원, (2004) 합병기업에서 출신조직정체성이 정체성 관리전략에 미치는 영향, 산업및조직

7.

Ashforth, B. E., (1989) Social identity theory and the organization, Academy of Management Review

8.

Cartwright, S., (1993) Managing mergers, acquisitions and startegic alliance: Integrating people and culture, Butterworth-Heinemann.

9.

Byrne, D, (1971) The attraction paradigm, Academic press

10.

Male, F., (1992) Alumi and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior

11.

Mirvis, P. H., (1992) The human side of merger planning; Assessing and analysis fit, Human Resource Plannng

12.

Leeuwen, E. V., (2003) Organizational identification following a merger: The importance of agreeing to differ. In Social identity at work, Psychology press

13.

Knippenberg, D. V, (2001) Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to postmerger identification. In Social identity processes in organizational contexts, Psychology press

14.

Quinn, R. E., (1985) The transformation of organizational culture : A competing value perspectives. In Organizational culture, Sage

15.

Sachdev, I., (1991) Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations, European Journal of Social Psychology

16.

hrivastava, P, (1986) ostmerger integration, Journal of Business Strategy

17.

Spears, R., (1997) Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

18.

Tajfel, H., (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Psychology of intergroup relations, Nelson-Hall

19.

Terry,D.J, (2003) A social identity perspective on organizational mergers: The role of group status, permeability, and similarity. In Social identity at work, Psychology press.

20.

Terry, D. J., (2001) Status, legitimacy, and ingroup bias in the context of an organizational merger, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

21.

Terry, D. J., (1998) In-group bias in response to and organizational merger, Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice

22.

Terry, D. J., (2001) Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

logo