바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on the Relation between Personal Characteristics and Psychological Resistance to Change & Organization Commitment

Abstract

Resistance to change and the experience of individuals during change is increasingly of interest to practitioners and academics alike. In the past, much of the organizational change literature and research has focussed on the team or organizational level, and as a result, managers have tended to develop quite broad change strategies. However these high-level strategies are critical, what has not been as widely explored is the experience of individuals during times of change, with the clear purpose of supporting them in order to allow the organization to meet its change objectives. Change processes have therefore been situated in the core of organization's actions, which is why individual's psychological responses to such changes are becoming a key area of research, as well as a critical management issue. Furthermore, few have considered the combined role of personal characteristics of employee to organizational change. Recently, the literature on the psychological responses to change shows two clear perspectives. One focuses on identifying the psychological reactions to change, such as coping with change, readiness to change, openness to change, and resistance to change(Cunningham, Woodward, Shannon, Maclntosh, Lendrum, & Rosenbloom, 2002). The other addresses the influence of individual differences on psychological reactions to change(Dunham, Grube, Gardner, Cummings, and Pierce, 1989). More recently, the construct of dispositional resistance to change has been established as a key contributor to individuals' reactions to change(Oreg, 2003). In consideration of research trends, this study focuses on employee ‘dispositional resistance to change’ in relation to psychological resistance to organizational change. The concept taps individuals' inherent tendency to resist changes: while some people openly accept and adapt to changes, others show an inclination to avoid and oppose them. According to Oreg (2006), those who are dispositionally resistant to change are less likely to voluntarily initiate changes in their lives, and are more likely to form negative attitudes towards specific changes they encounter. In this study, dispositional resistance to change comprises three dimensions: routine seeking, short-term focus and, lose of control. First, routine seeking involves the extent to which individuals prefer conventional and highly predictable tasks, procedures, and environments. Second, short-term focus addresses the degree to which individuals worry about all inconveniences and discomfort that change brings about, instead of focusing on the potential benefits and comfort that it could bring in the long term. Third, Some researchers have suggested that people resist change because it often involves lose of control involved in change. The current study attempts to examine empirically individual characteristics (routine seeking, short-term focused thinking, reluctance to lose control)as antecedents that affect on those psychological resistance, and to empirically investigate how psychological resistance impacts on organizational commitment. In addition, this study empirically tests the moderating effect on the relationship between psychological resistance and organizational commitment. To collect the data for empirical analysis, 260 questionnaires were distributed for about 4 weeks to 230 employees in 12 Korean companies which were implementing organizational change, Out of the 260 questionnaires, 230 questionnaires were returned. From the 230 returned, a total of 212 were used for analysis. A summary of hypothesis test is as follows: First, a routine seeking personality is positively related to an employee's psychological resistance to organizational change. Second, short-term way of thinking is not significantly related to an employee's psychological resistance to organizational change. Third, lose of control was found to have a significant positive relationship with an employee's psychological resistance. It was found that, among factors that affect resistance, lose of control is the variable that has the most significant impact on psychological resistance to change. Fourth, psychological resistance to organizational change is negatively related to organizational commitment. Finally, there was no indirect effect of psychological resistance that is expected to influence the relationship between individual characteristics and organizational commitment.

keywords
Routine seeking personality, Short-term focus, Lose of control, Psychological resistance, Organizational commitment., 관행추구성향, 단기사고성향, 통제 상실감, 심리적 저항, 조직몰입

Reference

1.

송석훈, (1999) 황갑진, 경영연구

2.

지성구 ; 이갑두, (2005) 개인성향, 혁신저항, 그리고 혁신성과의 관계, 대한경영학회지

3.

홍세희, (2007) 구조방정식 모형의 이론과 응용. 고급연구방법론 워크샵 시리즈,

4.

Allen, N. J., (1991) A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, Human Resource Management Review

5.

Anderson, L. M., (1997) Cynicism in the workplace: Some cause and efforts, Journal of Organizational Behavior

6.

Armenakis, A. A., (2002) Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness, Journal of Organizational Change Management

7.

Ashford, S. J., (1988) Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

8.

Baron, R. M., (1986) The Moderator-mediator variable distinction in Social Psychological Research, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

9.

Bovey, W. H., (2000) Resistance to organizational change:The role of defence mechanisms,Journal of Managerial Psychology, Journal of Managerial Psychology

10.

Bartunek, J. M., (1987) First-order, second-order, and third-order change an organization development interventions: A cognitive approach, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

11.

Brief, A. P., (1986) Prosocial Organizational Behavior, Academy of Management Review

12.

Chawla, A., (2004) Predicting openness and commitment to change, Leadership & Organizational Development Journal

13.

Coah, L., (1948) Overcoming resistance to change, Human Relations

14.

Coghlan, D. A., (1993) Person centered approach to dealing with resistance to change, Leadership & Organization Development Journal

15.

Conner,D., (1992) Managing at the speed of change: How resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail, Villard Books.

16.

Costello, S. J., (1994) Managing Change in the Workplace, Mirro Press.

17.

Dastmalchian, A., (1991) The climate of workplace relations, Routledge.

18.

Dawson,P., (1994) Organizational Change:A Process Approach, Paul Chapman.

19.

Dent, E. B., (1999) Challenging resistance to change, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

20.

Gardner, D. G., (1987) Employee focus of attention and reactions to organizational change, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

21.

George, J. M., (2001) Towards a process model of individual change in organization, Human Relations

22.

Goldsmith, R. E., (1984) Personality characteristics associated with adaptation-innovation, Journal of Psychology

23.

Goltz, S. M., (2002) Using the operant and strategic contingencies models of power to understand resistance to change, Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

24.

Graham, J. W., (1993) Commitment and the Conventional Organization, Journal of Managerial Issues

25.

Huy, Q. N., (1999) Emotional Capability, Emotional Intelligence, and Radical Change, The Academy of Management Review

26.

Judge, T. A., (1999) Managerial coping with organizational change, Journal of Applied Psychology

27.

Kirkpatrick, D., (1985) Why people resist or welcome change, Jossey-Bass Publishers

28.

Kotter, J. P., (1979) Choosing Strategies for Change, Harvard Business Review

29.

Lucas, R. E., (2000) Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extroversions, Journal of Personality and social Psychology

30.

Maurer, T. J., (1994) Individual Differences in Employee Leaning and Development Orientation, Presented at the Annual Conference of the Academy of Management

31.

McGuire, W. J., (1985) Attitudes and attitude change, Handbook of Social Psychology

32.

Meyer, J. P., (2002) Affective, continuance and normative commitment to organization: A meta analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences, Journal of Vocational Behavior

33.

Miller, V. D., (1994) Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change, Journal of Applied Communication Research

34.

Nord, W. R., (1994) Overcoming resistance to resistance: Insights from a study of the shadows, Public Administration Quarterly

35.

Oldham, G. R., (1986) Relations between situational factors and the comparative referents used by employees, Academy of Management Journal

36.

O'Neill, H. M., (1995) Voices of survivors: words that downsizing CEOs should hear, Academy of Management Executive

37.

Oreg, S., (2003) Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure, Journal of Applied Psychology

38.

Oreg,S., (2006) Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

39.

Organ, D. W., (1988) Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington Book.

40.

Piderit, S. K., (2000) Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence, Academy of Management Review

41.

Robinson, S. L., (1994) Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm, Journal of Organizational Behavior

42.

Rosenblatt, Z., (1999) A gender-based framework of the experience of job insecurity and its effects on work attitudes, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

43.

Rusbult, C. E., (1988) Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction, Academy of Management Journal

44.

Saunders, D. M., (1992) Employee voice to supervisors, Employee Responsibility and Rights Journal

45.

Taylor, S. E., (1988) Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health: Psychological Bulletin,

46.

Tichy,N.M., (1983) Managing strategic change: Technical, political and cultural dynamics, Wiley.

47.

Van de Ven, A. H., (1980) Measuring and Assessing Organizations, Wiley

48.

Vince, R., (1996) Paradox, defence and attachment; accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change, Organization Studies

49.

Wanberg, C. R., (2000) Predictors and outcomes of openness to change in a reorganizing workplace, Journal of Applied Psychology

50.

Watson, D., (1997) Extroversions and its positive emotional core, Handbook of Personality Psychology

51.

Zaltman, G., (1977) Strategies for planned change, Wiley

52.

Zander, A., (1950) esistance to change: Its analysis and prevention, Advanced Management Journal

logo