바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

nation as 'Society', Nationalism as 'Social Ideology'

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2007, v.0 no.28, pp.66-97

Abstract

The entity called ‘nation’ is supposed to be an moral community. The growth of nationalism in the colonized territory is a natural reaction to naked discrimination, exclusion and injustice practiced by imperialist forces. Nationalist cause among the colonized people or immigrated societies would be an parallel of the ideal of democracy, citizenship and human rights that realized in the normal sovereign state Thus nationalism in underdeveloped world is an symbolic expression of aspiration to acquire sovereignty, human dignity and social cohesion in order to get back the lost or demolished community. Although the state-led nationalism generally have revealed unhealthy or pathological appearance of nationalism, it was also an exit for the self-liberation of the bearers of the contradiction that worldly capitalism have created. The attractiveness of nationalist cause has been usually more powerful than the universal ideology like democracy or human rights as it appeal to people’s primodial desire to make solidarity. While nationalism itself can’t bring a vision of alternative society, it take a social cohesiveness for society’s self-defense. A bid for national reunification and a discourse of publicity in today’s South Korea may be regarded as a contemporary version of old-type resistant nationalism when we see the nationalism as a expression of the restoration of community.

keywords
nation, nationalism, social cohesion, moral community, 민족, 민족주의, 사회의 자기방어, 사회적 응집, 도덕공동체

Reference

1.

가라타니 고진, (2006) 세계공화국으로 , 도서출판 b

2.

Earnest Gellner, . 1988. 민족과 민족주의 . 이재석 옮김. 예하.,

3.

김동춘, (2007) 시민운동과 민족, 민족주의. 1987년 이후 한국사회의 성찰 : 기업사회로의 변환과 과제 , 길

4.

노태돈. 1992. 한국민족의 형성시기에 대한 검토 . 역사비평.,

5.

서경식, (2006) 난민과 국민사이: 재일 조선인 서경식의 사유와 성찰 ., 돌베개

6.

신용하. 1987. 한국 근대민족주의의 형성과 전개 , 서울대학교 출판부

7.

_____. 201. 한국민족의 형성과 민족사회학 . 지식산업사.,

8.

전쟁은 끝나지 않았다 . 이기웅 옮겨엮음. 열화당.,

9.

윤해동, (2005) 민족주의는 괴물이다, 민주화운동기념사업회

10.

이종석, (1995) 주체사상과 민족주의. 현대북한의 이해 ,

11.

임지현, (1999) 민족주의는 반역이다: 신화와 허무의 민족주의 담론을 넘어서 , 조합공동체 소나무

12.

프리드먼, 토마스, . 205. 세계는 평평하다 21세기 세계흐름에 대한 통찰 . 김상철·이윤섭 옮김. 창해.,

13.

Franz Fanon, (2004) 대지의 저주받은 사람들, 그린비

14.

한학수, (2006) 여러분, 이 뉴스를 어떻게 전해드려야 할까요 ,

15.

카아, E. H, . 1981. 민족주의의 세 단계. 백낙청 편. 민족주의란 무엇인가 . 창작과 비평사.,

16.

E. J, . 1994. 1780년 이후의 민족과 민족주의 . 강명세 옮김. 창작과 비평사.,

17.

Clifford. 1963. Old Societies, The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa. The Free Press reprinted from John Hutchinson & Anthony D. Smith, Oxford University Pres. 194.

18.

Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State, University of California Press.,

19.

Joppke, Christian, (1995) Intellectuals, Nationalism, and the Exit from Communism: The Case of East Germany,

20.

Greenfeld, Five Road to Modernity. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

21.

_____. 1993. “Transcending the Nation’s Worth.” Daedalus. Vol. 122, George. “Notes on Nationalism.” http,

22.

Smith, University of Nevada Press.,

23.

Weber, . From Max Weber Essay in Sociology. Routledge and Kehan Paul.,

Space and Environment