바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

ISSN : 1225-6706

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.2

Citation Share

국제규제와 지역성장: 세계생산네트워크 관점에서 본 다자간 섬유협정

International Regulations and Regional Growth: A Case Study of Multifiber Arrangement of WTO

공간과 사회 / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2015, v.25 no.2, pp.52-88
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2015.25.2.52
최은경 (고려대학교)
최은경. (2015). 국제규제와 지역성장: 세계생산네트워크 관점에서 본 다자간 섬유협정. 공간과 사회, 25(2), 52-88, https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2015.25.2.52

초록

본 연구는 국제규제가 세계생산지리를 어떻게 변화시키는지, 이로 인해 각 지역의 성장 결과가 어떻게 달라지는지를 세계생산네트워크(GPN) 관점을 통해 분석한다. GPN 이론은 기업 및 국가, 시민사회 등 세계적으로 상호 연결된 다양한행위자들이 어떻게 재화와 용역을 생산, 분배, 소비하는지를 잘 보여주고 있으나,그동안 기업 외 행위자에 대한 관심이 상대적으로 부족하였다. 특히 국제규제체제의 경우, 그 중요성은 널리 인지되고 있으면서도 이에 대한 실질적인 경험 연구가 진행되지는 못하였다. 이에 본 논문은 국제규제로 인해 세계생산네트워크가어떻게 변화되는지, 그로 인한 생산지리와 지역성장의 결과는 어떻게 달라지는지를 보임으로써, 세계지역경제성장에서 국제규제가 가지는 중요성을 보이고자 한다. 이를 위해 먼저 개념적 논의를 통해 국제규제가 GPN과 지역자산의 전략적 결합을 어떻게 변화시키는지 살펴보고, 이후 구체적으로 World Trade Organization(WTO)의 Multifibre Arrangement(MFA) 사례를 통해 이를 논증할 것이다. 주로문헌분석과 시계열적 데이터를 이용하였고, 분석 결과 선진국, 주요 수출개도국,최빈개도국별로 국제규제로 인한 지역성장의 결과가 상이한 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
세계생산네트워크, 국제 규제, 지역 성장, 세계생산지리, WTO/MFA, GPN, international regulations, regional development, production geography, WTO/MFA

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of international regulations or institutions onthe geography of a global production network(GPN) and its consequent regionalgrowth. The GPN theory, which the paper draws upon, explains well how variousactors such as firms, states, and CSOs are interconnected in a multi-scalar geographicalstructures and how they produce, distribute, and consume goods and serviceswithin the network. The literature so far, however, pays little attention tonon-firm actors, especially to international regulatory systems that all GPNs areembedded within. Their significance is widely recognized, but empirical studies havenot been sufficiently conducted. For the reason, the paper aims at conceptualizinghow international regulations affect the dynamics among actors within GPNs anda strategic coupling process between TNCs in a GPN and a region(or regional institutions). This process is then explored and examined through a case study ofWTO/MFA(Multifibre Arrangement). The empirical analysis demonstrates that MFAhas changed the geography of GPNs and resulted in different regional growth inthe three groups of countries－advanced industrial, main exporting, and leastdevelopment.

keywords
세계생산네트워크, 국제 규제, 지역 성장, 세계생산지리, WTO/MFA, GPN, international regulations, regional development, production geography, WTO/MFA

참고문헌

1.

김선혁. 2008. ｢세계화와 행정: 이론적 성찰과 정책적 함의｣. ≪한국행정학회 비정기학술발표논문집≫ 단일호, 1～21쪽.

2.

Ahmed, N. 2009. “Sustaining ready-made garment exports from Bangladesh.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 39(4), pp. 597～618.

3.

Bräutigam, D. 2003. “Close encounters: Chinese business networks as industrial catalysts in Sub‐Saharan Africa.” African Affairs, 102(408), pp. 447～467.

4.

Coe, N. M., Dicken, P., & Hess, M. 2008. “Global production networks: realizing the potential.” Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), pp. 271～295.

5.

Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W. C., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. 2004. “‘Globalizing’regional development: a global production networks perspective.”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), pp. 468～484.

6.

Collier, P., & Venables, A. J. 2007. “Rethinking trade preferences: how Africa can diversify its exports.” The World Economy, 30(8), pp. 1326～1345.

7.

Dicken, P. 201l. Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. Sage Publications Ltd.

8.

Frost, S., Pandita, S., & Hewison, K. 2002. “The Implications For Labor of Chinas Direct Investment In Cambodia.” Asian Perspective, 26(4), pp. 201～226.

9.

Hein, P. 1989. “Structural transformation in an island country: The Mauritius export processing zone(1971 to 1988).” Unctad Review, 1(2), pp. 41～58.

10.

Henderson, Jeffrey, Dicken, Peter, Hess, Martin, Coe, Neil and Yeung, Henry Waichung. 2002. “Global production networks and the analysis of economic development.”Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), pp. 436～464.

11.

Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. 2002. “Global production networks and the analysis of economic development.” Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), pp. 436～464.

12.

Kim, S. 2011. “Globalization and national responses: the case of Korea.” International Review of Public Administration, 16(2), pp. 165～179.

13.

Lincoln, D. 2006. “Beyond the plantation: Mauritius in the global division of labour.”The Journal of Modern African Studies, 44(01), pp. 59～78.

14.

MacKinnon, D. 2012. “Beyond strategic coupling: reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks.” Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), pp. 227～245.

15.

MacKinnon, D. 2013. “Strategic Coupling and Regional Development in Resource Economies: the case of the Pilbara. Australian Geographer.” 44(3), pp. 305～321. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2013.817039.

16.

Naumann, E. 2006. The Multifibre Agreement–WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing. Tralac Working Paper no. 4. Retrieved from http://www.fibre2fashion. com/industry-article/pdffiles/the-multifibre-agreement.pdf

17.

Nordås, H. K. 2004. The Global Textile and Clothing Industry post the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing. WTO Discussion paper No. 5. Retrieved from http://www.tno. it/tecno_it/fashion4_2_05/documenti/WTO%20Discussion%20Paper%20TExtile%20 and%20Clothing%20after%202005.pdf.

18.

Peerally, J. A., & Cantwell, J. A. 2012. “Changes in trade policies and the heterogeneity of domestic and multinational firms’ strategic response: the effects on firm-level capabilities.” World development, 40(3), pp. 469～485.

19.

Rasiah, R., & Ofreneo, R. E. 2009. “Introduction: The dynamics of textile and garment manufacturing in Asia.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 39(4), pp. 501～511.

20.

Rogerson, C. M. 1993. “Export‐processing industrialisation in Mauritius: The lessons of success.” Development Southern Africa, 10(2), pp. 177～197.

21.

Subramanian, A., & Roy, D. 2001. Who Can Explain the Mauritian Miracle: Meade, Romer, Sachs, or Rodrik? Washington: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2001/wp01116.pdf.

22.

Teal, F. 1999. “Why can Mauritius export manufactures and Ghana not?” The World Economy, 22(7), pp. 981～993.

23.

Wei, Y. H. D., & Liao, F. H. F. 2013. “The embeddedness of transnational corporations in Chinese cities: Strategic coupling in global production networks?” Habitat International, 40, pp. 82～90. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.01.005.

24.

Winham, G. 2005. “The evolution of the global trade regime.” in Ravenhill, John(ed.)Global Political Economy, Oxford University Press, pp. 87～115.

25.

Yang, C. 2013. “From Strategic Coupling to Recoupling and Decoupling: Restructuring Global Production Networks and Regional Evolution in China.” European Planning Studies, 21(7), pp. 1046～1063. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.733852

26.

Yang, D. Y.-R., Hsu, J.-Y., & Ching, C.-H. 2009. “Revisiting the Silicon Island? The geographically varied ‘strategic coupling’in the development of high-technology parks in Taiwan.” Regional Studies, 43(3), pp. 369～384.

27.

Yu, W., & Jensen, T. V. 2005. “Tariff preferences, WTO negotiations and the LDCs:the case of the ‘everything but arms’ initiative.” The World Economy, 28(3), pp. 375～405.

28.

GATT. 1986. The Text of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Geneva: GATT.

29.

UN Comtrade database: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/comtrade/(2014.6.5).

30.

WTO Website: www.wto.org(2014.6.5).

공간과 사회

논문 투고 OA 정책