바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

메콩지역(Greater Mekong Subregion) 연계성의 이상과 현실 : 도로 교통을 중심으로

The Ideals and Reality of Greater Mekong Subregion Connectivity: Focus on Road Transportation

공간과 사회 / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2015, v.25 no.4, pp.223-265
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2015.25.4.223
이상국 (연세대학교)

초록

이 연구는 GMS 도로망 연계를 세계화 담론에 입각하면서도 이 담론이 크게주목하지 않는 역사성, 주체성, 지역성을 고려하며 비판적으로 검토했다. 옛적부터 상인들은 오늘날의 대메콩지역을 통해서 중국에 닿고자 했고 서구 식민 세력역시 이 지역의 연계를 발전시키고자 했었다. 냉전 시기 연계 발전 시도가 잠시주춤해지기도 했지만, 1990년대 이후 활발하게 여러 발전 프로그램이 추진되면서역사적인 흐름을 잇고 있다. 이 연구는 오늘날의 GMS를 탄생시킨 ADB가 무역과 투자를 늘리고자 추진하는 도로망 연계 발전 프로그램을 아홉 개의 회랑을 중심으로 살펴봤다. 특히 중국 쿤밍에서 태국 방콕까지 이어지는 북남회랑에 주목하면서 제4태국-라오스우정교는 GMS의 대동맥 같은 북남회랑의 완성과 중국의본격적인 동남아 진출의 디딤돌이라는 의미가 있다고 평가했다. 이 연구는 GMS육로 연계의 실상을 검토하며 GMS 역내 무역이 압도적으로 해로를 통해 이뤄진다는 점, 험준한 지형이 육로 연계를 여전히 가로막고 있다는 점, 다리 건설은 메콩강 수로 연계를 약화시키고 지역사회에서 패자와 승자를 갈라놓고 있다는 점,내륙 수로 연계는 자연 장애물 탓에 한계가 많다는 점을 밝혔다.

keywords
GMS, 연계성, 회랑, 도로, 메콩강, ADB, GMS, connectivity, corridor, road, mekong river, ADB

Abstract

This study examines the ideals and reality of GMS connectivity that the AsianDevelopment Bank has developed since 1992 with a focus on road transportation. Road connectivity has so massively advanced that it has now become possible totravel across GMS by car. Although it is an outstanding outcome in the age ofglobalization, the study critically evaluates the current state of connectivity by bringinghistoricity, agency and locality into discussion. It reveals that the current connectivitymust be understood as part of historical development of connectivity thatbegan in ancient times and was greatly promoted during the colonial period. Thestudy highlights corridors as a key strategic framework whereby the ADB attemptsto transform the GMS into a single-unit market. In particular the study pays attentionto the North-South Corridor that is expected to be a symbolic and influentialpath for China to advance into Southeast Asia with the completion of the FourthThai-Lao Friendship Bridge in December 2013. The study unveils the reality ofroad connectivity: first, maritime transport is still a dominant mode for intra-GMStrade; second, mountainous terrains restrict road connectivity; third, the buildingof the bridge has brought about the decline of river transport and also internaldivision in local society; and fourth, river connectivity, despite its symbolic importance,has been hindered by natural obstacles.

keywords
GMS, 연계성, 회랑, 도로, 메콩강, ADB, GMS, connectivity, corridor, road, mekong river, ADB

참고문헌

1.

김태윤‧김홍구‧조영희‧이요한‧신민금. 2011. 메콩지역 개발 전략: 태국, 캄보디아, 라오스 . 서울: 대외경제정책연구원.

2.

류석춘‧최진명. 2012. 「메콩강유역개발사업(GMS)을 통해 본 중국의 대 동남아시아지역협력 연구」. ≪국제지역연구≫ 21(2), 137∼173쪽.

3.

스콧, 제임스. 2015. 조미아, 지배받지 않는 사람들: 동남아 산악지대 아나키즘의역사 . 이상국 옮김. 삼천리.

4.

최경희. 2014. ASEAN 연계성 프로젝트와 해운‧해상물류 연계성 . 동남아 이슈페이퍼 통권 7호. 서울: 서울대 아시아연구소 동남아지식정보센터.

5.

ADB. 2008. Transport and Trade Facilitation in the Greater Mekong Subregion-Time to Shift Gears. Manila: ADB.

6.

ADB. 2012a. Initial Assessments of Road Transport Infrastructure and Transport and Logistic Services for Trade Facilitation in the GMS Countries. Manila: ADB.

7.

ADB. 2012b. Transport and Logistics in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Manila: ADB.

8.

ADB. 2013. Progress Report on Transport and Trade Facilitation Initiatives in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Manila: ADB.

9.

ASEAN. 2010. Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

10.

Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.

11.

Battersby, P. 1998/1999. “Border Politics and the Broader Politics of Thailand’s International Relations in the 1990s: From Communism to Capitalism.” Pacific Affairs 71(4), pp. 473~488.

12.

Bayley, A. 2012. “Modes of Transport Underlying GMS Trade Flows.” in P. Sirvastava and U. Kumar (eds.). Trade and Trade Facilitation in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Manila: ADB, pp. 145∼169

13.

Buszynski, L. 1994. “Thailand’s Foreign Policy: Management of a Regional Vision.” Asian Survey 34(8), pp. 721∼737.

14.

Carné, L. D. 2000[1872]. Travels on the Mekong: Cambodia, Laos and Yunnan. Bangkok:White Lotus.

15.

Chang, C. T. 1964. Burma Road. Singapore: Malaysia Publications.

16.

Charoenpanyaying Sunanta, and Jittichai Rudjanakanoknad. 2015. “Situation Review of Goods Transportation on Lancang-Mekong River After R3A Completion.” Journal of Society for Transportation and Traffic Studies 6(2), pp. 20∼30.

17.

Coedès, G. 1966. The Making of South East Asia. Translated by H. M. Wright. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

18.

Frank, A. G. 1969. Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press.

19.

Glassman, J. 2010. Bounding the Mekong: The Asian Development Bank, China, and Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

20.

Hall, D. 1981[1954]. A History of South-East Asia. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

21.

Hannerz, U. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London and New York:Routledge.

22.

Ishida, M. and Ikumo Isono. 2012. “Border Economies in the Greater Mekong Subregion.”in M. Ishida (ed.). Emerging Economic Corridors in the Mekong Region. Bangkok:Bangkok Research Center, IDE-JETRO, pp. 1∼42

23.

Jeshurun, C. 1971. The Burma-Yunnan Railway: Anglo-French Rivalry in Mainland Southeast Asia and South China, 1895~1902. Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies, Southeast Asia Program.

24.

Kearney, M. 1991. “Borders and Boundaries of State and Self at the End of Empire.”Journal of Historical Sociology 4(1), pp. 52∼74.

25.

Keola, S. 2013. “Impacts of Cross-Border Infrastructure Development: The Case of the First and Second Lao-Thai Mekong Friendship Bridges.” in M. Ishida (ed.). Border Economies in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 163∼185

26.

Ku, S. C. Y. 2015. “Laos in 2014: Deepening Chinese Influence.” Asian Survey 55(1), pp. 214∼219.

27.

Kudo, T. and M. Ishida. 2013. “Prologue: Progress in Cross-Border Movement and the Development of Border Economic Zones.” in M. Ishida (ed). Border Economies in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3∼28.

28.

Lin, S. and C. Grundy-Warr. 2012. “One Bridge, Two Towns and Three Countries:Anticipatory Geopolitics in the Greater Mekong Subregion.” Geopolitics 17(4), pp. 952∼979.

29.

Ohmae, K. 1990. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. New York: Haper Business.

30.

Ohmae, K. 1995. The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. New York: Free Press.

31.

Osborne, M. 2000. The Mekong: Turbulent Past, Uncertain Future. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

32.

Reid, A. 1993. Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450∼1680, Volume Two: Expansion and Crisis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

33.

Renard, R. 1980. “Kariang: History of Karen-Tai Relations from the Beginnings to 1923.”Doctoral Dissertation. Department of History, University of Hawai’i.

34.

Richardson, D. 2004. Dr. Richardson’s missions to Siam, 1829∼1839. A. Farrington (ed.). Bangkok: White Lotus.

35.

Jakkrit S. 2008. “From Wat Luang in Chiag Khong to Night Smuggling in Luang Prabang: Negotiation of Transborder Trade in the Changing Mekong Border Riverscape.” in Thaweesit S., P. Vail and R. Sciortino eds.). Transborder Issues in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Ubon Rachathani: Ubon Ratchathani University, pp. 393∼417

36.

Sidaway, J. D. 2001. “Rebuilding Bridges: A Critical Geopolitics of Iberian Transfrontier Cooperation in a European Context.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19(6), pp. 743∼778.

37.

Pornsakol N. S. and J. Walsh. 2012. “Nakhon Phanom, The Third Mekong Friendship Bridge and the ASEAN Economic Community.” Journal of Social and Development Sciences 3(5), pp. 172∼179.

38.

Swe, T. and P. Chambers. 2011. Cashing in Across the Golden Triangle: Thailand’s Northern Border Trade with China, Laos, and Myanmar. Chiang Mai: Mekong Press.

39.

Taillard, C. 2014. “The Continental Grid of Economic Corridors in the Greater Mekong Subregion towards Transnational Integration.” in N. Fau, S. Khonthapane and C. Taillard (eds.). Transnational Dynamics in Southeast Asia: The Greater Mekong Subregion and Malacca Straits Economic Corridors. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 23∼52.

40.

Tambiah, S. J. 1976. World Conqueror and World Renouncer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

41.

Tan, D. 2014. “China in Laos: Is There Cause For Worry?” ISEAS Perspective, 16 May 2014.

42.

Tsuneishi, T. 2009. “Border Trade and Economic Zones on the North-South Economic Corridor: Focusing on the Connecting Points between the Four Countries.” IDE Discussion Paper No. 205. Chiba: IDE-JETRO.

43.

Walker, A. 1999. The Legend of the Golden Boat: Regulation, Trade and Traders in the Borderlands of Laos, Thailand, China, and Burma. Surrey: Curzon Press.

44.

Wallerstein, I. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

45.

Wolters, O. W. 1999. History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

46.

http://www.mekonginstitute.org/

47.

http://www.unescap.org/about

48.

http://www.gms-cbta.org/events/the-fourth-lao-thai-friendship-bridge-opening

49.

http://www.adb.org/results/ancient-trade-route-delivers-new-opportunities-greater-mekong-subregion

50.

http://www.mekonginstitute.org/newsletter.html

51.

http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2015/01/31/0200000000AKR20150131047900089. HTML

52.

http://www.gokunming.com/en/blog/item/3523/all_aboard_kunming_vientiane_railway_inches_forward

53.

http://kr.xinhuanet.com/2015-08/29/c_134565544.htm https://www.internationalrivers.org/resources/8477

54.

면담 왓차랏 리라왓(Watcharas Leelawath). 메콩연구소 소장. 2015년 8월 13일.

55.

소폰 라타나시리(Sopon Ratanasiri). 치앙콩 세관 부소장. 2015년 8월 6일.

56.

타 와차이((Tha Watchai). 치앙콩 게스트하우스 주인. 2015년 8월 6일.

공간과 사회