바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

Enclosure of Urban Commons and Takeout Drawing’s Insurgent Commoning

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2016, v.26 no.3, pp.42-76
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2016.26.3.42

Abstract

Recent activism and studies are seeing an increased use of the terms, enclosureand commoning, in entangling the relationship of physical displacement and normativecontrol of urban spaces and galvanizing practices. Taking the conceptual lensof enclosure and commoning, this study looks at a case of Takeout Drawing, anindependent artspace/café in Seoul. Diverse artists, cultural activists, and researchersgathered to combat forced eviction attempts by the landlord in 2015, labeling itas gentrification. This study is based on a 9-month long militant research in thefield and on media representations of the unfolding events. Findings suggest thatthe public perception embodies more than a mere spectator’ position, leading toauthoritarian legalism to judge and justify violence. Takeout Drawing attemptedto broaden their struggle to include shared concerns of those deprived of their rightsin current urban crisis. ‘Disaster’, ‘refugee’, and ‘great asylum’ are symbolic languagesTakeout Drawing used to create ruptures in the current power relations. In conclusion I argue that the uneven boundaries of ‘actually existing urban commons’are negotiated by ceaseless insurgencies, allowing re-imagination on cities ascollectively produced commons.

keywords
젠트리피케이션, 인클로저, 도시공유재, 공유 실천 운동(commoning), 테이크아웃드로잉, gentrification, enclosure, commons, commoning, Takeout Drawing

Reference

1.

곽노완. 2012. 「공통도시에서 글로컬아고라로」. ≪마르크스주의 연구≫, 9(1), 144~171쪽.

2.

곽노완. 2013. 「‘공유도시 서울’과 글로컬아고라의 공유도시」. ≪마르크스주의 연구≫, 10(3), 146~171쪽.

3.

김용창. 2015. 「신자유주의 도시화와 도시 인클로저(I)」. ≪대한지리학회지≫, 50(4), 431~449쪽.

4.

김현경. 2015. 『사람, 장소, 환대』. 서울: 문학과 지성사.

5.

배수현 역. 2015. 『공유인으로 사고하라』. 갈무리(Bollier, D. 2014. Think like a commoner:A short introduction to the life of the commons. New Society Publishers).

6.

송병건. 2010. 「연구 논문: 농업혁명, 의회 인클로저와 농촌사회의 변화, 1750~1850」. ≪영국 연구≫, 23(단일호), 91~124쪽.

7.

윤순진·차준희. 2009. 「일반논문: 공유지 비극론의 재이해를 토대로 한 마을숲의 지속가능한 관리-강릉 송림리 마을숲 사례에 대한 검토를 중심으로」. ≪농촌사회≫, 19(2), 125~166쪽.

8.

이계수. 2014. 「도시민의 불복종과 도시법의 도전」. ≪민주법학≫, 56(단일호), 137~178쪽.

9.

이임수. 2014. 「아나키텍처(Anarchitecture)·안티젠트리피케이션(Anti-gentrification)」. ≪서양미술사학회논문집≫, 40, 243~274쪽.

10.

정영신. 2014. 「공유의 이론과 현실, 그리고 가능성」. ≪환경사회학연구 ECO≫, 18(2), 205~214쪽.

11.

최은창 역. 2015. 『네트워크의 부』. 커뮤니케이션북스(Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press).

12.

테이크아웃드로잉. 2016. 『한남포럼』. 테이크아웃드로잉.

13.

황진태. 2016. 「발전주의 도시에서 도시 공유재 개념의 이론적·실천적 전망」. ≪한국도시지리학회지≫, 19(2), 1~16쪽.

14.

강재훈. “동네미술관, 싸이의 아량에 저당잡히다.” ≪한겨레≫, 2015.10.02(보도자료).

15.

백승우. 2016. <또 다른 시선: 가려짐>(단편영화). “싸이는 악성세입자에게 걸린거 같네요.” 인터넷 커뮤니티 오늘의 유머, 2016. 02.04.

16.

이재훈. “국립국어원, ‘젠트리피케이션’ → ‘둥지 내몰림’ 어때요?.” ≪중앙일보≫, 2016.05.10.

17.

조한혜정. “싸이와 테이크아웃드로잉의 수난.” ≪한겨레≫, 2016.03.15(보도자료).

18.

Blomley, N. 2007. “Making private property: enclosure, common right and the work of hedges.” Rural History, 18(01), pp. 1~21.

19.

Blomley, N. 2008. “Making space for law” in Cox, K. R., Low, M. & Robinson, J.(Eds.). The SAGE handbook of political geography. London: Sage.

20.

Bollier, D. 2013. Silent theft: The private plunder of our common wealth. New York: Routledge.

21.

Bresnihan, P. & Byrne, M. 2015. “Escape into the city: Everyday practices of commoning and the production of urban space in Dublin.” Antipode, 47(1), pp. 36~54.

22.

Caffentzis, G. 2010. “The future of ‘The Commons’: neoliberalism’s’ Plan B’ or the original disaccumulation of capital?.” New Formations, 69(1), pp. 23~41.

23.

Caffentzis, G. & Federici, S. 2014. “Commons against and beyond capitalism.” Community Development Journal, 49(suppl 1), pp. i92~i105.

24.

De Angelis, M. 2012. “Crises, movements and commons.” Borderlands E-Journal: New Spaces In The Humanities, 11(2), p. 4.

25.

Kip, M., Bieniok, M., Dellenbaugh, M., Müller, A. K., & Schwegmann, M. 2015. “Seizing the(Every)Day: Welcome to the Urban Commons!” in Dellenbaugh, M., Kip, M., Bieniok, M., Müller, A. K. & Schwegmann, M.(Eds.). Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market(Vol. 154). Basel: Birkhäuser.

26.

Eizenberg, E. 2012. “Actually existing commons: three moments of space of community gardens in New York City.” Antipode, 44(3), pp. 764~782.

27.

Foster, S. 2011. “Collective action and the urban commons.” Notre Dame Law Review, 87, p. 57.

28.

Ghertner, D. A. 2014. “India’s urban revolution: geographies of displacement beyond gentrification.” Environment and Planning A, 46(7), pp. 1554~1571.

29.

Gidwani, V. & Baviskar, A. 2011. “Urban commons.” Economic and Political Weekly, 46(50), pp. 42~43.

30.

Gillespie, T. 2016. “Accumulation by urban dispossession: struggles over urban space in Accra, Ghana.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(1), pp. 66~77.

31.

Harvey, D. 2012. Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. New York:Verso Books.

32.

Hodkinson, S. 2012. “The new urban enclosures.” City, 16(5), pp. 500~518.

33.

Hou, J.(Ed.). 2010. Insurgent public space: guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. Routledge.

34.

Jeffrey, A., McFarlane, C., & Vasudevan, A. 2012. “Rethinking enclosure: Space, subjectivity and the commons.” Antipode, 44(4), pp. 1247~1267.

35.

Lee, S. & Webster, C. 2006. “Enclosure of the urban commons.” GeoJournal, 66(1-2), pp. 27~42.

36.

Leitner, H., Sheppard, E., & Sziarto, K. M. 2008. “The spatialities of contentious politics.”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), pp. 157~172.

37.

Lees, L., Shin, H. B. & López-Morales, E. 2016. Planetary Gentrification. Cambridge: Polity Press.

38.

Linebaugh, P. 2008. The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Berkely and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

39.

Miraftab, F., & Wills, S. 2005. “Insurgency and spaces of active citizenship the Story of western cape anti-eviction campaign in South Africa.” Journal of planning education and research, 25(2), pp. 200~217.

40.

Newman, A. 2013. “Gatekeepers of the urban commons? Vigilant citizenship and neoliberal space in multiethnic Paris.” Antipode, 45(4), pp. 947~964.

41.

Noterman, E. 2016. “Beyond Tragedy: Differential Commoning in a Manufactured Housing Cooperative.” Antipode, 48(2), pp. 433~452.

42.

O’Brien, D. T. 2012. “Managing the Urban Commons.” Human Nature, 23(4), pp. 467~489.

43.

Russell, B. 2015. “Beyond activism/academia: militant research and the radical climate and climate justice movement(s).” Area, 47(3), pp. 222~229.

44.

Sevilla-Buitrago, A. 2012. “Territory and the governmentalisation of social reproduction:parliamentary enclosure and spatial rationalities in the transition from feudalism to capitalism.” Journal of Historical Geography, 38(3), pp. 209~219.

45.

Sevilla-Buitrago, A. 2014. “Central Park against the streets: the enclosure of public space cultures in mid-nineteenth century New York.” Social & Cultural Geography, 15(2), pp. 151~171.

46.

Sevilla-Buitrago, A. 2015. “Capitalist formations of enclosure: Space and the extinction of the commons.” Antipode, 47(4), pp. 999~1020.

47.

Shin, H. B. 2016. “Economic transition and speculative urbanisation in China: Gentrification versus dispossession.” Urban Studies, 53(3), pp. 471~489.

48.

Shin, H. B. & Kim, S. H. 2016. “The developmental state, speculative urbanisation and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul.” Urban Studies, 53(3), pp. 540~559.

49.

Shin, H. B. Lees, L. & López-Morales, E. 2016. “Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East.” Urban Studies, 53(3), pp. 455~470.

50.

Springer, S. 2014. “Why a radical geography must be anarchist.” Dialogues in Human Geography, 4(3), pp. 249~270.

51.

Springer, S. 2015. “Postneoliberalism?.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(1), pp. 5~17.

52.

Vasudevan, A., McFarlane, C. & Jeffrey, A. 2008. “Spaces of enclosure.” Geoforum, 39(5), pp. 1641~1646.

Space and Environment