바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

협동조합 지배구조에 대한 이론적 쟁점과 한국 금융협동조합에의 시사 : 지역사회개발 문제를 중심으로

The Theoretical Issues of Corporate Governance of Cooperatives and Implications for the Korean Financial Cooperatives : Focusing on the Problems regarding Community Development

공간과 사회 / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2017, v.27 no.2, pp.150-184
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2017.27.2.150
최진배 (경성대학교)
권오혁 (부경대학교)

초록

협동조합의 지배구조문제에 대한 관심은 1980년대 이후 지속되고 있다. 협동조합의 지배구조문제는 협동조합의 민주적 관리를 위한 조합원의 참여(의식) 제고, 조합원과 임직원의 교육, 지역사회 관여 등과 같은 협동조합 원칙의 문제이다. 원칙들은 협동조합의 가치를 표현하고 있으며, 협동조합의 실천은 원칙을 반영해야하므로 원칙과 그것이 표현하는 가치가 훼손되고 있다면 협동조합의 정체성도 훼손되었다고 말할 수 있다. 우리나라 금융협동조합은 비교적 오랜 역사를 가지고있지만 정체성에 대한 의구심이 제기되고 있다. 이러한 문제제기에서 보듯이 우리나라 금융협동조합에도 지배구조의 문제가 존재한다. 협동조합의 원칙을 준수하면서 조합원과 지역사회를 위해 더욱 적극적인 역할을 하도록 우리나라 금융협동조합의 지배구조에 대한 관심과 연구가 요청되고 있다.

keywords
협동조합 지배구조, 한국의 금융협동조합, 지역사회, cooperative governance, Korean financial cooperatives, community development

Abstract

Concerns for the corporate governance of cooperatives have increased since the 1980's. The main problems of corporate governance of cooperatives are mostly related to the cooperatives principle such as increasing the participation of the members for the democratic management of the cooperative, education of cooperative members and employees, and community involvement. Principles express the value of cooperatives, and the practice of cooperatives should reflect the principles, so that if the principles and their values are undermined, it can be said that the identity of the cooperatives is also undermined. While Korean financial cooperatives have a relatively long history, doubts have been raised about its identity. This implies that Korean financial cooperative also have corporate governance problems. There is a need for interest and research on the governance structure of Korean financial cooperative so that cooperatives can play a more active role for the members and local communities while adhering to the principles.

keywords
협동조합 지배구조, 한국의 금융협동조합, 지역사회, cooperative governance, Korean financial cooperatives, community development

참고문헌

1.

문진수. 2013. 「해외 사회적 금융 사례로 본 신협의 사회경제적 역할 제고방안 연구-협동조합금융기관을 중심으로」. ≪신협연구≫, 제61호, 155∼212쪽.

2.

백승대. 2008. “새마을금고 비이자수익 확대방안에 관한 연구」. ≪새마을금고연구≫, 18(1), 35∼61쪽.

3.

새마을금고연합회. 1989. 「새마을금고 25년사」.

4.

새마을금고중앙회. 2013. 「새마을금고 50년사」.

5.

신명호. 2014. 「사회적경제의 이해」. 김성기·김정원·변재관·신명호·이견직·이문국·이성수·이인재·장원봉·장종익. 「사회적경제의 이해와 전망」. 아르케.

6.

신협중앙회. 1991. 「신협운동 30년사」.

7.

신협중앙회. 2011. 「신협운동 50년사」.

8.

전철환. 1990. 「금융환경변화와 신협금융 발전방향」. ≪조사연구≫, 제18호, 5∼21쪽.

9.

전형수. 2013. 「협동조합 정의 및 원칙의 측면에서 본 신협의 정체성 제고 방안」. ≪신협연구≫, 제61호, 65∼153쪽.

10.

조복현. 2010. 「신용협동조합의 영업형태 변화와 사회적 목표」. ≪신협연구≫, 제55호, 1∼34쪽.

11.

최진배. 2015. 「한국 신협의 세 가지 도전적 과제」. ≪산업혁신연구≫, 31(2), 133∼162쪽.

12.

최진배. 2016. 「협동조합은행의 변화와 한국신협의 진로」. ≪한국협동조합연구≫, 34(1), 95∼122쪽.

13.

최진배·권오혁. 2017. 「한국의 금융협동조합과 지역사회개발」. ≪한국협동조합연구≫, 35(1) (게재예정).

14.

최진배·김명록. 2016. 「한국 금융협동조합과 대리인 문제: 신용협동조합을 중심으로」. ≪한국협동조합연구≫, 34(3), 1∼20쪽.

15.

황두영. 1990. 「한국새마을금고론」. 삼진출판사.

16.

Arup, K. 2010. “Promoting Transformation and Sustainability: Merkur’s Aim.” INAISE. Networking Social Finance. Brussel.

17.

Birchall, J. 1997. The International Co-operative Movement(장종익 옮김. 「21세기의 대안 협동조합운동」. 들녘).

18.

Birchall, J. & Simmons, R. 2004. “What Motivates Members to Participate in Cooperative and Mutual Businesses?” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol.75, no.3, pp. 465∼495.

19.

Borgström, M. 2013. “Effective Cooperative Governance: A Practitioner’s Perspective.” Journal of Cooperative Organization and Management, no.1(2013), pp. 49∼50.

20.

Chaves, R. & Sajardo-Moreno, A. 2004. “Social Economy Managers: Between Values and Entrenchment.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol.75, no.1, pp. 139∼161.

21.

Cornforth, C. 2004. “The Governance of Cooperatives and Mutual Associations: A Paradox Perspective.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol.75, no.1, pp. 11∼32.

22.

Davis, K. 2001. “Credit Union Governance and Survival of the Cooperative Form.” Journal of Financial Services Research, Vol.9, no.2/3, pp. 197∼210.

23.

Davis, K. 2005. “Credit Unions and Demutualization.” Managerial Science, Vol.1, no.11, pp. 6∼25.

24.

De Clark, F. 2010. “Ethical Banking.” INAISE, Networking Social Finance. Brussel.

25.

Descours, A., Donnedieu, R., Thiery, N. & Verjus, C. 2010. “La Nef: A Banking Organization Involved in Ethical Finance.” INAISE, Networking Social Finance. Brussel.

26.

Desrochers, M. & Fischer, K. P. 2003. “Theory and Test on Cooperative System: Merger vs. Networks.” CIRPEE Working Paper, 03-34.

27.

Desrochers, M. 2005. “The Power of Networks: Integration and Financial Cooperative Performance.” CIRPEE Working Paper, 05-14.

28.

Fischer, K. P. 2002. “Governance. Regulation and Mutual Financial Intermediaries Performance.” CREFA Working Paper, 01-11.

29.

Giagnocavo, C., Gerez, S. & Sforzi, J. 2012. “Cooperative Bank Strategies for Social-Economic Problem Solvinf: Supporting Social Enterprise and Local Development.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol.3, no.3, pp. 281∼315.

30.

Gorton, G., and Schmid, F. 1999. “Corporate Governance. Ownership Dispersion and Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Austrian Cooperative Banking.” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.5, pp. 119∼140.

31.

Jussila, I., & Tuominen, P. 2010. “Exploring the Consumer Co-operative Relationship with their Members. An Individual Psychological Perspective on Ownership.”International Journal of Co-operative Management, Vol.5, no.1, pp. 23∼33.

32.

Jussila, I., Tuominen, P., & Tuominen, T. 2012. “Are We Owners or Regular Customers? The Obscure Meaning of Ownership in Consumer Co-operatives.” International Business Research, Vol.5, no.12, pp. 195∼201.

33.

Laidlaw, A. F. 1980. Co-operatives in the Year 2000(양윤모. 1988. 「서기 2000년의 협동조합」. 광주제일문화사).

34.

Leggett, K. J., & Strand, R. W. 2002. “Member Growth. Multiful Memger Groups and Agency Control at Credit Unions.” Review of Financial Economics, no.11(2002), pp. 37∼46.

35.

Macpherson, I. 2008. “The Cooperative Movement and the Social Economy Traditions:Reflections on the Mingling of Broad Visions.” Annal of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79: 3/4, pp. 625∼642.

36.

Macpherson, I. 2012. “Cooperative’s concern for the community: from member toward local communities’ interest.” Euricse Working Paper, n.46/13

37.

((재)아이쿱협동조합연구소 역. 2012. 「협동조합의 지역사회 관여: 조합원에서 출발해 지역사회 이익을 향해」. ≪iCoop 해외협동조합연구동향≫, 12-1, 1-18).

38.

Merrick, B. 2001. “When CUs Become Banks.” Credit Union Magazine, January(2001).

39.

Novkovic, S. 2013. “Reflections on the International Symposium of Co-operative Governance.” Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 1(2013), pp. 93∼95.

40.

Oczkowski, E., Krivokapic-Skoko, B., & Plummer, K. 2013. “The Meaning. Importance and Practice of the Co-operative Principles: Qualitative Evidence from the Australian Co-operative Sector.” Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, no.1(2013), pp. 54∼63.

41.

Ory, Jean-Noel & Lemzeri, Y. 2012. “Efficiency and Hybridization in Cooperative Banking:The French Case.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol.83, no.2, pp. 215∼250.

42.

Puusa, A., Monkkonen, K., & Varis, A. 2013. “Mission Lost? Dilemmatic Dual Nature of Co-operatives.” Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, no.1(2013), pp. 6∼14.

43.

Spear, R. 2004. “Governance in Member-Based Organization.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Vol.75, no.1, pp. 33∼59.

44.

Stefancic, M. 2014. “Investigating Management Turnover in Italian Cooperative Banks.”Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, Vol.13, no.1, pp. 131∼163.

45.

Syrjä, P., Sjögrén, H., & Tuominen, P. 2012. “Financial Performance and Efficiency of Consumer Co-operatives and Limited Companies-Agency Theoretical Approach.”Journal of Co-operative Accounting and Reporting, Vol.1, no.1, pp. 53∼69.

46.

Zamagni, S., & Zamagni, V. 2009. La Cooperazione.(송성호 옮김. 2012. 「협동조합으로기업하라」. 북돋움).

공간과 사회