바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

Regional income disparities and risk sharing in Korea

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2018, v.28 no.2, pp.12-44
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2018.28.2.12

Abstract

There are different regional disparities dependent upon the type of regional income. This paper introduces the concept of inter-regional risk sharing in order to clarify this and grasp the mechanism by which the gap between production income and expenditure income(consumption) is relaxed through the variance decomposition of GRDP identity, and analyze it empirically. An empirical analysis of risk sharing shows that market-based channels such as credit and capital markets play an important role in absorbing shocks to income at the regional level. Also, the redistribution channel of the government also plays a significant role, but it appears to be pro-cyclical. The difference between the capital region and the non-capital regions in risk sharing is contrasted with the difference of the capital market channel. In the former, this channel plays a very important role, but the tax and transfer and credit market channels are more important in the latter. This analysis implies that the regional problem in Korea is related not only to regional concentration in the Capital region, but also to structural problems.

keywords
regional income account, regional income disparity, risk sharing, capital and non-capital regions, 지역소득계정, 소득격차, 험공유, 수도권과 비수도권

Reference

1.

김광호. 2008. 「지역개발 정책의 목표와 전략 재정립」. 고영선 엮음. 『지역개발정책의방향과 전략』, 21∼76쪽.

2.

김종일. 2008. 「지역경제력 격차에 관한 연구」. 고영선 엮음. 『지역개발정책의 방향과전략』, 77∼135쪽.

3.

문형표. 2003. 「지역 간 형평성과 재정분권화」. 문형표 엮음. 『2003년도 국가예산과정책목표』. 한국개발연구원, 49∼83쪽.

4.

박경. 2011. 「우리나라 지역 간 소득의 역외 유출 현상: 충남을 중심으로」. ≪공간과사회≫, 제38호, 83∼113쪽.

5.

정준호•김동수•변창욱. 2012. 「역외 소득의 유출입을 고려한 지역 간 소득격차 분석과 정책적 시사점」. ≪ISSUE PAPER≫, 2012-293. 산업연구원.

6.

통계청. 2013. 『2013년 지역소득통계』. 통계청.

7.

한국은행 대전충남본부. 2011. 『충남지역 경제의 특징 및 발전방향』.

8.

한국은행. 2015. 『우리나라의 국민계정체계』. 한국은행.

9.

허문구•이상호•김낙현. 2015. 『지역소득 역외유출경로 추적과 생산•분배소득 격차요인 분석』. 조사연구자료. 한국은행 경남본부.

10.

Areaza, A., B. Sorensen and O. Yosha. 1998. “Consumption Smoothing through Fiseal Poliey in OECD and EU Countries.” NBER Working Paper No. 6372.

11.

Asdrubali, P. and Soyoung Kim. 2004. “Dynamic Risk sharing in the United States and Europe.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(4), pp.809∼836.

12.

Asdrubali, P., B. Sorensen and O. Yosha. 1996. “Channels of Interstate Risk Sharing: United States: 1963-1990.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, pp.293∼328.

13.

Becker, S. and M. Hoffmann. 2003. “Intra-and international risk-sharing in the short run and the long run.” CESifo Working Paper, No. 1111.

14.

Foster, J., S. Seth, M. Lokshin, and Z. Sajaia. 2013. A Unified Approach to Measuring Poverty and Inequality: Theory and Practice. Washington D. C.: World Bank.

15.

Lanhard, V. and M. Sawicki. 2006. “International and Intranational Consumption Risk Sharing: the Evidence for the United Kingdom and OECD.” Bank of England. Working Paper No.302.

16.

Li, J. 2012. “On the Empirics of China’s Inter-regional Risk Sharing,” MIRA Paper No. 37805.

17.

Melitz, J. and F. Zumer. 1999. “Interregional and international risk-sharing and lessons for EMU.” Carnegie-Rochester Series for Public Policy, 51, pp.149∼188.

18.

Sorensen, B. and O. Yosha. 1998. “International Risk Sharing and European Monetary Unification.” Journal of International Economics, 45(2), pp.211∼238.

19.

Sorensen, B. and O. Yosha. 2000. “Is Risk Sharing in the United States: A Regional Phenomenon?” Economic Review Second Quarter, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp.33∼47.

Space and Environment