바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

ISSN : 1225-6706

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.3

Citation Share

Positive Effects and Problematic Conditions of Adopting the Benefit Sharing Mechanism in Renewable Energy Projects: Focusing on the Case of Onshore Wind Farms in Jeju Island

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2018, v.28 no.3, pp.227-270
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2018.28.3.227


& (2018). Positive Effects and Problematic Conditions of Adopting the Benefit Sharing Mechanism in Renewable Energy Projects: Focusing on the Case of Onshore Wind Farms in Jeju Island. Space and Environment, 28(3), 227-270, https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2018.28.3.227

Abstract

Despite of widely known environmentally-friendliness of renewable energy, local residents have opposed to installation projects of renewable energy facilities in South Korea, mostly because of benefit distribution problems. Accordingly, in 2017, the Moon Jae-in government in South Korea announced to implement new renewable energy policies in order to promote local participation in various and large-scale renewable energy projects. However, no case study has been conducted on the impact of the Benefit Sharing Mechanism (BSM) with regard to renewable energy projects in South Korea. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the positive effects and problematic conditions of adopting the BSM into renewable energy projects focusing on the case of onshore wind farms in Jeju island to drive a high level of public acceptance and policy implications. Interviews were conducted with seven representatives living in three villages, Samdal-ri, Gasi-ri, Hangwon-ri, in Jeju island. Through this study, three positive effects and four problematic conditions of the BSM came to be identified. The result of this study implies importance of internalizing sufficient damage rewards into the BSM, considering local residents as major stakeholders, utilizing electricity subsidy, expanding beneficiary scope, and preparing platform or guidelines for establishing place-based Benefit Sharing Mechanism in South Korea.

keywords
재생가능에너지, 이익공유체계, 주민수용성, 제주도, 육상풍력, Benefit Sharing Mechanism(BSM), local acceptance, Jeju island, onshore wind power

Reference

1.

고태호. 2013. ｢풍력발전사업이 지역경제에 미치는 효과｣. 제주발전연구원.

2.

김형성･황성원. 2015. ｢서남해안 해상풍력단지 설치지역 주민수용성에 대한 시차적접근 과 정책적 개선 방안｣. ≪정책개발연구≫, 제14권 2호.

3.

이상훈･윤성권. 2015. ｢재생에너지 발전설비에 대한 주민 수용성 제고 방안｣. ≪환경법과 정책≫, 15권, 133∼166쪽.

4.

이자원. 2015. ｢제주 가시리 마을 만들기 사례를 통한 한국형 마을만들기 연구｣. ≪국토지리학회지≫, 제49권 4호, 425∼437쪽.

5.

이철용･김민지. 2015. ｢에너지경제연구원 이슈진단 주민 참여형 신·재생에너지 사업운영사례 및 개선 방안｣. 에너지경제연구원. ≪에너진 포커스≫, 제12권 3호(통권 57호).

6.

Action Renewables. “the Centre for Sustainable Energy and Ricardo AEA. 2015.”Communities and Renewable Energy: a Study. UK Government.

7.

Allan, G., McGregor, P., and K Swales. 2011. “The Importance of Revenue Sharing for the Local Economic Impacts of a Renewable Energy Project: A Social Accounting Matrix Approach.” Regional Studies, Vol. 45 Issue 9.

8.

AMR Interactive. 2010. Community attitudes to wind farms in NSW. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water. Sydney: AMR Interactive.

9.

Centre for Sustainable Energy and Garrad Hassan. 2005. Community Benefits from Wind Power: A study of UK practice & comparison with leading European countries.

10.

Ernst & Young. 2014. Strategic options for delivering ownership and benefit sharing models for wind farms in NSW. NSW Office of Environment and Heritage.

11.

Hall, P., N. Ashworth and H. Shaw. 2012. Exploring Community Acceptance of Rural Wind Farms in Australia: A Snapshot, CSIRO Science into Society Group, Canberra.

12.

IEA-RETD. 2016. Cost and financing aspects of community renewable energy projects. Volume II:Danish Case Study. Ricardo Energy & Environment and Ecologic Institute, IEA-RETD Operating Agent, IEA Implementing Agreement for Renewable Energy Technology Deployment (IEA-RETD), Utrecht.

13.

NSW. 2015. Community Attitudes to Renewable Energy in NSW. Office of Environment and Heritage.

14.

Rebel Group. 2009. Benefit Sharing Mechanisms in Renewable Energy. RESHARE.

15.

Rudolph, D., Haggett, C., and M Aitken. 2017. “Community Benefits from Offshore Renewables: The relationship between different understandings of impact, community and benefit.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, pp. 1~22.

16.

Scottish Government. 2015. Good Practice Principles for Community Benefits from Onshore Renewable Energy Developments. The Scottish Government, Edinburgh.

17.

UNEP. 2007. United Nations Environment Programme Dams and Development Project Compendium on Relevant Practices - Social Impact Assessment of Affected People. United Nations Environment Programme Dams and Development Project Compendium on Relevant Practices.

18.

≪비즈니스워치≫. 2017.10.12. “2030년 6530억 달러 시장 … REC 높아 값비싼 에너지, 초기 대규모 투자비용 등이 관건 … 지역민원도 숙제”.

19.

≪에너지신문≫. 2017.1.16. “[기획] 2017년 풍력에너지 현황과 전망”.

20.

≪연합뉴스≫. 2016.3.25. “태국 기업, 제주 삼달풍력 주식 30% 인수 … 최대 주주로”.

21.

≪제주의 소리≫. 2009.9.22. “제주 가시리권역 농촌마을개발사업 ‘윤곽’ … 24일 지역 주민설명회”.

22.

≪제주일보≫. 2017.7.17. “행원육상풍력, 주민 입장 변화에 추진 불투명”.

23.

≪주간조선≫. 2015.10.26. “2030년까지 에너지 자립섬－미래 한국 제주에서 본다”.

24.

≪투데이에너지≫. 2009.10.29. “한신에너지, 삼달풍력단지 준공 확정”.

25.

≪한겨레21≫. 2017.10.11. “해와 바람으로 복지한다”.

26.

국무조정실. 2014. ｢친환경에너지타운 종합계획｣.

27.

제주마을만들기종합지원센터 홈페이지, http://jejumaeul.or.kr.

Space and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy