바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1225-6706

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.29 No.2

Citation Share

경로(신산업) 창출(Path creation)의 신지역정책: 진화경제지리학의 성과를 중심으로

Regional Policy of Path Creation and Evolutionary Economic Geography

공간과 사회 / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2019, v.29 no.2, pp.214-245
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2019.29.2.214
박경 (목원대학교)
박경. (2019). 경로(신산업) 창출(Path creation)의 신지역정책: 진화경제지리학의 성과를 중심으로. 공간과 사회, 29(2), 214-245, https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2019.29.2.214

Abstract

이 글은 신산업 또는 새로운 발전경로(path creation)는 어떻게 발생하고 다각화해 나가는가, 이 역량은 지역별로 왜 다르고 신경로를 창출하기 위해서는 어떤전략이 필요한 것인가를 최근의 진화 경제지리학(Evolutionary Economic Geography) 의 성과를 통해 검토하고 그 시사점을 논의한다. 새로운 산업은 지역 내기술 관련성과 산업의 연관 다양성이 클수록 발생하기 쉽다. 그러나 연관 다각화가 지역 신산업 창출의 유일한 길은 아니다. 덴마크 풍력산업의 사례나 미국의실리콘 밸리 등 현실 세계에는 많은 비관련 다각화의 사례가 존재하기 때문이다. 특히 비관련 다각화는 장기적 지역발전과 새로운 경로의 창출에 기여한다. 이런점에서 우리나라 지역산업 혁신 정책은 클러스터론을 넘어 신산업 창출의 진화경제지리학의 성과를 적극 수용할 필요가 있다. 기존에는 승자선택(picking winner) 식 전략산업 육성 정책을 추구했으나 지금은 관련 부문 간의 연계와 비관련 부문간 지식의 재조합을 지원하는 혁신정책이 필요하다.

keywords
New industry creation, Evolutionary economic geography, Related variety, Unrelated variety, Regional industrial innovation policy, 신산업 창출, 진화경제지리학, 연관 다각화, 비연관 다각화, 지역산업 혁신 정책

참고문헌

1.

이 근. 2019. ｢한국 산업 혁신성장의 길 : 혁신체제 전환과 세 가지 화살｣. 『한국경제학회 경기연구원 정책토론회 발표자료집』, 2019년 한국경제 어디로?(2019.3. 27).

2.

한국지역정책학회·산업연구원·대전세종연구원. 2019. 『4차산업혁명시대의 지역혁신과 포용적 성장, 국제심포지엄 자료집』. 2019.5.8.

3.

Aarstad, Jarle, Olav A. Kvitastein, and Stig-Erik Jakobsen. 2016. “Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study.” Research Policy 45(4), pp. 844∼856. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013.

4.

Arthur, W. B. 1989. “Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events.” Economic Journal 99, pp. 116∼131.

5.

Asheim Bjørn. 2017. “Smart Specialisation as an Innovation Driven Strategy for Economic Diversification and Inclusive Regional Development).” ≪지역정책≫ 제4권 제2호, 65∼95쪽. 한국지역정책학회.

6.

Asheim Bjørn. Markus Grillitsch & Michaela Trippl. 2017. “Introduction: Combinatorial Knowledge Bases, Regional Innovation, and Development Dynamics.” Economic Geography, 93(5), pp. 429∼435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775.

7.

Asheim Bjørn, Rune Dahl Fitjar, Sverre J. Herstad and Nina Hjertvikrem. 2018. “Diversity and beyond for new path development: Broadening the scope for new perspectives on innovation theory and policy.” Norges Forskningsråd, 59 s(supported from the FORINNPOL program of the Research Council of Norway).

8.

Balland Pierre-Alexandre, Ron Boschma, Joan Crespo and David Rigby. 2018a. “Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification.” Regional Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018. 1437900.

9.

Balland Pierre-Alexandre, Andrea Morrison, Ron Boschma and Teresa Farinha Fernandes. 2018b. “WHAT DRIVES THE GEOGRAPHY OF JOBS IN THE US? UNPACKING RELATEDNESS.” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography #18.13, Urban &Regional research center, Utrecht University.

10.

Boschma Ron & Koen Frenken. 2006. “Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography.” Journal of Economic Geography 6, pp. 273∼302.

11.

Boschma Ron & Koen Frenken. 2009. “Technological relatedness and regional branching.” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0907. Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2009.

12.

Boschma Ron & Martin, R. 2010. “The aims and scope of evolutionary economic geography.”In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.). The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, pp. 3∼39. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

13.

Boschma Ron, C. Gianelle. 2014. “Regional Branching and Smart Specialisation Policy.” S3 Policy Brief Series n° 06, January 2014, S3 Platform, JRC-IPTS. EU.

14.

Boschma Ron, Lars Coenen, Koen Frenken & Bernhard Truffer. 2017. “Towards a theory of regional diversification: combining insights from Evolutionary Economic Geography and Transition Studies.” Regional Studies, 51(1), pp. 31∼45, DOI:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460.

15.

Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. 2003. “Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification.” Research Policy, 32(1), pp. 69∼87. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5.

16.

Content Jeroen & Koen Frenken. 2016. “Related variety and economic development: a literature review.” European Planning Studies, 24(12), pp. 2097∼2112, DOI:10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517.

17.

David, P. A. 1985. “Clio and the economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75, pp. 332∼337.

18.

Dahl, M. S., Østergaard, C. R., & Dalum, B. 2010. “Emergence of regional clusters: the role of spinoffs in the early growth process.” I. R. Boschma & R. Martin (edited). The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, pp. 205∼221. Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar Publishing.

19.

European Commission. 2010. EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.

20.

European Commission. 2012. Guide to regional/national Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation(RIS3). Brussels: European Commission.

21.

Foray D., and B. Van Ark. 2007. “Knowledge Economists Policy Brief.” n° 1 October 2007.

22.

Foray D., and B. H. Hall. 2011. “Smart specialization. From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation.” MTEI-working paper, Lausanne, November.

23.

Frenken, K., Van Oort, F. G., & Verburg, T. 2007. “Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth.” Regional Studies, 41(5), pp. 685∼697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.

24.

Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. “Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship.” Research Policy, 32, pp. 277∼300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2.

25.

Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Sheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A. 1992. “Growth in cities.”Journal of Political Economic, 100(6), pp. 1126∼1152.

26.

Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., and Trippl, M. 2018a. “Unrelated knowledge combinations:the unexplored potential for regional industrial path development.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11, pp. 257∼274.

27.

Grillitsch, M., and Asheim, B. 2018b. “Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions.” European Planning Studies, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1484892.

28.

Groot De, H. L. F., Poot, J., & Smit, M. J. 2016. “Which agglomeration externalities matter most and why?” Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(4), pp. 756∼782.

29.

Hausmann R. 2016. “Economic development and the accumulation of knowhow.” Welch Economic Review 24, pp. 13∼16.

30.

Hausmann R., César A. Hidalgo, Sebastian Bustos, Michele Coscia, Alexander Simoes and Muhammed A. Yildiriml. 2013. “The Atlas of Economic Complexity; mapping paths to prosperity.” Section 3. http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/.

31.

Herstad, S., T. Sandven and B. Ebersberger. 2015. “Recruitment, knowledge integration and modes of innovation.” Research Policy 44(1), pp. 138∼153. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.007.

32.

Hidalgo C. A., and Hausmann R. 2009. “The building blocks of economic complexity.”Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United states 106, pp. 10570∼10575.

33.

Hidalgo C. A., P. Balland, R. Boschma, M. Delgado, M.Feldman, K. Frenken, E. Glaeser, C. He, D. F. Kogler, A. Morrison, F. Neffke, D. Rigby, S. Stern, S. Zheng and S. Zhu. 2018. “The Principle of Relatedness.” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, #18.30, Urban & Regional research center, Utrecht University, http://econ.geog.uu.nl/peeg/peeg.html.

34.

Isaksen Arne, Martin Roman and Trippl Michaela eds. 2018. New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons. Springer International Publishing AG.

35.

Jacobs, J. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage

36.

Jeroen Content and Koen Frenken. 2016. “Related variety and economic development: a literature review.” European Planning Studies, 24:12, pp. 2097∼2112, DOI:10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517.

37.

Krugman, P. 1994. “Complex landscapes in economic geography.” American Economic Review(Papers and Proceedings) 84, pp. 412∼416.

38.

Mackinnon D., Stuart Dawley, Andy Pike and Andrew Cumbers. 2018. “Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach.” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography #18.25. Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning.

39.

Martin R., and Sunley, P. 2006. “Path dependence and regional economic evolution.”Journal of Economic Geography, 6, pp. 395∼437.

40.

Martin R. 2010. “Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography-Rethinking Regional Path Dependence: Beyond Lock-in to Evolution.” Economic Geography, 86(1), pp. 1∼27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x.

41.

McCann Philip and Raquel Ortega-Argilés. 2011. “SMART SPECIALISATION, REGIONAL GROWTH AND APPLICATIONS TO EU COHESION POLICY.” Documents de Treball de l’IEB 2011/14, Barcelona Institute of Economics.

42.

Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. “How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions.”Economic Geography, 87, pp. 237∼265.

43.

Njøs, R., & Stig-Erik Jakobsen. 2016. “Cluster policy and regional development: scale, scope and renewal.” Regional Studies, 3(1), pp. 146∼169. DOI:10.1080/21681376.2015.1138094.

44.

Pinheiro Flávio L., Aamena Alshamsi, Dominik Hartmann, Ron Boschma & César Hidalgo. 2018. “Shooting Low or High: Do Countries Benefit from Entering Unrelated Activities?” Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning. Group Economic Geography.

45.

Radosevic Slavo. 2017. “Assessing EU Smart Specialization Policy in a Comparative Perspective(Chapter 1).” in Radosevic Slavo, Adrian Curaj, Radu Gheorghiu and Liviu Andreescu(edited). Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization. Academic Press Eisevier, London.

46.

Radosevic Slavo, Adrian Curaj, Radu Gheorghiu and Liviu Andreescu(edited). 2017. Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization. Academic Press Eisevier, London.

47.

Rodrik, Dani. 2004. “Industrial Policies for the Twenty-First Century.” John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, September 2004.

48.

Saviotti P. P., and Frenken K. 2008. “Export variety and the economic performance of countries.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18, pp. 201∼218.

49.

Tanner Anne Nygaard. 2014. “Regional Branching Reconsidered: Emergence of the Fuel Cell Industry in European Regions.” Economic Geography, 90(4), pp. 403∼427.

50.

Timmermans, B., and R. Boschma. 2014. “The effect of intra- and inter-regional labour mobility on plant performance in Denmark: the significance of related labour inflows.” Journal of Economic Geography 14(2), pp. 289∼311.

공간과 사회

논문 투고 OA 정책