바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Space and Environment

Urban diversity regime in queer festivals of non-capital cities: a case study of Dague, Jeju and Busan

Space and Environment / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2019, v.29 no.2, pp.96-133
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2019.29.2.96

Abstract

This study suggests the concept of ‘urban diversity regime’, analyzing queer festivals of non-capital cities in the Korean context. Conducting participant observation, in-depth/informal interviews, and archival data, this study catches the following results from the case of Dague, Jeju, and Busan. First, queer festivals of three cities arise as a political agenda through two main steps: uniting of local human resource and acquiring citizenship from local civil society. As the queer festival is a newly emerged activism in local areas except for Seoul, organizers integrate collective emotion within the progressive local civil community. Second, as a political project for urban diversity, queer festivals call for cooperation between civil and public actors. The cooperation is mainly built upon ‘the right for occupying public space’, which is a requisite for ‘the legitimate festival’. Since local government and police own exclusive power to approve accessibility to public space, governmental actors are inevitably involved in the political project. This study seeks to explore the power relationship in local queer festivals, which is rapidly spreading in recent, and to expand the regime approach to political participation and identity politics of minorities and localization of queer festivals.

keywords
레짐 이론, 다양성, 퀴어 축제, 성소수자, 지방 도시, regime theory, diversity, queer festival, sexual minorities, non-capital cities

Reference

1.

강인순. 2007. 「마산·창원 지역 여성운동의 현황과 과제」. ≪한국여성학회≫, 제23권제4호, 177∼213쪽.

2.

김주락. 2015. 「드러냄으로 물들이는 공간」. ≪문화역사지리≫, 제27권 제3호, 100∼113쪽.

3.

김현철. 2015a. 「성적 반체제자와 공공 공간-2014 신촌/대구 퀴어퍼레이드를 중심으로」. 서울대학교 사회교육과 대학원 석사학위논문.

4.

김현철. 2015b. 「성적 반체제자와 도시공간의 공공성: 2014 신촌 퀴어퍼레이드를 중심으로」. ≪공간과 사회≫, 제25권 제1호, 12∼62쪽.

5.

박경래·황정인·박노섭·안정민. 2009. 「집회·시위에 대한 경찰대응 기준과 개선방안」. ≪형사정책연구원 연구총서≫, 제12호, 7∼163쪽.

6.

루인(배성민)·정희성. 2018. 「퀴어와 공간의 관계 재구성: 영화 <불온한 당신>(이영, 2015)의 바지씨 이묵을 통해 한국이라는 공간의 이성애 규범성과 도시-촌락이분법 탐문하기」. ≪공간과 사회≫, 제28권 제1호, 194∼226쪽.

7.

서동진. 2005. 「인권, 시민권 그리고 섹슈얼리티: 한국의 성적 소수자 운동과 정치학」. ≪경제와 사회≫, 제67호, 66∼87쪽.

8.

송태은. 2017. 「미국 공공외교의 변화와 국제평판」. ≪국제정치논총≫, 제57권 제4호, 163∼198쪽.

9.

윤수종. 2005. 「소수자 운동의 특성과 사회운동의 방향」. ≪경제와 사회≫, 제67호, 12∼38쪽.

10.

이나영·백조연. 2017. 「<성과학연구협회>를 중심으로 본 ‘개신교’ 동성애 ‘혐오담론’」. ≪여성학연구≫, 제27권 제1호, 67∼108쪽.

11.

이혜숙. 2002. 「지역여성운동의 형성과 전개: 진주여성민우회를 중심으로」. ≪한국사회학≫, 제36권 제1호, 195∼221쪽.

12.

이혜숙. 2012. 「지역여성운동의 조직과 세력화의 전망」. ≪한국여성학≫, 제28권 제4호, 39∼83쪽.

13.

장미경. 2005. 「한국사회 소수자와 시민권의 정치」. ≪한국사회학≫, 제39권 제6호, 159∼182쪽.

14.

정현주. 2006. 「사회운동의 공간성: 사회운동연구에 있어서 지리학적 기여에 대한탐색」. ≪대한지리학회지≫, 제41권 제4호, 470∼490쪽.

15.

정희성. 2018. 「역설적 공간으로써 퀴어문화축제 장」. 경희대학교 지리학과 대학원석사학위논문.

16.

전영평. 2008. 「다문화시대의 소수자운동과 소수자행정」. ≪한국행정학보≫, 제42권제3호, 9∼27쪽.

17.

한윤애. 2015. 「‘축제적 전유’를 통한 공공공간의 재구성」. ≪공간과 사회≫, 제25권제1호, 63∼94쪽.

18.

한주희. 2015. 「퀴어 정치와 퀴어 지정학」. ≪문화과학≫, 제83호, 62∼81쪽.

19.

황진태. 2011. 「2008년 촛불집회시위의 공간성에 관한 고찰」. ≪경제와사회≫, 제90호, 262∼289쪽.

20.

황진태·정현주. 2015. 「페미니스트 공간연구에 다중스케일적 접근 접목하기」. ≪대한지리학회지≫, 제50권 제1호, 123∼139쪽.

21.

Aldrich, R. 2004. “Homosexuality and the city: An historical overview.” Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 1719∼1737.

22.

Andersson, T. D., and Getz, D. 2008. “Stakeholder management strategies of festivals.”Journal of Convention and Event Tourism, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 199∼220.

23.

Ammaturo, F. R. 2016. “Spaces of pride: a visual ethnography of gay pride parades in Italy and the United Kingdom.” Social Movement Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 19∼40.

24.

Annes, A., and Redlin, M. 2012. “Coming out and coming back: Rural gay migration and the city.” Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 56∼68.

25.

Bailey, R. C. 1999. Gay politics, urban politics: Identity and economics in the urban setting. Columbia University Press.

26.

Bell, D., and Binnie, J. 2004. “Authenticating queer space: Citizenship, urbanism and governance.” Urban studies, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 1807∼1820.

27.

Bertuzzi, N. 2017. “Urban Regimes and the Right to the City: An Analysis of the No Expo Network and its Protest Frames.” Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, Vol. 113, pp. 107∼128.

28.

Brickell, C. 2000. “Heroes and invaders: Gay and lesbian pride parades and the public/private distinction in New Zealand media accounts.” Gender, Place and Culture:A Journal of Feminist Geography, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 163∼178.

29.

Brown, G. 2007. “Mutinous eruptions: autonomous spaces of radical queer activism.”Environment and Planning A, Vol. 39, No. 11, pp. 2685∼2698.

30.

Brown, G. 2012. “Homonormativity: A Metropolitan Concept that Denigrates ‘Ordinary’Gay Lives.” Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 59, No. 7, pp. 1065∼1072.

31.

Browne, K. 2007. “A party with politics? (Re) making LGBTQ Pride spaces in Dublin and Brighton.” Social & Cultural Geography, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 63∼87.

32.

Bruce, K. 2013. “LGBT Pride as a cultural protest tactic in a southern city.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 608∼635.

33.

Brunner, C., and Schumaker, P. 1998. “Power and gender in the “new view” public schools.” Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 30∼45.

34.

Calvo, K., and Trujillo, G. 2011. “Fighting for love rights: Claims and strategies of the LGBT movement in Spain.” Sexualities, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 562∼579.

35.

DeLeon, R., and Naff, K. 2004. “Identity politics and local political culture: Some comparative results from the social capital benchmark survey.” Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 689∼719.

36.

Dinham, A., and Lowndes, V. 2008. “Religion, resources, and representation: three narratives of faith engagement in British urban governance.” Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 817∼845.

37.

Eleftheriadis, K. 2015. “Organizational practices and prefigurative spaces in European queer festivals.” Social Movement Studies, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 651∼667.

38.

Goh, K. 2018. “Safe cities and queer spaces: the urban politics of radical LGBT activism.”Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol. 108, No. 2, pp. 463∼477.

39.

Good, K. 2005. “Patterns of politics in Canada’s immigrant-receiving cities and suburbs:How immigrant settlement patterns shape the municipal role in multiculturalism policy.” Policy Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3-4, pp. 261∼289.

40.

Honneth, A. 1995. The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.

41.

Jagose, A. 1996. Queer theory: An introduction. NYU Press.

42.

Jayne, M. 2012. “Mayors and urban governance: discursive power, identity and local politics.” Social & Cultural Geography, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 29∼47.

43.

Johnston, L., and Waitt, G. 2015. “The spatial politics of gay pride parades and festivals:Emotional activism.” in Paternotte, D., and Tremblay, M.(eds.). Ashgate Research Companion on Lesbian and Gay Activism. Ashgate, pp. 105∼119.

44.

Keck, T. 2009. “Beyond backlash: Assessing the impact of judicial decisions on LGBT rights.” Law & Society Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 151∼186.

45.

Markwell, K., and Waitt, G. 2009. “Festivals, space and sexuality: Gay pride in Australia.”Tourism Geographies, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 143∼168.

46.

Monro, S. 2005. Gender politics: Activism, citizenship and sexual diversity. Pluto Press.

47.

Moore, M. R. 2010. “Articulating a Politics of (Multiple) Identities 1: LGBT Sexuality and Inclusion in Black Community Life.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 315∼334.

48.

Mossberger, K., and Stoker, G. 2001. “The evolution of urban regime theory: the challenge of conceptualization.” Urban affairs review, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 810∼835.

49.

Olson, E. 2017. “An exploration of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender pride festival sponsors.” Journal of convention & event tourism, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 60∼73.

50.

Pierre, J. 2014. “Can urban regimes travel in time and space? Urban regime theory, urban governance theory, and comparative urban politics.” Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 864∼889.

51.

Poppelaars, C. 2007. “Resource exchange in urban governance: On the means that matter.” Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 3∼27.

52.

Sharpe, E. 2008. “Festivals and social change: Intersections of pleasure and politics at a community music festival.” Leisure Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 217∼234.

53.

Stone, C. 1989. Regime politics: governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. University press of Kansas.

54.

Stone, C. 1993. “Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach.”Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1∼28.

55.

Stone, C. 2004. “It’s more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes.” Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1∼19.

56.

Stone, C. 2005. “Looking back to look forward: Reflections on urban regime analysis.”Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 309∼341.

57.

Stone, C. 2015. “Reflections on regime politics: From governing coalition to urban political order.” Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 101∼137.

58.

Waitt, G., and Stapel, C. 2011. “‘Fornicating on floats?’ The cultural politics of the Sydney Mardi Gras Parade beyond the metropolis.” Leisure Studies, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 197∼216.

59.

Whelan, R., Young, A. H., and Lauria, M. 1994. “Urban regimes and racial politics in New Orleans.” Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1∼21.

60.

Weinstein, L., and Ren, X. 2009. “The changing right to the city: Urban renewal and housing rights in globalizing Shanghai and Mumbai.” City & Community, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 407∼432.

61.

Wright, M. 2009. “Gender and geography: Knowledge and activism across the intimately global.” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 379∼386.

Space and Environment