바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-6706
  • E-ISSN2733-4295
  • KCI

코로나 19의 생명정치: 안전장치와 규율의 작동으로 바라본 한국의 코로나 19 ‘정치-역학’ 모델과 기술의 사용

The Biopolitics of COVID-19: Understanding South Korea’s Approach to COVID-19 as a ‘Politico-Epidemiological’ Model through the Exercise of Apparatuses of Security and Discipline

공간과 사회 / Space and Environment, (P)1225-6706; (E)2733-4295
2020, v.30 no.4, pp.85-123
https://doi.org/10.19097/kaser.2020.30.4.85
박위준 (University of Kentuck)

초록

본 논문은 코로나 19를 관리하고 있는 한국의 방역 모델을 푸코의 생명정치 개념으로분석한다. 대부분의 국가들이 전면적 봉쇄나 국경 폐쇄와 같은 공간적인 강제 조치를 통해코로나 19에 대응한 데 반해, 한국은 어떠한 형태의 광범위한 공간적 폐쇄 조치 없이 현 상황을 관리하고 있다. 이 논문은 이러한 예외적인 방역 모델을 강압적인 명령 보다는 ‘순환의 문제’에 집중하는 안전장치의 작동을 기본 전략으로 하고, 국지적으로 규율적 격리와치료의 방식을 덧붙인 생명정치적 ‘정치-역학’ 모델로 해석한다. 또한 본 논문은 이러한 모델의 작동에 중요한 역할을 했던 기술들이 공통적으로 이러한 메커니즘하에서 작동했다고본다. 이와 같은 이해는 이 ‘정치-역학’ 모델의 개별적인 부분에 집중하는 해석과 달리 대규모 전염병 관리에 대한 보다 포괄적이고도 실천적인 이해를 제공한다.

keywords
안전장치, 규율, 순환의 문제, 생명정치, 코로나 19, 기술, apparatuses of security, discipline, problem of circulation, biopolitics, COVID-19, technologies

Abstract

This paper analyses South Korea’s response to COVID-19 in the concept of Foucauldian biopolitics. South Korea’s model is managing this pandemic situation without any extensive spatial restrictions, such as lockdown and blocking borders, whereas most countries rely on them. This paper understands this model as a biopolitical ‘politico-epidemiological’ model which takes the apparatuses of security, focusing on the ‘problem of circulation’, as a global and primary strategy, rather than oppressive orders, and locally utilizes disciplinary exercises. Also, this paper argues that various technologies which are regarded as instrumental in this model, such as geospatial technology, computational technology, and medical technology, are jointly exercised under this mechanism. This approach provides a more comprehensive and practical understanding of the ‘politico-epidemiological’ model that is actually exercised in the pandemic situation, rather than just focusing on the individual parts of the model.

keywords
안전장치, 규율, 순환의 문제, 생명정치, 코로나 19, 기술, apparatuses of security, discipline, problem of circulation, biopolitics, COVID-19, technologies

참고문헌

1.

경남신문. 2020.3.2. “검사까지 10분 소요 … ‘드라이브 스루 선별진료소’ 북적”. http://m.knnews.co.kr/mView.php?idxno=1320595&gubun=(검색일: 2020.05.01.)

2.

국토교통부 보도자료. 2020.03.25., http://www.molit.go.kr/USR/NEWS/m_71/dtl.jsp?lcmspage=1&id=95083710(검색일: 2020.04.23.)

3.

국토교통부·질병관리본부 공동 외신브리핑. 2020.4.9. “MOLIT & KCDC Online Briefing on COVID-19 Smart Management System”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9o_HGN6v8E(검색일: 2020.04.23.)

4.

김강기명. 2020.4.7. “유럽이 한국으로부터 배울 수 없는 것”. https://firenzedt.com/?p=5909 (검색일: 2020.04.10., 원문은 https://www.merkur-zeitschrift.de/2020/04/01/waseuropa-von-suedkorea-nicht-lernen-kann/, 독일어).

5.

김동완. 2013. 통치성의 공간들: 한국의 정치지리를 고려한 시론적 검토, ≪공간과 사회≫. 23권 2호(통권 44권), 131-164쪽.

6.

대구시 언론 브리핑. 2020.4.13. http://www.daegu.go.kr/dgcontent/index.do?menu_id=00936590&menu_link=/icms/bbs/selectBoardArticle.do&bbsId=BBS_02098 (검색일: 2020.04.25., 위의 링크가 주소창에 제공되나 실제로 접속되지 않으므로 대구시 브리핑 게시판에서 4월 13일 게시물을 찾아서 접근할 것)

7.

박근영. 2019. “청소년의 인터넷, 스마트폰 이용 현황”. https://kess.kedi.re.kr/post/6684806? itemCode=03&menuId=m_02_03_03&fbclid=IwAR1cJpYJJ-gjyfqOALZP7tva7c2kpbGjaatUIaAs0Sy5zy3n6MqcltMocBs(검색일: 2020.05.17.)

8.

보건복지부 보도자료. 2020.3.23. http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&page=29&CONT_SEQ=353682(검색일:2020.04.28).

9.

서동진. 2009. 신자유주의 분석가로서의 푸코: 미셀 푸코의 통치성과 반정치적 정치의 회로. ≪문화과학≫. 57권. 315~335쪽.

10.

YTN. 2020.3.17. “’드라이브 스루’ 이어 등장한 1인용 ‘워킹 스루’ 진료소”. https://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0103_202003171150067171. (검색일: 2020.05.01.)

11.

연합뉴스. 2019.2.6. “한국 스마트폰 보유율 95% … 세계 1위”. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20190206008200009(검색일: 2020.05.17).

12.

윤재왕. 2016. 예외상태와 주권의 역설: 아감벤의 칼 슈미트 해석에 대한 비판. ≪강원법학≫. 47권. 337-404쪽.

13.

임동근. 2008. 국가와 통치성. ≪문화과학≫. 54권. 13-27쪽.

14.

질병관리본부. 2020. 코로나바이러스감염증-19 국내 발생 현황 정례브리핑 자료[2020.1.24 (글번호 3613번)~2020년 7월 22일(글번호 4096번)]. https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20501000000&bid=0015(검색일: 2020.07.22).

15.

최병두. 2015. 메르스 사태의 지리학과 생명권력의 정치. ≪공간과 사회≫. 25권 3호(통권 53호). 173-192쪽.

16.

코로나바이러스감염증-19 중앙사고수습본부. 2020.2.21. http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&page=27&CONT _SEQ=353024&SEARCHKEY=TITLE&SEARCHVALUE=%EC%BD%94%EB%A1%9C%EB%82%98(검색일: 2020.05.05).

17.

코로나바이러스감염증-19 중앙재난안전대책본부 정례브리핑. 2020.5.3. http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/tcmBoardView.do?contSeq=354337(검색일: 2020.05.04).

18.

TBS뉴스, 2020.2.6. “코로나맵 개발자 “누적조회 천만 … 제보, 데이터 사실유무 판단해 업로드”, http://www.tbs.seoul.kr/news/bunya.do?method=daum_html2&typ_800=1&seq_800=0010376419(검색일: 2020.04.30).

19.

한겨레, 2020.6.15. “구제역과 닮은 코로나, 회피할 건가 참여할 건가”: [애니멀피플] 포스트 코로나19 인간과 동물의 관계를 묻다 5. http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/animalpeople/human_animal/949350.html(검색일: 2020.06.15).

20.

Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

21.

Agamben, G. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Agamben, G. 2020.02.26.(2020a). “The Invention of an Epidemic”. in M. Foucualt et al.. Coronavirus and Philosopher. https://www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/coronavirus-andphilosophers/(검색일: 2020.04.13., (원문은 https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgioagamben-l-invenzione-di-un-epidemia, 이탈리아어)

23.

Agamben, G. 2020.03.17.(2020b). “Clarifications”. https://itself.blog/2020/03/17/giorgio-agambenclarifications/(검색일: 2020.04.13., 원문은 https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgioagamben-chiarimenti, 이탈리아어)

24.

Amnesty International. 2020. “COVID-19, Surveillance and the Threat to Your Rights”. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/04/covid-19-surveillance-threatto-your-rights/(검색일 2020.04.23).

25.

Amoore, L. 2013. The Politics of Possibility: Risk and Security beyond Probability. Durham:Duke University Press.

26.

Amoore, L. 2018. Cloud Geographies: Computing, Data, sovereignty. Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 42. No. 1. pp. 4~24.

27.

Ash, J., R. Kitchin. and A. Leszczynski. 2018. “Digital Turn, Digital Geographies?”. Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 42. No. 1. pp. 25~43.

28.

Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge and Medford: Polity Press.

29.

Berg, A. 2020.03.23. “Giorgio Agamben’s Coronavirus Cluelessness”. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Giorgio-Agamben-s/248306(검색일: 2020. 04. 26).

30.

Bischoff, P. 2019. “Surveillance Camera Statistics: Which Cities Have the Most CCTV Cameras?”. https://www.comparitech.com/vpn-privacy/the-worlds-most-surveilled-cities/(검색일: 2020.04.15., 해당 자료 전체는 다음에서 확인할 수 있음https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bKBFiVXNzrgtW95j66Tpcj2OYmL-GjmKxvVvEN8aI8/edit#gid=979494433).

31.

Boukalas, C. 2014. No Exceptions: Authoritarian Statism. Agamben, Poulantzas and Homeland Security. Critical Studies on Terrorism. Vol. 7. No. 1. pp. 112~130.

32.

Brennan, S. 2020.04.02. “The Biopolitics of Covid-19”. https://sluggerotoole.com/2020/04/02/the-biopolitics-of-covid-19/(검색일: 2020.04.15).

33.

Browne, S. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham and London:Duke University Press.

34.

Cho, J. 2020.02.27. “Why South Korea may have more coronavirus cases than the US”, https://abcnews.go.com/International/massive-coronavirus-testing-programsouth-korea-underscores-nimble/story?id=69226222(검색일: 2020.04.18).

35.

Chun, W. H. K. 2011. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory, Cambridge: MIT Press.

36.

Crampton, J. W. and S. Elden (eds.). 2007. Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.

37.

Diken, B. and B. L. Carsten. 2005. The Culture of Exception: Sociology Facing the Camp. New York: Routledge.

38.

Doberstyn, B. 2006. “What Did We Learn from SARS?” in World Health Organization (ed.). SARS: How a Global Epidemic was Stopped. Geneva: World Health Organization.

39.

Elden, S. 2007. Rethinking Governmentality. Political Geography. Vol. 26. No. 1. pp. 29-33.

40.

Elwood, S. and A. Leszczynski. 2013. New Spatial Media, New Knowledge Politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Vol. 38. pp. 544~559.

41.

Findlay, A. M. 2003. Population Geographies for the 21st Century. Scottish Geographical Journal. Vol. 119. pp. 117-190.

42.

Foucault, M. 1973[2003]. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. A. Sheridan (trans.). New York: Routledge.

43.

Foucault, M. 1977[1995]. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. A. Sheridan (trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

44.

Foucault, M. 1978[1990]. The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction. R. Hurley (trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

45.

Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. C. Gordon (ed.). C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, K. Soper (trans.). New York:Pantheon.

46.

Foucault, M. 2003. Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975-1976. M. Bertani, A. Fontana (eds.). D. Macey (trans.). New York: Picador.

47.

Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977-1978. M. Senellart (ed.). G. Burchell (trans.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. (오트르망 옮김. 2011. 『안전, 영토, 인구: 콜레주 드 프랑스 강의, 1977-78년』. 난장)

48.

Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979. M. Senellart (ed.). G. Burchell (trans.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. (오트르망 옮김. 2012. 『생명관리정치의 탄생: 콜레주 드 프랑스 강의, 1978-79년』. 난장)

49.

Foucault, M. and D. Trombadori. 1991. Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori. R. J. Goldstein, J. Cascaito (trans.). New York: Semiotext(e). (이승철 옮김. 2010. 『푸코의 맑스: 둣치오 뜨롬바도리와의 대담』. 갈무리)

50.

Gabrys, J. 2016. Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

51.

Ghebreyesus, T. A. 2020.03.15. in WHO News Conference. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-51916707/who-head-our-key-message-is-test-test-test, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GqhApWmFtA(검색일: 2020.04.28).

52.

Gilmore, R. W. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

53.

Guardian. 2020.04.27. “Ardern: New Zealand Has ‘Won Battle’ against Community Transmission of Covid-19”. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/27/new-zealand-prepares-to-lift-strict-lockdown-after-eliminating-coronavirus(검색일: 2020.05.01).

54.

Jefferson, B. J. 2017. Digitize and Punish: Computerized Crime Mapping and Racialized Carceral Power in Chicago. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Vol. 35. No. 5. pp. 775~796.

55.

Jessop, B. 2011 Constituting Another Foucault Effect: Foucault on States and Statecraft. U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann and T. Lemke(eds.). Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. New York: Routledge.

56.

Jessop, B. 2007. From Micro-powers to Governmentality: Foucault’s Work on Statehood, State Formation, Statecraft and State Power. Political Geography. Vol. 26. No. 1. pp. 34~40.

57.

Kluth, A. 2020.04.22. “If We Must Build a Surveillance State, Let’s Do It Properly: As We Develop New Apps to Track the Coronavirus, The Best Model Isn’t the U.S., China, Germany or South Korea. It’s Taiwan.” https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-04-22/taiwan-offers-the-best-model-for-coronavirus-data-tracking(검색일: 2020.04.28).

58.

Kwon, K. T. et al. 2020 Drive-through Screening Center for COVID-19: A Safe and Efficient Screening System against Massive Community Outbreak. Journal of Korean Medical Sciences. Vol. 35. No. 11. pp.1~4.

59.

Lee, S.-O., N. Jan, and J. Wainwright. 2014, Agamben, Postcoloniality, and Sovereignty in South Korea. Antipode. Vol. 46. No. 3. pp. 650~668.

60.

Legg, S. 2005. Foucault’s Population Geographies: Classifications, Biopolitics and Governmental Spaces. Population, Space and Place. Vol. 11. pp. 137~156.

61.

Lemke, T. 2005. A Zone of Indistinction: A critique of Giorgio Agamben’s Concept of Biopolitics. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies. Vol. 7. No. 1. pp. 3~13.

62.

Lemke, T. 2011. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.

63.

Logan, J. 2020.03.19. “How Different Societies React to Pandemics”. https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/how-different-societies-react-pandemics(검색일: 2020. 05.02).

64.

Lucas, F. 2020.03.27. “5 Things Americans Should Know about South Korea’s Handling of Coronavirus”. https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/03/27/5-things-americansshould-know-about-south-koreas-handling-of-coronavirus/. (검색일: 2020.05.02.)

65.

McCurry, J. 2020.04.23. “Test, Trace, Contain: How South Korea Flattened Its Coronavirus Curve”. shttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/23/test-trace-containhow-south-korea-flattened-its-coronavirus-curve. (검색일: 2020.04.18.)

66.

Nancy, J.-L. 2020.02.27.(2020). “Viral Exception”. in M. Foucault et al.. Coronavirus and Philosopher. https://www.journal-psychoanalysis.eu/coronavirus-and-philosophers/(검색일: 2020.04.13., 원문은 https://antinomie.it/index.php/2020/02/27/eccezione-virale/, 이탈리아어).

67.

Park, S. N. 2020.04.02. “Confucianism Isn’t Helping Beat the Coronavirus” https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/02/confucianism-south-korea-coronavirus-testingcultural-trope-orientalism/(검색일: 2020.05.02).

68.

Philo, C. 2005. Sex, Life, Death, Geography: Fragmentary Remarks Inspired by ‘Foucault’s Population Geographies’. Population, Space and Place. Vol. 11. pp. 325~333.

69.

Roberts, S. L. 2019. Big Data, Algorithmic Governmentality and the Regulation of Pandemic Risk. European Journal of Risk Regulation. Vol. 10. No. 1. pp. 94~115.

70.

Rose, N. and Miller, P. 1992. Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government. The British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 43. No. 2. pp. 173~205.

71.

Ryu, S. et al. 2020. Effect of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, South Korea, 2020. Emerging Infectious Diseases. Vol. 26. No. 10. DOI: 10.3201/eid2610.201886.

72.

Sonn, J. W. 2020.03.19. “Coronavirus: South Korea’s Success in Controlling Disease is due to Its Acceptance of Surveillance”. https://theconversation.com/coronavirussouth-koreas-success-in-controlling-disease-is-due-to-its-acceptance-of-surveillance-134068(검색일: 2020.04.18).

73.

Sonn, J. W. and J. Lee. 2020. Smart City as Time-Space Cartographer: South Korean Strategy for COVID-19 Control and Its Implications for Democratic Control of Data. Eurasian Geography and Economics. Vol. 61. No. 4. pp. 1~5.

74.

South China Morning Post. 2019.12.09. “China the Most Surveilled Nation? The US Has the Largest Number of CCTV Cameras per Capita”. https://www.scmp.com/tech/gear/article/3040974/china-most-surveilled-nation-us-has-largest-number-cctvcameras-capita(검색일: 2020.04.15).

75.

Sotiris, P. 2020.03.20. Against Agamben: Is a Democratic Biopolitics Possible? https://www.viewpointmag.com/2020/03/20/against-agamben-democratic-biopolitics/ (검색일: 2020.03.26).

76.

World Health Organization(WHO). 2012. “T3: Test. Treat. Track initiative”. https://www.who.int/malaria/areas/test_treat_track/en/(검색일: 2020.04.30), https://www.who. int/malaria/publications/atoz/test_treat_track_brochure.pdf?ua=1(검색일:2020.12.04).

공간과 사회