바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

한국심리학회지: 일반

데이트 폭력 관계를 유지시키는 요인으로서 용서: 투자모델에 더하여

The addition of forgiveness as a factor in sustaining dating violence relationships to the Investment model

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2009, v.28 no.2, pp.385-403
이은혜 (중앙대학교)
이초롱 (중앙대학교)
현명호 (중앙대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 폭력적인 데이트 관계를 유지하는데 있어서 용서가 이를 얼마나 설명하는지를 확인하기 위하여 수행되었다. 그동안 데이트 폭력에 관한 많은 연구가 투자모델로 데이트 폭력 관계 유지를 설명해왔고 본 연구는 이에 용서 변인을 추가하여 설명력을 보충하였다. 이를 위해, 210명의 여대생에게 갈등책략 척도(CTS-II)와 투자모델척도, 이타적 망상척도, Enright 용서질문지, 관계 종결/지속 척도를 실시하였다. 이 중 데이트 폭력을 경험하였던 133명의 자료가 최종적으로 분석되었다. 그 결과 투자 모델 변인은 관계지속과 관련이 있었고, 헌신과 관계의 지속에 있어서 용서가 부분매개를 하였다. 이러한 결과는 만족과 파트너에게 한 투자, 대안의 질, 헌신에 의해서 여성 희생자가 공격적인 파트너를 용서하고 결과적으로 데이트 폭력관계가 유지되었음을 보여주었다. 이러한 결과는 용서가 폭력적 상황을 유지하는데 부적절하게 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 시사한다. 끝으로 본 연구의 의의와 한계 및 앞으로 연구 과제를 논의하였다.

keywords
데이트 폭력, 투자 모델, 용서, dating violence, investment model, forgiveness

Abstract

The current study aimed to establish how forgiveness contributes to the abusive relationship sustaining in the dating violence relationship. The investment model was commonly used by many studies to explain the maintenance dating violence relationships. This study strengthens the explanation by using a forgiveness variable. A sample 210 of female university students conducted the Conflict Tactics Scales(CTS), Investment Model Scale(IMS), Altuistic Delusion Scale(ADS), Enright Forgiveness Inventory(EFI), Intent to Return Questionnaire. After that, the data of 133 who experienced dating violence were analyzed. The result of regression analysis revealed that the Investment model variables was associated with the commitment variable, and the forgiveness partially mediated connection between commitment and Intent to Return. The results mean that because of the satisfaction, investment to the partner, quality of alternatives, and commitment, female victims forgive the offensive partner, and consequently, dating violence relationship was sustained. This results suggests the forgiveness can effect maladaptively to the maintenance of abusive situation. And the future study for examining adaptive forgiveness of victims was suggested.

keywords
데이트 폭력, 투자 모델, 용서, dating violence, investment model, forgiveness

참고문헌

1.

김광수 (1999). 용서교육 프로그램의 개발. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.

2.

김재엽 (1998). 한국가정의 폭력실태와 사회복지 개입의 필요성: 부부폭력을 중심으로. 한국가족사회복지학회 제 4회 학술세미나, 한국가족사회복지학회.

3.

김정란, 김경신 (1999). 대학생의 이성교제 중 폭력과 대처행동. 대한가정학회지. 37(8), 73-90.

4.

김현옥 (2001). 우리나라 고등학생의 이성교제와 교제폭력의 실태에 대한 연구. 원광대학교 석사학위논문.

5.

배미자 (2004). 부부갈등대처 및 용서와 결혼만족도. 전주대학교 석사학위 논문.

6.

서경현 (2004). 고등학생과 대학생의 가정 폭력 피해자와 데이트 폭력간의 관계에 대한 성의 조절 효과. 한국심리학회지: 건강 9(1), 147-162.

7.

서경현 (2008). 공격적 데이트 폭력 피해여성의 분노 및 분노표현, 정신병적 경향성, 중독성과 대처방식. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제. 14(2), 21-39.

8.

신혜섭 (2007). 데이트폭력 피해의 위험요인. 한국가족복지학. 12(2), 149-170.

9.

안귀여루 (2002). 이성교제 폭력행동과 관련된 개인적 변인들에 관한 연구. 한국가족복지학. 9, 55-75.

10.

안귀여루 (2006). 데이트 폭력과 관련된 심리 사회적 위험 요인들에 대한 연구 개관. 한국심리학회지: 건강. 11(4), 709-726.

11.

안귀여루, 서경현 (2007). 성장기 가정 내 폭력 경험이 성인 초기 적응에 미치는 영향-부모간의 폭력 관찰 경험과 자신에 대한 폭력 행동 경험을 중심으로- 한국심리학회지: 사회문제. 13(4), 83-100.

12.

오영희 (2006). 한국인의 상처와 용서에 대한 조사. 교육심리연구, 20, 467-486.

13.

유선영 (2000). 여대생의 가정 폭력 피해와 이성교제폭력 피해간의 매개 요인에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.

14.

이정은, 현명호, 유제민 (2007). 폭력적 데이트관계 지속에 관한 투자모델의 수정 - 이타적 망상을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(4), 983-995.

15.

정윤주 (2008). ‘데이트 폭력’ 구성과 대응에 관한 연구: 20대 여성의 피해 경험을 중심으로. 부산대학교 석사학위논문.

16.

장희숙, 조현각 (2001), 대학생 이성교제폭력의 실태와 위험 요인들. 한국가족복지학, 8, 177-202.

17.

정혜숙 (2007). 매맞는 여성의 떠날 수 없는, 머물 수 없는 이유. 사회복지연구지, 32, 269-298.

18.

최상진, 박수현 (1990). 우리성에 대한 사회심리학적 분석. 한국심리학회 연차대회 발표논문집, pp.69-79.

19.

Anderson, M. P., Gillig, M., Sitaker, K., McCloskey, K. M., & Grigsby, N. (2003). Why doesn't she just leave: A descriptive study of victim reported impediments to her safety. Journal of Family Violence, 18(3), 151-155.

20.

Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

21.

Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Dimensions of Forgiveness (pp.79-104). Radnor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.

22.

Blackwell, L. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.

23.

Bryant, S. A. & Spencer, G. A. (2003). University students' attitudes about attributing blame in domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18(6), 369-376.

24.

Carlson, B. E. (1987). Dating violence: A research review and comparison with spouse. The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 68(1), 16-23.

25.

Davenport, D. S. (1991). The functions of anger and forgiveness: Guidelines for psychotherapy with victims. Psychotherapy, 28, 140-144.

26.

Enright, R. D. & Human Development Study Group. (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development(Vol. 1, pp.123-152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

27.

Enright, R. D. (2001). Forgiveness is a choice: A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

28.

Fenell, D. (1993). Characteristics of long-term first marriages. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 15(4), 446-460.

29.

Fincham, F. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7, 1-23.

30.

Fincham, F. D. & Beach, S. R. H. (2007). Forgiveness and marital quality: Precursor or consequence in well-established relationships? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(4), 260-268.

31.

Frisch, M., & MacKenzie, C. (1991). A comparison of formerly and chronically battered women on cognitive and situational dimensions. Psychotherapy, 28(2), 339-344.

32.

Gassin, E. A. (1995). Social cognition and forgiveness in adolescent romance: An intervention study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

33.

Gordon, K. C., Burton, S., & Porter, L. (2004). Predicting the intentions of women in domestic violence shelters to return to partners: Does forgiveness play a role? Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 331-338.

34.

Griffing, S., Ragin, D. F., Sage, R. E., Madry, L., Bingham, L. E., & Primm, B. J. (2002). Domestic violence survivors’ self-identified reasons for returning to abusive relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 306-319.

35.

Harrison, L. A., & Abrishami, G. (2004). Dating violence attribution: Do they differ for In-group and Out-group members who have a history of dating violence? Sex Role, 51, 543-550.

36.

Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 476−497.

37.

Jezl, D. R., Molider, C. E., & Wright, T. L. (1996). Physical, sexual and psychological abuse in high school dating relationships: Prevalence rate and self-esteem issues. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13(1), 69-87.

38.

Johnson, H., & Hotton, T. (2003). Losing Control: Homicide Risk in Estranged and Intact Intimate Relationships. Homicide Studies, 7(1), 58-84.

39.

Katz, J., Street, A., & Arias, I. (1997). Individual differences in self-appraisals and responses to dating violence scenarios. Violence and Victims, 12, 265-276.

40.

Kearns, J. N. & Fincham, F. D. (2005). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal transgressions: Self-serving or relationship- serving biases? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 321-333.

41.

Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality, 66, 1-37.

42.

Lesser, B. (1990). Attachment and situational factors influencing battered women’s return to their mates following a shelter program. In K. Pottharst (Ed.), Research Explorations in Adult Attachment (pp.81-128). New York: Peter Lang.

43.

Lloyd, S. A. (1991). The darkside of courtship: Violence and sexual exploitation. Family Relations, 40, 14-20.

44.

Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 37-102.

45.

Martin, A. J., Berenson, K. B., Griffing, S., Sage, R. E., Madry, L., Bingham, L. E., & Primm, B. J. (2000). The process of leaving an abusive relationship: The role of risk assessments and decision-certainty. Journal of Family Violence, 15(2), 109-122.

46.

Mason, A., & Blankenship, V. (1987). Power and affiliation, stress, and abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 42, 203-210.

47.

McCullough, M. E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43-55.

48.

Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1993). Seeing virtues in faults: Negativity and the transformation of interpersonal narratives in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 707-722.

49.

O'Leary, D. K. (1988). Physical aggression between spouses: A social learning theory perspective. Handbook of Family Violence. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

50.

O'Leary, D. K., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263-268.

51.

Peled, E., Eisikovits, G. E., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45(1), 9-25.

52.

Perry, P. J. (1992). Group Psychotherapy for Eating Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

53.

Rhatigan, D. L., & Street, A. E. (2005). The impact of intimate partner violence on decisions to leave dating relationships, a test of the investment model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(12), 1580-1597.

54.

Ronfeldt, H. M., Kimerling, R., & Arias, I. (1998). Satisfaction with relationship power and the perpetration of dating violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 70-78.

55.

Roscoe, B., & Benaske, N. (1985). Courtship violence experienced by abused wives: Similarities in patterns of abuse. Family Relations, 34, 419-424.

56.

Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172-186.

57.

Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: the development and deterioration of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101-117.

58.

Rusbult, C., & Martz, J. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment analysis of nonvoluntary dependence, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 558-571.

59.

Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-391

60.

Schutte, N., Malouff, J., & Doyle, J. (1988). The relationship between characteristics of the victim, persuasive techniques of the batterer, and returning to a battering relationship. Journal of Social Psychology, 128(5), 605-610.

61.

Smedes, L. B. (1996). Forgive and Forget: Healing the Hurts We don't Deserve. San Francisco: Harper.

62.

Simonelli, C. J., & Ingram, K. M. (1998). Psychological distress among men experiencing physical and emotional abuse in heterosexual dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 667-681.

63.

Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales(CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.

64.

Stroshine, M. S., & Robinson, A. L. (2003). The decision to end abusive relationships: The role of offender characteristics. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(1), 97-117.

65.

Strube (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 236-250.

66.

Tsang, J., Stanford M. S. (2007). Forgiveness for intimate partner violence: The influence of victim and offender variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 653-664.

67.

Vitanza, S., Vogel, L. C. M., & Marshall, L. L. (1995). Distress and symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder in abused women. Violence and Victims, 10, 23-34.

68.

Walker, L. E. (1979). The Battered Woman. New York: Harper and Row.

69.

Wallace H. M., Exline J. J., & Baumeister R. F. (2008). Interpersonal consequences of forgiveness: Does forgiveness deter or encourage repeat offenses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 453-460.

70.

Whipple, V. (1988). Counseling battered women from fundamentalist Christian backgrounds. Counseling and Values, 32, 140-143.

71.

White, J. W., Merrill, L., & Koss, M. P. (2001). Predictors of premilitary courtship violence in a Navy recruit sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 910-927.

72.

Worthington, E. L. & DiBlasio, F. A. (1990). Promoting mutual forgiveness within the fractured relationship. Psychotherapy, 27, 219-223.

73.

Young, G., & Gerson, S. (1991). New psychoanalytic perspectives on masochism and spouse abuse. Psychotherapy, 28(1), 30-38.

한국심리학회지: 일반