바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN1229-067X
  • E-ISSN2734-1127
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-067X

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.31 No.3

Citation Share

재범위험성 평가도구 타당도 검증: 정신장애 범죄자용

Validation of recidivism risk assessment for mentally disordered offenders

한국심리학회지: 일반 / Korean Journal of Psychology: General, (P)1229-067X; (E)2734-1127
2012, v.31 no.3, pp.643-666
정지숙 (국립법무병원)
신정 (국립법무병원)
이장규 (대구대학교)
정지숙, 신정, & 이장규. (2012). 재범위험성 평가도구 타당도 검증: 정신장애 범죄자용. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(3), 643-666.

초록

본 연구의 목적은 정신장애 범죄자의 재범위험성을 평가하는 도구의 타당도를 검증하여 추후 한국형 정신장애 재범위험성 평가도구를 개발하기 위한 것이다. 본 연구에서는 국립법무병원에 입소된 정신장애 범죄자를 대상으로 하여 초범이면서 신규 입소한 집단과 2회 이상의 재범으로 재입소를 한 집단으로 나눈 뒤, 그들의 공식기록 및 선행 연구 검토를 통해서 미리 구성한 반구조화된 질문에 따른 체계적이고 심층적인 면담을 통해 외국에서 활용도가 높은 재범위험성 평가도구들(LSI-R, HCR-20, VRAG)의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 내적합치도 Cronbach α는 LSI-R .81, HCR-20 .71, VRAG .60이었고, 평가자간 신뢰도는 .78에서 1.00의 범위였다. 각 평가도구의 총점 및 각 하위 요인별 상관을 제시하였다. 그리고 ROC 분석을 통하여 각 평가도구의 예측력과 예측 진단 기준점을 산출하였다. 초범/첫입소 집단과 재범/재입소 집단간에 유의한 차이를 보였던 인구통계학적 변인과 4개의 재범위험성 관련 요인을 토대로 하는 후속 연구를 통하여 우리나라 정신장애 범죄자의 재범 위험에 대한 객관적이고 타당성 있는 평가가 가능할 것으로 기대하며, 본 연구의 제한점과 후속 연구의 방향을 제시하였다.

keywords
정신장애 범죄자, 재범 위험 평가, LSI-R, HCR-20, VRAG, PCL-R, mentally disordered offender, recidivism, risk assessment, LSI-R, HCR-20, PCL-R, VRAG

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the validity of assessment tools to evaluate the risk of recidivism for mentally disordered offenders. The subjects of our study are mentally disordered offenders admitted to the National Forensic Hospital, and we used their official records in order to create a well-organized and in-depth interview based on semi-structured questionnaires. By reviewing previous research, this study identified the reliability and validity of recidivism risk assessment tools (LSI-R, HCR-20, VRAG), which had been widely used in other countries. Cronbach's α of internal consistency in the results of this study were shown as followed: LSI-R .81, HCR-20 .71, VRAG .60. Additionally, the inter-rater reliability ranged from ICC .78 to 1.00. The correlations of each assessment's total score and factors were presented in this study. By analyzing ROC, we found the predicting power and cut-off score of each assessment tool. We expect that we can estimate and predict, objectively and reasonably, the recidivism risk of mentally disordered offenders by conducting a follow-up study, which would focus on demographic factors and four other recidivism-related factors which had shown significant differences between high-risk groups and low-risk groups. We also discussed the limitations of this study and the direction of follow-up research.

keywords
정신장애 범죄자, 재범 위험 평가, LSI-R, HCR-20, VRAG, PCL-R, mentally disordered offender, recidivism, risk assessment, LSI-R, HCR-20, PCL-R, VRAG

참고문헌

1.

강호성 (2010). 보호관찰대상자 재범방지 모델 개발에 관한 연구. 보호관찰, 10, 7-53.

2.

손외철 (2011). 치료감호 가종료자의 재범요인에 관한 연구. 동국대학교 박사학위논문.

3.

송중일, 김병배, 최현식, 이상목 (2007). 영국 보호관찰 대상과 분류 평가 도구에 관한 연구. 보호관찰, 7, 57-106.

4.

이수정 (2010). 성인 판결전조사 활용, 재범위험성 평가도구. 법무부 연구용역보고서.

5.

이수정 (2008). 성폭력 범죄자 재범위험성 평가도구 개발 연구. 법무부 연구용역보고서.

6.

이수정, 윤옥경 (2003). 범죄위험성의 평가와 활용방안. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 22(2), 99- 126.

7.

조은경, 이수정 (2008). PCL-R 2nd Edition 전문가 지침서. 서울: 학지사 심리검사연구소.

8.

Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

9.

American Psychiatric Association. (2004). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.

10.

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health System.

11.

Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84-94.

12.

Belfrage, H. (1998). A ten-year follow-up of criminality in Stockholm mental patients: New evidence for a relationship between mental disorder and crime. British Journal of Criminology, 38, 144-155.

13.

Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional opinions that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp.18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA; SA.

14.

Bonta, J. (2002). Offender risk assessment: guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 355-379.

15.

Bonta, J., Harman, W. G., Hann, R. G., & Cormier, R. B. (1996). The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: a revalidation of the SIR scale. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 61-79.

16.

Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: a meta- analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123-142.

17.

Cottle, C. C., Lee, R. J., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: a meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 367-394.

18.

DeMatteo, D., & Edens, J. F. (2006). The role and relevance of the Psychopathy Checklist- Revised in court: a case law survey of U.S. courts (1991-2004). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 214-241.

19.

de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2005). The HCR-20 in personality disordered female offenders: A comparison with a matched sample of males. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 226-240

20.

de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2006). Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 12, 321-336.

21.

de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Hildebrand, M., Bos, B., & van de Ven, P. (2004). Type of discharge and risk of recidivism measured by the HCR-20: A retrospective study in a Dutch sample of treated forensic psychiatric patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 3, 149-165.

22.

Doren, D. M. (2002). Evaluating Sex Offenders: A Manual for Civil Commitments and Beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

23.

Douglas, K. S., & Webster, C. D. (1999). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Concurrent validity in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 3-19.

24.

Ferguson, A. M., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Thomson, L. (2009). Predicting Recidivism by Mentally Disordered Offenders Using the LSI-R:SV. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 5-20.

25.

Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Little, T. (1996). Predicting adult offender recidivism: what works! (Cat. No. JS4-1/1996-7E). Ottawa, ON: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

26.

Hanson, R. K. (2009). The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Canadian Psychology, 50, 172-182.

27.

Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2007). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis (Cat. No. PS4-36/ 2007E). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.

28.

Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist- Revised(PCL-R). North Tonawanda, NY: Multi- health Systems.

29.

Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) 2nd Edition. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-health Systems.

30.

Harris, G., Rice, M., & Quinsey, V. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.

31.

Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Performance of male psychopaths following conditional release from prison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 227-232.

32.

Higgins, N., Watts, D., Bindman, J., Slade, M., & Thornicroft, G. (2005). Assessing violence risk in general adult psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 131-133.

33.

Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 555-584.

34.

Hodgins, S. & Müller-Isberner, R. (2000). Violence, Crime, and Mentally Disordered Offenders. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

35.

Hoffman, P. B., & Beck, J. L. (1974). Parole decision-making: A Salient Factor Score. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 195-206.

36.

Hoffman, P. B. (1994). Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States Parole Commission's Salient Factor Score. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 477-494.

37.

Jackson, R. L., & Hess, D. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 409-448.

38.

Kemshall, H. (2001). Risk assessment and management of known sexual and violent offenders: a review of current issues. London: Home Office.

39.

Khiroya, R., Weaver, T., & Maden, T. (2009). Use and perceived utility of structured violence risk assessments in English medium secure forensic units. Psychiatrist, 33, 129-132.

40.

Mercado, C. C., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2007). Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 49-59.

41.

Mills, J. F., & Kroner, D. G., & Hemmati, T. (2004). The measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates(MCAA): The prediction of general and violent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 717-733.

42.

Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783- 792.

43.

Nuffield, J. (1982). Parole Decision-Making in Canada: Research towards Decision Guidelines. Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada.

44.

Phillips, H. K., Gray, N. S., & MacCulloch, S. I. (2005). Risk assessment in offenders with mental disorders: relative efficacy of personal demographic, criminal history, and clinical variables. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 833-847.

45.

Quensey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

46.

Rice, M. E, & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737- 748.

47.

Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross- validation and extension of the violence risk appraisal guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231-241.

48.

Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Quinsey, V. L. (1990). A follow-up of rapist assessed in a maximum security psychiatric facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 435-448.

49.

SBU (2005). Riskbedömningar inom psykiatrin. Kan våld i samhället förutsägas? [Risk assessments in psychiatry. Is it possible to predict community violence?]. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU).

50.

Singh, J., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 patients. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499-513.

51.

Singh, J. P., & Fazel, S. (2010). Forensic risk assessment: a meta-review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 965-988.

52.

Tittle, C. R., Villimez, W. J., & Smith, D. A. (1998). The myth of social class and criminality: an empirical assessment of the empirical evidence. American Sociological Review, 43, 643-656.

53.

Vess, J. (2008). Sex offender risk assessment: consideration of human rights in community protection legislation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 245-256.

54.

Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (version 2). Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute.

55.

Webster, C. D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K. S., & Wintrup, A. (1995). The HCR-20 scheme: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University and British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.

56.

Young, S. (2009). Risk assessment tools for children in conflict with the law. Dublin: Irish Youth Justice Service Retrieved December 2, 2008 from http://www.iyjs.ie

한국심리학회지: 일반

논문 투고 OA 정책